Distal Radius FracturesNCT06019585
Inmobilization With Compression Bandage vs Antebraquial Splint in Distal Radius Fractures
A study testing Splint inmmobilization and Bandage immovilization in people with Distal Radius Fractures and Internal Fixation; Complications, Mechanical, run by Hospital Costa del Sol at 2 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilized with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Distal Radius Fractures, Internal Fixation; Complications, Mechanical
- What is being tested?
- Splint inmmobilization and Bandage immovilization
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2021to 30 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with type A, B, C fractures of AO classification of distal radius fractures
- Patents aged between 18 and 75 years,
- Patients operated on in the first 3 weeks after the trauma, and independent for the basic activities of daily living
Who cannot join
- Patients with open fractures
- Patients with mental disorders (dementia, alcoholism, etc.),
- Patient dependent for basic activities of daily living
- Patients with fractures with severe articular and metaphyseal comminution and/or severe soft tissue injuries (type 2R3C3 AO),
- Patients with previous diseases or anatomical alterations in the injured wrist (previous fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.).
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Spain2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Reina Sofía
Córdoba, 14004
- Recruiting
Hospital Costa del Sol
Málaga, 29603
Francisco Rivas, Phd
About this study
Official title: Inmobilization With Compression Bandage vs Antebraquial Splint in Distal Radius Fractures Operated by Internal Fixation With Volar Locking Plate: A Pilot Study
The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilized with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3 weeks.
Read the detailed description
The aim of the study is to compare functional and radiological results as well as to evaluate possible complications in distal radius fractures operated by open reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plate in two groups , one treated with immobilization using a forearm cast for 3 weeks and the other with immobilization using a compression bandage for 3 weeks, based on the hypothesis that compression bandage group could obtain better results in the short term, and none of the treatments is superior to the other after 3 or 6 months of evolution, as indicated by some reviewed studies.
- Being tested
- Splint inmmobilization, Bandage immovilization
- Keywords
- distal radius fractures, volar plate, internal fixation, Inmobilization
- Medical subject headings
- Wrist Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Splint inmmobilizationDevice
After internal fixation with volar locking plate, groups of distal radius fractures are inmobilized with a plaster splint of París for 3 weeks
Bandage immovilizationDevice
After internal fixation with volar locking plate, groups of distal radius fractures are inmobilized with compressive bandage for 3 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Splint inmmobilization | Active comparator | Distal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plate and immobilized with an antebrachial splint for 3 weeks Receives: Device: Splint inmmobilization |
| Bandage immovilization | Active comparator | Distal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plate and immobilized with a compressive bandage for 3 weeks Receives: Device: Bandage immovilization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain in Visual Analogue Scale.
Points from 1 to 10. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Measured: 1 year
Function in Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation Scale.
Points from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Measured: 1 year
Range Of Motion in Flexion.
Grades from 0 to 70. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
Measured: 1 year
Range Of Motion in Flexion.
Grades from 0 to 80. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (14)
Function in Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scale.
Points from 1 to 150. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value
Measured: 1 year
Function in Mayo Wrist Score Scale.
Points from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Measured: 1 year
Range of motion in Supination.
Grades from 0 to 90. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
Measured: 1 year
Number of participants with posoperative complications.
Number of participants per group that suffer some complication or side effect during the follow-up period. Higher number of complications: worse value.
Measured: 1 year
Number of posoperative Fisiotherapy sessions performed.
Number of sessions per participant from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Measured: 1 year
Time of fracture union in radiographs.
Number of Weeks from 1 to 12. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Measured: 12 weeks
Number of Instability distal radius fracture Criteria per participant.
Number of criteria from 1 to 6. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Measured: 1 year
Grades of Dorsal Displacement in fracture.
Grades from -10 to 30 grades. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Measured: 6 weeks
Range of motion in Pronation.
Grades from 0 to 90. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
Measured: 1 year
Range of motion in Radial Deviation
Grades from 0 to 15. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
Measured: 1 year
Range of motion in Ulnar deviation.
Grades from 0 to 30. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
Measured: 1 year
Number of shortening millimeters in fracture.
Number of millimeters from 0-10. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Measured: 6 weeks
Number of ulnar variance millimeters in fracture.
Number of millimeters from -2 to +4. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Measured: 6 weeks
Number of step-off millimeters in fracture.
