Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)eSTEPNCT06159582
eSTEP: An Integrated mHealth Intervention to Engage High-risk Individuals Along the Full PrEP Care Continuum
A study testing eSTEP in people with Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), run by San Diego State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The long-term goal of this research is to develop a theoretically grounded, effective, accessible and sustainable mHealth PrEP care continuum intervention for men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
- What is being tested?
- eSTEP
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 113 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 3 Apr 2024to 30 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- Assigned male sex at birth
- Current male \& MSM identity OR transfeminine (woman, transgender woman, or non-binary) identification
- Self-reported HIV-negative status
- English-speaking (since the pilot intervention will be developed in English)
- Owner of an Android or iPhone mobile device and access to this phone during the 6-month study.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Willingness and ability to attend HIV prevention visits at the HIV treatment and prevention clinic.
- Consent to allow study team access to study-relevant PHI
- Eligible for PrEP following CDC guidelines (in the past 6 months had a sexual partner with HIV with unknown or detectable viral load, inconsistently used condoms, and/or was diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection)
- Has never used PrEP or has not used PrEP in the past 3 months
Who cannot join
- Was a Community Advisory Board Member or participant in the eSTEP focus groups
- Assigned female or intersex at birth
- Living with HIV
- Already taking PrEP
- Under 18 years old
- Does not own a mobile phone
- Does not speak or read English (since the pilot intervention will be developed in English)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
San Diego State University - Department of Psychology
San Diego, California, 92120
About this study
The long-term goal of this research is to develop a theoretically grounded, effective, accessible and sustainable mHealth PrEP care continuum intervention for men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW).
To reach this goal, the investigators will compare study outcomes among persons randomized to receive a mobile app (eSTEP) intervention tailored to the needs of MSM and TW plus usual PrEP care to a group of persons who only receive usual PrEP care.
Read the detailed description
Study Design:
The investigators propose to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of eSTEP in a pilot RCT with MSM and TW who are either PrEP naïve or have not been taking PrEP for at least 3 months, randomized (2:1) to receive either the eSTEP intervention or usual PrEP prevention services, and followed for 6 months with assessments at baseline, 12- and 24-weeks. eSTEP is a mobile application (i.e., app) with interactive PrEP components to increase PrEP uptake, and components to optimize PrEP retention and adherence.
eSTEP is grounded in the Information, Motivation, Behavioral Skills model [IMB] and includes the following components:
- PrEP information
- Identifying and addressing barriers to starting PrEP
- Information about stigma and managing stigma
- Matching the best PrEP option to one's personal life circumstances
- Appointment Scheduling
- PrEP Adherence Reminders \& Self-monitoring for those who start PrEP
- PrEP Appointment Reminders
- A Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) Control arm participants will not be offered the eSTEP mobile app, but both the eSTEP arm and control arm will be asked to attend a brief telephone visit with a PrEP navigator, which is usual care for the clinic.
Study Sample:
113 adult (18 years and older) MSM (n=89) and TW (n=24) participants (n = 89 MSM; n = 24 TW) not currently taking PrEP.
Recruitment and Clinical Sites:
Participants will be recruited in the following ways: a) ads on social media sites that will link to an online pre-screening survey, b) in-person while attending an HIV testing appointment at the HIV treatment and prevention clinic, c) community recruitment.
Enrollment, Randomization and Follow-up Visits:
Study candidates completed a short online pre-screening survey to assess eligibility. Next, preliminarily eligible participants completed a virtual enrollment visit to verify eligibility and complete an electronic written consent. After informed consent, participants completed an online 30- to 45-minute baseline survey. Participants were then randomized 2:1 either to the intervention arm (eSTEP and usual care) or to the control arm (Usual care only). All participants were provided with community resources electronically by the study coordinator and asked to schedule a telephone-based informational meeting with a clinic PrEP navigator. Persons who wish to start PrEP were scheduled for an in-person clinical appointment at the HIV treatment and prevention clinic for routine HIV testing, eligibility and safety lab screening for PrEP as routinely offered in the HIV treatment and prevention clinic. Any participant who received a positive test for HIV during the trial received appropriate post-test counseling and treatment by the HIV treatment and prevention clinic staff. Participants were asked to provide 3 self-collected dried blood spots (DBS) for the TFV-DP analysis (i.e., to assess PrEP adherence). All participants completed online surveys and DBS at weeks 12 and 24, and medical records were reviewed to determine PrEP initiation, retention in PrEP care, and timely PrEP injections.
