Traumatic Brain InjuryICP-CBFNCT06039098
Investigating CBF and ICP Using DCS
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury and Intracranial Hypertension, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
We aim to acquire data using DCS on patients who are undergoing invasive ICP and ABP monitoring on ITU as part of their normal treatment. Data will then be correlated to derive various parameters including CBF and BFI. All interventions are entirely non-invasive. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Intracranial Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- DCS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 5 Jan 2023to 20 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The largest demographic of patients undergoing ICP monitoring is trauma, therefore the study population is patients who have suffered TBI and are undergoing ICP monitoring on ITU.
Who may be able to join
- Invasive monitoring of ICP and ABP as part of normal treatment
Who cannot join
- Not meeting inclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Investigating the Relationship Between Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Blood Flow Using Near-infrared Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy
We aim to acquire data using DCS on patients who are undergoing invasive ICP and ABP monitoring on ITU as part of their normal treatment.
Data will then be correlated to derive various parameters including CBF and BFI.
All interventions are entirely non-invasive.
Read the detailed description
Cerebral Autoregulation (CA) is the complex process whereby the body maintains constant blood flow to the brain (cerebral blood flow, CBF) over a wide range of mean arterial pressures (MAP) in order to provide constant oxygenation and nutrition supply to cerebral tissue. By balancing blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressures, CA dynamically stabilises cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and hence blood flow. Disordered CA may result in reduced oxygen and nutrient delivery to the brain tissue leading to hypoxic and ischaemic damage resulting in significant morbidity and mortality.
High intracranial pressure (ICP) is frequently associated with failing CA. Hence ICP is routinely monitored in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) and other conditions which may result in CA failure. Raised ICP contributes to the majority of mortalities following severe TBI. All currently available ICP monitoring systems require insertion of an electrical or pneumatic transducer into the cranial cavity, usually sited within the brain parenchyma but occasionally into the subdural space (between the brain and the skull) or into the ventricles. This is currently only performed by neurosurgeons and carries a small but significant risk of haemorrhage or infection.
Non-invasive ICP and hence CA monitoring would eliminate the risk of complications, could be used by all healthcare professionals, would extend the use to outside a hospital settings and may extend the range of conditions to benefit from ICP monitoring.
This project pilots an approach to expand our understanding of the basic physiological interplay between intracranial pressure, arterial blood pressure, and cerebral blood flow in adult in-patients.
A recently-developed form of near-infrared (NIR) optical sensing known as Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy (DCS) offers an opportunity to investigate cerebral blood flow at the bed-side continuously. DCS measures blood flow in the microvasculature of the brain by determining a blood flow index (BFi).
A similar technology based on near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), was recently successfully applied by the Chief Investigator in the same population in the same manner as in the current proposal (IRAS ID: 219476, approved by the East of England - Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (18/EE/0276) on 14/02/19). We therefore have extensive experience working with optical instruments in these patient groups.
In this proposal we will use a custom DCS research instrument. This research instrument is designed to measure microvascular cerebral blood flow for neuroscience and neurological research applications. While this device is a bespoke instrument, built with this study in mind, it is based on established research technologies and has been tested successfully in more than 20 healthy volunteers and in a range of quality-control experiments to date. It uses a forehead-mounted optical probe that contains near-infrared light sources that can illuminate the brain tissue non-invasively and continuously. The light's path within brain tissue is modulated by the flow of blood in the cerebral microvasculature and it is ultimately absorbed or backscattered. The backscattered light is collected at a different point within the probe.
The interplay between mean arterial blood (MAP) (measured by means of an intra-arterial catheter (part of normal medical care for patients on ITU) or a non-invasive finger-cuff) and ICP affects the morphology of the pulsatile flow in the cerebral microvascular, so the analysis of these signals in unison will help us better understand the relationship between ICP (which is measured clinically), MAP (which is measured clinically) and cerebral blood flow (which is not). This in turn could help support new research into head injury management, notably ICP-targeted treatment regimes. Ultimately this could lead to significant improvements in secondary injury-related mortality, length of hospital stay and reduced post-trauma disability. In addition the non-invasive nature of the monitor could extend the range of medical conditions that may benefit from ICP and CA monitoring including stroke, brain tumour surveillance, hydrocephalus, pre-hospital care of trauma patients, routine anaesthetic and ICU monitoring systems and screening of patients with headache in primary care.
In addition, if successfully developed, this technology is likely to be extremely relevant to low and middle income countries where access to neurosurgeons (and hence ICP monitoring) is extremely limited.
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Intracranial Hypertension
- Being tested
- DCS
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Intracranial Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DCSDevice
DCS monitoring of brain
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | Participants are patients who are undergoing invasive ICP and ABP measurement as part of their normal medical treatment. Receives: Device: DCS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
DCS signal acquisition
Successful acquisition of DCS signals from brain tissue
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Correlation of DCS signals with routine physiological data measurements
Correlation of DCS signals with routine physiological data measurements
Measured: 10 months
ML approach to derive secondary parameters
Machine learning approach to derive additional parameters non-invasively
Measured: 10 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2023
- Study start5 Jan 2023
- Primary completion20 Aug 2023
- Study completion20 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Queen Mary University of LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barts & The London NHS Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06039098
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 317751
- Acronym
- ICP-CBF
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 20 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data will be shared with organizations / individuals upon reasonable request.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigating the Relationship Between Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Blood Flow Using Near-infrared Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06039098
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICP-CBF / 317751
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Intracranial Hypertension
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barts & The London NHS Trust
- Study start
- 5 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We aim to acquire data using DCS on patients who are undergoing invasive ICP and ABP monitoring on ITU as part of their normal treatment.
