AzTrials
AzTrials

Idiopathic Intracranial HypertensionBEHINDNCT06059703

Biomarkers in the Etiology of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

A study testing Blood punction, Central blood sampling and Intracranial pressure measurement in people with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a condition characterized by an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP), papilledema with a risk of permanent visual loss, and severe headaches that profoundly affect quality of life. To date the exact pathophysiology of IIH remains unknown. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
What is being tested?
Blood punction, Central blood sampling and Intracranial pressure measurement
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
27 Nov 2023to 27 Mar 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years and older
  • Patients with newly diagnosed untreated HII (following the modified Dandy criteria) with normal CSF composition, abnormal CSF pressure at the lumbar puncture (>25 cm H2O), and significant pressure gradient at the level of the stenosis (≥8 mmHg)
  • Presence of bilateral transverse sinus stenosis (or unilateral with hypoplastic contralateral sinus).

Who cannot join

  • Allergy to contrast media (nickel, titanium)
  • Allergy or contraindication to antiplatelet agents
  • Patient on anti-inflammatory treatment
  • Chronic inflammatory disease
  • History of intracranial venous thrombosis, cerebral hemorrhage, thrombophilia
  • History of intracranial tumor
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Fulminant IIH with acute visual loss
  • Optic nerve atrophy with papilledema (chronic IIH)
  • Female being pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant in the next 3 months
  • Major comorbidities with high procedural risk
  • Life expectancy < 6 months
  • Adult under guardianship or conservatorship or incapacitated
  • Refusal of consent after receiving all necessary information
  • Not covered by or not a beneficiary of the French social security system

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University Hospital of Montpellier - Gui de Chauliac

    Montpellier, 34090

    Frederico CAGNAZZO, MD, f-cagnazzo@chu-montpellier.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a condition characterized by an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP), papilledema with a risk of permanent visual loss, and severe headaches that profoundly affect quality of life.

To date the exact pathophysiology of IIH remains unknown. IIH is considered a complex neurometabolic and neuroendocrine disorder, favored by female gender, and obesity.

Read more

In the majority of patients (80% of the cases) IIH is associated with obstruction of cerebral venous drainage with stenosis of the transverse sinus. This stenosis may be the main underlying cause in the so-called "venogenic" form of IIH. Equally, in the absence of a stenosis, obstruction may occur when otherwise normal venous sinuses are compressed by the increased ICP, the so-called "non-venogenic" form of IIH. An innovative treatment of IIH with associated venous stenosis includes stenting of the transverse sinus stenosis. This strategy may allow resolution of papilledema and ICP reduction rates up to 80%.

Although the pathogenesis of IIH is still poorly understood, inflammatory mechanisms, autoimmune reactions, and hormonal abnormalities of notably androgens, have been proposed to contribute to its pathophysiology. The function of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has been studied by determining the prevalence of extravasation of endogenous proteins such as fibrinogen.

A growing body of the literature shows a correlation between increased ICP and metabolic/hormonal changes.

The improvement of IIH treated with acetazolamide and/or stenting appears to correlate with the reduction of ICP. Yet the association of this reduction with metabolic changes at the peripheral and central blood level as well as the CSF remains unclear. The search for specific inflammatory, immunological and hormonal biomarkers in patients with IIH and their variation in relation to the ICP should provide a better understanding of its etiology.

Read the detailed description

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a condition characterized by increased intracranial pressure (ICP) of unknown cause, papilledema with the risk of permanent visual impairment, and severe headaches that profoundly impair quality of life, often becoming irreversible despite resolution of the IIH and disappearance of the papilledema.

IIH is diagnosed using the modified Dandy criteria,based on increased ICP (>25 cm H2O on lumbar puncture (LP) performed in the lateral decubitus), papilledema, normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain imaging that rules out all other causes of intracranial hypertension.

IIH is attracting growing interest among clinicians as its incidence and prevalence increases. IIH predominates in women of childbearing age with increased body mass index (BMI) . In the United Kingdom its incidence has doubled in 14 years, rising from 3.5 per 100,000 to 7.69 per 100,000 in the female population between 2002 and 2016 (+ 108%)

To date, the exact pathophysiology of IIH remains unknown. IIH is considered to be a complex neurometabolic and neuroendocrine disorder favored by female gender and obesity. Hypothesized mechanisms include inflammatory, autoimmune and hormonal abnormalities, of notably androgens.

