Heart FailureEarly-RESYNCNCT06126081
Clinical Efficacy of Early Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
A study testing LBBP+GDMT and GDMT in people with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Pacing, run by Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
This is a two-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of early left bundle branch pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy and guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with mild-reduced ejection fraction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure, Left Bundle Branch Pacing
- What is being tested?
- LBBP+GDMT and GDMT
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 26 Jun 2023to Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- symptomatic heart failure despite guideline-directed medical therapy for at least 3 months, NYHA class II-IV, with an EF between 35% and 50%;
- complete LBBB meeting Strauss's standard definition
- Signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Expected survival less than 24 months;
- Indicated for ICD or pacing therapy;
- History of VT, VF, or hemodynamic instability;
- History of mechanical tricuspid valve replacement;
- Ischemic cardiomyopathy scheduled for CABG and PCI within 3 months;
- Severe structural heart disease may necessitate cardiac surgery or heart transplantation within 1 year;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Pregnancy or planning for pregnancy;
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or those underwent ventricular septal defect repair, in whom the success of LBBP is anticipated to be challenging;
- Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR < 15ml/min*1.73m^2).
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
China2 sites
Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037
The first affiliated hospital of Nanjing medical university
Nanjing, Jiangsu
About this study
Official title: Clinical Efficacy of Early Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Compared With Guideline-directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Mild-reduced Ejection Fraction.
This is a two-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of early left bundle branch pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy and guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with mild-reduced ejection fraction.
Read the detailed description
Early-resync is a two-center, prospective randomized controlled trial that is designed to determine whether early left bundle branch pacing has a better impact on LV function improvement as compared with traditional guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with mild-reduced ejection fraction(36%≤LVEF≤50%) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). Patients with symptomatic heart failure,36%≤LVEF≤50%, NYHA function class II-IV, and CLBBB(according to STRAUSS criteria) will be 1:1 randomized to LBBP+GDMT or GDMT group after enrollment and be followed at 3 and 6 months after randomization. LBBP will be performed by a double-chamber device in LBBP+GDMT group. All patients will receive GDMT. The primary endpoint is the change in the LVEF at 6 months after randomization from baseline.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Left Bundle Branch Pacing
- Being tested
- LBBP+GDMT, GDMT
- Keywords
- Heart Failure, Left Bundle Branch Pacing, Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LBBP+GDMTDevice
Also called Early Resynchc
LBBP is a procedure that the pacing lead is placed at the left bundle branch to achieve electrical and mechanical synchronization by pacing the left bundle branch area with stable pacing parameters.
GDMTDrug
Also called Conventional treatment
GDMT is defined as the drug strategy for treatment of heart failure according to the current guidelines.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LBBP+GDMT group | Experimental | Patients in the LBBP+GDMT group will receive LBBP using dual-chamber device as priority and guideline-directed medical therapy. The pacing lead will be implanted at the left bundle branch and whether LBB is captured will be judged during the procedure. For patients who LBBP is failed, CRTP using triple-chamber device or LVSP by using dual-chamber device will be an alternative option according to the co-determination after consultation between doctors and patients . Receives: Device: LBBP+GDMT |
| GDMT group | Active comparator | Patients in the GDMT group will receive guideline-directed medical therapy according to their complications, heart rate, blood pressure and so on. During follow-up of 6 months, patients may transfer to LBBP group if the LVEF decreased to <35% and patients accepted the device implantation. Receives: Drug: GDMT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ΔLVEF between baseline and 6-month follow-up
ΔLVEF:change in LVEF in percentage (%) between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
ΔLVEDD and ΔLVESV between baseline and 6-month follow-up
ΔLVEDD:change in LVEDD in millimeters between baseline and 6-month follow-up between two groups.
ΔLVESV:change in LVESV in milliliters between baseline and 6-month follow-up between two groups.
Measured: 6 months
The echocardiographic response rate of LVEF ≥50%
the percentage of patients with LVEF ≥50% at 6 month follow-up
Measured: 6 months
The changes of NYHA function class between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
NYHA function class (from I to IV) is evaluated by clinicians at each outpatient follow-up visit;
Measured: 6 months
Composite incidence rate of all-cause mortality and/or hospitalization for heart failure
All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Hospitalization for heart failure: an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required medication therapy.