- Conditions
- Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
- Being tested
- eSTEP, Usual Care
- Keywords
- Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), HIV Prevention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
eSTEPBehavioural
eSTEP (Electronic Support to Engage with PrEP) is an mHealth intervention to promote engagement on the full PrEP care continuum and is tailored to MSM and TW.
Usual CareBehavioural
Usual PrEP clinical care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| eSTEP Arm | Active comparator | Treatment group participants will be given access to the eSTEP (Electronic Support to Engage with PrEP) mobile app to promote engagement on the full PrEP care continuum plus usual PrEP clinical care. eSTEP includes the following components: PrEP information; Identifying and addressing barriers to starting PrEP; Information about stigma and managing stigma; Matching the best PrEP option to one's personal life circumstances; Appointment Scheduling; PrEP Adherence Reminders \& Self-monitoring for those who start PrEP; PrEP Appointment Reminders; a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) section. Receives: Behavioral: eSTEP; Behavioral: Usual Care |
| Control Arm | Placebo comparator | Usual PrEP clinical care Receives: Behavioral: Usual Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PrEP Initiation
PrEP initiation was the percent of participants in each arm who started PrEP any time in the 24 weeks after enrollment. A participant was considered to have initiated if they had evidence in the medical record of starting PrEP at any point during the 6-month intervention period. Study staff performed a review of medical records, including clinical encounters and medication records to confirm PrEP initiation.
Measured: Assess throughout the 24 weeks after study enrollment.
Retention in PrEP Care at 12 Weeks
Retention in PrEP care was assessed at 12 weeks based on documentation in the medical record during follow-up or clinical encounters. Participants were considered retained in care if they had initiated PrEP at the prior study visit and the clinician documented ongoing PrEP use during a follow-up clinical encounter or if there was evidence that the participant initiated a refill request in the absence of a visit as of the next study visit. At 12 weeks, participants were recorded as being retained in PrEP care (1) or not (0).
Measured: Participants who were retained in PrEP care through week 12 after enrollment
Retention in PrEP Care at 24 Weeks
Retention in PrEP care was assessed at 24 weeks based on documentation in the medical record during follow-up or clinical encounters. Participants were considered retained in care if they had initiated PrEP at the prior study visit and the clinician documented ongoing PrEP use during a follow-up clinical encounter or if there was evidence that the participant initiated a refill request in the absence of a visit as of the next study visit. At 24 weeks, participants were recorded as being retained in PrEP care (1) or not (0).
Measured: Participants who were retained in PrEP care at week 24
Protective PreP Adherence at 12 Weeks
Protective PrEP adherence for oral PrEP was assessed through analysis of TFV-DP levels from DBS specimens obtained using self-collection kits. Tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) levels were categorized as either protective (corresponding with ≥4 doses per week) or not protected (≤3 doses per week). For participants on injectable PrEP, timely PrEP injections (receiving an injection within 2 weeks of the ideal injection date) was used to determine whether they were protected or not protected.
Measured: Assessed at 12 weeks after study enrollment
Protective PrEP Adherence at 24 Weeks
Protective PrEP adherence for oral PrEP was assessed through analysis of TFV-DP levels from DBS specimens obtained using self-collection kits. Tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) levels were categorized as either protective (corresponding with ≥4 doses per week) or not protected (≤3 doses per week). For participants on injectable PrEP, timely PrEP injections (receiving an injection within 2 weeks of the ideal injection date) was used to determine whether they were protected or not protected.
Measured: Assessed at 24 weeks after study enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Dec 2023
- Study start3 Apr 2024
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025
- Study completion30 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by San Diego State UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 2-arm RCT with 2:1 randomization to eSTEP treatment group or usual care control group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- San Diego State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Diego
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Keith Horvath, San Diego State University
- Investigators
- Keith J Horvath, PhD, Principal investigator, San Diego State UniversitySusan J Little, MD, Principal investigator, University of California, San Diego
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06159582
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HS-2023-0226
- Acronym
- eSTEP
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Will share summary statistics, aggregated data. No deidentified data will be publicly available.
