Dental ImplantNCT06034171
Clinical Study of Implants With Modified Surface Treatment
A study testing dental implant in people with Dental Implant and Hydroxyapatite, run by SmileDent Kft. at 1 site in Hungary.
Trial summary
The observed medical device in this study were SGS P7D Dental implant. The device replaces the lost tooth root, and provides support for the dental bridges and crowns, or overdenture replacements. This medical device provides the opportunity to to replace partial or complete missing teeth. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Implant, Hydroxyapatite
- What is being tested?
- dental implant
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHungary
- Study dates
- 13 Jun 2019to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- complete lack of teeth in the lower jaw
- decision of the investigator: the patient is appropriate for implantation, clinical conditions are sufficient (adequate soft tissue and bone conditions and occlusal position;)
- the patient's consciousness is clear, understand the planned intervention.
- the patient communicates well with the examiner and is able to understand and comply with the requirements of the test plan.
- witten informed consent
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Women of childbearing potential, unless she uses effective birth control until the completion of the final radiological examination, and for another 4 weeks after that.
- A disease (including, but not limited to metabolic, hematological, kidney, liver, lung, neurological, endocrine, cardiac, infectious and gastrointestinal disease), which -in the opinion of the investigator- significantly affects the health of the examined person and/or exposes to an unacceptably high risk the person receiving the implantation treatment.
- Malignant disease in the medical history in the preceding 24 months.
- Known HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C, or any other considered viral infection relevant by the examiner known at the tome of randomization
- A medical or psychiatric illness which, in the opinion of the investigator, excludes that the participant adheres to the protocol, or complete the study according to the protocol.
Show all 21Show fewer
- Participation in an other interventional clinical study within 6 months prior to treatment.
- Known allergy to the implant or to the invetigational template or any of its components.
- Limitation of mouth opening, which make unpossible to complete the procedure, based on the opinion of the investigator
- Increased pharyngeal reflex, reduced ability to tolerate intraoral manipulation
- Radiotherapy, previous irradiation of the jawbones
- INR > 2.5
- Immunosuppressed patient
- previous or current bisphosphonate treatment
- Known alcohol or drug abuse
- Heavy smoking (≥ 20 cigarettes per day, or another form of smoking, used in an equivalent amount)
- Untreated periodontitis
- Local infection of the implant in the planned area
- Lack of dental hygiene, e.g. not removed radixes, plaque and calculus, or radiologically detectable potential periapical focus (also in asymptomatic case )
- Insufficient or poor oral hygiene
- Transient infectious state, with or without fever
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The observed medical device in this study were SGS P7D Dental implant. The device replaces the lost tooth root, and provides support for the dental bridges and crowns, or overdenture replacements. This medical device provides the opportunity to to replace partial or complete missing teeth. Device material: Ti-6Al-4V Device surface protection: Corundum Blasting and
- phosphate surface treatment or
- hydroxylapatite surface treatment
Read the detailed description
A prospective, randomized, two-arms "split-mouth" study. The two arms: right and left of the same mandible of the same volunteer with a different surface treatment, but every other circumstances of the implants are the same, the same device with different surface materilas.
"A" treatment: Implant with phosphate surface treatment is the lower one in the right side of the jawbone, with hydroxylapatite surface treatment implant is placed in the left side of the lower jaw. "B" treatment: Implant with phosphate surface treatment in the lower jaw on the left side, the bottom is an implant with hydroxylapatite surface treatment is inserted into the right side of the jaw bone
- Conditions
- Dental Implant, Hydroxyapatite
- Being tested
- dental implant
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
dental implantDevice
Dental implant surgery in the lower jawbone.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (study implant on the right side) | Experimental | Implant with phosphate surface device in the right side of the lower jawbone, and the hydroxylapatite surface treatment implant is placed in the left side of the lower jaw. Receives: Device: dental implant |
| Group B (study implant on the left side) | Experimental | Implant with phosphate surface device for the lower jaw on the left side, and the implant with hydroxylapatite surface treatment is inserted into the right side of the jawbone. Receives: Device: dental implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of OSSTELL ISQ score (for the degree of osseointegration indicator)
Evaluation the difference between the two types surface treated implants osseointegration. For the measure is used the OSSTELL ISQ score.
results with the OSSTELL radio frequency device based on measurable stability values. Values can vary form 1-100, higher values mean better stability.
Measured: 36 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Volunteer-Quality of Life (OHIP Scale Scores)
Establishing the effect of implantation and subsequent prosthetic intervention on the volunteers long-term quality of life based on the scales of the OHIP questionnaire (surface treatment-independent). long-term quality of life based on the scales of the OHIP questionnaire (surface treatment-independent). The OHIP-14 scores can range from 0 to 56 and are calculated by summing the ordinal values for the 14 items. The domain scores can range from 0 to 8. Higher OHIP-14 scores indicate worse and lower scores indicate better OHRQol
Measured: 36 months
Bone resorption measured mesially and distally in millimeters
Determining the long-term difference between different implants in relation to bone erosion around the implant (radiological based on measurements).
