AzTrials
AzTrials

Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3ICONIC-TOTALNCT06095102

A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Plaque Psoriasis Involving Special Areas (Scalp, Genital, and/or Palms of the Hands and the Soles of the Feet)

A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 90 sites in 11 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to see how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with plaque psoriasis affecting special areas (scalp, genital, and/or palms of the hands and the soles of the feet). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Plaque Psoriasis
What is being tested?
JNJ-77242113
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
311 participants
Where
90 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
12 Oct 2023to 17 Feb 2027
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
  • Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
  • Need to meet criteria: Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)1 percent (%) at screening and baseline, and investigator global assessment (IGA) (overall) >=2 at screening and baseline and at least one of the following: scalp-specific investigator global assessment (ss-IGA) score >=3 at screening and baseline, and/or static physician's global assessment of genitalia (sPGA-G) >=3 at screening and baseline, and/or physician's global assessment of hands and feet (hf-PGA) score >=3 at screening and baseline
  • Failed to respond to at least 1 topical therapy (example, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and/or vitamin D analogs) used for treatment of psoriasis
  • Confirmation of plaque psoriasis in a non-special area (example, areas excluding scalp, genital, palmoplantar) at screening and baseline

Who cannot join

  • Nonplaque form of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Dermatoses other than plaque psoriasis (such as contact dermatitis) or palmoplantar pustulosis of the palmoplantar area (if hf-PGA >=3 at baseline)
  • Current drug-induced psoriasis (example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
  • A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113 or its excipients

Trial locations and contacts

90 sites in 11 countries.

90 sites in 11 countries

United States28 sites
  • Hamilton Research LLC

    Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022

  • Arlington Research Center, Inc.

    Arlington, Texas, 76011

  • Allcutis Research 1

    Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915

  • Optima Research

    Boardman, Ohio, 44512

  • Cope Family Medicine - Ogden Clinic

    Bountiful, Utah, 84010

  • Schweiger Dermatology Group

    East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520

  • California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute

    Encinitas, California, 92024

  • Hamzavi Dermatology

    Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059

  • Johnson Dermatology

    Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72916

  • Center for Clinical Studies 1

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250

  • Dermatology and Advanced Aesthetics

    Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70605

  • Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC

    Mill Creek, Washington, 98012

  • Minnesota Clinical Study Center

    New Brighton, Minnesota, 55112

  • Skin Specialists

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68144

  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research

    Pflugerville, Texas, 78660

  • Paddington Testing Co, Inc.

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103

  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Indiana Clinical Trial Center

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Oregon Dermatology and Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Arlington Dermatology

    Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008

  • MediSearch Clinical Trials

    Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64506

  • Progressive Clinical Research

    San Antonio, Texas, 78213

  • Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Center for Dermatology and Plastic Surgery

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260

  • Forcare Clinical Research Inc

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Center for Clinical Studies

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Dundee Dermatology

    West Dundee, Illinois, 60118

Other trials in United States

Poland13 sites
  • Osteo-Medic s.c A. Racewicz, J Supronik

    Bialystok, 15-351

  • Specderm Poznanska sp j

    Bialystok, 15-375

  • Centrum Medyczne dr Rajzer Sp z o o

    Krakow, 30 438

  • Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna

    Krakow, 30-002

  • Centrum Medyczne Promed

    Krakow, 31-411

  • Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o

    Lodz, 90-265

  • Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C

    Osielsko, 86031

  • SOLUMED Centrum Medyczne

    Poznan, 60 529

  • Clinical Research Center sp z o o MEDIC R s k

    Poznan, 61 731

  • Dorota Bystrzanowska High-Med. Przychodnia Specjalistyczna

    Warsaw, 01 817

  • Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia

    Warsaw, 02 953

  • Wro Medica

    Wroclaw, 51 685

  • Centrum Medyczne Oporow

    Wroclaw, 52 416

Other trials in Poland

Germany9 sites
  • ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH

    Berlin, 10789

  • CRS Clinical Research Services Berlin GmbH

    Berlin, 13627

  • Niesmann & Othlinghaus GbR

    Bochum, 44793

  • Rosenpark Research GmbH

    Darmstadt, 64283

  • Medizinische Fakultaet Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universitaet Dresden

    Dresden, 01307

  • Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt am Main, 60590

  • Dermatologikum Hamburg Gmbh

    Hamburg, 20354

  • Klinische Forschung Schwerin GmbH

    Schwerin, 19055

  • Hautarztpraxis 2

    Witten, 58453

Other trials in Germany

Spain8 sites
  • Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol

    Badalona, 08916

  • Hosp. Del Mar

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Hosp. Sant Joan de Deu

    Esplugues de Llobregat, 08950

  • Hosp. Univ. San Cecilio

    Granada, 18016

  • Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, 28041

  • Hosp. de Manises

    Manises, 46940

  • Hosp. Virgen Macarena

    Seville, 41009

  • Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

Canada7 sites
  • Alberta DermaSurgery Centre

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C3

  • Lynderm Research Inc.

    Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X3

  • Innovaderm Research Inc.

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1

  • Skin Centre for Dermatology

    Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 5K2

  • Centre De Recherche Dermatologique Du Quebec Metropolitain

    Québec, Quebec, G2G 2R1

  • York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre

    Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B1L1

  • Skinsense Medical Research

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 2C1

Other trials in Canada

Hungary6 sites
  • Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem

    Borgyogyaszati Klinika, 7632

  • Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft

    Budapest, 1036

  • Derma-B Kft

    Debrecen, 4031

  • SZTE AOK Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Borgyogyaszati és Allergologiai Klinika

    Szeged, 6720

  • Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft.

    Szolnok, 5000

  • Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt.

    Veszprém, 8200

Other trials in Hungary

South Korea5 sites
  • Pusan National University Hospital

    Busan, 49241

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Seongnam-si, 13620

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 03080

  • Konkuk University Medical Center

    Seoul, 05030

  • Korea University Guro Hospital

    Seoul, 08308

Other trials in South Korea

Argentina4 sites
  • CIPREC

    Buenos Aires, C1061AAS

  • Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar

    Buenos Aires, C1417EYG

  • CEDIC Centro de Investigacion clinica

    Caba, C1060ABN

  • Conexa Investigacion Clinica S.A.

    CABA, C1012AAY

Other trials in Argentina

Taiwan4 sites
  • National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin Chu Branch

    Hsinchu, 30059

  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 83301

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 10048

  • Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Taoyuan, 33382

Other trials in Taiwan

Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
  • Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty

    Konya, 42080

  • Ondokuz Mayis University

    Samsun, 55270

  • Karadeniz Teknik University Medical Faculty

    Trabzon, 61080

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

United Kingdom3 sites
  • London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust

    Harrow, HA1 3UJ

  • Salford Royal Hospital

    Salford, M6 8HD

  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

    Southampton, SO16 6YD

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Plaque Psoriasis Involving Special Areas

The purpose of the study is to see how effective JNJ-77242113 is in participants with plaque psoriasis affecting special areas (scalp, genital, and/or palms of the hands and the soles of the feet).

Being tested
JNJ-77242113, Placebo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • JNJ-77242113Drug

    JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo will be administered orally.

Study groups in NCT06095102
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
JNJ-77242113ExperimentalParticipants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo from Week 0 through Week 16 and thereafter will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16

    IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema, scaling, each using 5 point scale. Induration:0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25 millimeters(mm); 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation,>1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe(4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (31)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=3

    The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) 90 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=3

    PSSI 90 response is defined as a percentage of participants who achieved at least 90% improvement from baseline in the PSSI score. PSSI is a physician assessment of erythema, induration and desquamation and percent of scalp that is covered with a scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the scalp area involved, 1 (<10%) to 6 (90%-100%) with a total score ranging from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA Score >=3

    The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Higher score indicates more severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=3

    The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet. hf-PFA was categorized from 0 to 4 where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher score indicates more severity. Meeting the hf-PGA 0 or 1 criteria defined as having an hf-PGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) among participants. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3 and a Baseline GenPs-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2

    The GenPs-SFQ was a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, or 4 = always). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date. Lower scores of item 2 indicated less limitation of sexual activity due to genital psoriasis.

    Measured: Week 16

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=3 and a Baseline Scalp Itch NRS Score >=4

    The Scalp Itch NRS is a single item instrument that evaluates the severity of scalp itch in adult and adolescent populations over the past 24 hours. The instrument uses an NRS score ranging from 0 (no scalp itch) to 10 (worst scalp itch imaginable), with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in Genital Psoriasis Symptoms Score (GPSS) Genital Itch NRS Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3 and a Baseline GPSS Genital Itch NRS Score >=4

    The GPSS is a participant-administered assessment of 8 symptoms: itch, pain, discomfort, stinging, burning, redness, scaling, and cracking. Each respondent is asked to answer the questions based on the psoriasis symptoms in his or her genital area. The overall severity for each individual genital psoriasis symptom is indicated by selecting the number from an NRS of 0 to 10 that best describes the worst level of each symptom in the genital area in the past 24 hours, ranging from 0 (no severity) to 10 (worst imaginable severity). Higher scores indicate greater itch intensity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  12. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  13. Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  14. Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  15. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

    A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  16. Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline mNAPSI Score >0

    Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at week 16 was reported. The mNAPSI was an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's ten fingernails were evaluated on 7 features. The first three features were each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and were 1 = onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, 2 = pitting, and 3 = nail plate crumbling. Next four features was each scored 0 absent or 1 present, and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in lunula. Each fingernail was rated for the presence and severity of seven features to give a total fingernail score of 0-13 (0= no involvement, 13 = greatest involvement). Total mNAPSI score is the sum of the 10 fingernail scores (range 0-130; 0= no involvement, 130= greatest involvement). Higher the score the more severe the nail bed psoriasis. Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  17. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (fPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline f-PGA Score >=2

    Percentage of participants who achieved f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 was reported. f-PGA 0 or 1 criteria was defined as an f-PGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1). The f-PGA is a 5-point scale used to assess fingernails separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease. A global score of between 0 indicating clear, and 4 indicating severe. The overall condition of the fingernails is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  18. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score of 0 at Week 8 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 8

  19. Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptoms Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  20. Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 4 Among Participants With a Baseline Itch Score >=4

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 4

  21. Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD sign score at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  22. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Sign Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  23. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1

    The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  24. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Children's Dermatological Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Adolescent Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score >1

    The CDLQI was an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and was utilized in the adolescent population in this study. The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children. The instrument is designed for use in children, is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  25. Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16

    PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  26. Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the PROMIS-25 Pediatric Score at Week 16

    The PROMIS-25 was utilized in the adolescent population and is a 25-item generic HRQoL survey. Six PROMIS domains (physical function mobility, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, peer relationships, pain interference) are each assessed with 4 questions. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always). Higher score=worst pain. Raw scores for each domain were converted to T-scores using standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10 with an observed range 20 to 80. For anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and pain interference, a negative change indicates an improvement while for physical function mobility and peer relationships, a positive change indicates an improvement. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  27. Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Quality of Life Instrument (ppQLI) Hands Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=3

    The ppQLI assesses impact on patient quality of life due to palmoplantar psoriasis over the past month in adult and adolescent populations. Sixteen items evaluate hand functionality, pain, and social impact due to psoriasis. Fourteen items evaluate foot functionality, pain, and physical limitations due to psoriasis. All items use verbal rating scales ranging from 1 to 5. The ppQLI yields a score for hands, ranging from 16 to 80, and a score for feet, ranging from 14 to 70. Higher score indicating more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  28. Change From Baseline in ppQLI Feet Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=3

    The ppQLI assesses impact on patient quality of life due to palmoplantar psoriasis over the past month in adult and adolescent populations. Sixteen items evaluate hand functionality, pain, and social impact due to psoriasis. Fourteen items evaluate foot functionality, pain, and physical limitations due to psoriasis. All items use verbal rating scales ranging from 1 to 5. The ppQLI yields a score for hands, ranging from 16 to 80, and a score for feet, ranging from 14 to 70. Higher score indicating more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  29. Change From Baseline in Genital Psoriasis Symptoms Score (GPSS) Total Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3

    The GPSS was a participant-administered assessment of 8 symptoms: itch, pain, discomfort, stinging, burning, redness, scaling, and cracking. Each respondent was asked to answer the questions based on the psoriasis symptoms in his or her genital area. The overall severity for each individual genital psoriasis symptom was indicated by selecting the number from an NRS of 0 to 10 that best describes the worst level of each symptom in the genital area in the past 24 hours, ranging from 0 (no severity) to 10 (worst imaginable severity). Results from each symptom assessment were summed to generate a total GPSS score ranging from 0 (no genital psoriasis symptoms) to 80 (worst imaginable genital psoriasis symptoms). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in genital psoriasis symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  30. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 160

  31. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 160

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Oct 2023
  2. Study start12 Oct 2023
  3. Primary completion19 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion17 Feb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
311 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06095102
Sponsor's protocol ID
77242113PSO3003
Other IDs
77242113PSO3003
Acronym
ICONIC-TOTAL
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
18 Oct 2023
Last updated
3 Nov 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Publications

  • Gooderham M, Lain E, Bissonnette R, Huang YH, Lynde CW, Hoffmann M, Song EJ, Weirich O, Ceitlin RHG, Rubens JH, DeLozier AM, Ota T, Hsu MC, Li S, DeKlotz CMC, Nunes F, Warren RB. Targeted Oral Peptide Icotrokinra for Psoriasis Involving High-Impact Sites. NEJM Evid. 2025 Dec;4(12):EVIDoa2500155. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2500155. Epub 2025 Nov 5.

    PubMed 41191932

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 90 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 90 sites in United States, Poland, Germany, Spain, Canada and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06095102, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in