Publications
Wilson IB, Lee Y, Michaud J, Fowler FJ Jr, Rogers WH. Validation of a New Three-Item Self-Report Measure for Medication Adherence. AIDS Behav. 2016 Nov;20(11):2700-2708. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1406-x.
PubMed 27098408Poteat T, Wirtz A, Malik M, Cooney E, Cannon C, Hardy WD, Arrington-Sanders R, Lujan M, Yamanis T. A Gap Between Willingness and Uptake: Findings From Mixed Methods Research on HIV Prevention Among Black and Latina Transgender Women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Oct 1;82(2):131-140. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002112.
PubMed 31180995Volk JE, Marcus JL, Phengrasamy T, Blechinger D, Nguyen DP, Follansbee S, Hare CB. No New HIV Infections With Increasing Use of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in a Clinical Practice Setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Nov 15;61(10):1601-3. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ778. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
PubMed 26334052Murnane PM, Celum C, Mugo N, Campbell JD, Donnell D, Bukusi E, Mujugira A, Tappero J, Kahle EM, Thomas KK, Baeten JM; Partners PrEP Study Team. Efficacy of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 prevention among high-risk heterosexuals: subgroup analyses from a randomized trial. AIDS. 2013 Aug 24;27(13):2155-60. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283629037.
PubMed 24384592Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, Goicochea P, Casapia M, Guanira-Carranza JV, Ramirez-Cardich ME, Montoya-Herrera O, Fernandez T, Veloso VG, Buchbinder SP, Chariyalertsak S, Schechter M, Bekker LG, Mayer KH, Kallas EG, Amico KR, Mulligan K, Bushman LR, Hance RJ, Ganoza C, Defechereux P, Postle B, Wang F, McConnell JJ, Zheng JH, Lee J, Rooney JF, Jaffe HS, Martinez AI, Burns DN, Glidden DV; iPrEx Study Team. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2587-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011205. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
PubMed 21091279Camp C, Saberi P. Facilitators and barriers of 2-1-1 HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. PLoS One. 2021 May 20;16(5):e0251917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251917. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34014998Sewell WC, Powell VE, Mayer KH, Ochoa A, Krakower DS, Marcus JL. Nondaily Use of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in a Large Online Survey of Primarily Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020 Jun 1;84(2):182-188. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002332.
PubMed 32168169Saberi P, Scott HM. On-Demand Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis with Tenofovir/Emtricitabine: What Every Clinician Needs to Know. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1285-1288. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05651-2. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
PubMed 31965523John SA, Whitfield THF, Rendina HJ, Parsons JT, Grov C. Will Gay and Bisexual Men Taking Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Switch to Long-Acting Injectable PrEP Should It Become Available? AIDS Behav. 2018 Apr;22(4):1184-1189. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1907-2.
PubMed 28913659Tolley EE, Zangeneh SZ, Chau G, Eron J, Grinsztejn B, Humphries H, Liu A, Siegel M, Bertha M, Panchia R, Li S, Cottle L, Rinehart A, Margolis D, Jennings A, McCauley M, Landovitz RJ. Acceptability of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir (CAB LA) in HIV-Uninfected Individuals: HPTN 077. AIDS Behav. 2020 Sep;24(9):2520-2531. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02808-2.
PubMed 32052214Whitfield THF, Parsons JT, Rendina HJ. Rates of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use and Discontinuation Among a Large U.S. National Sample of Sexual Minority Men and Adolescents. Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Jan;49(1):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01602-z. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
PubMed 31845148Parsons JT, Rendina HJ, Lassiter JM, Whitfield TH, Starks TJ, Grov C. Uptake of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in a National Cohort of Gay and Bisexual Men in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):285-292. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001251.
PubMed 28187084Wagner GA, Wu KS, Anderson C, Burgi A, Little SJ. Predictors of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake in a Sexual Health Clinic With Rapid PrEP Initiation. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;10(3):ofad060. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad060. eCollection 2023 Mar.
