AzTrials
AzTrials

Achilles TendinopathyNCT06080334

Effectiveness of Dry Needling of the Gastrocnemius Muscle VS Electrolysis in Subjects With Achilles Tendinopathy

A study testing Dry needling and Electrolysis in people with Achilles Tendinopathy and Pain, run by Universidad Católica de Ávila at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Achilles tendinopathy is the injury that primarily occurs in athletes and people who engage in repetitive activities that involve the calf muscles, such as running, jumping, and sudden acceleration and deceleration movements. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Achilles Tendinopathy, Pain
What is being tested?
Dry needling and Electrolysis
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 Dec 2023to 1 Sep 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signing of informed consent both to participate in the study and to undergo invasive in the study, as well as to undergo invasive physiotherapy techniques. physiotherapy techniques.
  • Presence of symptoms (swelling or pain) for at least 3 months.
  • Positive Achilles tendon palpation test.
  • Males and females over 18 years of age.
  • Presence of MMP in the gastrocnemius muscle, meeting at least three of the following criteria diagnostic criteria described by Travell and Simons:
  • Presence of palpable tight band.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Local pain on pressure at the nodule of the tense band.
  • Recognition by the patient as his usual pain after mechanical after mechanical stimulation of the sensitive nodule.
  • Limitation of range of motion.

Who cannot join

  • Any related acute or chronic musculoskeletal disease that may related chronic musculoskeletal disease, which may affect the results of the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Jorge Velázquez Saornil

    Ávila, 05005

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Dry Needling of the Gastrocnemius Muscle vs. Electrolysis in Subjects With Achilles Tendinopathy: a Randomised Single-blind Clinical Trial

Achilles tendinopathy is the injury that primarily occurs in athletes and people who engage in repetitive activities that involve the calf muscles, such as running, jumping, and sudden acceleration and deceleration movements. To observe the effectiveness of dry needling in the PGM of the gastrocnemius muscle, in the short and medium term, on the intensity of pain in gastrocnemius muscle, in the short and medium term, on pain intensity in patients with patients with Achilles tendinopathy, compared to the application of ultrasound-guided percutaneous electrolysis on the tendon.

Being tested
Dry needling, Electrolysis
Keywords
achilles tendon, electrolysis, tendinopathy
Medical subject headings
Pain, Tendinopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dry needlingDevice

    Dry needling using the Hong technique on the most hyperalgesic trigger point in the gastrocnemius muscle.

  • ElectrolysisDevice

    Electrolysis on the Achilles tendon using ultrasound-guided technique.

Study groups in NCT06080334
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dry needling+eccentric exercisesExperimentalApplication of dry needling on the hyperalgesic trigger points of the gastrocnemius muscle and subsequent inclusion of eccentric exercises.
Receives: Device: Dry needling
Electrolysis+eccentric exercisesExperimentalApplication of electrolysis to the Achilles tendon and subsequent inclusion of eccentric exercises.
Receives: Device: Electrolysis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain intensity.

    Measurement of pain intensity using the VAS scale (0 minimum pain, 10 maximum bearable pain).

    Measured: 5 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Pressure pain threshold

    Pressure pain threshold measured by algometer over the most hyperalgesic point on the Achilles tendon measured in Newtons.

    Measured: 5 weeks

  2. Range of movement

    Measurement of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measured by digital goniometer.

    Measured: 5 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Oct 2023
  2. Study start1 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2024
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06080334
Sponsor's protocol ID
06/10/2023
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
6 Oct 2023
Last updated
19 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Zunko H, Vauhnik R. Reliability of the weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measurement using a smartphone goniometer application. PeerJ. 2021 Sep 22;9:e11977. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11977. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34616594
  • Kedia M, Williams M, Jain L, Barron M, Bird N, Blackwell B, Richardson DR, Ishikawa S, Murphy GA. The effects of conventional physical therapy and eccentric strengthening for insertional achilles tendinopathy. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Aug;9(4):488-97.

    PubMed 25133077
  • Lucena-Anton D, Luque-Moreno C, Valencia-Medero J, Garcia-Munoz C, Moral-Munoz JA. Effectiveness of Dry Needling of Myofascial Trigger Points in the Triceps Surae Muscles: Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 24;10(10):1862. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101862.

    PubMed 36292308
  • Martin-Sacristan L, Calvo-Lobo C, Pecos-Martin D, Fernandez-Carnero J, Alonso-Perez JL. Dry needling in active or latent trigger point in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 24;12(1):3188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07063-0.

    PubMed 35210467
  • McDevitt AW, Snodgrass SJ, Cleland JA, Leibold MBR, Krause LA, Mintken PE. Treatment of individuals with chronic bicipital tendinopathy using dry needling, eccentric-concentric exercise and stretching; a case series. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020 Mar;36(3):397-407. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1488023. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

    PubMed 29932797
  • Asensio-Olea L, Leiros-Rodriguez R, Marques-Sanchez MP, de Carvalho FO, Maciel LYS. Efficacy of percutaneous electrolysis for the treatment of tendinopathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2023 Jun;37(6):747-759. doi: 10.1177/02692155221144272. Epub 2022 Dec 30.

    PubMed 36583575

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dry needling and Electrolysis in people with Achilles Tendinopathy and Pain, run by Universidad Católica de Ávila at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain intensity. (time frame: 5 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06080334, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in