Measured: 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2023
- Study start13 Jun 2019
- Primary completion31 Oct 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dental ImplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- two arms, split-mouth, randomized
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- SmileDent Kft.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- S.G.S International Kft.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Márk Antal, Dr. habil., Principal investigator, Szeged University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06034171
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SM-SGS_001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 12 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Derks J, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Larsson M, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss. J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):44S-51S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514563077. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
PubMed 25503901van Velzen FJ, Ofec R, Schulten EA, Ten Bruggenkate CM. 10-year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Oct;26(10):1121-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.12499. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
PubMed 25370914De Angelis F, Papi P, Mencio F, Rosella D, Di Carlo S, Pompa G. Implant survival and success rates in patients with risk factors: results from a long-term retrospective study with a 10 to 18 years follow-up. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Feb;21(3):433-437.
PubMed 28239830Wang H, Eliaz N, Xiang Z, Hsu HP, Spector M, Hobbs LW. Early bone apposition in vivo on plasma-sprayed and electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium alloy. Biomaterials. 2006 Aug;27(23):4192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.034. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
PubMed 16618502Eliaz N, Shmueli S, Shur I, Benayahu D, Aronov D, Rosenman G. The effect of surface treatment on the surface texture and contact angle of electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coating and on its interaction with bone-forming cells. Acta Biomater. 2009 Oct;5(8):3178-91. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
PubMed 19409870Eliaz N, Ritman-Hertz O, Aronov D, Weinberg E, Shenhar Y, Rosenman G, Weinreb M, Ron E. The effect of surface treatments on the adhesion of electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coating to titanium and on its interaction with cells and bacteria. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011 Jul;22(7):1741-52. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4355-y. Epub 2011 May 25.
PubMed 21611792Eliaz N, Kopelovitch W, Burstein L, Kobayashi E, Hanawa T. Electrochemical processes of nucleation and growth of calcium phosphate on titanium supported by real-time quartz crystal microbalance measurements and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Apr;89(1):270-80. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32129.
PubMed 18563813Eliaz N, Eliyahu M. Electrochemical processes of nucleation and growth of hydroxyapatite on titanium supported by real-time electrochemical atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Mar 1;80(3):621-34. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30944.
PubMed 17051536Lakstein D, Kopelovitch W, Barkay Z, Bahaa M, Hendel D, Eliaz N. Enhanced osseointegration of grit-blasted, NaOH-treated and electrochemically hydroxyapatite-coated Ti-6Al-4V implants in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 2009 Jul;5(6):2258-69. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.033. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
PubMed 19251497Fernandez de Grado G, Keller L, Idoux-Gillet Y, Wagner Q, Musset AM, Benkirane-Jessel N, Bornert F, Offner D. Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng. 2018 Jun 4;9:2041731418776819. doi: 10.1177/2041731418776819. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
PubMed 29899969Desjardins RP. Hydroxyapatite for alveolar ridge augmentation: indications and problems. J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Sep;54(3):374-83. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90556-6.
PubMed 2999379Younes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyckere T, Cleymaet R, Bouckaert E, Eghbali A. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45(6):721-732. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12897. Epub 2018 May 10.
PubMed 29608793Antal MA, Kiscsatari R, Braunitzer G, Piffko J, Varga E, Eliaz N. Assessment of a novel electrochemically deposited smart bioactive trabecular coating (SBTC(R)): a randomized controlled clinical trial. Head Face Med. 2024 Apr 16;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00426-0.
PubMed 38627712
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Study of Implants With Modified Surface Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06034171
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SM-SGS_001
- Conditions
- Dental Implant, Hydroxyapatite
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SmileDent Kft.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- S.G.S International Kft.
- Study start
- 13 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The observed medical device in this study were SGS P7D Dental implant. The device replaces the lost tooth root, and provides support for the dental bridges and crowns, or overdenture replacements. This medical device provides the opportunity to to replace partial or complete missing teeth. Device material: Ti-6Al-4V Device surface protection: Corundum Blasting and
- phosphate surface treatment or
- hydroxylapatite surface treatment
Detailed description
A prospective, randomized, two-arms "split-mouth" study. The two arms: right and left of the same mandible of the same volunteer with a different surface treatment, but every other circumstances of the implants are the same, the same device with different surface materilas.
"A" treatment: Implant with phosphate surface treatment is the lower one in the right side of the jawbone, with hydroxylapatite surface treatment implant is placed in the left side of the lower jaw. "B" treatment: Implant with phosphate surface treatment in the lower jaw on the left side, the bottom is an implant with hydroxylapatite surface treatment is inserted into the right side of the jaw bone
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- two arms, split-mouth, randomized
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (study implant on the right side) | Experimental | Device: dental implantImplant with phosphate surface device in the right side of the lower jawbone, and the hydroxylapatite surface treatment implant is placed in the left side of the lower jaw. |
| Group B (study implant on the left side) | Experimental | Device: dental implantImplant with phosphate surface device for the lower jaw on the left side, and the implant with hydroxylapatite surface treatment is inserted into the right side of the jawbone. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- complete lack of teeth in the lower jaw
- decision of the investigator: the patient is appropriate for implantation, clinical conditions are sufficient (adequate soft tissue and bone conditions and occlusal position;)
- the patient's consciousness is clear, understand the planned intervention.
