CycloplegiaPhase 4NCT06077682
Cycloplegic Refraction in Pediatric Patients With Esotropia
A Phase 4 study testing Cyclopentolate and Tropicamide in people with Cycloplegia and Refractive Errors, run by Islamic Hospital, Jordan at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The primary outcome of this study is to compare cyclopentolate 1% and tropicamide 1% for cycloplegic refractions in pediatric populations with esotropia. This will be a prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT), multi-center, with randomized sequencing of cycloplegic agent; each patient received one… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 16 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cycloplegia, Refractive Errors, Esotropia
- What is being tested?
- Cyclopentolate and Tropicamide
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2023to 1 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 16 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Alignment: subjects with esotropia Age: 3-16 years Brown irides; grade 4 and 5 using iris color classification system developed by Seddon et al Duration: 2 different visits ≥ 1 week apart within 3 months
Who cannot join
- Abnormal red reflex (e.g., media opacity) History of heart or neurological diseases History of developmental delay History of a previous allergy to cycloplegic agents Presence of syndromes (e.g., Down's syndrome) History of intraocular surgery
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
Wejdan Al-Thawabieh, MD contact
2 sites in 2 countries
Qatar1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Hamad Medical Corporation
Doha, 3050
Hashem Abu Serhan
About this study
Official title: Tropicamide Versus Cyclopentolate for Cycloplegic Refraction in Pediatric Patients With Esotropia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The primary outcome of this study is to compare cyclopentolate 1% and tropicamide 1% for cycloplegic refractions in pediatric populations with esotropia. This will be a prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT), multi-center, with randomized sequencing of cycloplegic agent; each patient received one agent at one visit, and the other agent in the next visit (2 different visits ≥ 1 week apart) within 3 months.
Read the detailed description
Many studies have been conducted over the last few decades to assess the need for cycloplegia in assessing refractive errors. Plenty of research on pediatric populations has demonstrated that a lack of cycloplegia may contribute to an overestimation of myopia prevalence or substantial mistakes in estimating the prevalence of emmetropia and hyperopia. (1,2) The amount of refractive error varies by individual, as well as the type of cycloplegic refractive error. (3) As a result, there is no reliable method for adjusting non-cycloplegic refractions to approximate cycloplegic refractions. Consideration should be given to the type of cycloplegic agent to be used, preferred dosing, optimal methods of instillation, indications for use, and potential side effects. Despite the fact that the benefits of a cycloplegic examination are undeniable, there is still some confusion and various practice methods when it comes to cycloplegic exams. (4) Although atropine is the most potent cycloplegic agent currently available in clinical practice, its long duration of action (up to 12 days) and well-known side effects have shifted clinical practice toward cyclopentolate use. Cyclopentolate has been shown to provide effective cycloplegia, even in patients with moderate to severe hyperopia, with a relatively short duration of action (up to 24 hours) and fewer side effects. Thus, since its introduction in 1951, cyclopentolate has largely replaced atropine as the standard of care for pediatric cycloplegic examination. (4,5,6) Nevertheless, numerous adverse effects of cyclopentolate for children have been observed, including dry mouth and skin, tachycardia, fever, hallucinations, delirium, restlessness, seizures, ataxia, acute midbrain hemorrhage, and even death. (7,8,9) Many studies compared cyclopentolate to tropicamide for cycloplegia. (10, 11, 12) Tropicamide, unlike cyclopentolate, is a cycloplegic with a rapid onset and a short duration of action lasting up to 6 hours. In addition, fewer side effects have been reported when compared to cyclopentolate. (3,11) According to the literature, cyclopentolate may cause +0.175 to +0.39 D more hyperopia than tropicamide, which is clinically insignificant. (10,11,13) Furthermore, it has been discovered that there is a strong correlation between the time spent waiting to complete the exam and patient satisfaction levels, so reducing the waiting time clearly increases satisfaction levels. (14, 15) Esotropia is a convergent misalignment of the visual axes. Esotropia can be categorized in a variety of ways, usually based on age of onset or underlying causes: Infantile esotropia or acquired esotropia or accommodative esotropia, either normal accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio or high AC/A ratio or partially accommodative esotropia or Nonaccommodative esotropia, and Sensory esotropia. (16) Prevalence estimates of strabismus range from 0.8% to 6.8% in different populations. In the United States, esotropia and exotropia have similar prevalence rates, whereas in Ireland esotropia has been reported five times more frequently than exotropia, and in Australia esotropia has been reported to be twice as frequent as exotropia. (17) The prevalence of esotropia in children increases with age (e.g., higher prevalence at 4 to 6 years compared with 6 to 11 months), moderate anisometropia, and moderate amounts of hyperopia. (18) The