TendinopathyVirtendonRehabNCT06056440
Efficacy of a Physical Rehabilitation Program Using Virtual Reality in Patients With Chronic Tendinopathy (Virtendon-Rehab)
A study testing Virtual reality in people with Tendinopathy and Patellar Tendinopathy, run by University of Cadiz at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Chronic tendinopathies (CT) have a high prevalence (30% of musculoskeletal injuries), causing pain, decreased physical activity and functionality, as well as limitations in daily life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tendinopathy, Patellar Tendinopathy, Tendinopathy, Elbow
- What is being tested?
- Virtual reality
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 28 Nov 2023to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of tendinopathy (shoulder rotator cuff tendinopathy, epicondylitis/epicondylitis, patellar tendinopathy, achilles tendinopathy).
- Duration of symptoms: greater than 6 weeks.
Who cannot join
- People who have any pathology that prevents them from performing physical exercise.
- Persons who have undergone surgery.
- Persons who have an illness that may be a contraindication to the proposed procedure.
- Persons who have received exercise therapy in the last 3 months.
- Persons who have received corticosteroid injections in the last 3 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy
Cadiz, 11009
David Lucena-Anton, PhD, 956015699 ext. +34, david.lucena@uca.es
About this study
Chronic tendinopathies (CT) have a high prevalence (30% of musculoskeletal injuries), causing pain, decreased physical activity and functionality, as well as limitations in daily life. Virtual reality (VR) fosters patient recovery through playful activities that promote competitiveness, stimulates motivation and continuous attention, allows individualizing the exercise program, objectively assessing the execution of the treatment and monitoring the patient's evolution. Therefore, the VIRTENDON-REHAB project aims to conduct a low-risk randomized controlled clinical trial to analyze the efficacy of a VR-based physical rehabilitation program in a population diagnosed with CT on pain, functionality, range of motion, strength, muscle activation pattern, kinesiophobia, quality of life, adherence to treatment and patient satisfaction with the use of the system, compared to a control group. Likewise, the aim is to characterize the clinical profile of this population and to know the relationships between the previous variables. Measurements will be taken at the beginning of the intervention, at the end (12 weeks) and 3 months after the end of the intervention. A descriptive analysis will be performed, inter- and intra-group differences will be analyzed by means of t-Student, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U and mixed ANOVA tests. Cohen's d will be used to determine the effect size. Relationships between variables will be analyzed using structural equations. The results obtained will allow improving knowledge on the management of CT using VR, as well as improving clinical care and reducing healthcare costs.
- Conditions
- Tendinopathy, Patellar Tendinopathy, Tendinopathy, Elbow, Tendinopathy Rotator Cuff, Achilles Tendinopathy
- Being tested
- Virtual reality, Control group
- Keywords
- virtual reality, chronic tendinopathy, physical therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Tendinopathy, Elbow Tendinopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual realityProcedure or surgery
The VR intervention program for the experimental group will be carried out with a frequency of 3 sessions/week, duration of approximately 45 minutes, and for a total of 12 weeks, being performed in addition to the patient's usual treatment program.
The Oculus Quest 2 device (which consists of VR glasses and different accessories) will be used, in conjunction with software specifically designed for physical rehabilitation of upper and lower limbs: Dynamics VR. Specifically, the specific functional rehabilitation program will be used, which comprises exercises that are easy to perform, with a playful component, and which encourage the patient's continuous attention to the task performed, acting as a distractor phenomenon in the face of restrictive movement factors such as fear of pain or movement. This software offers the possibility of adjusting the number of repetitions and characteristics of the exercises, thus allowing an individualized physical rehabilitation
Control groupOther
The control group will only receive their usual treatment program for the 12-week duration of the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| VR group | Experimental | The VR intervention program for the experimental group will be carried through the Oculus Quest 2 device (which consists of VR glasses and different accessories) will be used, in conjunction with software specifically designed for physical rehabilitation of upper and lower limbs: Dynamics VR. This VR intervention will be performed in addition to the patient's usual treatment program. Receives: Procedure: Virtual reality |
| Control group | Other | Not described Receives: Other: Control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disability (Shoulder And Pain Disability Index)
Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Measured: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Disability (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Patellar)
Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Measured: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Disability (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles)
Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Measured: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)
Longitudinal change from 0 to 10. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Measured: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Secondary outcomes (6)
Range of motion (Goniometer)
Longitudinal change
Measured: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Strength (Dynamometer)
Longitudinal change
Measured: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale Questionnaire)
Longitudinal change from 17 to 68 where the lowest 17 means no or negligible kinesiophobia, and the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of kinesiophobia
Measured: From Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Quality of Life (36-item Short Form Survey)
Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Measured: From Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Adherence (Exercise Adherence Rating Scale)
The original English version of the EARS is a 16-item, self-reported questionnaire, which assessadherence of prescribed exercises [6]. The EARS consist of 3 sections. Section 'A' is about prescribedexercise questionnaire. This section consists of 5 questions, which are related to way of doing activitiesand exercise that people often do to improve their physical quality of life. Section 'B' is about exerciseadherence behavior, so called exercise adherence rating scale. This section consists of 6 items, which isan actual measure to identify exercise adherence. This evaluates whether individuals do their exercise asper recommendation or not. Section 'C' is about reasons for adherence/non-adherence of exercises. Thissection consists of 10 items, which assesses factors that hinders and facilitates the exercises. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Measured: 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks
User satisfaction (Consumer Report Effectiveness Scale)
Global satisfaction with the treatment received. 3-item scale scoring from 0 to 300. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Measured: 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Sep 2023
- Study start28 Nov 2023
- Primary completionNov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TendinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cadiz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06056440
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- University of Cadiz PR2022-049
- Other IDs
- PR2022-049
- Acronym
- VirtendonRehab
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 10 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kaux JF, Forthomme B, Goff CL, Crielaard JM, Croisier JL. Current opinions on tendinopathy. J Sports Sci Med. 2011 Jun 1;10(2):238-53.