Number of millimeters from 0 to 4 mm. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Measured: 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2023
- Study start1 Jun 2021
- Primary completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Distal Radius FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 2 parallel groups, each one receives one treatment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Costa del Sol
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alberto Izquierdo Fernández, Phd, Study director, Hospital Reina Sofía ( Córdoba, Spain)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06019585
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 003may21PIInmovilizacionfxd
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Delft EAKV, Gelder TGV, Vries R, Vermeulen J, Bloemers FW. Duration of Cast Immobilization in Distal Radial Fractures: A Systematic Review. J Wrist Surg. 2019 Oct;8(5):430-438. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683433. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PubMed 31579555Quadlbauer S, Pezzei C, Jurkowitsch J, Kolmayr B, Keuchel T, Simon D, Hausner T, Leixnering M. Early Rehabilitation of Distal Radius Fractures Stabilized by Volar Locking Plate: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study. J Wrist Surg. 2017 May;6(2):102-112. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587317. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
PubMed 28428911Toemen A, Collocott S, Heiss-Dunlop W. Short Term Outcomes Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation Surgery for a Distal Radius Fracture: 2 Week Versus 4 Week Immobilization. A Retrospective Analysis. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Mar 25;12:21514593211004528. doi: 10.1177/21514593211004528. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 35186419Klein SM, Prantl L, Koller M, Vykoukal J, Dolderer JH, Graf S, Nerlich M, Loibl M, Geis S. Evidence based postoperative treatment of distal radius fractures following internal locking plate fixation. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(1):33-40.
PubMed 25748659Lichtman DM, Bindra RR, Boyer MI, Putnam MD, Ring D, Slutsky DJ, Taras JS, Watters WC 3rd, Goldberg MJ, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Haralson RH 3rd, Boyer KM, Hitchcock K, Raymond L; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the treatment of distal radius fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 20;93(8):775-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.938ebo. No abstract available.
PubMed 21508285Valdes K, Naughton N, Michlovitz S. Therapist supervised clinic-based therapy versus instruction in a home program following distal radius fracture: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2014 Jul-Sep;27(3):165-73; quiz 174. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
PubMed 24508093Driessens S, Diserens-Chew T, Burton C, Lassig E, Hartley C, McPhail S. A retrospective cohort investigation of active range of motion within one week of open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;26(3):225-30; quiz 231. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
PubMed 23770202Koval K, Haidukewych GJ, Service B, Zirgibel BJ. Controversies in the management of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;22(9):566-75. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-566.
PubMed 25157038Lozano-Calderon SA, Souer S, Mudgal C, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Wrist mobilization following volar plate fixation of fractures of the distal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun;90(6):1297-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01368.
PubMed 18519324Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063. No abstract available.
PubMed 29256945
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Inmobilization With Compression Bandage vs Antebraquial Splint in Distal Radius Fractures Operated by Internal Fixation With Volar Locking Plate: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06019585
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 003may21PIInmovilizacionfxd
- Keywords
- distal radius fractures, volar plate, internal fixation, Inmobilization
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Costa del SolUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilized with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3 weeks.
Detailed description
The aim of the study is to compare functional and radiological results as well as to evaluate possible complications in distal radius fractures operated by open reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plate in two groups , one treated with immobilization using a forearm cast for 3 weeks and the other with immobilization using a compression bandage for 3 weeks, based on the hypothesis that compression bandage group could obtain better results in the short term, and none of the treatments is superior to the other after 3 or 6 months of evolution, as indicated by some reviewed studies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 2 parallel groups, each one receives one treatment
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Splint inmmobilization | Active comparator | Device: Splint inmmobilizationDistal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plate and immobilized with an antebrachial splint for 3 weeks |
| Bandage immovilization | Active comparator | Device: Bandage immovilizationDistal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plate and immobilized with a compressive bandage for 3 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with type A, B, C fractures of AO classification of distal radius fractures
- Patents aged between 18 and 75 years,
- Patients operated on in the first 3 weeks after the trauma, and independent for the basic activities of daily living
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with open fractures
- Patients with mental disorders (dementia, alcoholism, etc.),
- Patient dependent for basic activities of daily living
- Patients with fractures with severe articular and metaphyseal comminution and/or severe soft tissue injuries (type 2R3C3 AO),
- Patients with previous diseases or anatomical alterations in the injured wrist (previous fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Splint inmmobilizationAfter internal fixation with volar locking plate, groups of distal radius fractures are inmobilized with a plaster splint of París for 3 weeks | Device | Splint inmmobilization |
| Bandage immovilizationAfter internal fixation with volar locking plate, groups of distal radius fractures are inmobilized with compressive bandage for 3 weeks | Device | Bandage immovilization |
Primary outcome
Pain in Visual Analogue Scale.
Time frame: 1 year
Points from 1 to 10. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Function in Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation Scale.
