Spine DeformityNCT06144879
Novel Pedicle Screws Used for Corrective Surgery in Spinal Deformity
A study testing double rods without dual-headed screw, three rods with one dual-headed screw and four rods with two dual-headed screw in people with Spine Deformity, run by The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
There are still a large number of severe spinal deformity cases which would keep progressing without treatment. These patients not only have severe appearance deformity, but also suffer from cardiopulmonary compression, reduced abdominal volume, and even spinal cord injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spine Deformity
- What is being tested?
- double rods without dual-headed screw, three rods with one dual-headed screw and four rods with two dual-headed screw
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2018to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- receive spinal corrective surgery from 2015-2020
- Age: 18-70 years old
- the Cobb angle of scoliosis or kyphosis more than 70 °
- posterior pedicle subtraction osteotomy(PSO), using novel duet screws in three-rod or four-rod group
- follow-up more than 24 months
Who cannot join
- previously received spinal surgery
- clinical and radiographic data preoperatively, postoperatively and last follow up were incomplete
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000
Xiaodong Qin, PH.D, 008615298386726, qinxd_njumed@163.com
About this study
Official title: The Biomechanics and Clinical Application of Novel Dual-headed Pedicle Screws in the Corrective Surgery for Spinal Deformity
There are still a large number of severe spinal deformity cases which would keep progressing without treatment. These patients not only have severe appearance deformity, but also suffer from cardiopulmonary compression, reduced abdominal volume, and even spinal cord injury. It is crucial to provide safe and effective surgical intervention for these patients. The corrective surgery with 3-column osteotomy is reported to be an effective surgical strategy for severe spinal deformity. However, due to the great corrective stress on the rods, there is an increased number of patients requiring revision surgery due to rod fracture (3.7%-15%). In patients with 3-column osteotomy, the osteotomy area and the upper and lower adjacent segments are mostly stress-concentrated areas, and the rod is prone to fatigue fracture. Therefore, it is necessary to reinforce the osteotomy area and adjacent segments to reduce the risk of rod fracture. Our previous study found the risk of rod fracture could be reduced by using satellite rods with duet connectors or dominos. However, in the traditional satellite rod technology, the connection of the main rod and the satellite rod rely on the traditional single slot screw and duet connectors. The two are separated and not a whole in the mechanical structure. The stability of the fixation is relatively insufficient, and stil deserves room for improvement.
Based on the traditional duet connectors, we further invent a novel dual-headed pedicle screw, which is an combination of traditional single slot screw and duet connector. Compared with the traditional duet connector, the novel dual-headed pedicle screw theoretically has stronger stability between the main rod and satellite rod, due to its integration of screw and connector. Hence, the purpose of this study is to verify the strong stability of the novel dual-headed screw by biomechanical study in cadavers performed with long spinal fusion (T12-pelvis) with L3 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). And to further investigate its effectiveness in severe adult spinal deformity patients receiving corrective surgery with PSO.
If the biomechanical properties and clinical effects of the novel dual-headed screw have been confirmed, the promotion of the product has great prospects in the world. The severe spinal deformity patients would benefit from this study when they receive spinal corrective surgery with 3-column osteotomy, using satellite rods technology by this novel dual-headed screw.
Read the detailed description
Kyphosis or scoliosis is a deformity of the three-dimensional structure of the spine caused by lateral or posterior displacement of the spine. According to the population incidence statistics, the number of patients with spinal deformity in China is more than 3 million. The continuous progression of untreated or improper spinal deformity not only causes severe deformity, but also compresses the heart, lung, neurospinal cord and other important organs, leading to cardiopulmonary failure, paraplegia and even death, bringing huge economic and social burden to the country and society.
Conventional spinal orthosis uses common pedicle screws and rods to straighten the twisted spine by turning the rods and pushing and pulling screws (multiple screws one rod mode). Compared with developed countries, there are a large number of patients with moderate to severe spinal deformity in China, and there are many problems in conventional orthopaedic techniques :(1) severe spinal deformity stiffness, often requiring three-column osteotomy, spinal cord distortion and shearing during orthopaedic and closure, and the incidence of neurological complications significantly increased (8%-23%); (2) The stress between screws and rods is concentrated, and the risk of fracture after traditional internal fixation is higher (5%-22%); (3) Complex spinal malformations (such as lumbosacral or cervix and chest malformations), the installation of orthopedic rod is difficult, time-consuming and laborious operation. Therefore, it is necessary to invent new orthopaedic internal fixation devices and techniques for the safe and effective treatment of numerous patients with moderate and severe complex spinal deformity in China.
