Extracting Own TeethPhase 1NCT06150456
Study of Alveolar Bone Preservation Using Photobiomodulation Combined With Grafting With Scaffold Biomaterial
A Phase 1 study testing extraction, low level laser therapy and Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide in people with Extracting Own Teeth and Bone Substitutes, run by University of Nove de Julho at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Bone graft added to the dental socket immediately after tooth extraction prevents atrophy and deformity of the bone at the site of element loss, enabling rehabilitation with implants. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Extracting Own Teeth, Bone Substitutes
- What is being tested?
- extraction, low level laser therapy and Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 24 May 2022to 10 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 17 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- All genders, aged between 8 and 17 years, without comorbidities, present satisfactory oral hygiene and present a condition of loss of first or second permanent molars
Who cannot join
- Habitual use of analgesic and anti-inflammatory medication for other comorbidities, present allergies to the proposed drug protocol, in neurological/psychiatric treatment, presence of teeth with lesions to be treated in the same hemiarch of the tooth to be removed, current smoking habit, pregnant or breast-feeding, presenting photosensitivity disorders, with the presence of neoplasia in the oral region; and patients with operative complications whose surgical time exceeds 90 minutes
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Preservation After Molar Extraction Using Photobiomodulation Combined With Grafting With Scaffold Biomaterial: Clinical, Randomized, Triple-blind Study.
Bone graft added to the dental socket immediately after tooth extraction prevents atrophy and deformity of the bone at the site of element loss, enabling rehabilitation with implants. Photobiomodulation accelerates bone healing; stimulates blood flow; activates osteoblasts, decreases osteoclastic activity, and improves the integration of the biomaterial with bone tissue. The study aims to develop a protocol for the management and preservation of alveolar bone after the loss of first and/or second permanent molars in patients aged between 8 and 17 years, with an indication for extraction associated or not with 808 nm infrared laser treatment. . Materials and methods: 60 patients aged between 8 and 17 years will be randomized and randomly divided into 4 groups, n= 15: Exo (extraction), Exo+Laser (extraction and laser treatment), Exo+Biomat (extraction with graft biomaterial), Exo+Biomat+Laser (biomaterial extraction and grafting and laser treatment). The biomaterials of choice will be Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide (Brazil), added to the alveolus immediately after molar extraction, groups that will receive the laser (λ = 808 nm, power = 100 mW, radiant energy 3J per point in 3 buccal, occlusal and lingual/palatal points), will receive the irradiation in the surgical act, 48 hours and 10 days after the surgery, in the Exo and Exo+Biomat groups a similar laser device without emission of irradiation will be used, the operator who will apply the laser and the patient will be blind to the device used and the patient will not know whether or not he received the biomaterial. Analysis: computed tomography and intraoral scanning were performed pre-surgery, 3 and 6 months after surgery; to assess bone volume by measuring the height and width of the socket in each group, as well as trabecular bone and the interdental space of the teeth lateral to the missing element. Statistical analysis will be performed using the Shapiro-Wilks test, Student's t-test, or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for parametric and non-parametric data, respectively, they will be two-tailed and the significance level adopted will be α = 0.05.
Read the detailed description
Clinical, randomized, triple-blind, triple-blind study (the patient will not know whether or not he has received the laser treatment or grafted with the biomaterial, and the operator who will apply the laser will also be blinded to the device with or without laser irradiation.
60 participants will be recruited to attend the dentistry clinic of Universidade Nove de Julho, in the courses of surgery, endodontics, and pediatric dentistry, as well as in a private office, with an indication for the removal of first and second upper and lower molars. This recruitment will only take place after approval by the ethics committee.
4.3 Sample size: The sample size was determined based on the primary outcome of the study: alveolar preservation with scaffold biomaterial. Based on data from Rosero et al. (Photobiomodulation as adjuvant therapy for alveolar preservation: a preliminary study in humans) and Araújo et al. (Ridge changes after engraftment of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial) Our initial sample size estimate was 9 subjects per group for a significant level of 0.05 and an estimated test power of 80% for references 104 and 105. To account for the possible non-parametric distribution of the data, 15% more subjects should be added to each group. Another 25% will be added to account for possible dropouts, resulting in 13 participants per group and for greater safety and reliability, 15 patients were established in each group. G*Power 3.1.9.6 was used to perform the calculations.
Materials used in the study:
The biomaterial chosen for this research is the Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide (Brazil) allograft. They are completely synthetic bone grafts and resorbable regenerating membranes (free of animal and human origin).
