AzTrials
AzTrials

AnxietyNCT06078124

Sibling-Support for Adolescent Girls (SSAGE)

A study testing Sibling Support for Adolescent Girls in Emergencies in people with Anxiety and Depression, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in Colombia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Forcibly displaced adolescents face increased risks for mental illness and distress, with adolescent girls disproportionately affected in part due to the heightened gender inequity that often accompanies forced displacement. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 19 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Anxiety, Depression, Mental Illness
What is being tested?
Sibling Support for Adolescent Girls in Emergencies
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
186 participants
Where
1 siteColombia
Study dates
5 Aug 2024to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 19 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Live with a male and female caregiver and an adolescent male sibling or relative
  • Immigrated to Colombia within the last year
  • Are available, along with their family members, to participate in the SSAGE intervention for three months
  • Are available to participate in survey questionnaires immediately before and one month after the intervention

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Colombia1 site
  • Los Andes University

    Bogotá

Other trials in Colombia

About this study

Official title: Sibling-Support for Adolescent Girls (SSAGE): A Whole-family, Gender Transformative Approach to Preventing Mental Illness Among Forcibly Displaced Adolescent Girls

Forcibly displaced adolescents face increased risks for mental illness and distress, with adolescent girls disproportionately affected in part due to the heightened gender inequity that often accompanies forced displacement. Although the family unit has the potential to prevent mental illness and promote healthy development in adolescents, few family interventions have employed a gender transformative approach or included male siblings in an effort to maximize benefits for adolescent girls. Therefore, the investigators propose to assess an innovative whole-family and gender transformative intervention-Sibling Support for Adolescent Girls in Emergencies (SSAGE)-to prevent mental health disorders among adolescent girls in Colombia who were recently and forcibly displaced from Venezuela. The proposed R34 study will adapt the SSAGE curriculum through human-centered design with a range of stakeholders, including Venezuelan refugees, Colombian returnees and relevant civil society organizations. The proposed study will then employ a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pilot randomized control trial (RCT) to test the program's effectiveness and mechanistic pathways as well as to explore determinants of implementation in order to establish the feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of SSAGE. To address these aims, the investigators will enroll 180 recently arrived, forcibly displaced adolescent girls in an RCT and examine the program's effectiveness on the prevention of mental illness (through reduction in anxiety, depression, interpersonal sensitivity, and somatization symptoms) one-month post-intervention. The investigators will use contextually adapted and piloted measures to collect additional data on the hypothesized mechanistic pathways, including family attachment, gender equitable family functioning, self-esteem, and coping strategies. The implementation evaluation will employ mixed methods to assess the program's feasibility, acceptability, fidelity and barriers and facilitators to successful implementation. Potential findings can support humanitarian program implementation, as well as inform policy to support adolescent girls' mental health and to prevent the myriad disorders that can arise as a result of exposure to displacement, conflict, and inequitable gender norms in their households and communities.

Being tested
Sibling Support for Adolescent Girls in Emergencies
Keywords
Mental illness, Adolescent girls, Forcibly displaced populations, Randomized-controlled trial, Implementation science, Family functioning, Gender inequity
Medical subject headings
Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Mental Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sibling Support for Adolescent Girls in EmergenciesBehavioural

    Also called SSAGE

    The Sibling Support for Adolescent Girls in Emergencies (SSAGE) intervention is a gender-transformative, 12-week program utilizing a "whole family approach" wherein an adolescent girl, her male sibling, and a male and female caregiver participate in sessions that are age- and gender-specific and combined with family-wide discussions of session learnings. The sessions are interactive, engaging, and promote self-reflection and discussion on topics such as power, gender, interpersonal communication, and healthy relationships. Given the whole-family approach, SSAGE addresses intersections between spousal relationships, caregiver-child relationships, and relationships between siblings, as they pertain to supporting the mental health and psychosocial well-being of adolescent girls.