The development of three-dimensional orthopaedic theory of spinal deformity and the application of three-column spinal osteotomy have significantly improved the surgical efficacy of severe spinal deformity. In recent years, the most widely used three-column spinal osteotomy mainly includes pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and total vertebral column osteotomy (VCR), both of which can achieve good effect. The correction rate was about 50%-70% . However, with the wide development of three-column spinal osteotomy and orthopaedic surgery, the number of patients needing revision surgery due to the complications of internal fixation failure such as broken rod is increasing. Previous literature reported that the complication rate of broken rod after severe spinal deformity was about 3.7%-15%. Suk et al. reported that the incidence of rod breakage after posterior VCR for severe spinal deformity was 7.1% (5/70). Smith et al. reported that the incidence of broken rod after PSO in adult spinal deformity patients was 15.8%. Lv et al. discussed the risk factors and management strategies of rod breakage after posterior VCR surgery for severe spinal deformity, and found that the incidence of rod breakage after surgery was 3.7%. Wang Fei et al. retrospectively analyzed 7 patients with rod breakage after posterior VCR, and found that rod breakage occurred mostly within 2 years after surgery, and residual kyphosis was an important risk factor for rod breakage after surgery. Other risk factors included trauma, anterior column defect, swing gait, single rod fixation and titanium mesh displacement, etc. In patients with tri-column spinal osteotomy, the osteotomy area and adjacent upper and lower segments are mostly stress concentrated areas, and the stable osseous fusion has not been formed in the short term after surgery, and the internal fixation rod is prone to fatigue fracture. Therefore, reinforcement of the osteotomy area and adjacent segments is required to reduce the risk of rod fracture. In the past, in order to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications of rod breakage, the commonly used improvement methods mainly include anterior support, increasing implant density and using thick rods. Anterior titanium mesh support has disadvantages such as difficulty in placement and postoperative subsidence, while increasing implant density and using thick rods will increase the cost of patients, and still cannot completely avoid the occurrence of postoperative rod breakage.
In the international scoliosis surgical orthosis mode, a long rod on the left and right sides of the spine is generally inserted into a single slot screw internal locking fixation. However, a major feature of severe scoliosis is the severe imbalance of the spine and the stiffness of the malformed segment, which makes the above traditional orthopaedic model difficult to achieve. Currently, scholars have widely recognized that the use of satellite rod technology in the periosteotomy area can reduce the risk of postoperative internal fixation failure in spinal deformity orthopaedic surgery. Scheer et al. showed in vitro biomechanical results that, compared with posterior internal fixation alone, the application of satellite rod technology in the peripherally fractured rod area could restore spinal strength during flexion, extension and left-right rotation, and the position of satellite rod was independent of spinal strength after revision. In 2012, the applicant team took the lead in applying the satellite rod technology in the three-column osteotomy for severe spinal deformity in China. The pedicle screws in the upper and lower segments of the osteotomy area were replaced by double-headed screws, making the screw placement simple. In addition, this technique does not increase the implant density of pedicle screws, and the satellite rods are mostly cut short rods, so there is no additional cost for patients. Relevant research results have been published in Spine and Chinese Journal of Orthopedics, etc.
However, in the traditional satellite rod technology, the fixation and connection of the main rod and the satellite rod rely on the traditional single slot screw and the traditional double slot connector, which are separated and not a whole in the mechanical structure, the stability of the rod is relatively poor, and the stability of the screw is insufficient. Applicants team early in order to solve the clinical problem, invented a kind of brand-new monomers double groove pedicle screws and internal fixation device, the new screw is always screw, on the basis of the traditional single slot screws and double groove connector combinations, constructed a new kind of monomers double groove pedicle screws (hereinafter referred to as new type double screw). The double-headed nail comprises a fixed end and a connecting end, and the connecting end is provided with two connecting slots: the main connecting slot and the auxiliary connecting slot. During the middle and posterior column osteotomy, double-headed nails were implanted at the head and tail of the osteotomy area, and satellite rods were placed across the osteotomy area and locked in the auxiliary connecting groove to keep the osteotomy area in a stable state during the osteotomy process. Then, the osteotomy point was closed by adjusting the satellite rods, and the main fixation rod was finally assembled.