PubMed 24149868Mallows A, Debenham J, Walker T, Littlewood C. Association of psychological variables and outcome in tendinopathy: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017 May;51(9):743-748. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096154. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
PubMed 27852585Chen KB, Sesto ME, Ponto K, Leonard J, Mason A, Vanderheiden G, Williams J, Radwin RG. Use of Virtual Reality Feedback for Patients with Chronic Neck Pain and Kinesiophobia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Aug;25(8):1240-1248. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2621886. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
PubMed 27810828Dominguez-Tellez P, Moral-Munoz JA, Salazar A, Casado-Fernandez E, Lucena-Anton D. Game-Based Virtual Reality Interventions to Improve Upper Limb Motor Function and Quality of Life After Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Games Health J. 2020 Feb;9(1):1-10. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2019.0043.
PubMed 32027185Almekinders LC, Almekinders SV. Outcome in the treatment of chronic overuse sports injuries: a retrospective study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 Mar;19(3):157-61. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.3.157.
PubMed 8156067Cook JL, Purdam CR. Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Jun;43(6):409-16. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.051193. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
PubMed 18812414Lucena-Anton D, Dominguez-Romero JG, Chacon-Barba JC, Santi-Cano MJ, Luque-Moreno C, Moral-Munoz JA. Efficacy of a physical rehabilitation program using virtual reality in patients with chronic tendinopathy: A randomized controlled trial protocol (VirTendon-Rehab). Digit Health. 2025 Feb 18;11:20552076241297043. doi: 10.1177/20552076241297043. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
PubMed 39974760
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of a Physical Rehabilitation Program Using Virtual Reality in Patients With Chronic Tendinopathy (Virtendon-Rehab)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06056440
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VirtendonRehab / University of Cadiz PR2022-049
- Conditions
- Tendinopathy, Patellar Tendinopathy, Tendinopathy, Elbow, Tendinopathy Rotator Cuff, Achilles Tendinopathy
- Keywords
- virtual reality, chronic tendinopathy, physical therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CadizUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic tendinopathies (CT) have a high prevalence (30% of musculoskeletal injuries), causing pain, decreased physical activity and functionality, as well as limitations in daily life. Virtual reality (VR) fosters patient recovery through playful activities that promote competitiveness, stimulates motivation and continuous attention, allows individualizing the exercise program, objectively assessing the execution of the treatment and monitoring the patient's evolution. Therefore, the VIRTENDON-REHAB project aims to conduct a low-risk randomized controlled clinical trial to analyze the efficacy of a VR-based physical rehabilitation program in a population diagnosed with CT on pain, functionality, range of motion, strength, muscle activation pattern, kinesiophobia, quality of life, adherence to treatment and patient satisfaction with the use of the system, compared to a control group. Likewise, the aim is to characterize the clinical profile of this population and to know the relationships between the previous variables. Measurements will be taken at the beginning of the intervention, at the end (12 weeks) and 3 months after the end of the intervention. A descriptive analysis will be performed, inter- and intra-group differences will be analyzed by means of t-Student, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U and mixed ANOVA tests. Cohen's d will be used to determine the effect size. Relationships between variables will be analyzed using structural equations. The results obtained will allow improving knowledge on the management of CT using VR, as well as improving clinical care and reducing healthcare costs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| VR group | Experimental | Procedure: Virtual realityThe VR intervention program for the experimental group will be carried through the Oculus Quest 2 device (which consists of VR glasses and different accessories) will be used, in conjunction with software specifically designed for physical rehabilitation of upper and lower limbs: Dynamics VR. This VR intervention will be performed in addition to the patient's usual treatment program. |
| Control group | Other | Other: Control group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of tendinopathy (shoulder rotator cuff tendinopathy, epicondylitis/epicondylitis, patellar tendinopathy, achilles tendinopathy).
