AzTrials
AzTrials

Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3ICONIC-LEADNCT06095115

A Study of JNJ-77242113 in Adolescent and Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 170 sites in 16 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is see how effective is JNJ-77242113 in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Plaque Psoriasis
What is being tested?
JNJ-77242113
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
684 participants
Where
170 sitesin 16 countries
Study dates
12 Oct 2023to 6 Apr 2027
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis, for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
  • Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
  • Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
  • Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
  • Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
  • A female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Week 0 prior to administration of study intervention

Who cannot join

  • Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
  • A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113 or its excipients
  • Major surgical procedures, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from a surgical procedure or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

170 sites in 16 countries.

170 sites in 16 countries

United States46 sites
  • Arlington Research Center, Inc.

    Arlington, Texas, 76011

  • Oakview Dermatology

    Athens, Ohio, 45701

  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

    Bellaire, Texas, 77401

  • Allcutis Research 1

    Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915

  • Optima Research

    Boardman, Ohio, 44512

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Michigan Center of Medical Research

    Clarkston, Michigan, 48346

  • Schweiger Dermatology Group

    East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520

  • The Pennsylvania Centre for Dermatology, LLC

    Exton, Pennsylvania, 19341

  • Pharmacology Translational Unit PTU Fairborn LLC

    Fairborn, Ohio, 45324

  • Johnson Dermatology

    Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72916

  • First OC Dermatology

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Center for Dermatology Clinical Research

    Fremont, California, 94538

  • Center for Clinical Studies 1

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250

  • Dermatology and Advanced Aesthetics

    Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70605

  • Skin Care Physicians of Georgia

    Macon, Georgia, 31217

  • Bioclinical Research Alliance Inc.

    Miami, Florida, 33155

  • Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC

    Mill Creek, Washington, 98012

  • Minnesota Clinical Study Center

    New Brighton, Minnesota, 55112

  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Virginia Dermatology Skin Cancer Center Pllc

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • Ziaderm Research LLC

    North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162

  • Central Sooner Research

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73170

  • Skin Specialists

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68144

  • Qualmedica Research

    Owensboro, Kentucky, 42301

  • Medical Dermatology Specialists

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Indiana Clinical Trial Center

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Oregon Medical Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97201

  • Oregon Dermatology and Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Allcutis Research

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801

  • Health Concepts

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702

  • Arlington Dermatology

    Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008

  • Integrative Skin Science and Research

    Sacramento, California, 95815

  • Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists

    San Antonio, Texas, 78218

  • Rady Childrens Hospital San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Southern California Dermatology

    Santa Ana, California, 92701

  • Clinical Science Institute

    Santa Monica, California, 90403

  • Endeavor Health

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

  • Premier Clinical Research

    Spokane, Washington, 99202

  • Springville Dermatology CCT Research

    Springville, Utah, 84663

  • Forcare Clinical Research Inc

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Center for Clinical Studies

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Dundee Dermatology

    West Dundee, Illinois, 60118

  • Wilmington Dermatology Center

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405

Other trials in United States

Germany17 sites
  • Fachklinik Bad Bentheim

    Bad Bentheim, 48455

  • Charite - Campus Mitte

    Berlin, 10117

  • Universitatsklinikum Bonn

    Bonn, 53127

  • Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH

    Dresden, 01069

  • Hautzentrum Dulmen

    Dülmen, 48249

  • Privatpraxis Dr. Hilton & Partner

    Düsseldorf, 40212

  • Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt am Main, 60590

  • Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79104

  • Derma-Study-Center Friedrichshafen GmbH

    Friedrichshafen, 88045

  • Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Hautarztpraxis

    Mahlow, 15831

  • Universitaetsklinikum Muenster

    Münster, 48149

  • Klinikum Oldenburg

    Oldenburg, 26133

  • Hautarztpraxis Mortazawi

    Remscheid, 42897

  • Universitaetsklinik Tuebingen

    Tübingen, 72076

  • Hautarztpraxis 2

    Witten, 58453

  • CentroDerm GmbH

    Wuppertal, 42287

Other trials in Germany

Poland16 sites
  • Osteo-Medic s.c A. Racewicz, J Supronik

    Bialystok, 15-351

  • Specderm Poznanska sp j

    Bialystok, 15-375

  • Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze J Brzezicki B Gornikiewicz Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska

