Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3ICONIC-LEADNCT06095115
A Study of JNJ-77242113 in Adolescent and Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 170 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is see how effective is JNJ-77242113 in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Plaque Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- JNJ-77242113
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 684 participants
- Where
- 170 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 12 Oct 2023to 6 Apr 2027
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis, for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
- Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
- Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
- Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
- Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
- A female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Week 0 prior to administration of study intervention
Who cannot join
- Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
- Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
- Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113 or its excipients
- Major surgical procedures, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from a surgical procedure or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
170 sites in 16 countries.
170 sites in 16 countries
United States46 sites
Arlington Research Center, Inc.
Arlington, Texas, 76011
Oakview Dermatology
Athens, Ohio, 45701
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Allcutis Research 1
Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915
Optima Research
Boardman, Ohio, 44512
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Michigan Center of Medical Research
Clarkston, Michigan, 48346
Schweiger Dermatology Group
East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520
The Pennsylvania Centre for Dermatology, LLC
Exton, Pennsylvania, 19341
Pharmacology Translational Unit PTU Fairborn LLC
Fairborn, Ohio, 45324
Johnson Dermatology
Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72916
First OC Dermatology
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Center for Dermatology Clinical Research
Fremont, California, 94538
Center for Clinical Studies 1
Houston, Texas, 77004
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250
Dermatology and Advanced Aesthetics
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70605
Skin Care Physicians of Georgia
Macon, Georgia, 31217
Bioclinical Research Alliance Inc.
Miami, Florida, 33155
Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC
Mill Creek, Washington, 98012
Minnesota Clinical Study Center
New Brighton, Minnesota, 55112
Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
Virginia Dermatology Skin Cancer Center Pllc
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Ziaderm Research LLC
North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162
Central Sooner Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73170
Skin Specialists
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144
Qualmedica Research
Owensboro, Kentucky, 42301
Medical Dermatology Specialists
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Indiana Clinical Trial Center
Plainfield, Indiana, 46168
Oregon Medical Research Center
Portland, Oregon, 97201
Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Allcutis Research
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801
Health Concepts
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
Arlington Dermatology
Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008
Integrative Skin Science and Research
Sacramento, California, 95815
Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists
San Antonio, Texas, 78218
Rady Childrens Hospital San Diego
San Diego, California, 92123
Southern California Dermatology
Santa Ana, California, 92701
Clinical Science Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90403
Endeavor Health
Skokie, Illinois, 60077
Premier Clinical Research
Spokane, Washington, 99202
Springville Dermatology CCT Research
Springville, Utah, 84663
Forcare Clinical Research Inc
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Center for Clinical Studies
Webster, Texas, 77598
Dundee Dermatology
West Dundee, Illinois, 60118
Wilmington Dermatology Center
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405
Germany17 sites
Fachklinik Bad Bentheim
Bad Bentheim, 48455
Charite - Campus Mitte
Berlin, 10117
Universitatsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, 53127
Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH
Dresden, 01069
Hautzentrum Dulmen
Dülmen, 48249
Privatpraxis Dr. Hilton & Partner
Düsseldorf, 40212
Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79104
Derma-Study-Center Friedrichshafen GmbH
Friedrichshafen, 88045
Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
Hautarztpraxis
Mahlow, 15831
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster, 48149
Klinikum Oldenburg
Oldenburg, 26133
Hautarztpraxis Mortazawi
Remscheid, 42897
Universitaetsklinik Tuebingen
Tübingen, 72076
Hautarztpraxis 2
Witten, 58453
CentroDerm GmbH
Wuppertal, 42287
Poland16 sites
Osteo-Medic s.c A. Racewicz, J Supronik
Bialystok, 15-351
Specderm Poznanska sp j
Bialystok, 15-375
Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze J Brzezicki B Gornikiewicz Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska
Elblag, 82 300
Centrum Medyczne dr Rajzer Sp z o o
Krakow, 30 438
Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna
Krakow, 30-002
Centrum Medyczne Promed
Krakow, 31-411
Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o
Lodz, 90-265
Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna
Lodz, 90-338
Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C
Osielsko, 86031
SOLUMED Centrum Medyczne
Poznan, 60 529
Clinical Research Center sp z o o MEDIC R s k
Poznan, 61 731
Dorota Bystrzanowska High-Med. Przychodnia Specjalistyczna
Warsaw, 01 817
Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia
Warsaw, 02 953
DERMMEDICA Sp.z o.o.