Time frame: 1 year
Points from 1 to 100. Higher score: worse value. Lower score: better value.
Range Of Motion in Flexion.
Time frame: 1 year
Grades from 0 to 70. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
Range Of Motion in Flexion.
Time frame: 1 year
Grades from 0 to 80. Higher score: better value. Lower score: worse value.
14 secondary outcomes
Function in Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scale.
Time frame: 1 year
Function in Mayo Wrist Score Scale.
Time frame: 1 year
Range of motion in Supination.
Time frame: 1 year
Number of participants with posoperative complications.
Time frame: 1 year
Number of posoperative Fisiotherapy sessions performed.
Time frame: 1 year
Time of fracture union in radiographs.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of Instability distal radius fracture Criteria per participant.
Time frame: 1 year
Grades of Dorsal Displacement in fracture.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Range of motion in Pronation.
Time frame: 1 year
Range of motion in Radial Deviation
Time frame: 1 year
Range of motion in Ulnar deviation.
Time frame: 1 year
Number of shortening millimeters in fracture.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Number of ulnar variance millimeters in fracture.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Number of step-off millimeters in fracture.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 31579555Delft EAKV, Gelder TGV, Vries R, Vermeulen J, Bloemers FW. Duration of Cast Immobilization in Distal Radial Fractures: A Systematic Review. J Wrist Surg. 2019 Oct;8(5):430-438. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683433. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 28428911Quadlbauer S, Pezzei C, Jurkowitsch J, Kolmayr B, Keuchel T, Simon D, Hausner T, Leixnering M. Early Rehabilitation of Distal Radius Fractures Stabilized by Volar Locking Plate: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study. J Wrist Surg. 2017 May;6(2):102-112. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587317. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 35186419Toemen A, Collocott S, Heiss-Dunlop W. Short Term Outcomes Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation Surgery for a Distal Radius Fracture: 2 Week Versus 4 Week Immobilization. A Retrospective Analysis. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Mar 25;12:21514593211004528. doi: 10.1177/21514593211004528. eCollection 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 25748659Klein SM, Prantl L, Koller M, Vykoukal J, Dolderer JH, Graf S, Nerlich M, Loibl M, Geis S. Evidence based postoperative treatment of distal radius fractures following internal locking plate fixation. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(1):33-40.
- Results publication: PubMed 21508285Lichtman DM, Bindra RR, Boyer MI, Putnam MD, Ring D, Slutsky DJ, Taras JS, Watters WC 3rd, Goldberg MJ, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Haralson RH 3rd, Boyer KM, Hitchcock K, Raymond L; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the treatment of distal radius fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 20;93(8):775-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.938ebo. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 24508093Valdes K, Naughton N, Michlovitz S. Therapist supervised clinic-based therapy versus instruction in a home program following distal radius fracture: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2014 Jul-Sep;27(3):165-73; quiz 174. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 23770202Driessens S, Diserens-Chew T, Burton C, Lassig E, Hartley C, McPhail S. A retrospective cohort investigation of active range of motion within one week of open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;26(3):225-30; quiz 231. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 25157038Koval K, Haidukewych GJ, Service B, Zirgibel BJ. Controversies in the management of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;22(9):566-75. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-566.
- Results publication: PubMed 18519324Lozano-Calderon SA, Souer S, Mudgal C, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Wrist mobilization following volar plate fixation of fractures of the distal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun;90(6):1297-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01368.
- Results publication: PubMed 29256945Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Distal Radius Fractures
Recruiting
No Reduction Compared to Closed Reduction for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 65 or Older
Distal Radius Fracture, Casting
Active, not recruiting
Immediate Mobilization Versus 2 Weeks Cast Immobilization After Distal Radius Fracture Treated With Volar Locking Plate
Distal Radius Fracture
Recruiting
Wrist Injury Strengthening Exercise (WISE) Versus Usual Care Advice for Improving Pain and Function
Distal Radius Fracture, Colles Fracture
Not yet recruiting
One Inch Punch High Impact Training Randomized Control Trial (1'' Punch HIT RCT)
Distal Radius Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Alloy Scaffold With Controlled Degradation for Periarticular Bone Defects
Periarticular Bone Defect, Proximal Humerus Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Alberto Izquierdo Fernández, Phd study director
Hospital Reina Sofía ( Córdoba, Spain)
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Splint inmmobilization and Bandage immovilization in people with Distal Radius Fractures and Internal Fixation; Complications, Mechanical, run by Hospital Costa del Sol at 2 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jose Ignacio Miró Jiménez, MD (+34 674501958, ppnxmj89@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain in Visual Analogue Scale. (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06019585, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2023.