Post-operative PainNCT06008821
Paravertebral Block for Improvement of Quality of Recovery Following Cardiac Surgery
A study testing Bilateral paravertebral block with 0.25% ropivicaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine in people with Post-operative Pain and Post-cardiac Surgery, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of bilateral, paravertebral blockade (intervention) against sham blocks (control) placed prior to sternotomy in improving quality of recovery following cardiac surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-operative Pain, Post-cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Disease
- What is being tested?
- Bilateral paravertebral block with 0.25% ropivicaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 224 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 13 Oct 2023to Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All adult (19 years or older)
- English-speaking patients
- Scheduled for elective cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy.
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal, inability to provide consent
- Mini-Cog© Score of 1-2
- emergent surgery
- infection at the site of injection
- empyema
- neoplastic mass in the paravertebral space
Show all 19Show fewer
- known preoperative coagulopathy
- platelet count < 50 x 109, INR or aPTT exceeding the upper range of normal in the absence of anticoagulant use, patients receiving anticoagulation medications or non-ASA anti-platelet medications that have not been stopped for the appropriate duration in accordance with American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine guidelines (20)
- severe kyphoscoliosis or deformed spines or previous thoracic surgery
- allergy to study medications
- preoperative liver failure (as defined by Child-Pugh B or C)
- chronic pain or opioid use history, alcohol or drug use disorders, major psychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorders
- Moderate to severe pain at baseline.
- preoperative renal failure (as defined by eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2)
- extremes of weight (BMI > 40 kg/m2, and weight < 50 kg)
- Patients anticipated to require prolonged post-operative ventilation > 24 hours after surgery
- High risk by Euroscore II >=8%) (21-23)
- 3 or more major procedures
- Procedures requiring deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
Terri Sun, M.D., 604-779-7817, terri.sun@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Bilateral Paravertebral Blockade for Improvement of Quality of Recovery Following Cardiac Surgery (P-QOR): a Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of bilateral, paravertebral blockade (intervention) against sham blocks (control) placed prior to sternotomy in improving quality of recovery following cardiac surgery.
Primary outcome: The hypothesis is that bilateral single-shot PVB at the thoracic spinal segmental levels T3/4, compared with sham blocks, improve the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours following cardiac surgery by a minimally clinically important difference of 8.0 or greater.
Secondary outcomes: The hypothesis is that the intervention will reduce pain scores, opioid requirements, and related side effects; improve respiratory mechanics; and facilitate a better first night's rest/sleep in the first 24-48 hours compared to sham blocks.
Read the detailed description
This will be a triple-blinded, individually-randomized, single-centered, placebo-controlled trial in which patients will be randomly allocated to two study groups in a 1:1 ratio.
Randomization: The investigators will randomize patients in blocks of 4 or 6. The randomization sequence will be generated online using Sealed Envelope (sealedenvelope.com) . Allocation to treatment versus control will be placed in sealed envelopes. The envelopes will be sequentially numbered, signed and opaque, with the randomization group insert wrapped in foil, and further blocked by carbon paper. On the day of surgery, the regional anesthesiologist be provided the envelope by the research assistant. They will to open it in private, and then destroy its contents immediately upon reading the allocation card.
This study observes blinding of the patients, anesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses, outcome collectors, and data analysts. Only the regional anesthesiologist performing the intervention will be unblinded. To preserve blinding for everyone else, only the regional anesthesiologist and anesthesia assistant will be present in the room at the time of block. Windows on the operating room doors will be covered and a sign mounted to limit entry unless there is an emergency.
Eligible patients will be identified in the Pre-assessment Clinic (PAC) or the inpatient ward. Potentially eligible participants will be screened for significant cognitive impairment, and those scoring 1-2 on the Mini-Cog will be excluded. Enrolled patients will complete a baseline QoR-15 survey. Patients will then be provided a study information package which they can then review on their own time. On the day of surgery, the unblinded regional anesthesiologist will receive information on patient allocation from sealedenvelopes.com and perform the study procedure in the operating room with arterial line monitoring prior to induction of anesthesia. anesthesiologist.
Patients will remain intubated following surgery and be transferred to the CSICU where they are usually extubated within 4-6 hours. Following extubation, patients will receive pain management using hydromorphone IV until transfer to the ward or for the first 24 hours (whichever comes first). For the remainder of the study, the patient will be prescribed a standard postoperative pain control regimen and management will be at the discretion of attending CSICU intensivist, cardiac surgeon or nurse practitioner without influence from this study.