- Duration of symptoms: greater than 6 weeks.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- People who have any pathology that prevents them from performing physical exercise.
- Persons who have undergone surgery.
- Persons who have an illness that may be a contraindication to the proposed procedure.
- Persons who have received exercise therapy in the last 3 months.
- Persons who have received corticosteroid injections in the last 3 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual realityThe VR intervention program for the experimental group will be carried out with a frequency of 3 sessions/week, duration of approximately 45 minutes, and for a total of 12 weeks, being performed in addition to the patient's usual treatment program. The Oculus Quest 2 device (which consists of VR glasses and different accessories) will be used, in conjunction with software specifically designed for physical rehabilitation of upper and lower limbs: Dynamics VR. Specifically, the specific functional rehabilitation program will be used, which comprises exercises that are easy to perform, with a playful component, and which encourage the patient's continuous attention to the task performed, acting as a distractor phenomenon in the face of restrictive movement factors such as fear of pain or movement. This software offers the possibility of adjusting the number of repetitions and characteristics of the exercises, thus allowing an individualized physical rehabilitation | Procedure or surgery | VR group |
| Control groupThe control group will only receive their usual treatment program for the 12-week duration of the study. | Other | Control group |
Primary outcome
Disability (Shoulder And Pain Disability Index)
Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Disability (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Patellar)
Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Disability (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles)
Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)
Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Longitudinal change from 0 to 10. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
6 secondary outcomes
Range of motion (Goniometer)
Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Strength (Dynamometer)
Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale Questionnaire)
Time frame: From Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Quality of Life (36-item Short Form Survey)
Time frame: From Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up
Adherence (Exercise Adherence Rating Scale)
Time frame: 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks
User satisfaction (Consumer Report Effectiveness Scale)
Time frame: 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2024.
- Background: PubMed 24149868Kaux JF, Forthomme B, Goff CL, Crielaard JM, Croisier JL. Current opinions on tendinopathy. J Sports Sci Med. 2011 Jun 1;10(2):238-53.
- Background: PubMed 27852585Mallows A, Debenham J, Walker T, Littlewood C. Association of psychological variables and outcome in tendinopathy: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017 May;51(9):743-748. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096154. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
- Background: PubMed 27810828Chen KB, Sesto ME, Ponto K, Leonard J, Mason A, Vanderheiden G, Williams J, Radwin RG. Use of Virtual Reality Feedback for Patients with Chronic Neck Pain and Kinesiophobia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Aug;25(8):1240-1248. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2621886. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
- Background: PubMed 32027185Dominguez-Tellez P, Moral-Munoz JA, Salazar A, Casado-Fernandez E, Lucena-Anton D. Game-Based Virtual Reality Interventions to Improve Upper Limb Motor Function and Quality of Life After Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Games Health J. 2020 Feb;9(1):1-10. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2019.0043.
- Background: PubMed 8156067Almekinders LC, Almekinders SV. Outcome in the treatment of chronic overuse sports injuries: a retrospective study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 Mar;19(3):157-61. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.3.157.
- Background: PubMed 18812414Cook JL, Purdam CR. Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Jun;43(6):409-16. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.051193. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39974760Lucena-Anton D, Dominguez-Romero JG, Chacon-Barba JC, Santi-Cano MJ, Luque-Moreno C, Moral-Munoz JA. Efficacy of a physical rehabilitation program using virtual reality in patients with chronic tendinopathy: A randomized controlled trial protocol (VirTendon-Rehab). Digit Health. 2025 Feb 18;11:20552076241297043. doi: 10.1177/20552076241297043. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
- Virtual reality softwareLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tendinopathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Patients With Elbow Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis, Medial Epicondylitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Natural History of Shoulder Pathology in Manual Wheelchair Users
Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of Cyriax Approach With and Without Mobilization With Movement in Shoulder Restriction With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Recruiting
A Comparison of the Effects of Combining ESWT With Blood Flow Restriction Therapy in Patients Diagnosed With Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Virtual reality in people with Tendinopathy and Patellar Tendinopathy, run by University of Cadiz at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact David Lucena Anton, PhD (956015699 ext. +34, david.lucena@uca.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disability (Shoulder And Pain Disability Index) (time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06056440, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2024.