Wroclaw, 51 503
Wro Medica
Wroclaw, 51 685
Centrum Medyczne Oporow
Wroclaw, 52 416
China15 sites
China Japan Friendship Hospital
Beijing, 100013
Beijing Friendship Hospital Capital Medical University
Beijing, 100050
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, 100191
The Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College
Bengbu, 233099
Hosp. of Chengde Medical University
Chengde, 067030
Chengdu Second People's Hospital
Chengdu, 610017
The First Hospital of Jiaxing
Jiaxing, 314001
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, 250012
Dermatology Hospital of Jiangxi Province
Nanchang, 330000
Nanyang First People's Hospital
Nanyang, 473004
Shanghai skin disease hospital
Shanghai, 200443
Northeast International Hospital
Shenyang, 110016
Union Hospital Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, 430022
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, 710004
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University
Zhenjiang, 212001
Canada11 sites
Dermatology Research Institute Inc
Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1
Rejuvenation Dermatology Clinic Edmonton Downtown
Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3S9
Mediprobe Research Inc.
London, Ontario, N5X 2P1
Dr Wei Jing Loo Medicine Professional Corporation
London, Ontario, N6H 5L5
Innovaderm Research Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1
Ryan Clinical Research Inc
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 5G8
Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical
Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7
Canadian Dermatology Center
Toronto, Ontario, M3B 0A7
FACET Dermatology
Toronto, Ontario, M4C 1L1
Avenue Research Group
Toronto, Ontario, M5N 1A8
XLR8 Medical Research
Windsor, Ontario, N8T 1E6
Spain11 sites
Hosp. Univ. Fundacion Alcorcon
Alcorcón, 28922
Hosp. Gral. Univ. Dr. Balmis
Alicante, 03010
Hosp Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Hosp. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Hosp. Univ. de Basurto
Bilbao, 48013
Grupo Dermatologico Y Estetico Pedro Jaen
Madrid, 28002
Hosp. Gral. Univ. Gregorio Maranon
Madrid, 28007
Hosp. Univ. Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, 07120
Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Hosp. Virgen Macarena
Seville, 41009
Hosp. de Manises
Valencia, 46940
Hungary8 sites
Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem
Borgyogyaszati Klinika, 7632
Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft
Budapest, 1036
Derma-B Kft
Debrecen, 4031
Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont
Debrecen, 4032
Somogy Varmegyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz
Kaposvár, 7400
SZTE AOK Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Borgyogyaszati és Allergologiai Klinika
Szeged, 6720
Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft.
Szolnok, 5000
Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt.
Veszprém, 8200
Japan8 sites
Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health
Kitakyushu-shi, 807-8556
Mito Kyodo General Hospital
Mito, 310 0015
Nagoya City University Hospital
Nagoya, 467 8602
Kindai University Hospital
Osaka Sayama Shi, 589 8511
Tohoku University Hospital
Sendai, 980 8574
Tokyo Medical University Hospital
Shinjuku, 160 0023
Teikyo University Hospital
tabashi City, 173 8606
Mie University Hospital
Tsu, 514 8507
Argentina7 sites
ARCIS Salud SRL Aprillus asistencia e investigacion
Buenos Aires, C1406AGA
Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar
Buenos Aires, C1417EYG
Derma Internacional S A
Buenos Aires, C1426
Psoriahue
CABA, C1425DKG
Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Mar Del Plata
Mar del Plata, B7600FYK
Instituto De Especialidades De La Salud SRL
Rosario, S2000DBS
MR Medicina Reumatologica
San Fernando, B1646
Australia6 sites
Dr Rodney Sinclair Pty Ltd
East Melbourne, 3002
Veracity Clinical Research
Greenslopes, 4120
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, 3004
Kingsway Dermatology & Aesthetics
Miranda, 2228
ISHI dermatology
Mitcham, 3132
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, 3050
Taiwan6 sites
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin Chu Branch
Hsinchu, 30059
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 83301
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 10048
Mackay Memorial Hospital
Taipei, 10449
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 11217
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan, 33382
South Korea5 sites
Korea University Ansan Hospital
Ansan-si, 15355
Chosun university hospital
Gwangju, 61453
CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University
Gyeonggi-do, 13496
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
Gyeonggi-do, 14068
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505
Italy4 sites
Azienda Di Rilievo Nazionale E Di Alta Specializzazione
Palermo, 90127
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma
Parma, 43126
Policlinico Tor Vergata
Roma, 00133
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, 20089
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Hacettepe University Medical Faculty
Ankara, 06230
Gazi University Medical Faculty
Ankara, 06560
Erciyes University Medical Faculty
Kayseri, 38039
Ondokuz Mayis University
Samsun, 55270
United Kingdom4 sites
London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust
Harrow, HA1 3UJ
Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE1 9RT
Royal Berkshire Hospital
Reading, RG1 5AN
Salford Royal Hospital
Salford, M6 8HD
France2 sites
Hopital Prive d'Antony
Antony, 92160
Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil, 95107
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis With Randomized Withdrawal and Retreatment
The purpose of this study is see how effective is JNJ-77242113 in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Being tested
