Heart FailureNCT06142903
Comparative Effectiveness of 7 Versus 21 Home-delivered Medically Tailored Meals to Improve Malnutrition Risk in Malnourished Patients With Heart Failure
A study testing 7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per week in people with Heart Failure and Malnutrition, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This protocol is designed to compare the effectiveness of two dietary intervention doses for patients with heart failure (HF) and malnutrition risk or malnutrition at hospital discharge. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure, Malnutrition
- What is being tested?
- 7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per week
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2022to 1 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18
- Diagnosis of Heart Failure (NYHA Class 1-3/ ACC/AHA Stage C) and moderate or severe malnutrition or malnutrition risk
- Residence within MANNA delivery area
Who cannot join
- >90 years of age
- Dementia/cognitive decline
- Heart Failure stage 4 or D
- Chronic kidney disease stage 5 or dialysis-dependent (GFR<30 mL/min/1.72 m2)
- Unstable COPD as COPD flare within prior 3 months
- Active cancer therapy
Show all 13Show fewer
- Pregnancy
- Living in a residential facility such as prison, long-term care, rehabilitation, other
- Allergy to foods on the menus
- Persistent hyperkalemia (> 5 mEq/L) more than twice without excess potassium intake during hospital admission
- Persistent hypotension (systolic BP<100 mm Hg) during the hospital admission
- Systolic BP> 180 or diastolic BP >100 mmHg
- Active substance or alcohol abuse
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Official title: THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF 7 VERSUS 21 HOME-DELIVERED MEDICALLY TAILORED MEALS TO IMPROVE MALNUTRITION RISK IN MALNOURISHED PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE: A RANDOM ORDER CROSSOVER FEEDING TRIAL (MEDIMEALS)
This protocol is designed to compare the effectiveness of two dietary intervention doses for patients with heart failure (HF) and malnutrition risk or malnutrition at hospital discharge. This random order crossover design will provide evidence as to whether the provision of dinner meals alone versus all 3 daily meals to patients' homes is more effective at improving malnutrition risk score, and secondarily unplanned emergency department visits and readmissions.
Read the detailed description
1.1 Background and Relevant Literature Heart failure (HF) is a common clinical syndrome occurring in 6.2 million adults in the US with a cost of $30.7 million in 2012 due to health care services, medications, and missed days of work. The symptoms of HF result from the impaired ability of the heart to deliver blood and oxygen adequately to peripheral tissues.
Patients with HF at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania experience worse than expected clinical outcomes. Length of hospital stay in FY2021 (mean LOS 7.49 d, expected LOS 6.6 d) and FY22 (mean 7.21 d, expected 6.6 d), and 30-day readmissions were 17.1% in FY21 and 17.3% in FY22.
Malnutrition is a common comorbid condition with HF. In an observation of 4000 patients with HF, 57% had at least mild malnutrition, a condition that was associated with increased mortality. The malnutrition reported with HF comprises protein-energy malnutrition, muscle wasting, and cachexia, variables evaluated during malnutrition assessment.
Patients with malnutrition have worse clinical outcomes. Patients at our hospital who had moderate or severe disease-related malnutrition during the hospital stay had significantly more 30-day readmissions (40% versus 23%, OR 2.13, 1.82-2.48), greater mortality (OR 1.47, 1.0-1.99), and longer length of stay (15 vs 12 days, p= 0.0067) than patients who did not meet criteria for malnutrition4. In data from the 2012-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, malnutrition was associated with mortality OR of 2.48, 2.3-2.66, almost double the admission cost, and longer length of stay of 8.7 days, 8.5-8.6 vs 5.3, 5.2-5.35.
The mainstay of HF disease management is patient self-management of medications, diet (restriction of Na with limited alcohol and fluid restriction to 1.5-2 L daily). Daily self-weighing is a strategy to detect fluid accumulation and permit adjustment of fluid intake or medical therapy. In addition to a Na restriction, the Diet Approach to Stop Hypertension or Mediterranean diet has been suggested. To optimize cardiovascular health and reduce cardiac deaths and strokes by 20%, the 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines included an evidence-based dietary approach targeting servings of six food groups (optimal intake of whole grains, fruits/vegetables, nuts/seeds/legumes, and fish; with limited intake of processed meats and sweet beverages)8 and with restriction of sodium intake to < 1500 mg and saturated fat to <7% of kcal. The DASH diet approach emphasizes intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, dairy, nuts/seeds/legumes, and limits intake of meat, sweets, and fats. A six-month nutrition intervention that included oral nutrition supplements in malnourished patients with HF significantly reduced mortality.
