Spine DiseaseNCT06059599
Active Informed Consent: a New Solution to Improve and Objectively Test the Patient Understanding of Complex Surgical Procedures Proposals
A study testing active informed consent in people with Spine Disease and Urologic Diseases, run by Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This is an interventional, non-pharmacological, randomized controlled superiority study (RCT), multicenter, open label, parallel group. The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new preoperative information method, based on multimedia tools and on the objective control of understanding by the patient candidate for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spine Disease, Urologic Diseases
- What is being tested?
- active informed consent
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 19 Jun 2024to 31 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged ≥ 18 years (with full legal capacity to consent).
- Scheduled for elective surgery in one of the two domains: spinal surgery or radical prostatectomy in the waiting list of our centers.
- Ability to comprehend Italian language.
- Basic computer or internet access skills. Patients (or their family members) should have the ability to access multimedia content.
Who cannot join
- Patients under age: minors.
- Inability to provide informed consent or self-determination (significant cognitive impairment, severe mental illness, or decisional incapacity that would prevent them from understanding the consent materials or participating in the decision-making).
- Urgent or emergency surgery cases.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This is an interventional, non-pharmacological, randomized controlled superiority study (RCT), multicenter, open label, parallel group.
The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new preoperative information method, based on multimedia tools and on the objective control of understanding by the patient candidate for spinal or urological surgery.
- Conditions
- Spine Disease, Urologic Diseases
- Being tested
- active informed consent
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Diseases, Urologic Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
active informed consentOther
new preoperative information method, based on multimedia tools and on the objective control of understanding by the patient candidate for vertebral or urological surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| active informed consent | Experimental | The experimental group will be prepared for the surgery through the new information tools, a video will be administered with information about the various surgical possibilities, graphics and animations in order to direct the patient toward a more informed choice. Next, an interview with the surgeon will be arranged for the patient and care givers to be listened to and guided through the use of 3D-printed models into the best decision for the individual case (Shared Decision Making - SDM). Having decided on the surgery, patients with similar surgical programs will be guided in educational programs to reinforce information, understanding and long-term retention of the concepts learned. The course will conclude with a second interview with the surgeon and the signing of the standard informed consent. Receives: Other: active informed consent |
| Traditional informed consent | No intervention | The control group of patients will be informed about the surgery according to standard practices. As per standard practice, the patient will meet with the physician before surgery for an explanatory interview and subsequent signing of informed consent. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
The primary outcome of the study will be measured: - by means of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, which provides a patient satisfaction score with a range from a minimum of 8 points (completely dissatisfied) to a maximum of 32 points (completely satisfied).
Measured: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Comprehension Questionnaire
procedure-specific assessment tool designed ad-hoc to evaluate a patient's knowledge and understanding of the planned procedure and associated risks/alternatives.
Measured: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21)
is a 21-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess the severity of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms over the past week
Measured: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
is a simple self-report measure in which patients rate their current pain intensity on an scale from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst imaginable pain").
Measured: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
self-administered questionnaire that assesses the degree of disability and functional impairment across ten daily-activity domains.
Measured: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Only for Urology patients: 7-item questionnaire that evaluates the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms and their impact on quality of life.
Measured: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)
Only for Urology patients: short, patient-completed questionnaire that measures the frequency, severity, and impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life.
Measured: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5 )
Only for Urology patients: brief, 5-item self-report measure used to assess erectile function and screen for erectile dysfunction severity
Measured: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
Rate of Patients Declining Spine Surgery (Opt-Out Rate)
The proportion of patients in spine surgery population, who, after receiving full information, choose not to proceed with the planned surgery.
Measured: baseline (T0)
Medico-Legal Outcomes
For each group, we will track through hospital records the number of medicolegal complaints or claims filed by patients, specifically those alleging inadequate informed consent or unexpected outcomes, related to their surgery within the follow-up period. The outcome will be reported as the count (or proportion of patients) with such complaints in each arm.
Measured: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Sep 2023
- Study start19 Jun 2024
- Primary completion1 Jul 2025
- Study completion31 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spine DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06059599
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIA21
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kinnersley P, Phillips K, Savage K, Kelly MJ, Farrell E, Morgan B, Whistance R, Lewis V, Mann MK, Stephens BL, Blazeby J, Elwyn G, Edwards AG. Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 6;2013(7):CD009445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009445.pub2.
PubMed 23832767Glaser J, Nouri S, Fernandez A, Sudore RL, Schillinger D, Klein-Fedyshin M, Schenker Y. Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review. Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):119-143. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19896348. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
PubMed 31948345Nathe JM, Krakow EF. The Challenges of Informed Consent in High-Stakes, Randomized Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review. MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Mar 28;4(1):2381468319840322. doi: 10.1177/2381468319840322. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
PubMed 30944886Luhnen J, Muhlhauser I, Steckelberg A. The Quality of Informed Consent Forms-a Systematic Review and Critical Analysis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Jun 1;115(22):377-383. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0377.