PubMed 36968957Matacotta JJ, Rosales-Perez FJ, Carrillo CM. HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis and Treatment as Prevention - Beliefs and Access Barriers in Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) and Transgender Women: A Systematic Review. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2020 Jul 27;7(3):265-274. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1737. eCollection 2020 Summer.
PubMed 32760758Ogunbajo A, Storholm ED, Ober AJ, Bogart LM, Reback CJ, Flynn R, Lyman P, Morris S. Multilevel Barriers to HIV PrEP Uptake and Adherence Among Black and Hispanic/Latinx Transgender Women in Southern California. AIDS Behav. 2021 Jul;25(7):2301-2315. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03159-2. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
PubMed 33515132
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- eSTEP: An Integrated mHealth Intervention to Engage High-risk Individuals Along the Full PrEP Care Continuum
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06159582
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- eSTEP / HS-2023-0226
- Conditions
- Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
- Keywords
- Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), HIV Prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- San Diego State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Diego
- Study start
- 3 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jun 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The long-term goal of this research is to develop a theoretically grounded, effective, accessible and sustainable mHealth PrEP care continuum intervention for men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW).
To reach this goal, the investigators will compare study outcomes among persons randomized to receive a mobile app (eSTEP) intervention tailored to the needs of MSM and TW plus usual PrEP care to a group of persons who only receive usual PrEP care.
Detailed description
Study Design:
The investigators propose to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of eSTEP in a pilot RCT with MSM and TW who are either PrEP naïve or have not been taking PrEP for at least 3 months, randomized (2:1) to receive either the eSTEP intervention or usual PrEP prevention services, and followed for 6 months with assessments at baseline, 12- and 24-weeks. eSTEP is a mobile application (i.e., app) with interactive PrEP components to increase PrEP uptake, and components to optimize PrEP retention and adherence.
eSTEP is grounded in the Information, Motivation, Behavioral Skills model [IMB] and includes the following components:
- PrEP information
- Identifying and addressing barriers to starting PrEP
- Information about stigma and managing stigma
- Matching the best PrEP option to one's personal life circumstances
- Appointment Scheduling
- PrEP Adherence Reminders \& Self-monitoring for those who start PrEP
- PrEP Appointment Reminders
- A Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) Control arm participants will not be offered the eSTEP mobile app, but both the eSTEP arm and control arm will be asked to attend a brief telephone visit with a PrEP navigator, which is usual care for the clinic.
Study Sample:
113 adult (18 years and older) MSM (n=89) and TW (n=24) participants (n = 89 MSM; n = 24 TW) not currently taking PrEP.
Recruitment and Clinical Sites:
Participants will be recruited in the following ways: a) ads on social media sites that will link to an online pre-screening survey, b) in-person while attending an HIV testing appointment at the HIV treatment and prevention clinic, c) community recruitment.
Enrollment, Randomization and Follow-up Visits:
Study candidates completed a short online pre-screening survey to assess eligibility. Next, preliminarily eligible participants completed a virtual enrollment visit to verify eligibility and complete an electronic written consent. After informed consent, participants completed an online 30- to 45-minute baseline survey. Participants were then randomized 2:1 either to the intervention arm (eSTEP and usual care) or to the control arm (Usual care only). All participants were provided with community resources electronically by the study coordinator and asked to schedule a telephone-based informational meeting with a clinic PrEP navigator. Persons who wish to start PrEP were scheduled for an in-person clinical appointment at the HIV treatment and prevention clinic for routine HIV testing, eligibility and safety lab screening for PrEP as routinely offered in the HIV treatment and prevention clinic. Any participant who received a positive test for HIV during the trial received appropriate post-test counseling and treatment by the HIV treatment and prevention clinic staff. Participants were asked to provide 3 self-collected dried blood spots (DBS) for the TFV-DP analysis (i.e., to assess PrEP adherence). All participants completed online surveys and DBS at weeks 12 and 24, and medical records were reviewed to determine PrEP initiation, retention in PrEP care, and timely PrEP injections.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 2-arm RCT with 2:1 randomization to eSTEP treatment group or usual care control group