While readmissions in patients with HF are generally attributed to disease exacerbations, the disease exacerbations may be related to diet. Patients with HF should follow a strict Na-restricted heart healthy diet as a strategy to limit fluid accumulation that can exacerbate symptoms of edema, bloating and dyspnea. However, disease-related symptoms of fatigue or dyspnea may make preparing such a diet challenging because meals must be prepared without the use of processed or commercial frozen food items due to their high sodium and fat content.
Clinicians often treat patients with HF in the ED during emergency department visits (EDV) to avoid formal hospital admissions, though data on this outcome are not commonly reported. However, EDVs are disruptive to the quality of life of the patient and utilize hospital resources. We hypothesize that reducing malnutrition risk by providing medically-tailored meals may provide protection against 30-day unplanned readmissions and EDV.
Simple interventions such as provision of medically-tailored meals to the patient's home setting hold the potential to improve malnutrition and prevent both EDV and readmissions. One pilot trial compared 21 meals/week to standard care in patients with HF, with a trend towards fewer readmissions in the meals treatment arm. A small pilot in elderly patients, 38% of whom were diagnosed with HF, determined that it was feasible to provide 10 days of home-delivered meals, but lacked statistical power to determine the impact on readmissions by 45 days. However, there are no data to determine whether dinner meals alone will provide equivalent outcomes to 21 meals/week, or whether provision of medically tailored meals can improve malnutrition risk or reduce EDVs or readmissions.
2 Study Objectives The overall objective of the study is to determine whether the provision of 7 or 21 medically tailored meals per week to the patient in their home setting can improve malnutrition risk (MST score), and secondarily reduce 30-day unplanned EDV, readmissions, and improve diet quality by PDH score.
2.1 Primary Objective • To compare the effectiveness of home delivery of 7 versus 21 medically-tailored meals per week on improvement (reduction) in malnutrition risk (MST score).
2.2 Secondary Objectives
- To compare the effectiveness of home delivery of 7 versus 21 medically-tailored meals per week on unplanned 30-day EDV or readmissions and PHD score.
3 Investigational Plan Patients with HF who are identified with moderate or severe malnutrition during their HUP admission will be offered participation in the random order crossover design home-based feeding trial. Telephone visits with the patient at day 0±5, 30±5 and 60±5 will be used to gather MST, PHD, SARC-F, calf circumference, and weight data. The meals will be delivered weekly to the patient's home address by MANNA. The EDV and readmission outcomes will be adjudicated by the clinical dietitian in consultation with the cardiology medical team, as planned or unplanned events. Adverse events will be adjudicated for seriousness and relatedness to the diet intervention by Dr Bruce Kinosian, the study's safety officer.
3.1 General Design Consented patients will be randomized using a computer-generated scheme to delivery of either 7 dinner meals or 21 meals (7 breakfast, 7 lunch, 7 dinner meals) each week for 4 weeks duration. At approximately day 0, 30 and 60 relative to discharge from the hospital, patients will be contacted by telephone to assess their MST score, diet quality relative to AHA dietary goals, and obtain their self-measured weight and calf circumference.
3.2 Allocation to Interventional Group Subjects will be randomized in a one to one fashion to the order of 7 versus 21 meals/week intervention for one month followed immediately by the other treatment arm, using a computer-generated algorithm designed by the study statistician. MANNA contacts will be aware of the treatment arm assignment, but the study personnel will be blinded. Because the study meals are provided using the same foods, a washout period is not indicated.
3.3 Study Measures Each of the following tools will be collected by telephone contact with enrolled patients at approximately 0, 30 and 60 days relative to hospital discharge.
The Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) score ranges from 0-5, with higher scores indicating greater risk of malnutrition.
The Penn Healthy Diet Survey (PHD) score ranges 0-64, with higher scores indicating a healthier diet.
Sarcopenia Screening Tool (SARC-F) score ranges 0-10 with higher results indicating greater debility.
