AzTrials
AzTrials

Biliary AtresiaPhase 2/3NCT06121375

Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of Obeticholic Acid (OCA) Compared to Placebo in Pediatric Participants With Biliary Atresia, Post-hepatoportoenterostomy

A Phase 2/3 study testing OCA in people with Biliary Atresia, run by Intercept Pharmaceuticals at 24 sites in 10 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability, as well as PK/PD of OCA in eligible pediatric participants with biliary atresia with successful hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE, also known as a Kasai portoenterostomy). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 day to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Biliary Atresia
What is being tested?
OCA
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
28 participants
Where
24 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
2 Sep 2024to 21 Oct 2025
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 day to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female pediatric participants from birth to <18 years old. Note: Participants aged <2 years old will not be enrolled until after review of safety data during the planned interim analysis and agreement from the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) that there is sufficient safety data to enroll this age group.
  • Diagnosis of non-syndromic biliary atresia.
  • Demonstrated successful HPE as defined by total bilirubin <2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (34.2 micromoles per liter [μmol/L]) at least 3 months post-HPE procedure.

Who cannot join

  • Prior liver transplant or active status on transplant list.
  • Participants diagnosed with biliary atresia splenic malformation (BASM).
  • Conjugated (direct) bilirubin ≥ upper limit of normal (ULN) of site-specific reference range. If conjugated bilirubin is not available: total bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL (34.2 mol/L).
  • Platelets <120,000/μL
  • International normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.5.
  • Current or history of complications of decompensated chronic liver disease including:
Show all 23Show fewer
  • Gastroesophageal varices and/or variceal bleeding
  • Clinically evident ascites related to portal hypertension
  • Hepatic encephalopathy
  • Prior placement of portosystemic shunt
  • Hepatopulmonary syndrome or portopulmonary hypertension
  • Hepatorenal syndrome
  • Any evidence of portal hypertension based on imaging (e.g., cavernous transformation of portal vein, abdominal varices, etc.)
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Childs-Pugh B or C
  • Height and weight Z-score <-2 per site-specific reference ranges.
  • Acholic (pale) stools.
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >4x ULN.
  • Alanine aminotransferase >4x ULN
  • GGT >500 Units per Liter (U/L)
  • On anticoagulation therapy
  • Albumin <3.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL).
  • Inability to swallow tablets (i.e., tablet or mini-tablet formulations).

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 10 countries.

24 sites in 10 countries

China5 sites
  • Guangzhou Women And Childrens Medical Center

    Guangzhou

  • Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006

  • Children's Hospital of Fudan University

    Shanghai

  • Childrens Hospital of Shanghai

    Shanghai

  • Children's Hospital of Shanxi

    Taiyuan

Other trials in China

Taiwan4 sites
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital

    Taichung

  • National Chen Kung University Hospital

    Tainan

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei

  • Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Taoyuan

Other trials in Taiwan

Australia3 sites
  • Women's and Children's Hospital

    North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006

  • Royal Childrens Hospital

    Parkville, Victoria, 3104

  • Queensland Childrens Hospital

    South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101

Other trials in Australia

Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
  • Hacettepe Universitesi ihsan Dogramaci Cocuk Hastansesi

    Ankara, 06230

  • Ege Üniversitesi Hastanesi Pediatrik Gastroenteroloji Bölümü

    Bornova, İzmir, 35100

  • Akdeniz Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Pediatrik Gastroenteroloji

    Konyaalti, Antalya, 07050

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Canada2 sites
  • Alberta Childrens Hospital

    Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8

  • Stollery Children's Hospital

    Edmonton, Alberta

Other trials in Canada

Israel2 sites
  • Hadassah Medical Center

    Jerusalem

  • Shaare-Zedek Medical Center

    Jerusalem

Other trials in Israel

Malaysia2 sites
  • Hospital Raja Perempuan Azinab II

    Kota Bharu, Kelantan, 15586

  • University Malaya Medical Center

    Kuala Lumpur, 59100

Other trials in Malaysia

Hong Kong1 site
  • Queen Mary Hospital

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

New Zealand1 site
  • Starship Child Health

    Auckland, 1142

Other trials in New Zealand

Singapore1 site
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital

    Singapore

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2/3 Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Obeticholic Acid Compared to Placebo in Pediatric Subjects With Biliary Atresia, Post-hepatoportoenterostomy

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability, as well as PK/PD of OCA in eligible pediatric participants with biliary atresia with successful hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE, also known as a Kasai portoenterostomy). The double-blind period comprises of 2 phases: dose titration phase and age expansion treatment phase.

Conditions
Biliary Atresia
Being tested
OCA, Matching Placebo
Keywords
Biliary Atresia, Placebo-controlled, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Obeticholic Acid, Efficacy, Post-hepatoportoenterostomy
Medical subject headings
Biliary Atresia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OCADrug

    OCA will be administered.