    Elblag, 82 300

  • Centrum Medyczne dr Rajzer Sp z o o

    Krakow, 30 438

  • Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna

    Krakow, 30-002

  • Centrum Medyczne Promed

    Krakow, 31-411

  • Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o

    Lodz, 90-265

  • Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna

    Lodz, 90-338

  • Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C

    Osielsko, 86031

  • SOLUMED Centrum Medyczne

    Poznan, 60 529

  • Clinical Research Center sp z o o MEDIC R s k

    Poznan, 61 731

  • Dorota Bystrzanowska High-Med. Przychodnia Specjalistyczna

    Warsaw, 01 817

  • Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia

    Warsaw, 02 953

  • DERMMEDICA Sp.z o.o.

    Wroclaw, 51 503

  • Wro Medica

    Wroclaw, 51 685

  • Centrum Medyczne Oporow

    Wroclaw, 52 416

Other trials in Poland

China15 sites
  • China Japan Friendship Hospital

    Beijing, 100013

  • Beijing Friendship Hospital Capital Medical University

    Beijing, 100050

  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, 100191

  • The Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College

    Bengbu, 233099

  • Hosp. of Chengde Medical University

    Chengde, 067030

  • Chengdu Second People's Hospital

    Chengdu, 610017

  • The First Hospital of Jiaxing

    Jiaxing, 314001

  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

    Jinan, 250012

  • Dermatology Hospital of Jiangxi Province

    Nanchang, 330000

  • Nanyang First People's Hospital

    Nanyang, 473004

  • Shanghai skin disease hospital

    Shanghai, 200443

  • Northeast International Hospital

    Shenyang, 110016

  • Union Hospital Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology

    Wuhan, 430022

  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

    Xi'an, 710004

  • Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University

    Zhenjiang, 212001

Other trials in China

Canada11 sites
  • Dermatology Research Institute Inc

    Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1

  • Rejuvenation Dermatology Clinic Edmonton Downtown

    Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3S9

  • Mediprobe Research Inc.

    London, Ontario, N5X 2P1

  • Dr Wei Jing Loo Medicine Professional Corporation

    London, Ontario, N6H 5L5

  • Innovaderm Research Inc.

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1

  • Ryan Clinical Research Inc

    Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 5G8

  • Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7

  • Canadian Dermatology Center

    Toronto, Ontario, M3B 0A7

  • FACET Dermatology

    Toronto, Ontario, M4C 1L1

  • Avenue Research Group

    Toronto, Ontario, M5N 1A8

  • XLR8 Medical Research

    Windsor, Ontario, N8T 1E6

Other trials in Canada

Spain11 sites
  • Hosp. Univ. Fundacion Alcorcon

    Alcorcón, 28922

  • Hosp. Gral. Univ. Dr. Balmis

    Alicante, 03010

  • Hosp Clinic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hosp. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08041

  • Hosp. Univ. de Basurto

    Bilbao, 48013

  • Grupo Dermatologico Y Estetico Pedro Jaen

    Madrid, 28002

  • Hosp. Gral. Univ. Gregorio Maranon

    Madrid, 28007

  • Hosp. Univ. Son Espases

    Palma de Mallorca, 07120

  • Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago

    Santiago de Compostela, 15706

  • Hosp. Virgen Macarena

    Seville, 41009

  • Hosp. de Manises

    Valencia, 46940

Other trials in Spain

Hungary8 sites
  • Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem

    Borgyogyaszati Klinika, 7632

  • Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft

    Budapest, 1036

  • Derma-B Kft

    Debrecen, 4031

  • Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Somogy Varmegyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz

    Kaposvár, 7400

  • SZTE AOK Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Borgyogyaszati és Allergologiai Klinika

    Szeged, 6720

  • Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft.