potential benefits of treatment for esotropia include promoting binocular vision and improving visual function in each eye. (19) If binocularity is achieved, the number of surgical procedures over a lifetime and overall cost to society may be reduced. (20) Fusion and stereopsis are necessary for some careers and may be useful in sports such as baseball and activities such as needlepoint and watching 3D movies. (21) The appearance of crossed eyes may reduce employment opportunities because of stigma and bias. (22) In addition, binocular alignment is important for the development of a positive self-image and enhances social interactions by normalizing appearance as well as eye contact. (23) In one study, children aged 5 years and older expressed a negative feeling about dolls that had been altered to be esotropic or exotropic. (24) In another study, elementary school teachers rated personal characteristics of children with esotropia and exotropia more negatively than orthotropic children. (25) In a sample of children enrolled in the Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study, strabismus was associated with a decreased general health-related quality of life in preschool children, based on the parents' proxy reporting. (26) Adequate cycloplegia is necessary for accurate retinoscopy in children because of their increased accommodative tone compared with adults. The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to explore the cycloplegic effect of tropicamide versus cyclopentolate in refracting pediatric subjects with esotropia.
- Conditions
- Cycloplegia, Refractive Errors, Esotropia, Vision Disorders
- Being tested
- Cyclopentolate, Tropicamide
- Keywords
- Vision, refractive error, cycloplegic agent, cycloplegia, esotropia, tropicamide, cyclopentolate
- Medical subject headings
- Refractive Errors, Esotropia, Vision Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CyclopentolateDrug
Also called Cyclogel
Well-known eye drop used for cycloplegic refraction among children.
TropicamideDrug
Also called Mydriacil
Well-known eye drop used for cycloplegic refraction among children.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclopentolate arm | Active comparator | To study the effect of cyclopentolate 1% for cycloplegic refractions in pediatric populations with ET:
Firstly, we instilled an anesthetic drop into patients' eyes. Secondly, 2 drops of cyclopentolate 1% (cyclogel) 5 minutes apart were instilled. Autorefraction was taken at 60 minutes after first drop instillation. Primary outcome: spherical equivalent (SE) of cycloplegic refraction at 60 minutes. Receives: Drug: Cyclopentolate |
| Tropicamide arm | Active comparator | To study the effect of tropicamide 1% for cycloplegic refractions in pediatric populations with ET:
Firstly, we instilled an anesthetic drop into patients' eyes. Secondly, 2 drops of tropicamide 1% (mydriacil) 5 minutes apart were instilled. Autorefraction was taken at 30 minutes after first drop instillation. Primary outcome: spherical equivalent (SE) of cycloplegic refraction at 30 minutes. Receives: Drug: Tropicamide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Spherical equivalent (SE) mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide
To study the SE of each drug and compare the mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide To study the SE of each drug and compare the mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide To study the SE of each drug and compare the mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide To study the SE of each drug and compare the mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide To study the SE mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Amplitude of accommodation
To measure the depth of cycloplegia mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2023
- Study start1 Sep 2023
- Primary completion1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CycloplegiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Islamic Hospital, Jordan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jordan University of Science and Technology, Yarmouk University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hashem Abu Serhan, Hamad Medical Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06077682
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Cycloplegic Refraction & ET
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The results will be shared with the researchers, and the data will be available upon request from the corresponding author.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Tropicamide Versus Cyclopentolate for Cycloplegic Refraction in Pediatric Patients With Esotropia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06077682
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Cycloplegic Refraction & ET
- Conditions
- Cycloplegia, Refractive Errors, Esotropia, Vision Disorders
- Keywords
- Vision, refractive error, cycloplegic agent, cycloplegia, esotropia, tropicamide, cyclopentolate
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Islamic Hospital, JordanUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jordan University of Science and Technology, Yarmouk University
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary outcome of this study is to compare cyclopentolate 1% and tropicamide 1% for cycloplegic refractions in pediatric populations with esotropia. This will be a prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT), multi-center, with randomized sequencing of cycloplegic agent; each patient received one agent at one visit, and the other agent in the next visit (2 different visits ≥ 1 week apart) within 3 months.