The purpose of this study :(1) to investigate whether the multi-rod orthopaedic technique using a new double-headed screw after PSO osteotomy can improve the range of motion and biomechanical properties of the main rod strain. (2) To explore the feasibility of applying the new double-headed screw in PSO surgery for severe spinal deformity in adults, and to evaluate whether this technique can reduce the incidence of complications such as broken rod and improve the quality of life of patients.
- Conditions
- Spine Deformity
- Being tested
- double rods without dual-headed screw, three rods with one dual-headed screw, four rods with two dual-headed screw
- Keywords
- dual-headed pedicle screw
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
double rods without dual-headed screwProcedure or surgery
adult patients with severe spinal deformity who underwent PSO osteotomy and posterior spinal corrective surgery with traditional double rods (No dual-headed screw used)
three rods with one dual-headed screwProcedure or surgery
adult patients with severe spinal deformity who underwent PSO osteotomy and posterior spinal corrective surgery with three rods (one dual-headed screw used in unilateral side)
four rods with two dual-headed screwProcedure or surgery
adult patients with severe spinal deformity who underwent PSO osteotomy and posterior spinal corrective surgery with four rods (two dual-headed screw used in bilateral side)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| the double-rod group | Experimental | posterior spinal corrective surgery with osteotomy (two rods without dual-headed screw) Receives: Procedure: double rods without dual-headed screw |
| the three-rod group | Experimental | posterior spinal corrective surgery with osteotomy (three rods with one dual-headed screw) Receives: Procedure: three rods with one dual-headed screw |
| the four-rod group | Experimental | posterior spinal corrective surgery with osteotomy (four rods with two dual-headed screws) Receives: Procedure: four rods with two dual-headed screw |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cobb angle of scoliosis (°)
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the angle of the major curve in coronal X-ray
Measured: 1 week after operation
Cobb angle of kyphosis (°)
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the angle of the kyphosis in sagittal X-ray
Measured: 1 week after operation
Coronal balance (mm)
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the distance between C7 plumb line (C7PL) and center sacral vertical line (CSVL) in coronal X-ray
Measured: 1 week after operation
Sagittal balance (mm)
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the distance between C7PL and the posterior edge of sacrum in sagittal X-ray
Measured: 1 week after operation
Rod broken rate (%)
The ratio: number of patients with rod broken/ number of patients received surgery
Measured: 1 week after operation
Screw broke rate(%)
The ratio: number of patients with screw broken/ number of patients received surgery
Measured: 1 week after operation
Coronal decompensation rate(%)
The ratio: number of patients with coronal decompensation / number of patients received surgery
Measured: 1 week after operation
Sagittal decompensation(%)
The ratio: number of patients with sagittal decompensation / number of patients received surgery
Measured: 1 week after operation
Short form-36 health survey(SF-36)
SF-36 were calculated, including physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality,social functioning, role-emotional and mental health.The SF-36 score is expressed as a number between 0 and 100. The higher the number, the better the health outcome.
Measured: 1 week after operation
Cobb angle of scoliosis (°)
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the angle of the major curve in coronal X-ray
Measured: 2 years after operation
Cobb angle of kyphosis (°)
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the angle of the kyphosis in sagittal X-ray
Measured: 2 years after operation
Coronal balance (mm)
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the distance between C7PL and CSVL in coronal X-ray
Measured: 2 years after operation
Sagittal balance (mm)
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the distance between C7PL and the posterior edge of sacrum in sagittal X-ray
Measured: 2 years after operation
Rod broken rate (%)
The ratio: number of patients with rod broken/ number of patients received surgery
Measured: 2 years after operation
Screw broke rate(%)
The ratio: number of patients with screw broken/ number of patients received surgery
Measured: 2 years after operation
Coronal decompensation rate(%)
The ratio: number of patients with coronal decompensation / number of patients received surgery
Measured: 2 years after operation
Sagittal decompensation(%)
The ratio: number of patients with sagittal decompensation / number of patients received surgery
Measured: 2 years after operation
Short form-36 health survey(SF-36)
SF-36 were calculated, including physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality,social functioning, role-emotional and mental health.The SF-36 score is expressed as a number between 0 and 100. The higher the number, the better the health outcome.