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| eSTEP Arm | Active comparator | Behavioral: eSTEP, Behavioral: Usual CareTreatment group participants will be given access to the eSTEP (Electronic Support to Engage with PrEP) mobile app to promote engagement on the full PrEP care continuum plus usual PrEP clinical care. eSTEP includes the following components: PrEP information; Identifying and addressing barriers to starting PrEP; Information about stigma and managing stigma; Matching the best PrEP option to one's personal life circumstances; Appointment Scheduling; PrEP Adherence Reminders \& Self-monitoring for those who start PrEP; PrEP Appointment Reminders; a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) section. |
| Control Arm | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Usual CareUsual PrEP clinical care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- 18 years of age or older
- Assigned male sex at birth
- Current male \& MSM identity OR transfeminine (woman, transgender woman, or non-binary) identification
- Self-reported HIV-negative status
- English-speaking (since the pilot intervention will be developed in English)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Was a Community Advisory Board Member or participant in the eSTEP focus groups
- Assigned female or intersex at birth
- Living with HIV
- Already taking PrEP
- Under 18 years old
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| eSTEPeSTEP (Electronic Support to Engage with PrEP) is an mHealth intervention to promote engagement on the full PrEP care continuum and is tailored to MSM and TW. | Behavioural | eSTEP Arm |
| Usual CareUsual PrEP clinical care | Behavioural | Control Arm, eSTEP Arm |
Primary outcome
PrEP Initiation
Time frame: Assess throughout the 24 weeks after study enrollment.
PrEP initiation was the percent of participants in each arm who started PrEP any time in the 24 weeks after enrollment. A participant was considered to have initiated if they had evidence in the medical record of starting PrEP at any point during the 6-month intervention period. Study staff performed a review of medical records, including clinical encounters and medication records to confirm PrEP initiation.
Retention in PrEP Care at 12 Weeks
Time frame: Participants who were retained in PrEP care through week 12 after enrollment
Retention in PrEP care was assessed at 12 weeks based on documentation in the medical record during follow-up or clinical encounters. Participants were considered retained in care if they had initiated PrEP at the prior study visit and the clinician documented ongoing PrEP use during a follow-up clinical encounter or if there was evidence that the participant initiated a refill request in the absence of a visit as of the next study visit. At 12 weeks, participants were recorded as being retained in PrEP care (1) or not (0).
Retention in PrEP Care at 24 Weeks
Time frame: Participants who were retained in PrEP care at week 24
Retention in PrEP care was assessed at 24 weeks based on documentation in the medical record during follow-up or clinical encounters. Participants were considered retained in care if they had initiated PrEP at the prior study visit and the clinician documented ongoing PrEP use during a follow-up clinical encounter or if there was evidence that the participant initiated a refill request in the absence of a visit as of the next study visit. At 24 weeks, participants were recorded as being retained in PrEP care (1) or not (0).
Protective PreP Adherence at 12 Weeks
Time frame: Assessed at 12 weeks after study enrollment
Protective PrEP adherence for oral PrEP was assessed through analysis of TFV-DP levels from DBS specimens obtained using self-collection kits. Tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) levels were categorized as either protective (corresponding with ≥4 doses per week) or not protected (≤3 doses per week). For participants on injectable PrEP, timely PrEP injections (receiving an injection within 2 weeks of the ideal injection date) was used to determine whether they were protected or not protected.
Protective PrEP Adherence at 24 Weeks
Time frame: Assessed at 24 weeks after study enrollment
Protective PrEP adherence for oral PrEP was assessed through analysis of TFV-DP levels from DBS specimens obtained using self-collection kits. Tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) levels were categorized as either protective (corresponding with ≥4 doses per week) or not protected (≤3 doses per week). For participants on injectable PrEP, timely PrEP injections (receiving an injection within 2 weeks of the ideal injection date) was used to determine whether they were protected or not protected.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 27098408Wilson IB, Lee Y, Michaud J, Fowler FJ Jr, Rogers WH. Validation of a New Three-Item Self-Report Measure for Medication Adherence. AIDS Behav. 2016 Nov;20(11):2700-2708. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1406-x.
- Background: PubMed 31180995Poteat T, Wirtz A, Malik M, Cooney E, Cannon C, Hardy WD, Arrington-Sanders R, Lujan M, Yamanis T. A Gap Between Willingness and Uptake: Findings From Mixed Methods Research on HIV Prevention Among Black and Latina Transgender Women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Oct 1;82(2):131-140. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002112.