Detailed description
Many studies have been conducted over the last few decades to assess the need for cycloplegia in assessing refractive errors. Plenty of research on pediatric populations has demonstrated that a lack of cycloplegia may contribute to an overestimation of myopia prevalence or substantial mistakes in estimating the prevalence of emmetropia and hyperopia. (1,2) The amount of refractive error varies by individual, as well as the type of cycloplegic refractive error. (3) As a result, there is no reliable method for adjusting non-cycloplegic refractions to approximate cycloplegic refractions. Consideration should be given to the type of cycloplegic agent to be used, preferred dosing, optimal methods of instillation, indications for use, and potential side effects. Despite the fact that the benefits of a cycloplegic examination are undeniable, there is still some confusion and various practice methods when it comes to cycloplegic exams. (4) Although atropine is the most potent cycloplegic agent currently available in clinical practice, its long duration of action (up to 12 days) and well-known side effects have shifted clinical practice toward cyclopentolate use. Cyclopentolate has been shown to provide effective cycloplegia, even in patients with moderate to severe hyperopia, with a relatively short duration of action (up to 24 hours) and fewer side effects. Thus, since its introduction in 1951, cyclopentolate has largely replaced atropine as the standard of care for pediatric cycloplegic examination. (4,5,6) Nevertheless, numerous adverse effects of cyclopentolate for children have been observed, including dry mouth and skin, tachycardia, fever, hallucinations, delirium, restlessness, seizures, ataxia, acute midbrain hemorrhage, and even death. (7,8,9) Many studies compared cyclopentolate to tropicamide for cycloplegia. (10, 11, 12) Tropicamide, unlike cyclopentolate, is a cycloplegic with a rapid onset and a short duration of action lasting up to 6 hours. In addition, fewer side effects have been reported when compared to cyclopentolate. (3,11) According to the literature, cyclopentolate may cause +0.175 to +0.39 D more hyperopia than tropicamide, which is clinically insignificant. (10,11,13) Furthermore, it has been discovered that there is a strong correlation between the time spent waiting to complete the exam and patient satisfaction levels, so reducing the waiting time clearly increases satisfaction levels. (14, 15) Esotropia is a convergent misalignment of the visual axes. Esotropia can be categorized in a variety of ways, usually based on age of onset or underlying causes: Infantile esotropia or acquired esotropia or accommodative esotropia, either normal accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio or high AC/A ratio or partially accommodative esotropia or Nonaccommodative esotropia, and Sensory esotropia. (16) Prevalence estimates of strabismus range from 0.8% to 6.8% in different populations. In the United States, esotropia and exotropia have similar prevalence rates, whereas in Ireland esotropia has been reported five times more frequently than exotropia, and in Australia esotropia has been reported to be twice as frequent as exotropia. (17) The prevalence of esotropia in children increases with age (e.g., higher prevalence at 4 to 6 years compared with 6 to 11 months), moderate anisometropia, and moderate amounts of hyperopia. (18) The potential benefits of treatment for esotropia include promoting binocular vision and improving visual function in each eye. (19) If binocularity is achieved, the number of surgical procedures over a lifetime and overall cost to society may be reduced. (20) Fusion and stereopsis are necessary for some careers and may be useful in sports such as baseball and activities such as needlepoint and watching 3D movies. (21) The appearance of crossed eyes may reduce employment opportunities because of stigma and bias. (22) In addition, binocular alignment is important for the development of a positive self-image and enhances social interactions by normalizing appearance as well as eye contact. (23) In one study, children aged 5 years and older expressed a negative feeling about dolls that had been altered to be esotropic or exotropic. (24) In another study, elementary school teachers rated personal characteristics of children with esotropia and