Study groups in NCT06078124
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sibling Support for Adolescent Girls in Emergencies (SSAGE)ExperimentalParticipants in this arm will participate in the Sibling Support for Adolescent Girls in Emergencies (SSAGE) intervention, along with three family members, for twelve weeks
Receives: Behavioral: Sibling Support for Adolescent Girls in Emergencies
Control armNo interventionCare as usual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom

    This measure initially includes 25 items and assesses the presence and severity of several psychiatric symptom domains in children and adolescents over the last two weeks. 19 of the items are rated on a 5-point scale (0=none/never; 1=slight/rare; 2=mild/several days; 3=moderate/more than half the days; and 4=severe/almost daily). Questions on suicide ideation, suicide attempts, and substance use are rated on a 2-point scale of yes/no. The included symptoms represent 12 domains of mental disorders: somatic symptoms, sleep problems, inattention, depression, anger/irritability (measured together), mania, anxiety, psychosis, repetitive thoughts and behaviors, substance use, and suicide ideation/attempts. Generally, a respondent is flagged as requiring further inquiry for a given domain if they answered '2' or higher on at least one of the symptoms in each respective domain. As such, this outcome is operationalized as 12 dichotomous variables reflecting the 12 domains.

    Measured: Up to 2 weeks following the end of the 12 week intervention

  2. Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)-25

    This scale assesses symptoms of depression and anxiety over the past two weeks in children and adolescents using 25 items. Items are scored on a 4-point scale (0-never; 1-sometimes; 2-often; and 3-always) for the last two weeks. The sum of all item scores are then converted into t-scores based on gender and age. Ranges are as follows: t-score<65 is normal range; >=65 and <=69 is borderline clinical; and >=70 is clinical range.

    Measured: Up to 2 weeks following the end of the 12 week intervention

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Family Attachment and Changeability Index (FACI-8) (Modified)

    We employed a modified version of the FACI8. The FACI8 is traditionally a 16-item scale where each item is scored using a 4-point Likert scale of how frequently the event occurs in the last 2 weeks (1-Never; 2-Sometimes; 3-Most of the time; 4-Always). During baseline training, it was determined that four of the items in the traditional FACI8 were not reliable or valid in our study setting. As such, a 12-item version was employed. The modified FACI8 consists of two subscales: Attachment and Changeability. The attachment subscale includes 7 items and the changeability subscale comprises 5 items. Subscale scores are created by summing the relevant item responses. Unfortunately, there was a tech issue with one of the changeability items at endline and data were not collected for that item. As such, we removed that item from the changeability subscale to preserve comparability with baseline. The final score for attachment can be 7-28 and changeability from 4-16. Higher scores are better.

    Measured: Up to 2 weeks following the end of the 12 week intervention

  2. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

    The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is a 10-item scale that measures positive and negative feelings about the self to create a measure of overall self-worth. Items are scored using a 4-point Likert scale signaling level of agreement with each statement, from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Five items are reverse coded. The final score can take a value from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater self-esteem. The scale asks about the last two weeks and the measure was taken up to 2 weeks following the end of the 12 week intervention.

    Measured: Up to 2 weeks following the end of the 12 week intervention

  3. Kidcope

    Kidcope is a 15-item checklist designed to measure cognitive and behavioural coping in children and adolescents. It measures the frequency of 15 coping strategies, including: problem-solving, distraction, social support, social withdrawal, cognitive restructuring, self-criticism, blaming others, emotional expression, wishful thinking and resignation. Items rare scored on a 4-point scale (0 = "Not at all" to 3 = "Almost all the time"). The final measure is operationalized as 15 dichotomous indicators, where a '1' signals the participant used that coping strategy at least sometimes in the last two weeks for a stressor and a '0' means the participant never used the coping mechanism in the last two weeks.

    Measured: A stressor that occurred in the last two weeks; measurement taken up to 2 weeks following the end of the 12 week intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Oct 2023
  2. Study start5 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pilot randomized-controlled trial with one treatment arm and one control arm.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
186 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06078124
Sponsor's protocol ID
R34MH134078-01
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
28 Sep 2023
Last updated
21 Nov 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified questionnaire data will be shared beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication with qualified researchers who have a research question appropriate to the data and of potential benefit to forcibly displaced adolescent girls. Deidentified data will only be provided in aggregate after completion of a data use agreement. Requests should be directed to lindsaystark@wustl.edu. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Sibling Support for Adolescent Girls in Emergencies in people with Anxiety and Depression, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in Colombia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Colombia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jul 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom (time frame: Up to 2 weeks following the end of the 12 week intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in