In the majority of patients (80% of the cases) IIH is associated with obstruction of cerebral venous drainage with bilateral stenosis of the transverse sinus. This stenosis may be the main underlying cause in the so-called "venogenic" form of IIH. Equally, in the absence of a stenosis, obstruction may occur when otherwise normal venous sinuses are compressed by the increased ICP, the so-called "non-venogenic" form of IIH.

The therapeutic management of IIH has a triple objective: i) to treat the underlying cause(s); ii) to protect vision, and iii) to reduce the impact of headaches. Unfortunately, current treatments (weight loss, drug therapy with acetazolamide or Diamox, and/or anti-migraine treatment) are not very effective. It has been argued to favor treatments targeted directly at the cause of the increased ICP, and therefore at its etiology. A promising innovative treatment of venogenic IIH includes stenting of the transverse sinus stenosis. It has been associated with papilledema and ICP reduction rates up to 80% .

However, venous stenosis is probably not the only underling mechanism of increased ICP. Accordingly, the role of metabolic, hormonal and inflammatory mechanisms requires further investigation. It has been found that serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were significantly higher in patients with IIH compared with healthy controls . The serum TNF-α level was a significant predictor of the severity of visual field disease. Interestingly, by evaluating adipokine and cytokine levels to identify possible serum markers of inflammation in the pathophysiology of IIH, it was observed that interleukin (IL)-1β levels were significantly higher in the IIH group compared to the control group, whereas IL-8 and TNF-α levels were significantly lower. Although the latter seems in contrast with previous findings, the presence of recurrent relapses - known to enhance chronic inflammatory protective mechanisms and thus increased TNF- α levels, may explain this difference. Serum levels seem thus to be altered (IL-1β, IL-8 and TNF-α) and may be associated with the pathogenesis of IIH. Cytokines might be valuable as prognostic markers in IIH to predict possible relapse.

Given the established association between increased perivascular expression of the water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4), degeneration of pericytes, capillary basement membranes, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction in patients with IIH, the BBB function was investigated by determining the prevalence of extravasation of endogenous proteins such as fibrinogen. Signs of BBB dysfunction, measured by the surface area of extravasated fibrinogen/fibrin, were significantly more pronounced in IIH patients than in reference subjects and demonstrated BBB dysfunction. The increased degree of BBB dysfunction was associated with increased perivascular AQP4 immunoreactivity. AQP4 appears to play a major role in "flushing" brain parenchyma through interstitial fluid, thus also affecting inflammation-generating substances including fibrinogen extravasation.

Given the obesity of IHH patients, the involvement of leptin, a hormone associated with the sensation of hunger, was also investigated and found to be elevated. Its regulation mechanism of Na/K ATPase in the choroid plexus and CSF secretion has been postulated . It is also important to point out that between 40%-50% of women with IIH suffer from polycystic ovary syndrome, which is characterized by dysregulation of sex hormones . Finally, mineralocorticoids, such as 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, have been studied in the pathogenesis of IIH following their potential role in the regulation of Na/K ATPase at the level of the choroid plexus .

Taken together, these studies seem to highlight a wide range of processes for which biomarkers associated with IIH are starting to emerge, but that are still poorly understood. The lack of prospective studies and the small number of patients included in most of the studies carried out so far, impedes conclusions on the role of these factors in the etiology of IIH.

Nevertheless, improvement of IIH treated with acetazolamide and/or stenting seems to correlate with a reduction in ICP, but the association of this reduction with metabolic changes in peripheral, central blood and/or CSF needs to be clarified. The identification of specific inflammatory, immunological and hormonal biomarkers in patients with IIH and their variation in relation to ICP variation should provide a better understanding of its etiology. Biomarkers related to disease severity should allow, in the longer term, proposing alternative treatments.

Advances in endovascular techniques have made it possible to measure ICP at the level of the intracerebral venous system, and to take biological samples at the central (intracerebral) level in order to identify biomarkers associated with clinical severity, and to study their variation as a function of i) normalization of intracranial pressure after treatment with stenting or Diamox, ii) changes in ophthalmological symptoms and headaches.

To date, there are very few prospective cohorts analyzing the biology of patients with IIH. This study will help in the search for biomarkers of the pathology's severity, with a dual aim: 1) to stimulate understanding of the pathophysiology of IIH, which to date remains largely unknown; 2) to develop new drug treatments targeting the mechanisms of increased ICP.