Plenum® OSShp is a porous synthetic biphasic bioceramic (hydroxyapatite: β - tricalcium phosphate, HA: β-TCP - 70:30%), and the granules are 500 - 1000 µm.
Plenum® Guide is a polydioxanone (PDO)-based synthetic membrane material whose surface morphology closely mimics the extracellular matrix.
Randomization:
All participants will be invited to participate in the research and after signing the informed consent will be randomized into blocks of 4; 60 participants will be randomly divided into 4 groups n=15 Exo (extraction), Exo+Laser (extraction and treatment with 808 nm laser), Exo+Biomat (extraction with biomaterial graft), Exo+Biomat+Laser (extraction and grafting of biomaterial and 808 nm laser treatment). Participants will be randomly allocated by a computer-generated list (Excel) 4.7 CLINICAL PROCEDURE: At the pre-surgical moment, the patient will be submitted to a CT scan (Figure 12) and intraoral scanning (Figure 13) for initial measurement of the vertical and horizontal bone dimensions of the alveolus and between the adjacent teeth of the tooth to be extracted in position in the alveolus and dental arch, and surgical planning, as recommended by the best current dentistry practices, and will sign the Image Use Authorization Term (ANNEX 4). Pre-surgical guidance and delivery of prescriptions with the established drug protocol will also be carried out. All research patients will receive the same post-surgical guidance care (ANNEX 3) and the drug protocol performed for all tooth removal surgery with or without grafting with biomaterials. The tooth will be extracted using an odontosection technique to remove the roots with the least possible trauma. It will not be necessary to lift the soft tissue flap due to the properties of the membrane that will be used, reducing tissue trauma and helping to repair the surgical site. After the extraction, the biomaterial will be added and accommodated to the socket with instruments that allow this insertion and covered by a membrane that will serve as a mechanical barrier, preventing the invagination of the gingival tissue and the formation of keratinized tissue to close the surgical wound so as not to compromise the osseointegration of the bone biomaterial. grafted.
The Exo+Laser and Exo+Biomat+Laser groups will receive, in addition to the drug protocol and guidelines, laser treatment. The Exo and Exo+Biomat groups will use a similar laser device, however, it will not emit irradiation.
In the postoperative period at 3 and 6 months, new intraoral digital scanning and digital computed tomography exams will be performed to take images and perform volumetric analysis with specific software.
- Conditions
- Extracting Own Teeth, Bone Substitutes
- Being tested
- extraction, low level laser therapy, Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide
- Keywords
- Bone regeneration, photobiomodulation, scaffold biomaterial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
extractionProcedure or surgery
extraction: in all groups, extraction will be performed
low level laser therapyRadiation
extraction: in all groups, extraction will be performed Treatment with low-intensity infrared 808 nm laser therapy will be applied in 2 stages: one in the immediate postoperative period and 10 days after surgery.
Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® GuideBiological
extraction: in all groups, extraction will be performed Immediately after tooth extraction, the biomaterials Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide (Brazil) will be added to the dental socket, serving as a bone substitute and maintaining alveolar dimensions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Group 1 | Experimental | 15 patients who will only have their first teeth or second molars extracted. Receives: Procedure: extraction |
| Experimental: Group 2 | Experimental | 15 patients who will have only their first or second molars extracted and will receive infrared laser treatment Receives: Procedure: extraction; Radiation: low level laser therapy |
| Experimental: Group 3 | Experimental | 15 patients who will have their first or second molars extracted and will receive a graft with scaffold biomaterial Receives: Procedure: extraction; Biological: Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide |
| Experimental: Group 4 | Experimental | 15 patients who will have their first or second molars extracted and will receive a graft with scaffold biomaterial and infrared laser treatment Receives: Procedure: extraction; Radiation: low level laser therapy; Biological: Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Surgical intervention phase
The computed tomography examination will be carried out pre-surgery, with the tooth before extraction and after 3 and 6 months after surgery and the measurements chosen for the dimensional measurement of the alveolar process will refer to the buccolingual thickness of the alveolus. In the orthoradial cut, the limits of the alveolus will be delimited based on the tooth apex to the maximum height of the bone crests. In the most central position, the vertical measurement will be taken and 3 buccolingual cuts will be made, proportional to each other according to the measured vertical measurement; and in each apical, middle and cervical third, measurements will be taken regarding the horizontal dimensions of the alveolus. In the intraoral scanning examination, the mesio-distal measurements will be measured from the mesial bone crest to the distal bone crest, and the buccal-lingual measurements in the most central portion of the dental socket.