- JNJ-77242113, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
JNJ-77242113Drug
JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo will be administered orally
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| JNJ-77242113 | Experimental | Adolescent and adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156. At Week 24, adult participants who are psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 75 or investigator global assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 responders (that is, those who achieve an IGA score of 0 or 1 and have >=2-grade improvement from baseline) will be re-randomized either to continue JNJ-77242113 or to placebo (and will be retreated with JNJ-77242113 upon loss of >=50% of their Week 24 PASI improvement). Adult participants identified as both PASI 75 and IGA 0 or 1 score non-responders will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 through Week 52. From Week 52 to Week 156, all adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113. Adolescents will not participate in re-randomization regardless of their PASI score or IGA score at Week 24. Adolescents will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156. Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113 |
| Placebo | Experimental | Adolescent and adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113 matching placebo from Week 0 to Week 16. Participants will cross-over to receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156. Receives: Drug: JNJ-77242113; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis.Lesions were graded for induration,erythema and scaling, each using 5 point scale.Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation,1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25 millimeters(mm);2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5mm;3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, greater than(>)1 mm; Erythema:0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present,1=faint erythema,2=light red coloration,3=moderate red coloration,4=bright red coloration; Scaling:0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over <5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates,3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale:cleared(0),minimal(1), mild(2),moderate(3),or severe(4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline:closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 (at least 90% improvement from baseline in PASI score) response at Week 16 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (40)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 at Week 16
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeter (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 4
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 75 (at least >=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 4 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 8
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 (at least >=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 8 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 8
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 75 (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 16 were reported.. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 100 (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 16 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2
The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness, which are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = absence of disease, 1 = very mild disease, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, and 4 = severe disease. Higher score indicated severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Week 8 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived first by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 8
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived first by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 4 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms(itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms(itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 52 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 75 Responders at Week 24
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 52 among participants randomized at Week 24 and were PASI 75 responders at Week 24 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 52 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 90 Responders at Week 24
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 (at least >=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 52 among participants randomized at Week 24 and were PASI 90 responders at Week 24 were reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline=closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 52
Time to Loss of PASI 75 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 75 Responders at Week 24
Time to loss of PASI 75 response was defined as time from re-randomization at Week 24 to visit of loss of PASI 75 response. Loss of PASI 75 response was defined as less than (<)75% improvement in PASI from Week 24 up to Week 52 in an adult participant who had achieved >=75% improvement in PASI from baseline at Week 24. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis.
Measured: Week 24 up to Week 52
Time to Loss of PASI 90 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 90 Responders at Week 24
The time to loss of PASI 90 response was defined as the time from re-randomization at Week 24 to the visit of loss of PASI 90 response. Loss of PASI 90 response is defined as <90% improvement in PASI from Week 24 up to Week 52 in an adult participant who had achieved >=90% improvement in PASI from baseline at Week 24. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis.
