AzTrials
AzTrials

Hematopoietic NeoplasmsSTEPPNCT06010017

Peer Support Intervention for Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

A study testing STEPP Intervention in people with Hematopoietic Neoplasms and Hematopoietic Malignancy, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of this study is to determine if a novel peer support intervention (STEPP) is feasible among patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The name of the intervention used in this research study is STEPP, a peer support intervention comprised of five learning modules on… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
STEPP Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
136 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
20 Feb 2024to 21 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients (age > 18 years) with a hematologic malignancy undergoing autologous or allogeneic HSCT.
  • Ability to comprehend, read, and respond to questions in English as STEPP is only available in English.

Who cannot join

  • Patients undergoing HSCT for benign hematologic conditions.
  • Patients undergoing outpatient HSCT.
  • Patients with acute or unstable psychiatric or cognitive conditions which the treating clinicians believes prohibits informed consent or compliance with study procedures.
  • Patients undergoing HSCT for the second time.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Brigham and Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Peer Support Intervention for Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (STEPP): Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy Trial

The main purpose of this study is to determine if a novel peer support intervention (STEPP) is feasible among patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

The name of the intervention used in this research study is STEPP, a peer support intervention comprised of five learning modules on psychoeducation and supportive psychotherapy strategies, tailored to the unique needs of patients undergoing HSCT.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this project is to refine a peer support intervention (STEPP) for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and to conduct a randomized clinical trial to test its feasibility and preliminary efficacy for improving quality of life (QOL) and reducing psychological distress.

Participants will be randomized into one of two study groups: Peer Support Intervention (STEPP) vs. Usual Care. Randomization means a participant is placed into a group by chance. Participants will have an equal chance of being placed in either group.

Study procedures include screening for eligibility and questionnaires.

Participation in this study is expected to last about 10 weeks.

It is expected that about 80 people will participate in this randomized clinical trial.

Being tested
STEPP Intervention
Keywords
Hematopoietic Neoplasms, Hematopoietic Malignancy, HSCT, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Medical subject headings
Hematologic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • STEPP InterventionBehavioural

    Peer support intervention comprised of five learning modules on psychoeducation and supportive psychotherapy strategies, via virtual platform. If participants do not have a smart device, one will be provided by the study team.

Study groups in NCT06010017
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
STEPPExperimentalParticipants will be randomized in 1:1 fashion, stratified by transplant type (autologous vs. allogeneic), and will complete study procedures as follows: * Baseline self-reported assessment (in-person or remotely). * Virtual, STEPP intervention sessions 1x weekly for five weeks with peer mentor. * HSCT and hospitalization per standard of care. * Day +30 (+/- 10 days) and Day +60 (+/- 10 days) self-reported assessments. * Optional exit interview with study staff (40 participants).
Receives: Behavioral: STEPP Intervention
Usual CareNo interventionParticipants will be randomized in 1:1 fashion, stratified by transplant type (autologous vs. allogeneic), and will complete study procedures as follows: * Baseline self-reported assessment. * HSCT and hospitalization per standard of care. * Day +30 (+/- 10 days) and Day +60 (+/- 10 days) self-reported assessments.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of STEPP

    The proposed STEPP intervention will be deemed feasible if at least 60% of eligible patients are enrolled in the study, and of those enrolled and randomized to the intervention, at least 60% complete at least 3/5 of the intervention sessions.

    Measured: Up to 10 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Acceptability of STEPP

    The 7-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) will assess patient satisfaction with the STEPP intervention. Each question is scored from 0-4 to result in a total of 0-28. Higher scores indicate increased acceptability of the intervention.

    Measured: Up to Day +60 (+/- 10 days)

  2. Anxiety Symptoms based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety Subscale (HADS-A)

    Compare anxiety symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety Subscale (HADS-A) between the two groups. The HADS-A is comprised of 7 items that quantify the degree to which participants experience mood symptoms, with each item's score ranging from 0 to 3. Scores range from 0 to 21, with a cutoff of 8 or greater denoting clinically significant anxiety.

    Measured: Up to Day +60 (+/- 10 days)

  3. Quality of Life based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT)

    Compare quality of life (QOL) using the 45-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) between the two groups.

    The FACT-BMT consists of five subscales assessing well-being across the following domains: physical, functional, emotional, social, and bone marrow transplant symptoms. Each question is scored from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very Much"). The FACT-BMT ranges from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: Up to Day +60 (+/- 10 days)

  4. Depression Symptoms based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression Subscale (HADS-D)

    Compare depression symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression Subscale (HADS-D) between the two groups. The HADS-D is comprised of 7 items that quantify the degree to which participants experience mood symptoms, with each item's score ranging from 0 to 3. Scores range from 0 to 21, with a cutoff of 8 or greater denoting clinically significant depression.

    Measured: Up to Day +60 (+/- 10 days)

  5. Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms based on the Post-traumatic Stress Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C)

    Compare post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms using the 17-item Post-traumatic Stress Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) between the two groups.

    The PCL-C evaluates symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV. Each item is scored from 1 to 5 for a total score ranging from 17 to 85. A higher score indicates greater severity of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms.

    Measured: Up to Day +60 (+/- 10 days)

  6. Social Support based on the Social Support Effectiveness Questionnaire (SSEQ)

    Compare social support using the 26-item Social Support Effectiveness Questionnaire (SSEQ) between the two groups.

    The SSEQ is a validated instrument used in the oncological population to assess patients' perception of social support. The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more effective support.

    Measured: Up to Day +60 (+/- 10 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2023
  2. Study start20 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completion3 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion21 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06010017
Sponsor's protocol ID
23-132
Acronym
STEPP
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
21 Aug 2023
Last updated
5 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to Sponsor, Investigator, or designee. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on ClinicalTrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

Publications

  • Amonoo HL, Keane EP, Guo M, Gudenkauf LM, Boardman AC, Larizza IS, Wolfe ED, Mate-Kole MN, Healy BC, Cutler C, Jim HS, Lee SJ, Greer JA, Huffman JC, El-Jawahri A. A pilot randomized clinical trial of a peer support intervention for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood Adv. 2026 Jun 9;10(11):3987-3997. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018918.

    PubMed 41945755
  • Keane EP, Guo M, Gudenkauf LM, Boardman AC, Song MT, Wolfe ED, Larizza IS, Mate-Kole MN, Healy BC, Huffman JC, El-Jawahri A, Amonoo HL. A peer support intervention in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): The STEPP randomized pilot trial design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jan;148:107746. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107746. Epub 2024 Nov 19.

    PubMed 39566722

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing STEPP Intervention in people with Hematopoietic Neoplasms and Hematopoietic Malignancy, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of STEPP (time frame: Up to 10 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06010017, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in