All patients will be followed from the time of randomization thereafter until the common study end date (to be determined, approximately 2 years after the first patient randomized). Primary analysis will be intent to treat.
Statistical Analysis
Sample size: A sample size of n = 112 per group, or total of N=224 patients will be required to reject a null hypothesis that there is no difference in QoR-15 at 24 hours (Student's t test), at a 2-sided alpha of 0.05, and a power of 80% (UBC Sample Size Calculator). This is based off a Minimally Clinically Important Difference of 8.0 in a mixed population of surgical patients reported by Myles et al. At St. Paul's Hospital, the investigators conducted a preliminary prospective study assessing QoR-15 scores in 70 patients approximately 24 hours following cardiac surgery found a lower mean (SD) QoR-15 score of 83.47 +/- 19.86 (unpublished data) than what has been published in the original validation study of QoR-15. The investigators used the QoR-15 scores at 24 hours and a MCID of 8 to calculate a sample size of n=97 per arm. The sample size will be increased by 15% to account for a dropout rate of 5% and delirium rate of 10% observed at St Paul's Hospital, to arrive at a sample size of n=112 per group, or total of N=224 for the entire study.
Primary analysis: intention-to-treat comparison on QoR-15 score at 24 hours (PVB vs sham block) using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test). There will be a secondary efficacy analysis done for per protocol population, which would exclude major protocol deviations. In addition, the investigators will conduct a multiple linear regression analysis between the primary outcome of QoR-15 score at 24 hours and treatment group adjusted for baseline QoR-15 score and baseline characteristics (age, sex, history of chronic pain prior to surgery, history depression requiring medication, history of anxiety requiring medication, history of poorly-controlled post-surgical pain, surgical risk stratification (Euroscore II). The primary analyses will be conducted at a two-sided significance level of 0.05
Secondary Analysis: Continuous variables including cumulative opioid consumption, simplified PONVIS score, VISmax score, duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay will be compared using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test, or repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferoni correction when applicable. Dichotomous variables such as atrial fibrillation, pulmonary complications, delirium, and adverse events will be compared using Chi-Squared test or Fisher's Exact Test, or repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction when applicable. Area under the pain intensity curve (AUE) derived from NRS-11 pain scores obtained from the 4th to 48th hour, and QoR-15 scores at baseline, 24 hours, 48 hours and 12 weeks will be analyzed using a mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM), with baseline values, study group, study visit, and the interaction between study visit and study group as covariates. The analysis of secondary outcomes will be conducted at a two-sided significance level of 0.05.
Handling of Missing data: There will be a proportion of patients who will have missing outcomes due to complications such as delirium/confusion, delayed extubation, postoperative bleeding, and hemodynamic instability. It is anticipated that the loss to follow-up to be <15% which is considered in the sample size calculation. All efforts will be made to collect complete data for all patients in this study. Patients will be followed till the study end and will complete all required data collection. In general, missing values observed in the study will be treated as 'missing'. No attempt will be made to impute missing values and only observed values will be used for analysis.
Subgroup and Sensitivity Analysis: The investigators plan to conduct 3 subgroup analyses based on sex, age, and patients with moderate to severe asthma or COPD. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted comparing intent to treat versus per protocol analysis.
- Conditions
- Post-operative Pain, Post-cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Disease
- Being tested
- Bilateral paravertebral block with 0.25% ropivicaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine, Bilateral sham block with normal saline
- Keywords
- Regional anesthesia, Paravertebral blockade, Cardiac surgery, Post-operative pain, Quality of recovery
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Heart Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bilateral paravertebral block with 0.25% ropivicaine with 1:400,000 epinephrineProcedure or surgery
60mL of 0.25% ropivacaine will be injected into the PVB at thoracic vertebrae T3/4 level bilaterally (30mL at each site for a total of 2 injections)
Bilateral sham block with normal salineProcedure or surgery
10 mL of normal saline will be injected into subcutaneous space at the T3/4 level bilaterally (5 mL at each site for a total of 2 injections)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Bilateral, single level, paravertebral blockade with 0.25% ropivicaine Receives: Procedure: Bilateral paravertebral block with 0.25% ropivicaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine |
| Control Group | Sham comparator | Bilateral, single level, subcutaneous sham block with normal saline Receives: Procedure: Bilateral sham block with normal saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Initial Quality of Recover-15 (QoR-15) score
The QoR-15 score is a validated tool used to assess the quality of recovery at 24 hours. following the intervention. This score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating higher quality of recovery.