Measured: Week 24 up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-Grade Improvement in Genital Psoriasis From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=2
Percentage of participants achieving a sPGA-G Score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-grade improvement in genital psoriasis from baseline at Week 16 among participants with a baseline sPGA-G score >=2 was reported. The sPGA-G was a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis was assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Higher score indicates more severity. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=2
Percentage of participants achieving a hf-PGA score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-grade improvement at Week 16 among participants with a baseline hf-PGA score >=2 was reported. The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet. hf-PFA was categorized from 0 to 4 where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher score indicates more severity. Meeting the hf-PGA 0 or 1 criteria defined as having an hf-PGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) and a >=2-grade improvement from baseline. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline mNAPSI Score >0
The mNAPSI was an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's ten fingernails are evaluated on 7 features. The first three features are each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and were 1 = onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, 2 = pitting, and 3 = nail plate crumbling. The next four features was each scored 0 (absent) or 1 (present), and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in the lunula. Each fingernail is rated for the presence and severity of seven features to give a total fingernail score of 0-13 (0= no involvement, 13 = greatest involvement). The total mNAPSI score is the sum of the 10 fingernail scores (range 0-130; 0= no involvement, 130= greatest involvement). The higher the score the more severe the nail bed psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline f-PGA Score >=2
Percentage of participants who achieved f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 was reported. f-PGA 0 or 1 criteria was defined as an f-PGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1). The f-PGA is a 5-point scale used to assess fingernails separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease. A global score of between 0 indicating clear, and 4 indicating severe. The overall condition of the fingernails is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4= severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms(itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Symptom score was derived by averaging the 5 weekly symptom item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 5 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms(itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Sign Score >0
PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 24-hour recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Each individual item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly item score. Sign score was derived by averaging the 6 weekly sign item scores when at least 3 items are available (>=50% of 6 items). Average score was then multiplied by 10 to convert into 0-100 scoring (0-least severe, 100-most severe). The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2 and a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3
Percentage of participants achieving GenPs-SFQ Item 2 score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 among participants with baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 score >=2 and a baseline sPGA-G score >=3 was reported. GenPs-SFQ was a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/ zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, or 4 = always). Lower scores of item 2 indicated less limitation of sexual activity due to genital psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16
Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 was reported. The DLQI was a dermatology specific health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Adult Participants: Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T score=more of concept being measured that is, higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles=better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants Achieving Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score >1
The CDLQI was an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and was utilized in the adolescent population in this study. The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children. The instrument is designed for use in children, is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 16
Adolescent Participants: Change From Baseline in CDLQI at Week 16
The CDLQI was an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and was utilized in the adolescent population in this study. The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. CDLQI total score was the sum of individual scores of questions 1-10 and ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children. The instrument is designed for use in children, is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Adolescent Participants: Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the PROMIS-25 Pediatric Score at Week 16
The PROMIS-25 was utilized in the adolescent population and is a 25-item generic HRQoL survey. Six PROMIS domains (physical function mobility, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, peer relationships, pain interference) are each assessed with 4 questions. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always). Higher score=worst pain. Raw scores for each domain were converted to T-scores using standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10 with an observed range 20 to 80. For anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and pain interference, a negative change indicates an improvement while for physical function mobility and peer relationships, a positive change indicates an improvement. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 52
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation, =0.25mm; 2=mild plaque elevation, =0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation, =0.75mm;4=severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling: 0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates,3 =moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 =severe; thick, scale predominates.Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration,erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared(0),minimal(1),mild(2),moderate (3), or severe (4).Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 at Week 52 Among Participants Who Were IGA 0 Responders at Week 24
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Week 52 Among PASI 100 Responders at Week 24
Percentage of participants achieving PASI 100 (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) response at Week 52 among PASI 100 responders at Week 24 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis.
Measured: Week 52
Time to Loss of IGA Response of 0 or 1
The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.
Measured: Week 24 up to Week 52
Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants With IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 52
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration,erythema and scaling,each using 5 point scale. Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation, 1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25mm; 2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5 mm; 3=moderate plaque elevation,= 0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, >1mm; Erythema: 0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1=faint erythema, 2=light red coloration, 3=moderate red coloration, 4=bright red coloration; Scaling:0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates, 3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared(0), minimal(1), mild(2), moderate(3), or severe(4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline:closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 52
Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 52
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 75 (>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline) response at Week 52 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline:closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 52
Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 52
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 (at least >=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) response at Week 52 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Measured: From Week 0 up to Week 160
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Measured: From Week 0 up to Week 160
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2023
- Study start12 Oct 2023
- Primary completion29 Jul 2024
- Study completion6 Apr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Plaque PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 684 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06095115
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 77242113PSO3001
- Other IDs
- 77242113PSO3001, 2023-505120-59-00, 2023
- Acronym
- ICONIC-LEAD
- Status last verified
- Nov 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2023
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Publications
Bissonnette R, Soung J, Hebert AA, Pink AE, Pinter A, Moore AY, Shi Y, Wang WH, Toth DP, Miller-Kassamali M, Cafone J, Jiang J, Li S, DeKlotz CMC, Nunes F, Lebwohl MG. Oral Icotrokinra for Plaque Psoriasis in Adults and Adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2025 Nov 6;393(18):1784-1795. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2504187.
