AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteoarthritis, KneeNCT06158425

Constitutional Alignment in Osteoarthritic and Healthy Chinese

An observational study of Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by The First Hospital of Jilin University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

coronal plane alignment of the knee(CPAK) distribution of 246 cases(477 knees) of OA patients and 107 cases(214 knees) of healthy people were examined on long-leg radiographs retrospectively. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis, Knee
What is being tested?
long-leg radiograph
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
353 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
22 Nov 2023to 6 Dec 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: OA group: consecutive OA patients with knee pain who underwent primary TKA Healthy group: consecutive visitors at outpatient clinic who underwent long-leg radiographs but without any sign of cartilage degeneration or medical history of low extremity

Who may be able to join

  • OA group: Data for consecutive OA patients with knee pain who underwent primary TKA by one senior surgeon between August 2021 and July 2023 at a single institution were analyzed retrospectively.
  • Healthy group: Data for consecutive visitors at outpatient clinic who underwent long-leg radiographs but without any sign of cartilage degeneration or medical history of low extremity between January 2023 and July 2023 at the same institution were analyzed retrospectively.

Who cannot join

  • OA group: prior total hip arthroplasty; obvious bony deficiency of the femur or tibia, simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs Healthy group: extra-articular deformity of the femur or tibia; simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs; poor quality image

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The First Hospital of Jilin University

    Changchun

    Xin Qi, Dr., +8615843073202, qixindoc@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Distribution of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Classification in Chinese Osteoarthritic as Well as Healthy Population

coronal plane alignment of the knee(CPAK) distribution of 246 cases(477 knees) of OA patients and 107 cases(214 knees) of healthy people were examined on long-leg radiographs retrospectively. Radiological measurements and CPAK classification on different Kellgren- Lawrence(K-L) Grade in patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty(TKA) were compared. Clinical outcomes of CPAK type I patients performed by mechanical alignment(MA) and restricted kinematic alignment(rKA) during TKA were examined. ML algorithm including K nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest(RF), artificial neural networks (ANN), logistic regression(LR) and gradient boosting (GBDT) were established, the dependent variable was set as whether the constitutional phenotype of an arthritic knee classified as type I was type I.

Read the detailed description

Study groups and design OA group Data for consecutive OA patients with knee pain who underwent primary TKA by one senior surgeon between August 2021 and July 2023 at a single institution were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 273 patients underwent long-leg radiographs. The following 27 patients were excluded from this study: prior total hip arthroplasty, 2; obvious bony deficiency of the femur or tibia, 10; simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs, 15. CPAK distribution of the remaining 246 cases(unilateral, 15; bilateral, 231; totally 477 knees) was examined.

healthy group Data for consecutive visitors at outpatient clinic who underwent long-leg radiographs but without any sign of cartilage degeneration or medical history of low extremity between January 2023 and July 2023 at the same institution were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 136 visitors were recruited. The following 18 visitors were excluded from this study: extra-articular deformity of the femur or tibia, 15; simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs, 13; poor quality image, 1. CPAK distribution of the remaining 107 cases(214 knees) was examined.

Radiological measurements All participants underwent standard digital long leg radiographs. The mechanical axis of the femur was marked from the centre of the femoral head to the centre of the knee. The centre of the head was marked using the concentric-circle method to identify the centre. The centre of the ankle was marked as the point on the talar dome at mid-width. The mHKA angle was the angle subtended by the mechanical axes of the femur and tibia. The LDFA was defined as the lateral angle formed between the femoral mechanical axis and the joint line of the distal femur. The MPTA was defined as the medical angle formed between the tibial mechanical axis and the joint line of the proximal tibia. Joint line convergence angle(JLCA) was the angle formed between joint orientation lines on opposite sides of the same joint[17]. All measurements were carried out by an orthopaedic fellow. A senior author undertook a subgroup analysis of 60 knees in OA group and repeated at one- week intervals to assess for inter- and intra- observer agreement.

CPAK classification of OA and healthy group aHKA was calculated based on the following formula: aHKA=MPTA-LDFA. JLO was calculated by the formula: JLO=MPTA+LDFA. With aHKA and JLO measured, patients can be matched to 9 possible CPAK alignment groups. The mean aHKA and JLO of the two groups were rounded to the nearest whole number for final allocation to a CPAK Class. CPAK limits for the definition of neutral knees was an aHKA of 0 ± 2 degrees. CPAK boundaries for a neutral JLO were defined as 180 ± 3 degrees, varus aHKA less than-2 degrees and a valgus aHKA more than+2 degrees. An apex distal JLO was less than 177°, while an apex proximal JLO was greater than 183°[9]. The OA and healthy group were categorized according to the CPAK classification, and their distribution were investigated.

Being tested
long-leg radiograph
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • long-leg radiographRadiation

    A flat-panel digital radiography(DR) equipment (Siemens DR AXIOM Aristos AX/VX) was used to capture full-length bipedal lower extremities in a standing position. The technician moved the detector from top to bottom, capturing four parts: the bilateral hip joints, femur, tibia and fibula and ankle joint. The exposure parameters for each part were as follows: 1st exposure - 85kV, 75mAs; 2nd exposure - 80kV, 50mAs; 3rd exposure - 75kV, 40mAs; 4th exposure - 68kV, 20mAs. The distance from the source (kv-kg) was 300cm, and the field of view was 43.18cm x 43.18cm. All 4 X-rays were stitched using the Siemens DR Station.

Study groups in NCT06158425
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OA groupData for consecutive OA patients with knee pain who underwent primary TKA by one senior surgeon between August 2021 and July 2023 at a single institution were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 273 patients underwent long-leg radiographs. The following 27 patients were excluded from this study: prior total hip arthroplasty, 2; obvious bony deficiency of the femur or tibia, 10; simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs, 15. CPAK distribution of the remaining 246 cases(unilateral, 15; bilateral, 231; totally 477 knees) was examined.
Receives: Radiation: long-leg radiograph
healthy groupData for consecutive visitors at outpatient clinic who underwent long-leg radiographs but without any sign of cartilage degeneration or medical history of low extremity between January 2023 and July 2023 at the same institution were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 136 visitors were recruited. The following 18 visitors were excluded from this study: extra-articular deformity of the femur or tibia, 15; simultaneous flexion of the knee and rotation of the leg on radiographs, 13; poor quality image, 1. CPAK distribution of the remaining 107 cases(214 knees) was examined.
Receives: Radiation: long-leg radiograph

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. CPAK distribution

    distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification

    Measured: before surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Dec 2023
  2. Study start22 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion6 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
353 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06158425
Sponsor's protocol ID
FirstJilinUQX
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
26 Nov 2023
Last updated
6 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gao YH, Qi YM, Huang PH, Zhao XY, Qi X. Joint line convergence angle should be considered when constitutional alignment is predicted based on arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):1624-1628. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002097.

    PubMed 39361874
  • Gao YH, Qi YM, Huang PH, Zhao XY, Qi X. Distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification in Chinese osteoarthritic and healthy population: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2583-2592. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001178.

    PubMed 38349219

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by The First Hospital of Jilin University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Xin Qi, Dr. (+8615843073202, dr.qixin@jlu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

CPAK distribution (time frame: before surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06158425, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in