ExpectationsNCT06080997
Patients' Expectations Before Spinal Surgery
An observational study of Expectations and Surgery, run by Zealand University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
With this study the investigators want to perform a prospective observational cohort study at Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark. The purpose of this study is twofold: 1. to investigate how expectations predict patients' pain, rehabilitation and quality of life after spinal surgery. 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Expectations, Surgery, Pain
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2024to 30 Nov 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients at Zealand University Hospital, undergoing spinal surgery during 1 year, will be invited to participate in the study.
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. Patients able to read and understand Danish.
Who cannot join
- Patients with cognitive deficits, such as dementia. Patients with alcohol and drug dependence.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Zealand University Hospital
Køge, Region Sjælland, 4600
Josephine Zachodnik, RN, +4547326316, jzc@regionsjaelland.dk
Louise Linding, RN, +4547326316
About this study
Official title: Patients' Expectations Before, and Their Experiences After Spinal Surgery, Regarding Pain, Rehabilitation and Quality of Life
With this study the investigators want to perform a prospective observational cohort study at Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.
The purpose of this study is twofold:
- to investigate how expectations predict patients' pain, rehabilitation and quality of life after spinal surgery.
- to explore the patients' expectations before, and their experiences after, spinal surgery regarding pain, rehabilitation and quality of life.
Read the detailed description
Background Surgery can be an overwhelming and often life-changing experience for patients. To mitigate this experience a patient-centered approach can be beneficial. Patient-centered care is defined as providing care that is "respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs and values, and which ensures that patient values guide all clinical decisions". Patient-centeredness should be considered in discussions about the value of surgical treatment for the patient and the expectations regarding the process of postoperative rehabilitation, especially considering the patient's definition of a successful outcome. The meaning of rehabilitation may vary between stakeholders involved in surgery, including patients, surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses, and hospital administrators. Studies addressing strategies to improve rehabilitation, such as minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery pathways, commonly focus on measures such as complication rates, gastrointestinal activity, physical function, and duration of hospital stay. These parameters are mostly relevant to clinicians and administrators, but they do not reflect the complexity of the rehabilitation process or include the patient's perspective and expectations.
In musculoskeletal practice, patients' expectations have been reported as a valuable predictor for treatment outcomes in patients with acute and chronic pain. Patients with higher expectations regarding the treatment report better outcomes than those with lower expectations. Previous studies have investigated the relationship between expectations and postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing spinal surgery, and some evidence suggests patients' expectations also impact rehabilitation after surgery.
Patients undergoing spinal surgery usually suffer from moderate to severe pain during the perioperative and postoperative period, which is associated with developing persistent pain 8 and compromises patients' quality of life.
Lumbar disc herniation is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases which, in some cases, can compromise patients' quality of life, and the most common operations performed on the spine. A previous study has shown that persistent pain after surgery for lumbar disc herniation is negatively associated with psychological and physical well-being, and the overall quality of life is decreased.
This study hypothesize that interviewing patients in a semi-structured manner would give unique perspectives on what is important to patients, as opposed to what is important to researchers. Further, the study hypothesize that patients' preoperative expectations for spinal surgery can affect postoperative rehabilitation. Gaining an in-depth understanding of the process of recovery from the patient´s perspective can, ultimately, guide patient-centered care and future research.
- Conditions
- Expectations, Surgery, Pain, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- Expectations, Pain, Rehabilitation, Quality of life
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal surgery | No intervention will take place Recruiting autumn 2023 until autumn 2024. All patients at Zealand University Hospital, who meet the inclusion criteria, undergoing spinal surgery during 1 year, will be invited to participate in the quantitative part of the study. We estimate that 300 patients will be eligible for the quantitative part. For the qualitative part, we will include 10 - 15 patients undergoing spinal surgery. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Expectations
Expectations measured by Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX Q) pre-operatively and 3 month postoperatively
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025
Patients Expectations
Expectations measured by a semi-structured interview pre-operatively
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025
Secondary outcomes (3)
Patients pain intensity
Pain level measured by Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) pre-operatively and 3 month post- operatively
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025
Patients functional level
Functional level measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) pre-operatively and 3 month post-operatively
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025
Quality of life score
Quality of life measured by WHO Quality of Life - BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) pre-opertively and 3 month post-operatively
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Oct 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2024
- Primary completion30 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ExpectationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zealand University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Josephine Zachodnik, Zealand University Hospital
- Investigators
- Anja Geisler, Study director, Zealand University Hospital Koege
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06080997
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EXP - jzc - 2023
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rajabiyazdi F, Alam R, Pal A, Montanez J, Law S, Pecorelli N, Watanabe Y, Chiavegato LD, Falconi M, Hirano S, Mayo NE, Lee L, Feldman LS, Fiore JF Jr. Understanding the Meaning of Recovery to Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):758-765. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1557.