Measured: 24 hours following the intervention
Secondary outcomes (12)
Subsequent Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores
QoR-15 score at 48 hours following PVB and at 12 weeks following surgery. This score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating higher quality of recovery.
Measured: 48 hours following surgery and 12 weeks following surgery
Quality of sleep
Quality of sleep on the first and second night as measured by Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire. The RCSQ is scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-100, with higher scores representing better sleep.
Measured: 24 hours and 48 hours following surgery
Opioid consumption
Cumulative opioid consumption (in intravenous morphine equivalents) at 24 and 48 hours
Measured: 24 hours and 48 hours following surgery
Pain scores
Numeric rating scale pain scores at rest and with coughing every 4-8 hours following extubation for 48 hours following the PVB. The bedside nurse will be trained and provided a standardized script to assess pain every 4-8 hours by NRS for the first 48 hours. Pain scores Coughing will be elicited with a standardized script for a sitting patient: "Please use both hands to hold on to the pillow in front you to hold your chest in, and give me three forceful coughs in a row". The pain score ranges from 0-10, with higher score indicating a higher severity of pain.
Measured: every 4 hours for the first 24 hours then every 8 hours until the 48 hour mark following surgery
Severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting
Severity of nausea and vomiting at 24 and 48 hours as measured by the simplified Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Intensity Scale (PONVIS) using the Impact Score, where clinically significant PONV is defined as having a score of >=5.
Measured: 24 hours and 48 hours following surgery.
Duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation
Total duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation will be calculated as the duration of time from arrive in CSICU to first tracheal extubation, up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post operatively, which ever is sooner. Extubation time will be obtained from respiratory therapy notes.
Measured: Up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Incidence of pulmonary complications
Pulmonary complications at the 24 and 48 hr mark will be recorded by the research assistant after consulting with the nurse and or physician in charge. Pulmonary complications will include respiratory events requiring defined as non-invasive positive pressure ventilation or high flow nasal cannula or non-rebreather mask, tracheal reintubation, >5L NP or face mask oxygenation. It will be assessed from date of randomization up to 48 hours following surgery.
Measured: 24 hours and 48 hours following surgery
Incidence of new onset post-operative atrial fibrillation
New onset post operative atrial fibrillation (defined as persistent or ≥2 paroxysmal episodes lasting >24 hours) will be collected at the time of hospital discharge. It will be assessed from date of randomization until the date of first documented occurrence assessed up to 48 hours following surgery.
Measured: Up to 48 hours following surgery
Incidence of new onset delirium during hospital stay
Delirium as per CAM-ICU will be reviewed and noted as "present" or "absent" . It will be assessed from date of randomization until the date of first documented occurrence assessed up to hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Measured: Up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Incidence of hospital or ventilator acquired pneumonia during hospital stay
Hospital or ventilator acquired pneumonia requiring antibiotics will be reviewed after discharge from discharge summary. It will be assessed from date of randomization until the date of first documented occurrence assessed up to hospital discharge, or 14 days postoperatively, whichever is sooner.
Measured: Up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care unit length of stay
CSICU length of stay (days) will be defined from time of arrival to CSICU post operatively to time that the patient is ready (but not necessarily physically transferred) for the ward, as determined by nursing. It will be collected by bedside nursing prior the patient leaving the cardiac surgery intensive care unit.
Measured: Up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Hospital length of stay
Duration of hospital length of stay (days) will be collected at the time of discharge, or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Measured: Up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Aug 2023
- Study start13 Oct 2023
- Primary completionNov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Post-operative PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This will be a triple-blinded (patient, outcomes assessor and all clinicians except the regional anesthesiologist), individually-randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which patients will be randomly allocated to two study groups in a 1:1 ratio. We will randomize patients in blocks of 4 or 6.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Providence Health & Services, Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Terri Sun, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Terri Sun, M.D., Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06008821
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H23-00055
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 8 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bilateral Paravertebral Blockade for Improvement of Quality of Recovery Following Cardiac Surgery (P-QOR): a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06008821
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H23-00055
- Conditions
- Post-operative Pain, Post-cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Disease
- Keywords
- Regional anesthesia, Paravertebral blockade, Cardiac surgery, Post-operative pain, Quality of recovery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 224 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Providence Health & Services, Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
- Study start
- 13 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of bilateral, paravertebral blockade (intervention) against sham blocks (control) placed prior to sternotomy in improving quality of recovery following cardiac surgery.