exotropia more negatively than orthotropic children. (25) In a sample of children enrolled in the Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study, strabismus was associated with a decreased general health-related quality of life in preschool children, based on the parents' proxy reporting. (26) Adequate cycloplegia is necessary for accurate retinoscopy in children because of their increased accommodative tone compared with adults. The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to explore the cycloplegic effect of tropicamide versus cyclopentolate in refracting pediatric subjects with esotropia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclopentolate arm | Active comparator | Drug: CyclopentolateTo study the effect of cyclopentolate 1% for cycloplegic refractions in pediatric populations with ET: Firstly, we instilled an anesthetic drop into patients' eyes. Secondly, 2 drops of cyclopentolate 1% (cyclogel) 5 minutes apart were instilled. Autorefraction was taken at 60 minutes after first drop instillation. Primary outcome: spherical equivalent (SE) of cycloplegic refraction at 60 minutes. |
| Tropicamide arm | Active comparator | Drug: TropicamideTo study the effect of tropicamide 1% for cycloplegic refractions in pediatric populations with ET: Firstly, we instilled an anesthetic drop into patients' eyes. Secondly, 2 drops of tropicamide 1% (mydriacil) 5 minutes apart were instilled. Autorefraction was taken at 30 minutes after first drop instillation. Primary outcome: spherical equivalent (SE) of cycloplegic refraction at 30 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Alignment: subjects with esotropia Age: 3-16 years Brown irides; grade 4 and 5 using iris color classification system developed by Seddon et al Duration: 2 different visits ≥ 1 week apart within 3 months
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Abnormal red reflex (e.g., media opacity) History of heart or neurological diseases History of developmental delay History of a previous allergy to cycloplegic agents Presence of syndromes (e.g., Down's syndrome) History of intraocular surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CyclopentolateAlso: CyclogelWell-known eye drop used for cycloplegic refraction among children. | Drug | Cyclopentolate arm |
| TropicamideAlso: MydriacilWell-known eye drop used for cycloplegic refraction among children. | Drug | Tropicamide arm |
Primary outcome
Spherical equivalent (SE) mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide
Time frame: 3 months
To study the SE of each drug and compare the mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide To study the SE of each drug and compare the mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide To study the SE of each drug and compare the mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide To study the SE of each drug and compare the mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide To study the SE mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide
1 secondary outcome
Amplitude of accommodation
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The results will be shared with the researchers, and the data will be available upon request from the corresponding author.
Related trials for Cycloplegia
Recruiting
The Objective of This Study is to Evaluate the Perfomance of a Photorefraction Device for Screening Ametropia in Children. Eligible Participants Will Undergo Multiple Refractive Error Measurements, Visual Acuity and Strabismus Assessments During a Single Evaluation Visit.
Ametropia, Myopia; Refractive Error
Active, not recruiting
Assessing Patient Comfort, Anxiety, and Satisfaction During CR Comparing Conventional Drops With ROC
Cycloplegic Paralysis of Accommodation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wejdan Al-Thawabieh, MD contact
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Cyclopentolate and Tropicamide in people with Cycloplegia and Refractive Errors, run by Islamic Hospital, Jordan at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Jordan, Qatar. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hashem Abu Serhan, MBBS (+974-77912335, hashemabusarhan@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Spherical equivalent (SE) mean difference between cyclopentolate and tropicamide (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2023.