Being tested
Blood punction, Central blood sampling, Intracranial pressure measurement
Keywords
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension HII, Intracranial pressure elevation (ICP), Transverse venous sinus stenosis, Cerebral venous stenting, Blood biomarkers
Medical subject headings
Pseudotumor Cerebri, Intracranial Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood punctionProcedure or surgery

    Peripheral blood sampling (5 ml) at inclusion and 3 months after treatment

  • Central blood samplingProcedure or surgery

    Central blood sampling (2 ml) at inclusion and 3 months after treatment

  • Intracranial pressure measurementProcedure or surgery

    Intracranial pressure measurement at sinus level with micro-catheter at inclusion and 3 months after treatment

Study groups in NCT06059703
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IHH) patientExperimentalIHH patient with bilateral stenosis of the transversal sinus
Receives: Procedure: Blood punction; Procedure: Central blood sampling; Procedure: Intracranial pressure measurement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. intracranial pressure (ICP) blood biomarker correlation

    The correlation (Pearson's r) between blood biomarkers and ICP measured before and after IIH treatment. Pearson's r will be calculated with a multivariate stepwise linear regression to identify those biomarkers that can explain a change in ICP. The blood biomarkers are extracted from peripheral and central venous blood. The ICP is measured at torcular level.

    The blood biomarkers include:

    • Inflammatory markers (pg/mL):
    • Osteopontin, γ\&β-chain fibrinogen, α1-acid glycoprotein 2 et haptoglobin
    • Inflammatory cytokines : INFγ, IL-2, IL-10, IL-4, IL-12p70, IL-6, IL-13, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-17, IL-23, IGF-1, TGFβ1
    • Chemokines: Fractalkine, SDF-1, CX3CL1, MCP-1, CCL3, CCL5
    • BBB integrity markers (pg/mL): S100b, GFAP, Neurofilament light-chain, Neuronal specific enolase, Uch-L1
    • Headache associated markers (pg/mL): Calcitonin Gene Related-Peptide, Glucagon-Like Peptide
    • Hormonal markers (ng/mL): 11β-HSD1, Glucagon-like peptide-1, DHEAS, Leptin, estradiol, and testosterone

    Measured: Change over time before (at inclusion) and 3 months after IIH treatment (follow-up)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Headache severity

    Calculation of the correlation (multivariate regression, Pearson's r) between variations in blood biomarker concentrations (inflammatory, BBB, headache and hormonal) and headache severity as determined by the HIT-6 (6-item questionnaire, scores range from 36 to 78; the higher the score, the greater the impact of headaches on quality of life.).

    The correlation will be defined:

    • The correlation before treatment
    • The correlation after treatment
    • The change over time

    Measured: change over time before (at inclusion) and 3 months after IIH treatment (follow-up)

  2. Body mass index (BMI)

    Calculation of the correlation (multivariate regression, Pearson's r) between the concentration of all blood biomarkers (inflammatory, Blood-Brain Barrier, headache and hormonal) and the Body-Mass-Index (expressed in kg/m² by combining weight and height).

    The correlation will be defined:

    • The correlation before treatment
    • The correlation after treatment
    • The change over time

    Measured: change over time before (at inclusion) and 3 months after IIH treatment (follow-up)

  3. Optic fibre layer (RNF) thickness

    Calculation of the correlation (multivariate regression, Pearson's r) between the variation in concentration of all blood biomarkers (inflammatory, Blood brain barrier, headache and hormonal) and the severity of papilledema, which is quantified by the average thickness (µm) of the optic fibre layer (RNF)

    The correlation will be defined:

    • The correlation before treatment
    • The correlation after treatment
    • The change over time

    Measured: Before (at inclusion) and 3 months after treatment (follow-up)

  4. Transverse sinus stenosis

    Quantify by means of a correlation analysis (linear regression, Pearson's r) whether changes in de degree of traverse sinus stenosis can be an indirect indication of ICP increase. Traverse sinus stenosis is measured on T2* Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging by measuring the dilation of the optic nerve sheath in mm.

    Measured: change over time before (at inclusion) and 3 months after IIH treatment (follow-up)

  5. Cerebral blood flow

    Quantify by means of a multivariate regression analysis (Pearson's r) whether cerebral blood flow characteristics are related to variations in ICP and headache severity over time. The cerebral blood flow is analyzed with arterial spin labeling MRI, the headache severity is evaluated with the HIT-6 questionary (6-item questionnaire, scores range from 36 to 78; the higher the score, the greater the impact of headaches on quality of life.).