Measured: Baseline, pre surgical, 3 and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Interdental distance
In computed tomography and intraoral scanning, the horizontal distance will be measured with the limit at the mesial and distal bone crest of the alveolus preoperatively with the tooth still in place, 3 and 6 months after extraction, to verify maintenance of the interdental space.
Measured: Baseline, pre surgical, 3 and 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2023
- Study start24 May 2022
- Primary completion10 Aug 2022
- Study completion10 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (70)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Extracting Own TeethStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Nove de Julho
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, University of Nove de Julho
- Investigators
- Vanessa Dalapria, Principal investigator, University of Nove de Julho
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06150456
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Vanessa 1
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 9 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 8 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.
PubMed 12956475Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century--the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Dec;31 Suppl 1:3-23. doi: 10.1046/j..2003.com122.x.
PubMed 15015736De Marchi RJ, Hugo FN, Hilgert JB, Padilha DM. Association between oral health status and nutritional status in south Brazilian independent-living older people. Nutrition. 2008 Jun;24(6):546-53. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.01.054.
PubMed 18455655Rezaie M, Ghapanchi J, Haghnegahdar A, Khojastehpour L, Khorshidi H, Heidari H. A Radiographic Evaluation of Missing of Permanent First Molars in a Group of Iranian Children and Adults: A Retrospective Study. Int J Dent. 2018 Apr 1;2018:5253965. doi: 10.1155/2018/5253965. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29808093Saber AM, Altoukhi DH, Horaib MF, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi NM, Sabbagh HJ. Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Apr 5;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0516-4.
PubMed 29622000Alkhadra T. A Systematic Review of the Consequences of Early Extraction of First Permanent First Molar in Different Mixed Dentition Stages. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;7(5):223-226. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_222_17. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
PubMed 29026692Chappuis V, Araujo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):73-83. doi: 10.1111/prd.12167.
PubMed 28000281Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628.
PubMed 18672985Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: A 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):433-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x.
PubMed 19522974Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jun;32(6):645-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x.
PubMed 15882225Van der Weijden F, Dell'Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Dec;36(12):1048-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x.
PubMed 19929956Osburn RC. Preservation of the alveolar ridge: a simplified technique for retaining teeth beneath removable appliances. J Indiana State Dent Assoc. 1974 Jan-Feb;53(1):8-11. No abstract available.
PubMed 4523604PELTIER LF. The use of plaster of Paris to fill defects in bone. Clin Orthop. 1961;21:1-31. No abstract available.
PubMed 14485018Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. The application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral for ridge preservation prior to implantation. Clinical and histological observations in a case report. J Periodontol. 1998 Sep;69(9):1062-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1062.
PubMed 9776036Faour O, Dimitriou R, Cousins CA, Giannoudis PV. The use of bone graft substitutes in large cancellous voids: any specific needs? Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.020. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
PubMed 21723553
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Preservation After Molar Extraction Using Photobiomodulation Combined With Grafting With Scaffold Biomaterial: Clinical, Randomized, Triple-blind Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06150456
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Vanessa 1
- Conditions
- Extracting Own Teeth, Bone Substitutes
- Keywords
- Bone regeneration, photobiomodulation, scaffold biomaterial
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Nove de JulhoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 May 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bone graft added to the dental socket immediately after tooth extraction prevents atrophy and deformity of the bone at the site of element loss, enabling rehabilitation with implants. Photobiomodulation accelerates bone healing; stimulates blood flow; activates osteoblasts, decreases osteoclastic activity, and improves the integration of the biomaterial with bone tissue. The study aims to develop a protocol for the management and preservation of alveolar bone after the loss of first and/or second permanent molars in patients aged between 8 and 17 years, with an indication for extraction associated or not with 808 nm infrared laser treatment. . Materials and methods: 60 patients aged between 8 and 17 years will be randomized and randomly divided into 4 groups, n= 15: Exo (extraction), Exo+Laser (extraction and laser treatment), Exo+Biomat (extraction with graft biomaterial), Exo+Biomat+Laser (biomaterial extraction and grafting and laser treatment). The biomaterials of choice will be Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide (Brazil), added to the alveolus immediately after molar extraction, groups that will receive the laser (λ = 808 nm, power = 100 mW, radiant energy 3J per point in 3 buccal, occlusal and lingual/palatal points), will receive the irradiation in the surgical act, 48 hours and 10 days after the surgery, in the Exo and Exo+Biomat groups a similar laser device without emission of irradiation will be used, the operator who will apply the laser and the patient will be blind to the device used and the patient will not know whether or not he received the biomaterial. Analysis: computed tomography and intraoral scanning were performed pre-surgery, 3 and 6 months after surgery; to assess bone volume by measuring the height and width of the socket in each group, as well as trabecular bone and the interdental space of the teeth lateral to the missing element. Statistical analysis will be performed using the Shapiro-Wilks test, Student's t-test, or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for parametric and non-parametric data, respectively, they will be two-tailed and the significance level adopted will be α = 0.05.