Measured: 2 years after operation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2018
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spine DeformityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lili Sha, Ph.D, Study director, Medical Ethics Committee of Drum Tower Hospital affiliated to Nanjing University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06144879
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- qinxiaodong1991
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 16 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 22 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Lee JH, Jeong BO. Outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance of multiple etiologies: a retrospective review of 140 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 1;37(19):1667-75. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182552fd0.
PubMed 22433502Zhang Y, Hai Y, Tao L, Yang J, Zhou L, Yin P, Pan A, Zhang Y, Liu C. Posterior Multiple-Level Asymmetrical Ponte Osteotomies for Rigid Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e467-e473. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.173. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
PubMed 30922897Suk SI, Kim JH, Kim WJ, Lee SM, Chung ER, Nah KH. Posterior vertebral column resection for severe spinal deformities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):2374-82. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00012.
PubMed 12438987Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Demakakos J, Fu KM, Keshavarzi S, Li CM, Deviren V, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Bess S; International Spine Study Group. Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2012 Oct;71(4):862-7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182672aab.
PubMed 22989960Scheer JK, Tang JA, Deviren V, Buckley JM, Pekmezci M, McClellan RT, Ames CP. Biomechanical analysis of revision strategies for rod fracture in pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurgery. 2011 Jul;69(1):164-72; discussion 172. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820f362a.
PubMed 21336218Zhu ZZ, Chen X, Qiu Y, Chen ZH, Li S, Xu L, Sun X. Adding Satellite Rods to Standard Two-rod Construct With the Use of Duet Screws: An Effective Technique to Improve Surgical Outcomes and Preventing Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Posterior-Only Correction of Scheuermann Kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jul 1;43(13):E758-E765. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002489.
PubMed 29189571He Z, Chen Y, Liu Z, Yang B, Shi B, Wang Y, Feng Z, Zhang T, Chen X, Qiu Y, Qin X, Zhu Z. Biomechanical Advantages of Novel Duet Screws Plus Bilateral Satellite Rods Fixation in the Correction Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity. Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug;17(8):2454-2466. doi: 10.1111/os.70121. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
PubMed 40667831
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Biomechanics and Clinical Application of Novel Dual-headed Pedicle Screws in the Corrective Surgery for Spinal Deformity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06144879
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- qinxiaodong1991
- Conditions
- Spine Deformity
- Keywords
- dual-headed pedicle screw
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are still a large number of severe spinal deformity cases which would keep progressing without treatment. These patients not only have severe appearance deformity, but also suffer from cardiopulmonary compression, reduced abdominal volume, and even spinal cord injury. It is crucial to provide safe and effective surgical intervention for these patients. The corrective surgery with 3-column osteotomy is reported to be an effective surgical strategy for severe spinal deformity. However, due to the great corrective stress on the rods, there is an increased number of patients requiring revision surgery due to rod fracture (3.7%-15%). In patients with 3-column osteotomy, the osteotomy area and the upper and lower adjacent segments are mostly stress-concentrated areas, and the rod is prone to fatigue fracture. Therefore, it is necessary to reinforce the osteotomy area and adjacent segments to reduce the risk of rod fracture. Our previous study found the risk of rod fracture could be reduced by using satellite rods with duet connectors or dominos. However, in the traditional satellite rod technology, the connection of the main rod and the satellite rod rely on the traditional single slot screw and duet connectors. The two are separated and not a whole in the mechanical structure. The stability of the fixation is relatively insufficient, and stil deserves room for improvement.
Based on the traditional duet connectors, we further invent a novel dual-headed pedicle screw, which is an combination of traditional single slot screw and duet connector. Compared with the traditional duet connector, the novel dual-headed pedicle screw theoretically has stronger stability between the main rod and satellite rod, due to its integration of screw and connector. Hence, the purpose of this study is to verify the strong stability of the novel dual-headed screw by biomechanical study in cadavers performed with long spinal fusion (T12-pelvis) with L3 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). And to further investigate its effectiveness in severe adult spinal deformity patients receiving corrective surgery with PSO.
If the biomechanical properties and clinical effects of the novel dual-headed screw have been confirmed, the promotion of the product has great prospects in the world. The severe spinal deformity patients would benefit from this study when they receive spinal corrective surgery with 3-column osteotomy, using satellite rods technology by this novel dual-headed screw.