    Szolnok, 5000

  • Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt.

    Veszprém, 8200

Other trials in Hungary

Japan8 sites
  • Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health

    Kitakyushu-shi, 807-8556

  • Mito Kyodo General Hospital

    Mito, 310 0015

  • Nagoya City University Hospital

    Nagoya, 467 8602

  • Kindai University Hospital

    Osaka Sayama Shi, 589 8511

  • Tohoku University Hospital

    Sendai, 980 8574

  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital

    Shinjuku, 160 0023

  • Teikyo University Hospital

    tabashi City, 173 8606

  • Mie University Hospital

    Tsu, 514 8507

Other trials in Japan

Argentina7 sites
  • ARCIS Salud SRL Aprillus asistencia e investigacion

    Buenos Aires, C1406AGA

  • Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar

    Buenos Aires, C1417EYG

  • Derma Internacional S A

    Buenos Aires, C1426

  • Psoriahue

    CABA, C1425DKG

  • Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Mar Del Plata

    Mar del Plata, B7600FYK

  • Instituto De Especialidades De La Salud SRL

    Rosario, S2000DBS

  • MR Medicina Reumatologica

    San Fernando, B1646

Other trials in Argentina

Australia6 sites
  • Dr Rodney Sinclair Pty Ltd

    East Melbourne, 3002

  • Veracity Clinical Research

    Greenslopes, 4120

  • The Alfred Hospital

    Melbourne, 3004

  • Kingsway Dermatology & Aesthetics

    Miranda, 2228

  • ISHI dermatology

    Mitcham, 3132

  • Royal Melbourne Hospital

    Parkville, 3050

Other trials in Australia

Taiwan6 sites
  • National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin Chu Branch

    Hsinchu, 30059

  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 83301

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 10048

  • Mackay Memorial Hospital

    Taipei, 10449

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei, 11217

  • Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Taoyuan, 33382

Other trials in Taiwan

South Korea5 sites
  • Korea University Ansan Hospital

    Ansan-si, 15355

  • Chosun university hospital

    Gwangju, 61453

  • CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University

    Gyeonggi-do, 13496

  • Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital

    Gyeonggi-do, 14068

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 05505

Other trials in South Korea

Italy4 sites
  • Azienda Di Rilievo Nazionale E Di Alta Specializzazione

    Palermo, 90127

  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma

    Parma, 43126

  • Policlinico Tor Vergata

    Roma, 00133

  • Istituto Clinico Humanitas

    Rozzano, 20089

Other trials in Italy

Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
  • Hacettepe University Medical Faculty

    Ankara, 06230

  • Gazi University Medical Faculty

    Ankara, 06560

  • Erciyes University Medical Faculty

    Kayseri, 38039

  • Ondokuz Mayis University

    Samsun, 55270

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

United Kingdom4 sites
  • London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust

    Harrow, HA1 3UJ

  • Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust

    London, SE1 9RT

  • Royal Berkshire Hospital

    Reading, RG1 5AN

  • Salford Royal Hospital

    Salford, M6 8HD

Other trials in United Kingdom

France2 sites
  • Hopital Prive d'Antony

    Antony, 92160

  • Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy

    Argenteuil, 95107

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis With Randomized Withdrawal and Retreatment

The purpose of this study is see how effective is JNJ-77242113 in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Being tested
JNJ-77242113, Placebo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • JNJ-77242113Drug

    JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo will be administered orally