Data will then be correlated to derive various parameters including CBF and BFI.
All interventions are entirely non-invasive.
Detailed description
Cerebral Autoregulation (CA) is the complex process whereby the body maintains constant blood flow to the brain (cerebral blood flow, CBF) over a wide range of mean arterial pressures (MAP) in order to provide constant oxygenation and nutrition supply to cerebral tissue. By balancing blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressures, CA dynamically stabilises cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and hence blood flow. Disordered CA may result in reduced oxygen and nutrient delivery to the brain tissue leading to hypoxic and ischaemic damage resulting in significant morbidity and mortality.
High intracranial pressure (ICP) is frequently associated with failing CA. Hence ICP is routinely monitored in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) and other conditions which may result in CA failure. Raised ICP contributes to the majority of mortalities following severe TBI. All currently available ICP monitoring systems require insertion of an electrical or pneumatic transducer into the cranial cavity, usually sited within the brain parenchyma but occasionally into the subdural space (between the brain and the skull) or into the ventricles. This is currently only performed by neurosurgeons and carries a small but significant risk of haemorrhage or infection.
Non-invasive ICP and hence CA monitoring would eliminate the risk of complications, could be used by all healthcare professionals, would extend the use to outside a hospital settings and may extend the range of conditions to benefit from ICP monitoring.
This project pilots an approach to expand our understanding of the basic physiological interplay between intracranial pressure, arterial blood pressure, and cerebral blood flow in adult in-patients.
A recently-developed form of near-infrared (NIR) optical sensing known as Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy (DCS) offers an opportunity to investigate cerebral blood flow at the bed-side continuously. DCS measures blood flow in the microvasculature of the brain by determining a blood flow index (BFi).
A similar technology based on near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), was recently successfully applied by the Chief Investigator in the same population in the same manner as in the current proposal (IRAS ID: 219476, approved by the East of England - Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (18/EE/0276) on 14/02/19). We therefore have extensive experience working with optical instruments in these patient groups.
In this proposal we will use a custom DCS research instrument. This research instrument is designed to measure microvascular cerebral blood flow for neuroscience and neurological research applications. While this device is a bespoke instrument, built with this study in mind, it is based on established research technologies and has been tested successfully in more than 20 healthy volunteers and in a range of quality-control experiments to date. It uses a forehead-mounted optical probe that contains near-infrared light sources that can illuminate the brain tissue non-invasively and continuously. The light's path within brain tissue is modulated by the flow of blood in the cerebral microvasculature and it is ultimately absorbed or backscattered. The backscattered light is collected at a different point within the probe.
The interplay between mean arterial blood (MAP) (measured by means of an intra-arterial catheter (part of normal medical care for patients on ITU) or a non-invasive finger-cuff) and ICP affects the morphology of the pulsatile flow in the cerebral microvascular, so the analysis of these signals in unison will help us better understand the relationship between ICP (which is measured clinically), MAP (which is measured clinically) and cerebral blood flow (which is not). This in turn could help support new research into head injury management, notably ICP-targeted treatment regimes. Ultimately this could lead to significant improvements in secondary injury-related mortality, length of hospital stay and reduced post-trauma disability. In addition the non-invasive nature of the monitor could extend the range of medical conditions that may benefit from ICP and CA monitoring including stroke, brain tumour surveillance, hydrocephalus, pre-hospital care of trauma patients, routine anaesthetic and ICU monitoring systems and screening of patients with headache in primary care.
In addition, if successfully developed, this technology is likely to be extremely relevant to low and middle income countries where access to neurosurgeons (and hence ICP monitoring) is extremely limited.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | – | Device: DCSParticipants are patients who are undergoing invasive ICP and ABP measurement as part of their normal medical treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The largest demographic of patients undergoing ICP monitoring is trauma, therefore the study population is patients who have suffered TBI and are undergoing ICP monitoring on ITU.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Invasive monitoring of ICP and ABP as part of normal treatment
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Not meeting inclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DCSDCS monitoring of brain | Device | Participants |
Primary outcome
DCS signal acquisition
Time frame: 12 months
Successful acquisition of DCS signals from brain tissue
2 secondary outcomes
Correlation of DCS signals with routine physiological data measurements
Time frame: 10 months
ML approach to derive secondary parameters
Time frame: 10 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data will be shared with organizations / individuals upon reasonable request.
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulated Evoked Potentials
Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
CoMind Early Feasibility Study
Intracranial Pressure, Intracranial Pressure Changes
Enrolling by invitation
Improving In-hospital and Post-discharge Patient Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Concussion, Mild, Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Description of Clinicians' Predictive Abilities Before and After a Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Prognosis, Brain Injury, Traumatic
Enrolling by invitation
Risk Assessment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Military Training
Trauma, Brain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury and Intracranial Hypertension, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
DCS signal acquisition (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2024.