Detailed description
Kyphosis or scoliosis is a deformity of the three-dimensional structure of the spine caused by lateral or posterior displacement of the spine. According to the population incidence statistics, the number of patients with spinal deformity in China is more than 3 million. The continuous progression of untreated or improper spinal deformity not only causes severe deformity, but also compresses the heart, lung, neurospinal cord and other important organs, leading to cardiopulmonary failure, paraplegia and even death, bringing huge economic and social burden to the country and society.
Conventional spinal orthosis uses common pedicle screws and rods to straighten the twisted spine by turning the rods and pushing and pulling screws (multiple screws one rod mode). Compared with developed countries, there are a large number of patients with moderate to severe spinal deformity in China, and there are many problems in conventional orthopaedic techniques :(1) severe spinal deformity stiffness, often requiring three-column osteotomy, spinal cord distortion and shearing during orthopaedic and closure, and the incidence of neurological complications significantly increased (8%-23%); (2) The stress between screws and rods is concentrated, and the risk of fracture after traditional internal fixation is higher (5%-22%); (3) Complex spinal malformations (such as lumbosacral or cervix and chest malformations), the installation of orthopedic rod is difficult, time-consuming and laborious operation. Therefore, it is necessary to invent new orthopaedic internal fixation devices and techniques for the safe and effective treatment of numerous patients with moderate and severe complex spinal deformity in China.
The development of three-dimensional orthopaedic theory of spinal deformity and the application of three-column spinal osteotomy have significantly improved the surgical efficacy of severe spinal deformity. In recent years, the most widely used three-column spinal osteotomy mainly includes pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and total vertebral column osteotomy (VCR), both of which can achieve good effect. The correction rate was about 50%-70% . However, with the wide development of three-column spinal osteotomy and orthopaedic surgery, the number of patients needing revision surgery due to the complications of internal fixation failure such as broken rod is increasing. Previous literature reported that the complication rate of broken rod after severe spinal deformity was about 3.7%-15%. Suk et al. reported that the incidence of rod breakage after posterior VCR for severe spinal deformity was 7.1% (5/70). Smith et al. reported that the incidence of broken rod after PSO in adult spinal deformity patients was 15.8%. Lv et al. discussed the risk factors and management strategies of rod breakage after posterior VCR surgery for severe spinal deformity, and found that the incidence of rod breakage after surgery was 3.7%. Wang Fei et al. retrospectively analyzed 7 patients with rod breakage after posterior VCR, and found that rod breakage occurred mostly within 2 years after surgery, and residual kyphosis was an important risk factor for rod breakage after surgery. Other risk factors included trauma, anterior column defect, swing gait, single rod fixation and titanium mesh displacement, etc. In patients with tri-column spinal osteotomy, the osteotomy area and adjacent upper and lower segments are mostly stress concentrated areas, and the stable osseous fusion has not been formed in the short term after surgery, and the internal fixation rod is prone to fatigue fracture. Therefore, reinforcement of the osteotomy area and adjacent segments is required to reduce the risk of rod fracture. In the past, in order to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications of rod breakage, the commonly used improvement methods mainly include anterior support, increasing implant density and using thick rods. Anterior titanium mesh support has disadvantages such as difficulty in placement and postoperative subsidence, while increasing implant density and using thick rods will increase the cost of patients, and still cannot completely avoid the occurrence of postoperative rod breakage.
In the international scoliosis surgical orthosis mode, a long rod on the left and right sides of the spine is generally inserted into a single slot screw internal locking fixation. However, a major feature of severe scoliosis is the severe imbalance of the spine and the stiffness of the malformed segment, which makes the above traditional orthopaedic model difficult to achieve. Currently, scholars have widely recognized that the use of satellite rod technology in the periosteotomy area can reduce the risk of postoperative internal fixation failure in spinal deformity orthopaedic surgery. Scheer et al. showed in vitro biomechanical results that, compared with posterior internal fixation alone, the application of satellite rod technology in the peripherally fractured rod area could restore spinal strength during flexion, extension and left-right rotation, and the position of satellite rod was independent of spinal strength after revision. In 2012, the applicant team took the lead in applying the satellite rod technology in the three-column osteotomy for severe spinal deformity in China. The pedicle screws in the upper and lower segments of the osteotomy area were replaced by double-headed screws, making the screw placement simple. In addition, this technique does not increase the implant density of pedicle screws, and the satellite rods are mostly cut short rods, so there is no additional cost for patients. Relevant research results have been published in Spine and Chinese Journal of Orthopedics, etc.