- Background: PubMed 26334052Volk JE, Marcus JL, Phengrasamy T, Blechinger D, Nguyen DP, Follansbee S, Hare CB. No New HIV Infections With Increasing Use of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in a Clinical Practice Setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Nov 15;61(10):1601-3. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ778. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
- Background: PubMed 24384592Murnane PM, Celum C, Mugo N, Campbell JD, Donnell D, Bukusi E, Mujugira A, Tappero J, Kahle EM, Thomas KK, Baeten JM; Partners PrEP Study Team. Efficacy of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 prevention among high-risk heterosexuals: subgroup analyses from a randomized trial. AIDS. 2013 Aug 24;27(13):2155-60. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283629037.
- Background: PubMed 21091279Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, Goicochea P, Casapia M, Guanira-Carranza JV, Ramirez-Cardich ME, Montoya-Herrera O, Fernandez T, Veloso VG, Buchbinder SP, Chariyalertsak S, Schechter M, Bekker LG, Mayer KH, Kallas EG, Amico KR, Mulligan K, Bushman LR, Hance RJ, Ganoza C, Defechereux P, Postle B, Wang F, McConnell JJ, Zheng JH, Lee J, Rooney JF, Jaffe HS, Martinez AI, Burns DN, Glidden DV; iPrEx Study Team. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2587-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011205. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
- Background: PubMed 34014998Camp C, Saberi P. Facilitators and barriers of 2-1-1 HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. PLoS One. 2021 May 20;16(5):e0251917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251917. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 32168169Sewell WC, Powell VE, Mayer KH, Ochoa A, Krakower DS, Marcus JL. Nondaily Use of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in a Large Online Survey of Primarily Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020 Jun 1;84(2):182-188. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002332.
- Background: PubMed 31965523Saberi P, Scott HM. On-Demand Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis with Tenofovir/Emtricitabine: What Every Clinician Needs to Know. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1285-1288. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05651-2. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 28913659John SA, Whitfield THF, Rendina HJ, Parsons JT, Grov C. Will Gay and Bisexual Men Taking Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Switch to Long-Acting Injectable PrEP Should It Become Available? AIDS Behav. 2018 Apr;22(4):1184-1189. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1907-2.
- Background: PubMed 32052214Tolley EE, Zangeneh SZ, Chau G, Eron J, Grinsztejn B, Humphries H, Liu A, Siegel M, Bertha M, Panchia R, Li S, Cottle L, Rinehart A, Margolis D, Jennings A, McCauley M, Landovitz RJ. Acceptability of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir (CAB LA) in HIV-Uninfected Individuals: HPTN 077. AIDS Behav. 2020 Sep;24(9):2520-2531. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02808-2.
- Background: PubMed 31845148Whitfield THF, Parsons JT, Rendina HJ. Rates of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use and Discontinuation Among a Large U.S. National Sample of Sexual Minority Men and Adolescents. Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Jan;49(1):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01602-z. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
- Background: PubMed 28187084Parsons JT, Rendina HJ, Lassiter JM, Whitfield TH, Starks TJ, Grov C. Uptake of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in a National Cohort of Gay and Bisexual Men in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):285-292. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001251.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Will share summary statistics, aggregated data. No deidentified data will be publicly available.
Related trials for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Long-term Follow-up of Long-acting Cabotegravir (CAB LA) for PrEP (Pre-exposure Prophylaxis) in Participants at Risk of Acquiring HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)
HIV Infections
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Mobile HIV Prevention App to Increase HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Testing and PrEP Initiation Among Rural Men Who Have Sex With Men
HIV Infections, STI
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Starting HIV Prevention Medicine (PrEP) During an Emergency Department Visit With a Peer Navigator
HIV Prevention, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Healthy Families PrEP Program for Women at Risk for HIV
HIV, Pregnancy
RecruitingObservational study
Implementation Study of Lenacapavir Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention
HIV Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Keith J Horvath, PhD principal investigator
San Diego State University
Susan J Little, MD principal investigator
University of California, San Diego
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing eSTEP in people with Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), run by San Diego State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PrEP Initiation (time frame: Assess throughout the 24 weeks after study enrollment.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06159582, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2026.