PubMed 33978692Lee L, Tran T, Mayo NE, Carli F, Feldman LS. What does it really mean to "recover" from an operation? Surgery. 2014 Feb;155(2):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 12. No abstract available.
PubMed 24331759Mohamed Mohamed WJ, Joseph L, Canby G, Paungmali A, Sitilertpisan P, Pirunsan U. Are patient expectations associated with treatment outcomes in individuals with chronic low back pain? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Nov;74(11):e13680. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13680. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
PubMed 33166045Krauss P, Sonnleitner C, Reinartz F, Meyer B, Meyer HS. Patient-Reported Expectations, Outcome and Satisfaction in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Stabilization Surgery: A Prospective Study.Surgeries 2020; 1: 63-76.
Werner MU, Mjobo HN, Nielsen PR, Rudin A. Prediction of postoperative pain: a systematic review of predictive experimental pain studies. Anesthesiology. 2010 Jun;112(6):1494-502. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181dcd5a0.
PubMed 20460988Frisaldi E, Shaibani A, Benedetti F. Why We should Assess Patients' Expectations in Clinical Trials. Pain Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):107-110. doi: 10.1007/s40122-017-0071-8. Epub 2017 May 5.
PubMed 28477082Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):934-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3.
PubMed 23392233Gulur P, Nelli A. Persistent postoperative pain: mechanisms and modulators. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Oct;32(5):668-673. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000770.
PubMed 31343465Papadopoulos T, Abrahim A, Sergelidis D, Bitchava K. Original article Ερευνητική. 2011; 2: 119-23.
Heider D, Kitze K, Zieger M, Riedel-Heller SG, Angermeyer MC. Health-related quality of life in patients after lumbar disc surgery: a longitudinal observational study. Qual Life Res. 2007 Nov;16(9):1453-60. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9255-8. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
PubMed 17849238Kong H, West S. WMA DECLARATION OF HELSINKI - ETHICAL PRINCIPLES FOR Scienti c Requirements and Research Protocols. 2013; 29-32.
Alberts J, Lowe B, Glahn MA, Petrie K, Laferton J, Nestoriuc Y, Shedden-Mora M. Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews. BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e036169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036169.
PubMed 32819942Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
PubMed 14769454
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patients' Expectations Before, and Their Experiences After Spinal Surgery, Regarding Pain, Rehabilitation and Quality of Life
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06080997
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EXP - jzc - 2023
- Conditions
- Expectations, Surgery, Pain, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- Expectations, Pain, Rehabilitation, Quality of life
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Zealand University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
With this study the investigators want to perform a prospective observational cohort study at Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.
The purpose of this study is twofold:
- to investigate how expectations predict patients' pain, rehabilitation and quality of life after spinal surgery.
- to explore the patients' expectations before, and their experiences after, spinal surgery regarding pain, rehabilitation and quality of life.
Detailed description
Background Surgery can be an overwhelming and often life-changing experience for patients. To mitigate this experience a patient-centered approach can be beneficial. Patient-centered care is defined as providing care that is "respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs and values, and which ensures that patient values guide all clinical decisions". Patient-centeredness should be considered in discussions about the value of surgical treatment for the patient and the expectations regarding the process of postoperative rehabilitation, especially considering the patient's definition of a successful outcome. The meaning of rehabilitation may vary between stakeholders involved in surgery, including patients, surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses, and hospital administrators. Studies addressing strategies to improve rehabilitation, such as minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery pathways, commonly focus on measures such as complication rates, gastrointestinal activity, physical function, and duration of hospital stay. These parameters are mostly relevant to clinicians and administrators, but they do not reflect the complexity of the rehabilitation process or include the patient's perspective and expectations.
In musculoskeletal practice, patients' expectations have been reported as a valuable predictor for treatment outcomes in patients with acute and chronic pain. Patients with higher expectations regarding the treatment report better outcomes than those with lower expectations. Previous studies have investigated the relationship between expectations and postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing spinal surgery, and some evidence suggests patients' expectations also impact rehabilitation after surgery.
Patients undergoing spinal surgery usually suffer from moderate to severe pain during the perioperative and postoperative period, which is associated with developing persistent pain 8 and compromises patients' quality of life.
Lumbar disc herniation is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases which, in some cases, can compromise patients' quality of life, and the most common operations performed on the spine. A previous study has shown that persistent pain after surgery for lumbar disc herniation is negatively associated with psychological and physical well-being, and the overall quality of life is decreased.