However, in the traditional satellite rod technology, the fixation and connection of the main rod and the satellite rod rely on the traditional single slot screw and the traditional double slot connector, which are separated and not a whole in the mechanical structure, the stability of the rod is relatively poor, and the stability of the screw is insufficient. Applicants team early in order to solve the clinical problem, invented a kind of brand-new monomers double groove pedicle screws and internal fixation device, the new screw is always screw, on the basis of the traditional single slot screws and double groove connector combinations, constructed a new kind of monomers double groove pedicle screws (hereinafter referred to as new type double screw). The double-headed nail comprises a fixed end and a connecting end, and the connecting end is provided with two connecting slots: the main connecting slot and the auxiliary connecting slot. During the middle and posterior column osteotomy, double-headed nails were implanted at the head and tail of the osteotomy area, and satellite rods were placed across the osteotomy area and locked in the auxiliary connecting groove to keep the osteotomy area in a stable state during the osteotomy process. Then, the osteotomy point was closed by adjusting the satellite rods, and the main fixation rod was finally assembled.
The purpose of this study :(1) to investigate whether the multi-rod orthopaedic technique using a new double-headed screw after PSO osteotomy can improve the range of motion and biomechanical properties of the main rod strain. (2) To explore the feasibility of applying the new double-headed screw in PSO surgery for severe spinal deformity in adults, and to evaluate whether this technique can reduce the incidence of complications such as broken rod and improve the quality of life of patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| the double-rod group | Experimental | Procedure: double rods without dual-headed screwposterior spinal corrective surgery with osteotomy (two rods without dual-headed screw) |
| the three-rod group | Experimental | Procedure: three rods with one dual-headed screwposterior spinal corrective surgery with osteotomy (three rods with one dual-headed screw) |
| the four-rod group | Experimental | Procedure: four rods with two dual-headed screwposterior spinal corrective surgery with osteotomy (four rods with two dual-headed screws) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- receive spinal corrective surgery from 2015-2020
- Age: 18-70 years old
- the Cobb angle of scoliosis or kyphosis more than 70 °
- posterior pedicle subtraction osteotomy(PSO), using novel duet screws in three-rod or four-rod group
- follow-up more than 24 months
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- previously received spinal surgery
- clinical and radiographic data preoperatively, postoperatively and last follow up were incomplete
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| double rods without dual-headed screwadult patients with severe spinal deformity who underwent PSO osteotomy and posterior spinal corrective surgery with traditional double rods (No dual-headed screw used) | Procedure or surgery | the double-rod group |
| three rods with one dual-headed screwadult patients with severe spinal deformity who underwent PSO osteotomy and posterior spinal corrective surgery with three rods (one dual-headed screw used in unilateral side) | Procedure or surgery | the three-rod group |
| four rods with two dual-headed screwadult patients with severe spinal deformity who underwent PSO osteotomy and posterior spinal corrective surgery with four rods (two dual-headed screw used in bilateral side) | Procedure or surgery | the four-rod group |
Primary outcome
Cobb angle of scoliosis (°)
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the angle of the major curve in coronal X-ray
Cobb angle of kyphosis (°)
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the angle of the kyphosis in sagittal X-ray
Coronal balance (mm)
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the distance between C7 plumb line (C7PL) and center sacral vertical line (CSVL) in coronal X-ray
Sagittal balance (mm)
Time frame: 1 week after operation
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the distance between C7PL and the posterior edge of sacrum in sagittal X-ray
Rod broken rate (%)
Time frame: 1 week after operation
The ratio: number of patients with rod broken/ number of patients received surgery
Screw broke rate(%)
Time frame: 1 week after operation
The ratio: number of patients with screw broken/ number of patients received surgery
Coronal decompensation rate(%)
Time frame: 1 week after operation
The ratio: number of patients with coronal decompensation / number of patients received surgery
Sagittal decompensation(%)
Time frame: 1 week after operation
The ratio: number of patients with sagittal decompensation / number of patients received surgery
Short form-36 health survey(SF-36)
Time frame: 1 week after operation
SF-36 were calculated, including physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality,social functioning, role-emotional and mental health.The SF-36 score is expressed as a number between 0 and 100. The higher the number, the better the health outcome.