Calf Circumference will be measured in cm by the patient or a caregiver at the maximum diameter of the calf using a paper measuring tape provided by the study prior to discharge.
Weight measured on the day of the telephone call will be recorded.
Adherence to medically-tailored meals will be determined by asking the patient how many of the meal entrees they were able to consume in the prior week.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Malnutrition
- Being tested
- 7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per week
- Keywords
- medically-tailored meals, diet quality, readmissions, emergency department visits
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Malnutrition
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per weekOther
Meals designed to support overall cardiovascular health will be provided to patients in their own home setting.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 7 medically-tailored meals per week | Placebo comparator | Patients will be randomized to medically tailored dinner meals delivered to their homes for four weeks. Receives: Other: 7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per week |
| 21 medically-tailored meals per week | Active comparator | Patients will be randomized to three medically tailored dinner meals each day delivered to their homes for four weeks. Receives: Other: 7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per week |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change in malnutrition risk
Malnutrition risk will be measured by the Malnutrition Risk Score survey
Measured: one month
Secondary outcomes (2)
Emergency Department Visits
ED visits will be evaluated relative to likelihood of dietary vs disease influence
Measured: one month
Readmissions within 30 days
Readmissions during each 30-day window of diet treatment arm will be evaluated relative to the influence of diet versus disease
Measured: one month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2023
- Study start1 Aug 2022
- Primary completion1 Feb 2024
- Study completion1 Feb 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Consented patients will be randomized using a computer-generated scheme in REDcap to delivery of either 7 dinner meals or 21 meals (7 breakfast, 7 lunch, 7 dinner meals) each week for 4 weeks duration. At approximately day 0, 30 and 60 relative to discharge from the hospital, patients will be contacted by telephone to assess their malnutrition risk score, diet quality relative to AHA dietary goals, and obtain their self-measured weight and calf circumference.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charlene Compher, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06142903
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 850914
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 20 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data will not be shared.
Publications
Compher CW, Quinn R, Haslam R, Bader E, Weaver J, Dudek S, Ritchie MD, Lewis JD, Wu GD. Penn Healthy Diet survey: pilot validation and scoring. Br J Nutr. 2024 Jan 14;131(1):156-162. doi: 10.1017/S0007114523001642. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
PubMed 37519237Compher C, Henstenburg JA, Aloupis M, Sun A, Quinn R, Emery E, Thomas J, Crafford AG, Schwartz DR. The nutritional impact of 7 versus 21 home-delivered medically tailored meals in patients with heart failure and malnutrition risk: a random order crossover feeding trial (MEDIMEALS). BMC Nutr. 2025 Mar 18;11(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40795-025-01036-y.
PubMed 40102963
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF 7 VERSUS 21 HOME-DELIVERED MEDICALLY TAILORED MEALS TO IMPROVE MALNUTRITION RISK IN MALNOURISHED PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE: A RANDOM ORDER CROSSOVER FEEDING TRIAL (MEDIMEALS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06142903
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 850914
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Malnutrition
- Keywords
- medically-tailored meals, diet quality, readmissions, emergency department visits
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This protocol is designed to compare the effectiveness of two dietary intervention doses for patients with heart failure (HF) and malnutrition risk or malnutrition at hospital discharge. This random order crossover design will provide evidence as to whether the provision of dinner meals alone versus all 3 daily meals to patients' homes is more effective at improving malnutrition risk score, and secondarily unplanned emergency department visits and readmissions.
Detailed description
1.1 Background and Relevant Literature Heart failure (HF) is a common clinical syndrome occurring in 6.2 million adults in the US with a cost of $30.7 million in 2012 due to health care services, medications, and missed days of work. The symptoms of HF result from the impaired ability of the heart to deliver blood and oxygen adequately to peripheral tissues.
Patients with HF at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania experience worse than expected clinical outcomes. Length of hospital stay in FY2021 (mean LOS 7.49 d, expected LOS 6.6 d) and FY22 (mean 7.21 d, expected 6.6 d), and 30-day readmissions were 17.1% in FY21 and 17.3% in FY22.
Malnutrition is a common comorbid condition with HF. In an observation of 4000 patients with HF, 57% had at least mild malnutrition, a condition that was associated with increased mortality. The malnutrition reported with HF comprises protein-energy malnutrition, muscle wasting, and cachexia, variables evaluated during malnutrition assessment.