PubMed 41191940
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis With Randomized Withdrawal and Retreatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06095115
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICONIC-LEAD / 77242113PSO3001
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 684 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 12 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 Jun 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is see how effective is JNJ-77242113 in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| JNJ-77242113 | Experimental | Drug: JNJ-77242113Adolescent and adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156. At Week 24, adult participants who are psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 75 or investigator global assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 responders (that is, those who achieve an IGA score of 0 or 1 and have >=2-grade improvement from baseline) will be re-randomized either to continue JNJ-77242113 or to placebo (and will be retreated with JNJ-77242113 upon loss of >=50% of their Week 24 PASI improvement). Adult participants identified as both PASI 75 and IGA 0 or 1 score non-responders will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 through Week 52. From Week 52 to Week 156, all adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113. Adolescents will not participate in re-randomization regardless of their PASI score or IGA score at Week 24. Adolescents will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 0 through Week 156. |
| Placebo | Experimental | Drug: JNJ-77242113, Drug: PlaceboAdolescent and adult participants will receive JNJ-77242113 matching placebo from Week 0 to Week 16. Participants will cross-over to receive JNJ-77242113 from Week 16 through Week 156. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis, for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
- Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
- Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
- Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline
- Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
- Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
- Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113 or its excipients
- Major surgical procedures, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from a surgical procedure or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| JNJ-77242113JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally. | Drug | JNJ-77242113, Placebo |
| PlaceboPlacebo will be administered orally | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis.Lesions were graded for induration,erythema and scaling, each using 5 point scale.Induration: 0=no evidence of plaque elevation,1=minimal plaque elevation,=0.25 millimeters(mm);2=mild plaque elevation,=0.5mm;3=moderate plaque elevation,=0.75 mm; 4=severe plaque elevation, greater than(>)1 mm; Erythema:0=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present,1=faint erythema,2=light red coloration,3=moderate red coloration,4=bright red coloration; Scaling:0=no evidence of scaling, 1=minimal; occasional fine scale over <5% of lesion, 2=mild; fine scale dominates,3=moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4=severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale:cleared(0),minimal(1), mild(2),moderate(3),or severe(4). Higher score=more severe disease. Baseline:closest measurement taken prior to or at time of first study drug administration date.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 (at least 90% improvement from baseline in PASI score) response at Week 16 were reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.
40 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of 0 at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Week 8 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
Time frame: Week 8
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Symptom and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >0
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 4 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
Time frame: Week 4
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 52 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 75 Responders at Week 24
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 52 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 90 Responders at Week 24
Time frame: Week 52
Time to Loss of PASI 75 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 75 Responders at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24 up to Week 52
Time to Loss of PASI 90 Among Participants Randomized at Week 24 and Were PASI 90 Responders at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24 up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-Grade Improvement in Genital Psoriasis From Baseline at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=2
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (Hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Hf-PGA Score >=2
Time frame: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline mNAPSI Score >0
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline f-PGA Score >=2
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Sign Score >0
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline GenPS-SFQ Item 2 Score >=2 and a Baseline sPGA-G Score >=3
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline DLQI Score >1
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Adult Participants: Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants Achieving Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline CDLQI Score >1
Time frame: Week 16
Adolescent Participants: Change From Baseline in CDLQI at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Adolescent Participants: Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the PROMIS-25 Pediatric Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 at Week 52 Among Participants Who Were IGA 0 Responders at Week 24
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Week 52 Among PASI 100 Responders at Week 24
Time frame: Week 52
Time to Loss of IGA Response of 0 or 1
Time frame: Week 24 up to Week 52
Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants With IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Adolescent Participants: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From Week 0 up to Week 160
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From Week 0 up to Week 160
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41191940Bissonnette R, Soung J, Hebert AA, Pink AE, Pinter A, Moore AY, Shi Y, Wang WH, Toth DP, Miller-Kassamali M, Cafone J, Jiang J, Li S, DeKlotz CMC, Nunes F, Lebwohl MG. Oral Icotrokinra for Plaque Psoriasis in Adults and Adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2025 Nov 6;393(18):1784-1795. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2504187.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Related trials for Plaque Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CS32582 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Non-pustular Palmoplantar Psoriasis
Palmoplantar Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Investigate the Effectiveness of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) Following Initiation of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque PsO and Obesity or Overweight in Clinical Practice (TOGETHER AMPLIFY-PsO)
Psoriasis, Overweight or Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
170 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing JNJ-77242113 in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 170 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 170 sites in United States, Germany, Poland, China, Canada and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06095115, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.