This study hypothesize that interviewing patients in a semi-structured manner would give unique perspectives on what is important to patients, as opposed to what is important to researchers. Further, the study hypothesize that patients' preoperative expectations for spinal surgery can affect postoperative rehabilitation. Gaining an in-depth understanding of the process of recovery from the patient´s perspective can, ultimately, guide patient-centered care and future research.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal surgery | – | –No intervention will take place Recruiting autumn 2023 until autumn 2024. All patients at Zealand University Hospital, who meet the inclusion criteria, undergoing spinal surgery during 1 year, will be invited to participate in the quantitative part of the study. We estimate that 300 patients will be eligible for the quantitative part. For the qualitative part, we will include 10 - 15 patients undergoing spinal surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients at Zealand University Hospital, undergoing spinal surgery during 1 year, will be invited to participate in the study.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. Patients able to read and understand Danish.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with cognitive deficits, such as dementia. Patients with alcohol and drug dependence.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Expectations
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025
Expectations measured by Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX Q) pre-operatively and 3 month postoperatively
Patients Expectations
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025
Expectations measured by a semi-structured interview pre-operatively
3 secondary outcomes
Patients pain intensity
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025
Patients functional level
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025
Quality of life score
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2025.
- Background: PubMed 33978692Rajabiyazdi F, Alam R, Pal A, Montanez J, Law S, Pecorelli N, Watanabe Y, Chiavegato LD, Falconi M, Hirano S, Mayo NE, Lee L, Feldman LS, Fiore JF Jr. Understanding the Meaning of Recovery to Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):758-765. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1557.
- Background: PubMed 24331759Lee L, Tran T, Mayo NE, Carli F, Feldman LS. What does it really mean to "recover" from an operation? Surgery. 2014 Feb;155(2):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 12. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33166045Mohamed Mohamed WJ, Joseph L, Canby G, Paungmali A, Sitilertpisan P, Pirunsan U. Are patient expectations associated with treatment outcomes in individuals with chronic low back pain? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Nov;74(11):e13680. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13680. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
- BackgroundKrauss P, Sonnleitner C, Reinartz F, Meyer B, Meyer HS. Patient-Reported Expectations, Outcome and Satisfaction in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Stabilization Surgery: A Prospective Study.Surgeries 2020; 1: 63-76.
- Background: PubMed 20460988Werner MU, Mjobo HN, Nielsen PR, Rudin A. Prediction of postoperative pain: a systematic review of predictive experimental pain studies. Anesthesiology. 2010 Jun;112(6):1494-502. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181dcd5a0.
- Background: PubMed 28477082Frisaldi E, Shaibani A, Benedetti F. Why We should Assess Patients' Expectations in Clinical Trials. Pain Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):107-110. doi: 10.1007/s40122-017-0071-8. Epub 2017 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 23392233Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):934-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3.
- Background: PubMed 31343465Gulur P, Nelli A. Persistent postoperative pain: mechanisms and modulators. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Oct;32(5):668-673. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000770.
- BackgroundPapadopoulos T, Abrahim A, Sergelidis D, Bitchava K. Original article Ερευνητική. 2011; 2: 119-23.
- Background: PubMed 17849238Heider D, Kitze K, Zieger M, Riedel-Heller SG, Angermeyer MC. Health-related quality of life in patients after lumbar disc surgery: a longitudinal observational study. Qual Life Res. 2007 Nov;16(9):1453-60. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9255-8. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
- BackgroundKong H, West S. WMA DECLARATION OF HELSINKI - ETHICAL PRINCIPLES FOR Scienti c Requirements and Research Protocols. 2013; 29-32.
- Background: PubMed 32819942Alberts J, Lowe B, Glahn MA, Petrie K, Laferton J, Nestoriuc Y, Shedden-Mora M. Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews. BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e036169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036169.
Related trials for Expectations
Recruiting
Neural Mechanisms of Interpersonal Expectations on Negative Affect
Negative Affectivity, Non-invasive Brain Stimulation
RecruitingObservational study
Physical Therapy Program and Treatment Expectations in Knee Osteoarthritis
Gonarthrosis; Primary, Physical Therapy
Not yet recruiting
Positive Expectation Effects on Early Emotional Processing
Positive Expectations
RecruitingObservational study
Maternal Expectations on Labor Analgesia and Risk of Postpartum Depression: An Observational Study
Postpartum Depression (PPD), Labor Analgesia
Not yet recruiting
Expectation Effects on Emotional Processing
Expectation Effects on Emotional Processing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Anja Geisler study director
Zealand University Hospital Koege
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Expectations and Surgery, run by Zealand University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Josephine Zachodnik (+45 47326316, jzc@regionsjaelland.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Expectations (time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed and presented 2025). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06080997, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.