  • Matching PlaceboDrug

    Matching Placebo will be administered.

Study groups in NCT06121375
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Participants receiving OCAActive comparatorParticipants will be randomized to receive OCA (starting at 1.5 milligrams [mg] adult equivalent dose [AED]) orally, with water, once daily. Dose will be titrated every 2 weeks in a stepwise manner for the first 6 weeks, starting at 1.5 mg AED and titrating through 3 mg AED to a maximum of 5 mg AED, as tolerated; a discussion with the Medical Monitor is encouraged when determining uptitration if considerable signs or symptoms have arisen. Following the 6-week dose titration phase, participants will continue at the tolerated dose for approximately 24 months in Age Expansion Treatment Phase.
Receives: Drug: OCA
Participants receiving Matching placeboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will be randomized to receive matching placebo orally, with water, once daily. Dose will be titrated every 2 weeks in a stepwise manner for the first 6 weeks, starting at 1.5 mg AED and titrating through 3 mg AED to a maximum of 5 mg AED, as tolerated; a discussion with the Medical Monitor is encouraged when determining uptitration if considerable signs or symptoms have arisen. Following the 6-week dose titration phase, participants will continue at the tolerated dose for approximately 24 months in Age Expansion Treatment Phase.
Receives: Drug: Matching Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Composite Liver-Related Clinical Events

    Number of participants experiencing any of the following: All-cause death; Liver transplantation; Hospitalization (≥24 hours) for variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; Clinically relevant ascites requiring therapeutic paracentesis have been presented. No clinical outcome events were reported at the time of the study termination; hence It was not possible to conduct the planned primary efficacy analysis.

    Measured: Up to Week 48

  2. Change From Baseline in Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) Score

    The Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) score is a scale used to assess the severity of chronic liver disease in pediatric participants younger than 12 years of age. The total PELD score ranges from negative values to positive values, with no absolute minimum or maximum, with higher scores indicating more severe liver disease and greater urgency for liver transplantation. The score is calculated using total bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR), albumin, age at listing, and growth failure. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was calculated as the last post-baseline value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement, while a positive change indicates worsening.

    Measured: Baseline and up to Week 48

  3. Change From Baseline in Model of End-stage Liver Disease With Sodium (MELD-NA) Score

    The Model of End-stage Liver Disease with Sodium (MELD-Na) score is a scale used to assess the severity of chronic liver disease in participants 12 years of age and older, ranging from 6 (less ill) to 40 (gravely ill). Higher scores indicate more severe liver disease and greater urgency for liver transplantation. The score is derived from total bilirubin, serum creatinine, INR, and serum sodium. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was calculated as the last post-baseline value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement, while a positive change indicates worsening.

    Measured: Baseline and up to Week 48

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in GGT and Direct Bilirubin (Composite Responder Endpoint)

    Participants were considered responders if both of the following criteria were met at EOS: ≥40% reduction from baseline in Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), and ≥25% reduction from baseline in direct (conjugated) bilirubin. Participants with missing values were considered non-responders.

    Measured: Up to Week 48

  2. Change From Baseline in GGT

    Blood samples were collected to assess GGT levels. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and up to Week 48

  3. Change From Baseline in Total and Direct (Conjugated) Bilirubin

    Blood samples were collected to assess direct bilirubin levels. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and up to Week 48

  4. Change From Baseline in Endogenous Bile Acids

    Plasma samples were collected to assess endogenous bile acids. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and up to Week 48

  5. Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness as Assessed by Transient Elastography

    Liver stiffness was measured using ultrasound elastography. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and up to Week 48

  6. Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

    TEAEs were defined as adverse events that were reported or worsened on or after the first dose of study treatment. Serious adverse events are adverse events resulting in death, are immediately life threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity.

    Measured: Up to Week 48

  7. Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamin D

    Plasma samples were collected to assess levels of fat-soluble vitamins D. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48

  8. Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamin K

    Plasma samples were collected to assess levels of fat-soluble vitamin K. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to first study drug administration. Change from baseline was computed by subtracting the baseline value from the post-baseline value, with a positive change indicating improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2023
  2. Study start2 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completion21 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion21 Oct 2025

Why it stopped: Intercept made a business decision to terminate the study based on FDA's request for voluntary withdrawal of Ocaliva and the issuance of clinical hold on studies under US IND involving OCA.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06121375
Sponsor's protocol ID
747-308
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
2 Nov 2023
Last updated
7 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing OCA in people with Biliary Atresia, run by Intercept Pharmaceuticals at 24 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in China, Taiwan, Australia, Turkey (Türkiye), Canada and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Jul 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Composite Liver-Related Clinical Events (time frame: Up to Week 48). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in