Primary outcome: The hypothesis is that bilateral single-shot PVB at the thoracic spinal segmental levels T3/4, compared with sham blocks, improve the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours following cardiac surgery by a minimally clinically important difference of 8.0 or greater.
Secondary outcomes: The hypothesis is that the intervention will reduce pain scores, opioid requirements, and related side effects; improve respiratory mechanics; and facilitate a better first night's rest/sleep in the first 24-48 hours compared to sham blocks.
Detailed description
This will be a triple-blinded, individually-randomized, single-centered, placebo-controlled trial in which patients will be randomly allocated to two study groups in a 1:1 ratio.
Randomization: The investigators will randomize patients in blocks of 4 or 6. The randomization sequence will be generated online using Sealed Envelope (sealedenvelope.com) . Allocation to treatment versus control will be placed in sealed envelopes. The envelopes will be sequentially numbered, signed and opaque, with the randomization group insert wrapped in foil, and further blocked by carbon paper. On the day of surgery, the regional anesthesiologist be provided the envelope by the research assistant. They will to open it in private, and then destroy its contents immediately upon reading the allocation card.
This study observes blinding of the patients, anesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses, outcome collectors, and data analysts. Only the regional anesthesiologist performing the intervention will be unblinded. To preserve blinding for everyone else, only the regional anesthesiologist and anesthesia assistant will be present in the room at the time of block. Windows on the operating room doors will be covered and a sign mounted to limit entry unless there is an emergency.
Eligible patients will be identified in the Pre-assessment Clinic (PAC) or the inpatient ward. Potentially eligible participants will be screened for significant cognitive impairment, and those scoring 1-2 on the Mini-Cog will be excluded. Enrolled patients will complete a baseline QoR-15 survey. Patients will then be provided a study information package which they can then review on their own time. On the day of surgery, the unblinded regional anesthesiologist will receive information on patient allocation from sealedenvelopes.com and perform the study procedure in the operating room with arterial line monitoring prior to induction of anesthesia. anesthesiologist.
Patients will remain intubated following surgery and be transferred to the CSICU where they are usually extubated within 4-6 hours. Following extubation, patients will receive pain management using hydromorphone IV until transfer to the ward or for the first 24 hours (whichever comes first). For the remainder of the study, the patient will be prescribed a standard postoperative pain control regimen and management will be at the discretion of attending CSICU intensivist, cardiac surgeon or nurse practitioner without influence from this study.
All patients will be followed from the time of randomization thereafter until the common study end date (to be determined, approximately 2 years after the first patient randomized). Primary analysis will be intent to treat.
Statistical Analysis
Sample size: A sample size of n = 112 per group, or total of N=224 patients will be required to reject a null hypothesis that there is no difference in QoR-15 at 24 hours (Student's t test), at a 2-sided alpha of 0.05, and a power of 80% (UBC Sample Size Calculator). This is based off a Minimally Clinically Important Difference of 8.0 in a mixed population of surgical patients reported by Myles et al. At St. Paul's Hospital, the investigators conducted a preliminary prospective study assessing QoR-15 scores in 70 patients approximately 24 hours following cardiac surgery found a lower mean (SD) QoR-15 score of 83.47 +/- 19.86 (unpublished data) than what has been published in the original validation study of QoR-15. The investigators used the QoR-15 scores at 24 hours and a MCID of 8 to calculate a sample size of n=97 per arm. The sample size will be increased by 15% to account for a dropout rate of 5% and delirium rate of 10% observed at St Paul's Hospital, to arrive at a sample size of n=112 per group, or total of N=224 for the entire study.