Patients with malnutrition have worse clinical outcomes. Patients at our hospital who had moderate or severe disease-related malnutrition during the hospital stay had significantly more 30-day readmissions (40% versus 23%, OR 2.13, 1.82-2.48), greater mortality (OR 1.47, 1.0-1.99), and longer length of stay (15 vs 12 days, p= 0.0067) than patients who did not meet criteria for malnutrition4. In data from the 2012-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, malnutrition was associated with mortality OR of 2.48, 2.3-2.66, almost double the admission cost, and longer length of stay of 8.7 days, 8.5-8.6 vs 5.3, 5.2-5.35.
The mainstay of HF disease management is patient self-management of medications, diet (restriction of Na with limited alcohol and fluid restriction to 1.5-2 L daily). Daily self-weighing is a strategy to detect fluid accumulation and permit adjustment of fluid intake or medical therapy. In addition to a Na restriction, the Diet Approach to Stop Hypertension or Mediterranean diet has been suggested. To optimize cardiovascular health and reduce cardiac deaths and strokes by 20%, the 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines included an evidence-based dietary approach targeting servings of six food groups (optimal intake of whole grains, fruits/vegetables, nuts/seeds/legumes, and fish; with limited intake of processed meats and sweet beverages)8 and with restriction of sodium intake to < 1500 mg and saturated fat to <7% of kcal. The DASH diet approach emphasizes intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, dairy, nuts/seeds/legumes, and limits intake of meat, sweets, and fats. A six-month nutrition intervention that included oral nutrition supplements in malnourished patients with HF significantly reduced mortality.
While readmissions in patients with HF are generally attributed to disease exacerbations, the disease exacerbations may be related to diet. Patients with HF should follow a strict Na-restricted heart healthy diet as a strategy to limit fluid accumulation that can exacerbate symptoms of edema, bloating and dyspnea. However, disease-related symptoms of fatigue or dyspnea may make preparing such a diet challenging because meals must be prepared without the use of processed or commercial frozen food items due to their high sodium and fat content.
Clinicians often treat patients with HF in the ED during emergency department visits (EDV) to avoid formal hospital admissions, though data on this outcome are not commonly reported. However, EDVs are disruptive to the quality of life of the patient and utilize hospital resources. We hypothesize that reducing malnutrition risk by providing medically-tailored meals may provide protection against 30-day unplanned readmissions and EDV.
Simple interventions such as provision of medically-tailored meals to the patient's home setting hold the potential to improve malnutrition and prevent both EDV and readmissions. One pilot trial compared 21 meals/week to standard care in patients with HF, with a trend towards fewer readmissions in the meals treatment arm. A small pilot in elderly patients, 38% of whom were diagnosed with HF, determined that it was feasible to provide 10 days of home-delivered meals, but lacked statistical power to determine the impact on readmissions by 45 days. However, there are no data to determine whether dinner meals alone will provide equivalent outcomes to 21 meals/week, or whether provision of medically tailored meals can improve malnutrition risk or reduce EDVs or readmissions.
2 Study Objectives The overall objective of the study is to determine whether the provision of 7 or 21 medically tailored meals per week to the patient in their home setting can improve malnutrition risk (MST score), and secondarily reduce 30-day unplanned EDV, readmissions, and improve diet quality by PDH score.
2.1 Primary Objective • To compare the effectiveness of home delivery of 7 versus 21 medically-tailored meals per week on improvement (reduction) in malnutrition risk (MST score).
2.2 Secondary Objectives
- To compare the effectiveness of home delivery of 7 versus 21 medically-tailored meals per week on unplanned 30-day EDV or readmissions and PHD score.
3 Investigational Plan Patients with HF who are identified with moderate or severe malnutrition during their HUP admission will be offered participation in the random order crossover design home-based feeding trial. Telephone visits with the patient at day 0±5, 30±5 and 60±5 will be used to gather MST, PHD, SARC-F, calf circumference, and weight data. The meals will be delivered weekly to the patient's home address by MANNA. The EDV and readmission outcomes will be adjudicated by the clinical dietitian in consultation with the cardiology medical team, as planned or unplanned events. Adverse events will be adjudicated for seriousness and relatedness to the diet intervention by Dr Bruce Kinosian, the study's safety officer.