Cobb angle of scoliosis (°)
Time frame: 2 years after operation
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the angle of the major curve in coronal X-ray
Cobb angle of kyphosis (°)
Time frame: 2 years after operation
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the angle of the kyphosis in sagittal X-ray
Coronal balance (mm)
Time frame: 2 years after operation
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the distance between C7PL and CSVL in coronal X-ray
Sagittal balance (mm)
Time frame: 2 years after operation
Radiographic parameters measured on X-ray by Surgimap: the distance between C7PL and the posterior edge of sacrum in sagittal X-ray
Rod broken rate (%)
Time frame: 2 years after operation
The ratio: number of patients with rod broken/ number of patients received surgery
Screw broke rate(%)
Time frame: 2 years after operation
The ratio: number of patients with screw broken/ number of patients received surgery
Coronal decompensation rate(%)
Time frame: 2 years after operation
The ratio: number of patients with coronal decompensation / number of patients received surgery
Sagittal decompensation(%)
Time frame: 2 years after operation
The ratio: number of patients with sagittal decompensation / number of patients received surgery
Short form-36 health survey(SF-36)
Time frame: 2 years after operation
SF-36 were calculated, including physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality,social functioning, role-emotional and mental health.The SF-36 score is expressed as a number between 0 and 100. The higher the number, the better the health outcome.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Nov 2023.
- Background: PubMed 22433502Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Lee JH, Jeong BO. Outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance of multiple etiologies: a retrospective review of 140 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 1;37(19):1667-75. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182552fd0.
- Background: PubMed 30922897Zhang Y, Hai Y, Tao L, Yang J, Zhou L, Yin P, Pan A, Zhang Y, Liu C. Posterior Multiple-Level Asymmetrical Ponte Osteotomies for Rigid Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e467-e473. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.173. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
- Background: PubMed 12438987Suk SI, Kim JH, Kim WJ, Lee SM, Chung ER, Nah KH. Posterior vertebral column resection for severe spinal deformities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):2374-82. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00012.
- Background: PubMed 22989960Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Demakakos J, Fu KM, Keshavarzi S, Li CM, Deviren V, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Bess S; International Spine Study Group. Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2012 Oct;71(4):862-7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182672aab.
- Background: PubMed 21336218Scheer JK, Tang JA, Deviren V, Buckley JM, Pekmezci M, McClellan RT, Ames CP. Biomechanical analysis of revision strategies for rod fracture in pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurgery. 2011 Jul;69(1):164-72; discussion 172. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820f362a.
- Background: PubMed 29189571Zhu ZZ, Chen X, Qiu Y, Chen ZH, Li S, Xu L, Sun X. Adding Satellite Rods to Standard Two-rod Construct With the Use of Duet Screws: An Effective Technique to Improve Surgical Outcomes and Preventing Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Posterior-Only Correction of Scheuermann Kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jul 1;43(13):E758-E765. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002489.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40667831He Z, Chen Y, Liu Z, Yang B, Shi B, Wang Y, Feng Z, Zhang T, Chen X, Qiu Y, Qin X, Zhu Z. Biomechanical Advantages of Novel Duet Screws Plus Bilateral Satellite Rods Fixation in the Correction Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity. Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug;17(8):2454-2466. doi: 10.1111/os.70121. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spine Deformity
Enrolling by invitation
Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) and Corrective Exercise for Adolescent Hyperkyphosis
Hyperkyphosis, Adolescent
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical and Biological Parameters in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)
Recruiting
Quality of Life, Psychosocial Burden, and Structural-functional Status in Adults With Spinal Deformity.
ASD, Scoliosis Idiopathic Adolescent
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real-World Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment in Idiopathic Scoliosis
Idiopathic Scoliosis, Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)
Active, not recruiting
Comprehensive Study of Post-surgical Pain After Pectus or Spine Surgery
Pain, Postoperative, Excavatum, Pectus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lili Sha, Ph.D study director
Medical Ethics Committee of Drum Tower Hospital affiliated to Nanjing University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing double rods without dual-headed screw, three rods with one dual-headed screw and four rods with two dual-headed screw in people with Spine Deformity, run by The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Xiaodong Qin, Ph.D (008615298386726, qinxd_njumed@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cobb angle of scoliosis (°) (time frame: 1 week after operation). The study lists 18 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06144879, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2023.