Primary analysis: intention-to-treat comparison on QoR-15 score at 24 hours (PVB vs sham block) using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test). There will be a secondary efficacy analysis done for per protocol population, which would exclude major protocol deviations. In addition, the investigators will conduct a multiple linear regression analysis between the primary outcome of QoR-15 score at 24 hours and treatment group adjusted for baseline QoR-15 score and baseline characteristics (age, sex, history of chronic pain prior to surgery, history depression requiring medication, history of anxiety requiring medication, history of poorly-controlled post-surgical pain, surgical risk stratification (Euroscore II). The primary analyses will be conducted at a two-sided significance level of 0.05
Secondary Analysis: Continuous variables including cumulative opioid consumption, simplified PONVIS score, VISmax score, duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay will be compared using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test, or repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferoni correction when applicable. Dichotomous variables such as atrial fibrillation, pulmonary complications, delirium, and adverse events will be compared using Chi-Squared test or Fisher's Exact Test, or repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction when applicable. Area under the pain intensity curve (AUE) derived from NRS-11 pain scores obtained from the 4th to 48th hour, and QoR-15 scores at baseline, 24 hours, 48 hours and 12 weeks will be analyzed using a mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM), with baseline values, study group, study visit, and the interaction between study visit and study group as covariates. The analysis of secondary outcomes will be conducted at a two-sided significance level of 0.05.
Handling of Missing data: There will be a proportion of patients who will have missing outcomes due to complications such as delirium/confusion, delayed extubation, postoperative bleeding, and hemodynamic instability. It is anticipated that the loss to follow-up to be <15% which is considered in the sample size calculation. All efforts will be made to collect complete data for all patients in this study. Patients will be followed till the study end and will complete all required data collection. In general, missing values observed in the study will be treated as 'missing'. No attempt will be made to impute missing values and only observed values will be used for analysis.
Subgroup and Sensitivity Analysis: The investigators plan to conduct 3 subgroup analyses based on sex, age, and patients with moderate to severe asthma or COPD. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted comparing intent to treat versus per protocol analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This will be a triple-blinded (patient, outcomes assessor and all clinicians except the regional anesthesiologist), individually-randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which patients will be randomly allocated to two study groups in a 1:1 ratio. We will randomize patients in blocks of 4 or 6.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Procedure: Bilateral paravertebral block with 0.25% ropivicaine with 1:400,000 epinephrineBilateral, single level, paravertebral blockade with 0.25% ropivicaine |
| Control Group | Sham comparator | Procedure: Bilateral sham block with normal salineBilateral, single level, subcutaneous sham block with normal saline |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- All adult (19 years or older)
- English-speaking patients
- Scheduled for elective cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Patient refusal, inability to provide consent
- Mini-Cog© Score of 1-2
- emergent surgery
- infection at the site of injection
- empyema
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bilateral paravertebral block with 0.25% ropivicaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine60mL of 0.25% ropivacaine will be injected into the PVB at thoracic vertebrae T3/4 level bilaterally (30mL at each site for a total of 2 injections) | Procedure or surgery | Intervention Group |
| Bilateral sham block with normal saline10 mL of normal saline will be injected into subcutaneous space at the T3/4 level bilaterally (5 mL at each site for a total of 2 injections) | Procedure or surgery | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Initial Quality of Recover-15 (QoR-15) score
Time frame: 24 hours following the intervention
The QoR-15 score is a validated tool used to assess the quality of recovery at 24 hours. following the intervention. This score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating higher quality of recovery.
12 secondary outcomes
Subsequent Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores
Time frame: 48 hours following surgery and 12 weeks following surgery
Quality of sleep
Time frame: 24 hours and 48 hours following surgery
Opioid consumption
Time frame: 24 hours and 48 hours following surgery
Pain scores
Time frame: every 4 hours for the first 24 hours then every 8 hours until the 48 hour mark following surgery
Severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting
Time frame: 24 hours and 48 hours following surgery.
Duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Incidence of pulmonary complications
Time frame: 24 hours and 48 hours following surgery
Incidence of new onset post-operative atrial fibrillation
Time frame: Up to 48 hours following surgery
Incidence of new onset delirium during hospital stay
Time frame: Up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Incidence of hospital or ventilator acquired pneumonia during hospital stay
Time frame: Up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care unit length of stay
Time frame: Up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Hospital length of stay
Time frame: Up to time of hospital discharge or 14 days post-operatively, whichever is sooner.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jan 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Post-operative Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section at Assuit University Hospital
Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Terri Sun, M.D. principal investigator
University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bilateral paravertebral block with 0.25% ropivicaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine in people with Post-operative Pain and Post-cardiac Surgery, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Terri Sun, M.D. (604-779-7817, terri.sun@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Initial Quality of Recover-15 (QoR-15) score (time frame: 24 hours following the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2024.