Measured: 6 months
The rate of LVEF <=35% at six-month
The percentage of patients with LVEF <=35% at 6 month follow-up
Measured: 6 months
The changes of NT-proBNP between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
NT-proBNP in pg/ml was measured by performing a blood test;
Measured: 6 months
The changes of 6MWD between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
6MWD in meters stands for "6-Minute Walk Distance." It is a common test used to assess a person's functional exercise capacity and cardiovascular endurance. During the test, the patient is asked to walk as far as possible within a span of 6 minutes in a straight path or designated walking course;
Measured: 6 months
The changes of QoL between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
QoL stands for "Quality of Life", which is measured by The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). The MLHFQ is a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire for patients with HF, comprising 21 items from 0 (none) to 5 (very much). It provides a total score (range 0-105, from best to worst HRQoL).
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2023
- Study start26 Jun 2023
- Primary completionJun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 1:1 randomized to two groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Xiaohan Fan, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China
- Investigators
- Xiaohan Fan, PhD, Principal investigator, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06126081
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023-1996
- Acronym
- Early-RESYNC
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 5 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 31 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Efficacy of Early Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Compared With Guideline-directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Mild-reduced Ejection Fraction.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06126081
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Early-RESYNC / 2023-1996
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Left Bundle Branch Pacing
- Keywords
- Heart Failure, Left Bundle Branch Pacing, Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, ChinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
- Study start
- 26 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a two-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of early left bundle branch pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy and guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with mild-reduced ejection fraction.
Detailed description
Early-resync is a two-center, prospective randomized controlled trial that is designed to determine whether early left bundle branch pacing has a better impact on LV function improvement as compared with traditional guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with mild-reduced ejection fraction(36%≤LVEF≤50%) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). Patients with symptomatic heart failure,36%≤LVEF≤50%, NYHA function class II-IV, and CLBBB(according to STRAUSS criteria) will be 1:1 randomized to LBBP+GDMT or GDMT group after enrollment and be followed at 3 and 6 months after randomization. LBBP will be performed by a double-chamber device in LBBP+GDMT group. All patients will receive GDMT. The primary endpoint is the change in the LVEF at 6 months after randomization from baseline.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 1:1 randomized to two groups
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LBBP+GDMT group | Experimental | Device: LBBP+GDMTPatients in the LBBP+GDMT group will receive LBBP using dual-chamber device as priority and guideline-directed medical therapy. The pacing lead will be implanted at the left bundle branch and whether LBB is captured will be judged during the procedure. For patients who LBBP is failed, CRTP using triple-chamber device or LVSP by using dual-chamber device will be an alternative option according to the co-determination after consultation between doctors and patients . |
| GDMT group | Active comparator | Drug: GDMTPatients in the GDMT group will receive guideline-directed medical therapy according to their complications, heart rate, blood pressure and so on. During follow-up of 6 months, patients may transfer to LBBP group if the LVEF decreased to <35% and patients accepted the device implantation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- symptomatic heart failure despite guideline-directed medical therapy for at least 3 months, NYHA class II-IV, with an EF between 35% and 50%;
- complete LBBB meeting Strauss's standard definition
- Signed informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Expected survival less than 24 months;
- Indicated for ICD or pacing therapy;
- History of VT, VF, or hemodynamic instability;
- History of mechanical tricuspid valve replacement;
- Ischemic cardiomyopathy scheduled for CABG and PCI within 3 months;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LBBP+GDMTAlso: Early ResynchcLBBP is a procedure that the pacing lead is placed at the left bundle branch to achieve electrical and mechanical synchronization by pacing the left bundle branch area with stable pacing parameters. | Device | LBBP+GDMT group |
| GDMTAlso: Conventional treatmentGDMT is defined as the drug strategy for treatment of heart failure according to the current guidelines. | Drug | GDMT group |
Primary outcome
ΔLVEF between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
ΔLVEF:change in LVEF in percentage (%) between baseline and 6-month follow-up
8 secondary outcomes
ΔLVEDD and ΔLVESV between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
The echocardiographic response rate of LVEF ≥50%
Time frame: 6 months
The changes of NYHA function class between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
Time frame: 6 months
Composite incidence rate of all-cause mortality and/or hospitalization for heart failure
Time frame: 6 months
The rate of LVEF <=35% at six-month
Time frame: 6 months
The changes of NT-proBNP between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
Time frame: 6 months
The changes of 6MWD between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
Time frame: 6 months
The changes of QoL between baseline and 6-month follow-up.
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xiaohan Fan, PhD principal investigator
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing LBBP+GDMT and GDMT in people with Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Pacing, run by Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ΔLVEF between baseline and 6-month follow-up (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2026.