3.1 General Design Consented patients will be randomized using a computer-generated scheme to delivery of either 7 dinner meals or 21 meals (7 breakfast, 7 lunch, 7 dinner meals) each week for 4 weeks duration. At approximately day 0, 30 and 60 relative to discharge from the hospital, patients will be contacted by telephone to assess their MST score, diet quality relative to AHA dietary goals, and obtain their self-measured weight and calf circumference.
3.2 Allocation to Interventional Group Subjects will be randomized in a one to one fashion to the order of 7 versus 21 meals/week intervention for one month followed immediately by the other treatment arm, using a computer-generated algorithm designed by the study statistician. MANNA contacts will be aware of the treatment arm assignment, but the study personnel will be blinded. Because the study meals are provided using the same foods, a washout period is not indicated.
3.3 Study Measures Each of the following tools will be collected by telephone contact with enrolled patients at approximately 0, 30 and 60 days relative to hospital discharge.
The Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) score ranges from 0-5, with higher scores indicating greater risk of malnutrition.
The Penn Healthy Diet Survey (PHD) score ranges 0-64, with higher scores indicating a healthier diet.
Sarcopenia Screening Tool (SARC-F) score ranges 0-10 with higher results indicating greater debility.
Calf Circumference will be measured in cm by the patient or a caregiver at the maximum diameter of the calf using a paper measuring tape provided by the study prior to discharge.
Weight measured on the day of the telephone call will be recorded.
Adherence to medically-tailored meals will be determined by asking the patient how many of the meal entrees they were able to consume in the prior week.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Consented patients will be randomized using a computer-generated scheme in REDcap to delivery of either 7 dinner meals or 21 meals (7 breakfast, 7 lunch, 7 dinner meals) each week for 4 weeks duration. At approximately day 0, 30 and 60 relative to discharge from the hospital, patients will be contacted by telephone to assess their malnutrition risk score, diet quality relative to AHA dietary goals, and obtain their self-measured weight and calf circumference.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 7 medically-tailored meals per week | Placebo comparator | Other: 7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per weekPatients will be randomized to medically tailored dinner meals delivered to their homes for four weeks. |
| 21 medically-tailored meals per week | Active comparator | Other: 7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per weekPatients will be randomized to three medically tailored dinner meals each day delivered to their homes for four weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ≥ 18
- Diagnosis of Heart Failure (NYHA Class 1-3/ ACC/AHA Stage C) and moderate or severe malnutrition or malnutrition risk
- Residence within MANNA delivery area
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- >90 years of age
- Dementia/cognitive decline
- Heart Failure stage 4 or D
- Chronic kidney disease stage 5 or dialysis-dependent (GFR<30 mL/min/1.72 m2)
- Unstable COPD as COPD flare within prior 3 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per weekMeals designed to support overall cardiovascular health will be provided to patients in their own home setting. | Other | 21 medically-tailored meals per week, 7 medically-tailored meals per week |
Primary outcome
change in malnutrition risk
Time frame: one month
Malnutrition risk will be measured by the Malnutrition Risk Score survey
2 secondary outcomes
Emergency Department Visits
Time frame: one month
Readmissions within 30 days
Time frame: one month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Feb 2025.
- Background: PubMed 37519237Compher CW, Quinn R, Haslam R, Bader E, Weaver J, Dudek S, Ritchie MD, Lewis JD, Wu GD. Penn Healthy Diet survey: pilot validation and scoring. Br J Nutr. 2024 Jan 14;131(1):156-162. doi: 10.1017/S0007114523001642. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40102963Compher C, Henstenburg JA, Aloupis M, Sun A, Quinn R, Emery E, Thomas J, Crafford AG, Schwartz DR. The nutritional impact of 7 versus 21 home-delivered medically tailored meals in patients with heart failure and malnutrition risk: a random order crossover feeding trial (MEDIMEALS). BMC Nutr. 2025 Mar 18;11(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40795-025-01036-y.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data will not be shared.
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charlene Compher principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per week in people with Heart Failure and Malnutrition, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change in malnutrition risk (time frame: one month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06142903, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2025.