Study groups in NCT06095115
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
JNJ-77242113ExperimentalAdolescent and adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156. At Week 24, adult participants who are psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 75 or investigator global assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 responders (that is, those who achieve an IGA score of 0 or 1 and have >=2-grade improvement from baseline) will be re-randomized either to continue JNJ-77242113 or to placebo (and will be retreated with JNJ-77242113 upon loss of >=50% of their Week 24 PASI improvement). Adult participants identified as both PASI 75 and IGA 0 or 1 score non-responders will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 through Week 52. From Week 52 to Week 156, all adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113. Adolescents will not participate in re-randomization regardless of their PASI score or IGA score at Week 24. Adolescents will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113
PlaceboExperimentalAdolescent and adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113 matching placebo from Week 0 to Week 16. Participants will cross-over to receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16

    IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis.Lesions were graded for induration,erythema and scaling, each using 5 point scale.Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation,1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25 millimeters(mm);2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5mm;3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, greater than(>)1 mm; Erythema:0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present,1=faint erythema,2=light red coloration,3=moderate red coloration,4=bright red coloration; Scaling:0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over <5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates,3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale:cleared(0),minimal(1), mild(2),moderate(3),or severe(4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline:closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 (at least 90% improvement from baseline in PASI score) response at Week 16 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeter (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 4

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 75 (at least >=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 4 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 4

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 8

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 (at least >=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 8 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 8

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 75 (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 16 were reported.. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 100 (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 16 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2

    The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness, which are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = absence of disease, 1 = very mild disease, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, and 4 = severe disease. Higher score indicated severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Week 8 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived first by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 8

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived first by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 4 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms(itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 4

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms(itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 52 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 75 Responders at Week 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 52 among participants randomized at Week 24 and were PASI 75 responders at Week 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 52

  12. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 52 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 90 Responders at Week 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 (at least >=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 52 among participants randomized at Week 24 and were PASI 90 responders at Week 24 were reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 52

  13. Time to Loss of PASI 75 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 75 Responders at Week 24

    Time to loss of PASI 75 response was defined as time from re-randomization at Week 24 to visit of loss of PASI 75 response. Loss of PASI 75 response was defined as less than (<)75% improvement in PASI from Week 24 up to Week 52 in an adult participant who had achieved >=75% improvement in PASI from baseline at Week 24. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Week 24 up to Week 52

  14. Time to Loss of PASI 90 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 90 Responders at Week 24

    The time to loss of PASI 90 response was defined as the time from re-randomization at Week 24 to the visit of loss of PASI 90 response. Loss of PASI 90 response is defined as <90% improvement in PASI from Week 24 up to Week 52 in an adult participant who had achieved >=90% improvement in PASI from baseline at Week 24. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Week 24 up to Week 52

  15. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

    A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  16. Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  17. Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  18. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-Grade Improvement in Genital Psoriasis From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=2

    Percentage of participants achieving a sPGA-G Score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-grade improvement in genital psoriasis from baseline at Week 16 among participants with a baseline sPGA-G score >=2 was reported. The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Higher score indicates more severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  19. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=2

    Percentage of participants achieving a hf-PGA score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-grade improvement at Week 16 among participants with a baseline hf-PGA score >=2 was reported. The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet. hf-PFA was categorized from 0 to 4 where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher score indicates more severity. Meeting the hf-PGA 0 or 1 criteria defined as having an hf-PGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) and a >=2-grade improvement from baseline. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  20. Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline mNAPSI Score >0

    The mNAPSI was an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's ten fingernails are evaluated on 7 features. The first three features are each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and were 1 = onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, 2 = pitting, and 3 = nail plate crumbling. The next four features was each scored 0 (absent) or 1 (present), and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in the lunula. Each fingernail is rated for the presence and severity of seven features to give a total fingernail score of 0-13 (0= no involvement, 13 = greatest involvement). The total mNAPSI score is the sum of the 10 fingernail scores (range 0-130; 0= no involvement, 130= greatest involvement). The higher the score the more severe the nail bed psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  21. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline f-PGA Score >=2