PubMed 29932049Boriani L, Quattrini I, Maccaferri B, Lima C, Benuzzi A, Salvador M, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Deiure F, Maselli V, De Stefano R, Vommaro F, Gasbarrini A. Protocol RCT for active informed consent in spine and urologic surgery in the metropolitan city of Bologna: does an increased patient engagement improve satisfaction of complex surgical procedures? BMJ Open. 2026 Mar 10;16(3):e108286. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108286.
PubMed 41806994
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Active Informed Consent: a New Solution to Improve and Objectively Test the Patient Understanding of Complex Surgical Procedures Proposals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06059599
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIA21
- Conditions
- Spine Disease, Urologic Diseases
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an interventional, non-pharmacological, randomized controlled superiority study (RCT), multicenter, open label, parallel group.
The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new preoperative information method, based on multimedia tools and on the objective control of understanding by the patient candidate for spinal or urological surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| active informed consent | Experimental | Other: active informed consentThe experimental group will be prepared for the surgery through the new information tools, a video will be administered with information about the various surgical possibilities, graphics and animations in order to direct the patient toward a more informed choice. Next, an interview with the surgeon will be arranged for the patient and care givers to be listened to and guided through the use of 3D-printed models into the best decision for the individual case (Shared Decision Making - SDM). Having decided on the surgery, patients with similar surgical programs will be guided in educational programs to reinforce information, understanding and long-term retention of the concepts learned. The course will conclude with a second interview with the surgeon and the signing of the standard informed consent. |
| Traditional informed consent | No intervention | –The control group of patients will be informed about the surgery according to standard practices. As per standard practice, the patient will meet with the physician before surgery for an explanatory interview and subsequent signing of informed consent. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults aged ≥ 18 years (with full legal capacity to consent).
- Scheduled for elective surgery in one of the two domains: spinal surgery or radical prostatectomy in the waiting list of our centers.
- Ability to comprehend Italian language.
- Basic computer or internet access skills. Patients (or their family members) should have the ability to access multimedia content.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients under age: minors.
- Inability to provide informed consent or self-determination (significant cognitive impairment, severe mental illness, or decisional incapacity that would prevent them from understanding the consent materials or participating in the decision-making).
- Urgent or emergency surgery cases.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| active informed consentnew preoperative information method, based on multimedia tools and on the objective control of understanding by the patient candidate for vertebral or urological surgery. | Other | active informed consent |
Primary outcome
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time frame: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
The primary outcome of the study will be measured: - by means of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, which provides a patient satisfaction score with a range from a minimum of 8 points (completely dissatisfied) to a maximum of 32 points (completely satisfied).
9 secondary outcomes
Comprehension Questionnaire
Time frame: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21)
Time frame: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time frame: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Time frame: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)
Time frame: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5 )
Time frame: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)
Rate of Patients Declining Spine Surgery (Opt-Out Rate)
Time frame: baseline (T0)
Medico-Legal Outcomes
Time frame: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 23832767Kinnersley P, Phillips K, Savage K, Kelly MJ, Farrell E, Morgan B, Whistance R, Lewis V, Mann MK, Stephens BL, Blazeby J, Elwyn G, Edwards AG. Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 6;2013(7):CD009445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009445.pub2.
- Results publication: PubMed 31948345Glaser J, Nouri S, Fernandez A, Sudore RL, Schillinger D, Klein-Fedyshin M, Schenker Y. Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review. Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):119-143. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19896348. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 30944886Nathe JM, Krakow EF. The Challenges of Informed Consent in High-Stakes, Randomized Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review. MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Mar 28;4(1):2381468319840322. doi: 10.1177/2381468319840322. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
- Results publication: PubMed 29932049Luhnen J, Muhlhauser I, Steckelberg A. The Quality of Informed Consent Forms-a Systematic Review and Critical Analysis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Jun 1;115(22):377-383. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0377.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41806994Boriani L, Quattrini I, Maccaferri B, Lima C, Benuzzi A, Salvador M, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Deiure F, Maselli V, De Stefano R, Vommaro F, Gasbarrini A. Protocol RCT for active informed consent in spine and urologic surgery in the metropolitan city of Bologna: does an increased patient engagement improve satisfaction of complex surgical procedures? BMJ Open. 2026 Mar 10;16(3):e108286. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108286.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spine Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Study of Sagittal Pelvic Statics in the Sitting Position in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy Infantile
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Not yet recruiting
Selective Nerve Root Block Versus Sham to Reduce Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Radiculopathy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Frequency and Complications of Major Orthopedic Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
Not yet recruiting
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy
Cervical Disc Herniation, Cervical Foraminal Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing active informed consent in people with Spine Disease and Urologic Diseases, run by Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (time frame: baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months follow-up (T2) and 6 months follow-up (T3)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06059599, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2026.