Detailed description
Clinical, randomized, triple-blind, triple-blind study (the patient will not know whether or not he has received the laser treatment or grafted with the biomaterial, and the operator who will apply the laser will also be blinded to the device with or without laser irradiation.
60 participants will be recruited to attend the dentistry clinic of Universidade Nove de Julho, in the courses of surgery, endodontics, and pediatric dentistry, as well as in a private office, with an indication for the removal of first and second upper and lower molars. This recruitment will only take place after approval by the ethics committee.
4.3 Sample size: The sample size was determined based on the primary outcome of the study: alveolar preservation with scaffold biomaterial. Based on data from Rosero et al. (Photobiomodulation as adjuvant therapy for alveolar preservation: a preliminary study in humans) and Araújo et al. (Ridge changes after engraftment of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial) Our initial sample size estimate was 9 subjects per group for a significant level of 0.05 and an estimated test power of 80% for references 104 and 105. To account for the possible non-parametric distribution of the data, 15% more subjects should be added to each group. Another 25% will be added to account for possible dropouts, resulting in 13 participants per group and for greater safety and reliability, 15 patients were established in each group. G*Power 3.1.9.6 was used to perform the calculations.
Materials used in the study:
The biomaterial chosen for this research is the Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide (Brazil) allograft. They are completely synthetic bone grafts and resorbable regenerating membranes (free of animal and human origin).
Plenum® OSShp is a porous synthetic biphasic bioceramic (hydroxyapatite: β - tricalcium phosphate, HA: β-TCP - 70:30%), and the granules are 500 - 1000 µm.
Plenum® Guide is a polydioxanone (PDO)-based synthetic membrane material whose surface morphology closely mimics the extracellular matrix.
Randomization:
All participants will be invited to participate in the research and after signing the informed consent will be randomized into blocks of 4; 60 participants will be randomly divided into 4 groups n=15 Exo (extraction), Exo+Laser (extraction and treatment with 808 nm laser), Exo+Biomat (extraction with biomaterial graft), Exo+Biomat+Laser (extraction and grafting of biomaterial and 808 nm laser treatment). Participants will be randomly allocated by a computer-generated list (Excel) 4.7 CLINICAL PROCEDURE: At the pre-surgical moment, the patient will be submitted to a CT scan (Figure 12) and intraoral scanning (Figure 13) for initial measurement of the vertical and horizontal bone dimensions of the alveolus and between the adjacent teeth of the tooth to be extracted in position in the alveolus and dental arch, and surgical planning, as recommended by the best current dentistry practices, and will sign the Image Use Authorization Term (ANNEX 4). Pre-surgical guidance and delivery of prescriptions with the established drug protocol will also be carried out. All research patients will receive the same post-surgical guidance care (ANNEX 3) and the drug protocol performed for all tooth removal surgery with or without grafting with biomaterials. The tooth will be extracted using an odontosection technique to remove the roots with the least possible trauma. It will not be necessary to lift the soft tissue flap due to the properties of the membrane that will be used, reducing tissue trauma and helping to repair the surgical site. After the extraction, the biomaterial will be added and accommodated to the socket with instruments that allow this insertion and covered by a membrane that will serve as a mechanical barrier, preventing the invagination of the gingival tissue and the formation of keratinized tissue to close the surgical wound so as not to compromise the osseointegration of the bone biomaterial. grafted.
The Exo+Laser and Exo+Biomat+Laser groups will receive, in addition to the drug protocol and guidelines, laser treatment. The Exo and Exo+Biomat groups will use a similar laser device, however, it will not emit irradiation.