    Percentage of participants who achieved f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 was reported. f-PGA 0 or 1 criteria was defined as an f-PGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1). The f-PGA is a 5-point scale used to assess fingernails separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease. A global score of between 0 indicating clear, and 4 indicating severe. The overall condition of the fingernails is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4= severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  22. Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms(itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  23. Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms(itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  24. Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Sign Score >0

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  25. Percentage of Participants Achieving Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2 and a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3

    Percentage of participants achieving GenPs-SFQ Item 2 score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 among participants with baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 score >=2 and a baseline sPGA-G score >=3 was reported. GenPs-SFQ was a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/ zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, or 4 = always). Lower scores of item 2 indicated less limitation of sexual activity due to genital psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  26. Percentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1

    The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  27. Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 was reported. The DLQI was a dermatology specific health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  28. Adult Participants: Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16

    PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T score=more of concept being measured that is, higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles=better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  29. Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants Achieving Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score >1

    The CDLQI was an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and was utilized in the adolescent population in this study. The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children. The instrument is designed for use in children, is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 16

  30. Adolescent Participants: Change From Baseline in CDLQI at Week 16

    The CDLQI was an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and was utilized in the adolescent population in this study. The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children. The instrument is designed for use in children, is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  31. Adolescent Participants: Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the PROMIS-25 Pediatric Score at Week 16

    The PROMIS-25 was utilized in the adolescent population and is a 25-item generic HRQoL survey. Six PROMIS domains (physical function mobility, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, peer relationships, pain interference) are each assessed with 4 questions. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always). Higher score=worst pain. Raw scores for each domain were converted to T-scores using standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10 with an observed range 20 to 80. For anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and pain interference, a negative change indicates an improvement while for physical function mobility and peer relationships, a positive change indicates an improvement. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  32. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 52

    IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation, =0.25mm; 2=mild plaque elevation, =0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation, =0.75mm;4=severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates,3 =moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 =severe; thick, scale predominates.Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration,erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared(0),minimal(1),mild(2),moderate (3), or severe (4).Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 52

  33. Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 at Week 52 Among Participants Who Were IGA 0 Responders at Week 24

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 52

  34. Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Week 52 Among PASI 100 Responders at Week 24

    Percentage of participants achieving PASI 100 (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 52 among PASI 100 responders at Week 24 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Week 52

  35. Time to Loss of IGA Response of 0 or 1

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 24 up to Week 52

  36. Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants With IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 52

    IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration,erythema and scaling,each using 5 point scale. Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25mm; 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,= 0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, >1mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling:0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared(0), minimal(1), mild(2), moderate(3), or severe(4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline:closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 52

  37. Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 52

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 75 (>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline) response at Week 52 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline:closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 52

  38. Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 52

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 (at least >=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) response at Week 52 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.

    Measured: Week 52

  39. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

    Measured: From Week 0 up to Week 160

  40. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Measured: From Week 0 up to Week 160

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Oct 2023
  2. Study start12 Oct 2023
  3. Primary completion29 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion6 Apr 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
684 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06095115
Sponsor's protocol ID
77242113PSO3001
Other IDs
77242113PSO3001, 2023-505120-59-00, 2023
Acronym
ICONIC-LEAD
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
18 Oct 2023
Last updated
4 Nov 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Publications

  • Bissonnette R, Soung J, Hebert AA, Pink AE, Pinter A, Moore AY, Shi Y, Wang WH, Toth DP, Miller-Kassamali M, Cafone J, Jiang J, Li S, DeKlotz CMC, Nunes F, Lebwohl MG. Oral Icotrokinra for Plaque Psoriasis in Adults and Adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2025 Nov 6;393(18):1784-1795. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2504187.

    PubMed 41191940

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 170 sites in 16 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 170 sites in United States, Germany, Poland, China, Canada and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06095115, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in