AzTrials
AzTrials

Vitamin D SupplementationTransVitDNCT06098846

Human Transdermal Vitamin D Supplement Study

A study testing Vitamin D phosphate in people with Vitamin D Supplementation, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite the wide availability of vitamin D supplements vitamin D deficiency remains a concerning global problem. It is hypothesised that hypothesize that vitamin D delivered via the skin will overcome the problems associated with variable oral bioavailability and lead to a patient-friendly and efficacious means to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vitamin D Supplementation
What is being tested?
Vitamin D phosphate
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
108 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
23 Oct 2023to 10 Sep 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy adults between 18 and 65 years of age
  • Suspected low vitamin D levels (defined as moderate or high risk using the Deschasaux questionnaire (10))
  • Written informed consent for study participation.
  • Willingness to comply with all study requirements.
  • Competent use of English language.

Who cannot join

  • Patients unable to give informed consent.
  • The use of vitamin D supplements 4 weeks prior to the commencement of the study (and unwilling to washout).
  • Pregnancy
  • Those with parathyroid, thyroid, or calcium disorders, sarcoidosis, a requirement for calcium channel blockers, Type I diabetes, and concurrent active malignancies.
  • Those who have been diagnosed with vitamin D deficiency by a GP in the last 3 months using a blood test.
  • Those who have been diagnosed with vitamin D deficiency by a GP in the last 6 months using a blood test and have not taken any vitamin D supplements.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London

    London, London, SE19NH

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Human Transdermal Vitamin D Supplement Study

Despite the wide availability of vitamin D supplements vitamin D deficiency remains a concerning global problem. It is hypothesised that hypothesize that vitamin D delivered via the skin will overcome the problems associated with variable oral bioavailability and lead to a patient-friendly and efficacious means to supplement this vitamin. The main objective of this study is therefore to test the efficacy of a vitamin D transdermal patch that employs vitamin D phosphate to deliver the vitamin D into the blood.

In this two-part supplementation study healthy individuals with a risk of vitamin D deficiency (n=118), aged between 18 - 65 years, will be recruited. The recruitment in central London, UK, will ensure a multicultural, multi-ethnic cohort to enable the findings to be translated into evidence to try and find a solution for the global vitamin D deficiency problem.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to understand the ability of a vitamin D transdermal patch to provide effective vitamin D supplementation. To do this, the study team will identify, using a questionnaire (validated collection tool), a cohort of healthy individuals who are at risk of vitamin D deficiency. The study team will take the personal details of the volunteers, a full medical history, food, exercise, body indices, and diet information and register these details. A baseline assessment will be taken of those patients who are identified by the questionnaire as likely to have low vitamin D levels and meet the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. The baseline measurements will include a blood sample to determine 25(OH)vitamin D3 (25(OH)VD3) concentration in the serum (perhaps also other metabolites), vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) concentrations in the blood serum and the skin interstitial fluid, parathyroid hormone levels and calcium in the blood. It will also require images of the human nails. This information will help to understand the vitamin D status of each study participant. This baseline data will be uploaded to a secure database and form the basic demographic information and baseline levels prior to the application of the vitamin D supplement patch.

The supplementation study will take 2 parts. In part one, two cohorts of 8 participants will be provided with one of two doses of the supplement in a dose escalation pilot study. These cohorts will be supplemented in sequence to establish the safety of the dose, with the lowest dose being confirmed to be safe prior to the second dose being tested. The primary outcome will be safety and tolerability. A calcium measure of more than 12 mg/dL or 25(OH)VD3 > 150 nM/L will indicate a risk of toxicity at the 2-week or 4-week blood draw and the dosing would terminate and this would be considered as a serious adverse event. If there are serious adverse events in 2 or more of the participants the dose will not be safe. The secondary outcome will be efficacy, and a change of 25(OH)VD3 of less than 5 nM/L in more than 75% of participants would indicate the dose is ineffective after 4 weeks and this will be used to guide the second cohort dosing.

Upon completion of part 1 the second part will begin. In part 2, the participants will be randomized by a statistician into 4 interventional arms, one placebo, and 3 different patch dosing frequencies. In part 2, the study will last 8 weeks with measurements at weeks 4 and 8. Part 2 will have an interim analysis at week 4, then it will proceed with only 2 study arms and make final measurements on week 8. The dosing for part 2 in the different arms of the study will be based on the part 1 results. The aim of these two studies is to establish if vitamin D supplementation via the skin improves the vitamin D status and at what dosing level/interval is required to achieve this.

Being tested
Vitamin D phosphate, Placebo transdermal patch
Keywords
vitamin D, supplementation, transdermal patch

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin D phosphateDietary supplement

    Application of a Vitamin D phosphate active patch

  • Placebo transdermal patchDietary supplement

    Application of a placebo transdermal patch

Study groups in NCT06098846
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo patchPlacebo comparatorPlacebo transdermal patch daily
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo transdermal patch
Dose Frequency 1Active comparatorActive transdermal patch daily (actives could be alternated with placebo in a given sequence)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D phosphate
Dose Frequency 2Active comparatorActive transdermal patch daily (actives could be alternated with placebo in a given sequence)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D phosphate
Dose Frequency 3Active comparatorActive transdermal patch daily (actives could be alternated with placebo in a given sequence)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D phosphate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Measurement of the % change in 25(OH)vitamin D3 concentration in human serum compared to baseline

    Concentration of 25(OH)vitamin in the serum (ng/ml)

    Measured: After 4 and 8 weeks compared to baseline

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Measurement of the % change in vitamin D binding protein concentration in human serum compared to baseline

    Concentration of vitamin D binding protein levels in the serum (micrograms per ml)

    Measured: After 4 and 8 weeks compared to baseline

  2. Measurement % of chemical biomarker concentrations in the human skin interstitial fluid compared to baseline

    Concentration change of chemicals identified in skin interstitial fluid (ng/ml)

    Measured: 4 and 8 weeks compared to baseline

  3. Measurement of the change in human nail plate characteristics measured using pixels compared to baseline

    Quantification of image feature change in nail photographs (unit pixels)

    Measured: 4 and 8 weeks compared to baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Oct 2023
  2. Study start23 Oct 2023
  3. Primary completion10 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion10 Sep 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
108 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06098846
Sponsor's protocol ID
HR/DP-22/23-34078
Acronym
TransVitD
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
5 Oct 2023
Last updated
12 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kawashita M, Lim CH, Hibbard T, Andriollo P, Li Y, Lawrence KP, John E, Royall PR, Guo Q, Tasdemir D, Ayrton O, Fitzgerald O'Connor E, Benaouda F, Bashir S, Cilibrizzi A, Luebcke P, Young AR, Douiri A, O'Shaughnessy R, Carpenter G, Alhnan M, Jones SA. A UV-Free Strategy for Vitamin D Synthesis in Skin: Concept Verification and a Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of a Cholecalciferol Phosphate Patch (TransVitD). Br J Dermatol. 2026 Oct 1:ljag421. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljag421. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42817826
  • Hibbard T, Andriollo P, Lim CH, Guo Q, Lawrence KP, Coker B, Malek R, Douiri A, Alhnan MA, Jones SA. A multistage double-blind placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of transdermal vitamin D phosphate supplementation (TransVitD). Trials. 2025 Feb 19;26(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08711-8.

    PubMed 39972355

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Vitamin D phosphate in people with Vitamin D Supplementation, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Measurement of the % change in 25(OH)vitamin D3 concentration in human serum compared to baseline (time frame: After 4 and 8 weeks compared to baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06098846, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in