    Measured: change over time before (at inclusion) and 3 months after IIH treatment (follow-up)

  6. MRI contrast enhancement

    Evaluate the link between MRI 3DT1 contrast enhancement after gadolinium injection and the biomarkers of blood-brain barrier integrity over time with a linear regression (Pearson's r).

    Measured: change over time before (at inclusion) and 3 months after IIH treatment (follow-up)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2023
  2. Study start27 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion27 Nov 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion27 Mar 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06059703
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL22_0565
Acronym
BEHIND
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
4 Sep 2023
Last updated
28 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Markey KA, Mollan SP, Jensen RH, Sinclair AJ. Understanding idiopathic intracranial hypertension: mechanisms, management, and future directions. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan;15(1):78-91. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00298-7. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

    PubMed 26700907
  • Mollan SP, Aguiar M, Evison F, Frew E, Sinclair AJ. The expanding burden of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Eye (Lond). 2019 Mar;33(3):478-485. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0238-5. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

    PubMed 30356129
  • Riggeal BD, Bruce BB, Saindane AM, Ridha MA, Kelly LP, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Clinical course of idiopathic intracranial hypertension with transverse sinus stenosis. Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3):289-95. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827debd6. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

    PubMed 23269597
  • Toscano S, Lo Fermo S, Reggio E, Chisari CG, Patti F, Zappia M. An update on idiopathic intracranial hypertension in adults: a look at pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and management. J Neurol. 2021 Sep;268(9):3249-3268. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09943-9. Epub 2020 May 27.

    PubMed 32462350
  • Dhungana S, Sharrack B, Woodroofe N. Cytokines and chemokines in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Headache. 2009 Feb;49(2):282-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.001329.x.

    PubMed 19222599
  • Zanello SB, Tadigotla V, Hurley J, Skog J, Stevens B, Calvillo E, Bershad E. Inflammatory gene expression signatures in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: possible implications in microgravity-induced ICP elevation. NPJ Microgravity. 2018 Jan 11;4:1. doi: 10.1038/s41526-017-0036-6. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 29354685
  • Nicholson P, Brinjikji W, Radovanovic I, Hilditch CA, Tsang ACO, Krings T, Mendes Pereira V, Lenck S. Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Apr;11(4):380-385. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014172. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

    PubMed 30166333
  • Fahmy EM, Rashed LA, Mostafa RH, Ismail RS. Role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the pathophysiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurol Scand. 2021 Nov;144(5):509-516. doi: 10.1111/ane.13482. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

    PubMed 34131899
  • Samanci B, Samanci Y, Tuzun E, Altiokka-Uzun G, Ekizoglu E, Icoz S, Sahin E, Kucukali CI, Baykan B. Evidence for potential involvement of pro-inflammatory adipokines in the pathogenesis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Cephalalgia. 2017 May;37(6):525-531. doi: 10.1177/0333102416650705. Epub 2016 May 18.

    PubMed 27193133
  • Hasan-Olive MM, Hansson HA, Enger R, Nagelhus EA, Eide PK. Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2019 Sep 1;78(9):808-818. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlz063.

    PubMed 31393574
  • Eide PK, Eidsvaag VA, Nagelhus EA, Hansson HA. Cortical astrogliosis and increased perivascular aquaporin-4 in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Brain Res. 2016 Aug 1;1644:161-75. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.05.024. Epub 2016 May 14.

    PubMed 27188961
  • Ball AK, Sinclair AJ, Curnow SJ, Tomlinson JW, Burdon MA, Walker EA, Stewart PM, Nightingale PG, Clarke CE, Rauz S. Elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leptin in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH): evidence for hypothalamic leptin resistance? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009 Jun;70(6):863-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03401.x. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

    PubMed 18771566
  • Markey KA, Uldall M, Botfield H, Cato LD, Miah MA, Hassan-Smith G, Jensen RH, Gonzalez AM, Sinclair AJ. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension, hormones, and 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases. J Pain Res. 2016 Apr 19;9:223-32. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S80824. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27186074

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blood punction, Central blood sampling and Intracranial pressure measurement in people with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Federico CAGNAZZO, MD (00334 67 33 75 32, f-cagnazzo@chu-montpellier.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

intracranial pressure (ICP) blood biomarker correlation (time frame: Change over time before (at inclusion) and 3 months after IIH treatment (follow-up)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06059703, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in