In the postoperative period at 3 and 6 months, new intraoral digital scanning and digital computed tomography exams will be performed to take images and perform volumetric analysis with specific software.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Group 1 | Experimental | Procedure: extraction15 patients who will only have their first teeth or second molars extracted. |
| Experimental: Group 2 | Experimental | Procedure: extraction, Radiation: low level laser therapy15 patients who will have only their first or second molars extracted and will receive infrared laser treatment |
| Experimental: Group 3 | Experimental | Procedure: extraction, Biological: Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide15 patients who will have their first or second molars extracted and will receive a graft with scaffold biomaterial |
| Experimental: Group 4 | Experimental | Procedure: extraction, Radiation: low level laser therapy, Biological: Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide15 patients who will have their first or second molars extracted and will receive a graft with scaffold biomaterial and infrared laser treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All genders, aged between 8 and 17 years, without comorbidities, present satisfactory oral hygiene and present a condition of loss of first or second permanent molars
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Habitual use of analgesic and anti-inflammatory medication for other comorbidities, present allergies to the proposed drug protocol, in neurological/psychiatric treatment, presence of teeth with lesions to be treated in the same hemiarch of the tooth to be removed, current smoking habit, pregnant or breast-feeding, presenting photosensitivity disorders, with the presence of neoplasia in the oral region; and patients with operative complications whose surgical time exceeds 90 minutes
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| extractionextraction: in all groups, extraction will be performed | Procedure or surgery | Experimental: Group 1, Experimental: Group 2, Experimental: Group 3, Experimental: Group 4 |
| low level laser therapyextraction: in all groups, extraction will be performed Treatment with low-intensity infrared 808 nm laser therapy will be applied in 2 stages: one in the immediate postoperative period and 10 days after surgery. | Radiation | Experimental: Group 2, Experimental: Group 4 |
| Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guideextraction: in all groups, extraction will be performed Immediately after tooth extraction, the biomaterials Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide (Brazil) will be added to the dental socket, serving as a bone substitute and maintaining alveolar dimensions. | Biological | Experimental: Group 3, Experimental: Group 4 |
Primary outcome
Surgical intervention phase
Time frame: Baseline, pre surgical, 3 and 6 months
The computed tomography examination will be carried out pre-surgery, with the tooth before extraction and after 3 and 6 months after surgery and the measurements chosen for the dimensional measurement of the alveolar process will refer to the buccolingual thickness of the alveolus. In the orthoradial cut, the limits of the alveolus will be delimited based on the tooth apex to the maximum height of the bone crests. In the most central position, the vertical measurement will be taken and 3 buccolingual cuts will be made, proportional to each other according to the measured vertical measurement; and in each apical, middle and cervical third, measurements will be taken regarding the horizontal dimensions of the alveolus. In the intraoral scanning examination, the mesio-distal measurements will be measured from the mesial bone crest to the distal bone crest, and the buccal-lingual measurements in the most central portion of the dental socket.
1 secondary outcome
Interdental distance
Time frame: Baseline, pre surgical, 3 and 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Dec 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 12956475Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.
- Results publication: PubMed 15015736Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century--the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Dec;31 Suppl 1:3-23. doi: 10.1046/j..2003.com122.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 18455655De Marchi RJ, Hugo FN, Hilgert JB, Padilha DM. Association between oral health status and nutritional status in south Brazilian independent-living older people. Nutrition. 2008 Jun;24(6):546-53. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.01.054.
- Results publication: PubMed 29808093Rezaie M, Ghapanchi J, Haghnegahdar A, Khojastehpour L, Khorshidi H, Heidari H. A Radiographic Evaluation of Missing of Permanent First Molars in a Group of Iranian Children and Adults: A Retrospective Study. Int J Dent. 2018 Apr 1;2018:5253965. doi: 10.1155/2018/5253965. eCollection 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 29622000Saber AM, Altoukhi DH, Horaib MF, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi NM, Sabbagh HJ. Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Apr 5;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0516-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 29026692Alkhadra T. A Systematic Review of the Consequences of Early Extraction of First Permanent First Molar in Different Mixed Dentition Stages. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;7(5):223-226. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_222_17. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 28000281Chappuis V, Araujo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):73-83. doi: 10.1111/prd.12167.
- Results publication: PubMed 18672985Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628.
- Results publication: PubMed 19522974Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: A 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):433-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 15882225Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jun;32(6):645-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 19929956Van der Weijden F, Dell'Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Dec;36(12):1048-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 4523604Osburn RC. Preservation of the alveolar ridge: a simplified technique for retaining teeth beneath removable appliances. J Indiana State Dent Assoc. 1974 Jan-Feb;53(1):8-11. No abstract available.
Related trials for Extracting Own Teeth
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vanessa Dalapria principal investigator
University of Nove de Julho
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing extraction, low level laser therapy and Plenum® OSShp and Plenum® Guide in people with Extracting Own Teeth and Bone Substitutes, run by University of Nove de Julho at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Surgical intervention phase (time frame: Baseline, pre surgical, 3 and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06150456, which also lists 70 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2023.