- the patient communicates well with the examiner and is able to understand and comply with the requirements of the test plan.
- witten informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Women of childbearing potential, unless she uses effective birth control until the completion of the final radiological examination, and for another 4 weeks after that.
- A disease (including, but not limited to metabolic, hematological, kidney, liver, lung, neurological, endocrine, cardiac, infectious and gastrointestinal disease), which -in the opinion of the investigator- significantly affects the health of the examined person and/or exposes to an unacceptably high risk the person receiving the implantation treatment.
- Malignant disease in the medical history in the preceding 24 months.
- Known HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C, or any other considered viral infection relevant by the examiner known at the tome of randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| dental implantDental implant surgery in the lower jawbone. | Device | Group A (study implant on the right side), Group B (study implant on the left side) |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of OSSTELL ISQ score (for the degree of osseointegration indicator)
Time frame: 36 months
Evaluation the difference between the two types surface treated implants osseointegration. For the measure is used the OSSTELL ISQ score. results with the OSSTELL radio frequency device based on measurable stability values. Values can vary form 1-100, higher values mean better stability.
2 secondary outcomes
Volunteer-Quality of Life (OHIP Scale Scores)
Time frame: 36 months
Bone resorption measured mesially and distally in millimeters
Time frame: 36 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 25503901Derks J, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Larsson M, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss. J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):44S-51S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514563077. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
- Background: PubMed 25370914van Velzen FJ, Ofec R, Schulten EA, Ten Bruggenkate CM. 10-year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Oct;26(10):1121-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.12499. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
- Background: PubMed 28239830De Angelis F, Papi P, Mencio F, Rosella D, Di Carlo S, Pompa G. Implant survival and success rates in patients with risk factors: results from a long-term retrospective study with a 10 to 18 years follow-up. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Feb;21(3):433-437.
- Background: PubMed 16618502Wang H, Eliaz N, Xiang Z, Hsu HP, Spector M, Hobbs LW. Early bone apposition in vivo on plasma-sprayed and electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium alloy. Biomaterials. 2006 Aug;27(23):4192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.034. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
- Background: PubMed 19409870Eliaz N, Shmueli S, Shur I, Benayahu D, Aronov D, Rosenman G. The effect of surface treatment on the surface texture and contact angle of electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coating and on its interaction with bone-forming cells. Acta Biomater. 2009 Oct;5(8):3178-91. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
- Background: PubMed 21611792Eliaz N, Ritman-Hertz O, Aronov D, Weinberg E, Shenhar Y, Rosenman G, Weinreb M, Ron E. The effect of surface treatments on the adhesion of electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coating to titanium and on its interaction with cells and bacteria. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011 Jul;22(7):1741-52. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4355-y. Epub 2011 May 25.
- Background: PubMed 18563813Eliaz N, Kopelovitch W, Burstein L, Kobayashi E, Hanawa T. Electrochemical processes of nucleation and growth of calcium phosphate on titanium supported by real-time quartz crystal microbalance measurements and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Apr;89(1):270-80. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32129.
- Background: PubMed 17051536Eliaz N, Eliyahu M. Electrochemical processes of nucleation and growth of hydroxyapatite on titanium supported by real-time electrochemical atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Mar 1;80(3):621-34. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30944.
- Background: PubMed 19251497Lakstein D, Kopelovitch W, Barkay Z, Bahaa M, Hendel D, Eliaz N. Enhanced osseointegration of grit-blasted, NaOH-treated and electrochemically hydroxyapatite-coated Ti-6Al-4V implants in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 2009 Jul;5(6):2258-69. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.033. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
- Background: PubMed 29899969Fernandez de Grado G, Keller L, Idoux-Gillet Y, Wagner Q, Musset AM, Benkirane-Jessel N, Bornert F, Offner D. Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng. 2018 Jun 4;9:2041731418776819. doi: 10.1177/2041731418776819. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
- Background: PubMed 2999379Desjardins RP. Hydroxyapatite for alveolar ridge augmentation: indications and problems. J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Sep;54(3):374-83. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90556-6.
- Background: PubMed 29608793Younes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyckere T, Cleymaet R, Bouckaert E, Eghbali A. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45(6):721-732. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12897. Epub 2018 May 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dental Implant
Active, not recruiting
Influence of Implant Insertion Depth on Peri-implant Bone Changes Around Short Implants
Tooth Loss, Edentulism
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Association Between Peri-implant Tissue Health and Crown Shape: a Prospective Study
Dental Implants
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
S-TiUltra Implant Study
Missing Tooth/Teeth
Recruiting
Surgical Guide Versus Freehand Dental Implants Placement
Dental Implant Placement
Recruiting
Dental Implant Healing With TNF-Alpha Inhibitors
Dental Implants, TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Márk Antal, Dr. habil. principal investigator
Szeged University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing dental implant in people with Dental Implant and Hydroxyapatite, run by SmileDent Kft. at 1 site in Hungary.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of OSSTELL ISQ score (for the degree of osseointegration indicator) (time frame: 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06034171, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2026.