AzTrials
AzTrials

Decision Making, SharedImPartNCT06173323

A Stakeholder-enhanced Intervention to Improve the Decisional Partnership of Chronic Kidney Disease Dyads (IMPART)

A study testing ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships in people with Decision Making, Shared and Family Caregiving, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Using a highly innovative methodology, the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), the purpose of this study is to pilot test, an optimization trial approach to develop and refine the decision partnering skills of persons with stage 4 chronic kidney disease and their caregivers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
128 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
16 Sep 2024to 31 Mar 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients
  • Age ≥18;
  • EMR documented diagnosis of stage 4 CKD (2 eGFR 29-15 within 90 days);
  • Ability to speak and read English and complete baseline questionnaires;
  • Patients must have an enrolled caregiver
  • Caregivers
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Age ≥18;
  • Self-endorsing or identified by the patient as a relative, friend, or partner that has a close relationship with you and who assists you with your medical decisions and who may or may not live in the same residence as you and who is not paid for their help
  • Caring for a patient with CKD;
  • Ability to speak and read English and complete baseline questionnaires;
  • Caregivers must have an enrolled patient.

Who cannot join

  • Patients
  • Receiving hospice;
  • Receiving dialysis;
  • Medical record documentation of active unmedicated severe mental illness, moderate-severe dementia, suicidal ideation, uncorrected hearing loss, and active substance abuse.
  • Caregivers 1) Self-reported unmedicated mental illness, Moderate-severe dementia, active suicidal ideation, uncorrected hearing loss, or active substance abuse ascertained by scripted study introduction questioning.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Shena Gazaway, Phd, RN contact

205-975-5704

gazaways@uab.edu

Alicia Cole, MS contact

205-934-2862

acole569@uab.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Shena Gazaway

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-1150

    Shena Gazaway, 2059755304, gazaways@uab.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Optimization Trial of a Stakeholder-enhanced Intervention to Improve the Decisional Partnership of Chronic Kidney Disease Dyads (IMPART)

Using a highly innovative methodology, the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), the purpose of this study is to pilot test, an optimization trial approach to develop and refine the decision partnering skills of persons with stage 4 chronic kidney disease and their caregivers. Using a 2x2x2 full factorial design, 64 dyads (patients and one identified caregiver) will be randomized to receive one or more lay coach-delivered decision partnering training components, based on Pearlin's Stress-Health Model of Family Caregiving and Rini's Social Support Effectiveness theory. The components include: 1) caregiver coaching on effective decision support (1 vs. 3 sessions); 2) caregiver decision support communication training (1 session vs. none); and 3) patient social support effectiveness psychoeducation (yes vs. no).

Read the detailed description

Of the estimated 37 million U.S. adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD), many who are newly diagnosed with advancing CKD rely on the support of family caregivers to help cope with serious illness and make health-related decisions, such as dialysis and end of life choices. Underprepared family and patient decision-makers may lack CKD knowledge, have poor disease understanding, and unclear expectations about treatments, especially at the end of life. Underprepared CKD dyads (patient and caregiver) may experience greater decisional conflict, ineffective coping, and heightened distress compared to adequately prepared ones. Black CKD patients and their families who face discrimination experience additional obstacles when navigating health-related decisions.

There is a critical need to train CKD dyads to effectively partner with each other and their clinicians when contemplating treatment related decisions, early in disease trajectory to increase trust and enhance communication. However, few interventions exist to enhance dyad skills in effectively requesting the specific support and resources they need to successfully navigate decision-making and to manage their illness experience. To date, systematic reviews and national reports have highlighted how interventions to optimize health-related decision-making in CKD have focused mainly on the patient and have not included the family caregiver, particularly in historically excluded populations. Furthermore, nearly all work has focused on interventions for specific CKD medical decisions and not the broader landscape of health-related decision-making along the CKD illness trajectory (i.e., biopsy, medication regiment, diet and nutrition). To develop an intervention to enhance the decision-making partnership between CKD dyads, the investigators have identified intervention components from other caregiving interventions that focus on optimizing the dyad's ability to partner in decision-making earlier in the course of illness. However, it is unknown which of these components and component combinations might best comprise a packaged intervention that optimizes patient and caregiver health-related decision-making as related to advancing CKD. Traditional intervention development approaches typically treat interventions as "bundled" treatment packages, making it difficult to determine which components of an intervention are effective. Hence, the investigators propose an intervention development and testing approach using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), aiming to develop and test intervention components more efficiently.

Study Objective: The overall purpose of this study is to pilot test components of ImPart (Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships), a telehealth, decision support training intervention for stage 4 CKD dyads (2 estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] values between 15ml/min - 29ml/min in the last 90 days based on the new 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine race-free equation), using pilot data from current works and the MOST framework for intervention development and testing. A pilot 2X2X2 factorial trial to assess the stakeholder-informed individual components to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary component efficacy with 64 stage 4 CKD dyads (128 individuals) randomized to 1 of 8 experimental conditions. Tentative intervention components include 1) caregiver coaching on effective decision support (1 vs. 3 sessions); 2) caregiver decision support communication training (1 session vs. none); and 3) patient social support effectiveness psychoeducation (yes vs. no).

The research specific aims (SA) are to:

SA 1. Determine acceptability \& feasibility of the refined intervention components in a sample of 64 dyads over 24 weeks using a pilot factorial design. Feasibility: Completion of ≥75% of intervention session \&; data collection completion and the results of the feasibility of intervention measure. Acceptability: Post-intervention acceptability interviews, acceptability of intervention measure, and intervention appropriateness measure.

SA 2. Explore the preliminary efficacy of individual intervention components on patient and caregiver outcomes over 24 weeks, including patient-reported decisional conflict using the Decision Conflict Scale (primary). Secondary outcomes: Patients: a) social support effectiveness (Social Support Effectiveness Scale), b) distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), c) quality of life (Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item short-form [KDQOL-36]) Caregivers: a) distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), b) quality of life (PROMIS Global 10) Both: dyadic interaction (Dyadic Coping Inventory).

Being tested
ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships
Keywords
chronic kidney disease, shared decision making, family caregiving
Medical subject headings
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional PartnershipsBehavioural

    ImPart is a decision support intervention developed and refined in partnership with a advisory group of patients with and caregivers of people living with Chronic Kidney Disease. The program is designed to support decision-making throughout the illness experience.

Study groups in NCT06173323
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Basic social support + communication + patient psychoeducationExperimental2 in-person/telephone weekly sessions on providing social support and tips for good communication for caregiver participants and 2 sessions of social support, decision aids, and tips for good communication for patient participants and a single monthly follow-up call for both participants.
Receives: Behavioral: ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships
Basic social support + communicationExperimental2 in-person/telephone weekly sessions on providing social support and tips for good communication for caregiver participants and a single monthly follow-up call for caregiver participant
Receives: Behavioral: ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships
Basic social support + patient psychoeducationExperimental1 in-person/telephone weekly sessions on providing social support for caregiver participants and 2 sessions of social support, decision aids, and tips for good communication for patient participants and a single monthly follow-up call for both participants.
Receives: Behavioral: ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships
Basic social supportExperimental1 in-person/telephone weekly sessions on providing social support for caregiver participants a single monthly follow-up call for the caregiver participant.
Receives: Behavioral: ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships
Advanced social support + communication+ patient psychoeducationExperimental4 in-person/telephone weekly sessions on providing social support and tips for good communication for caregiver participants and 2 sessions of social support, decision aids, and tips for good communication for patient participants and a single monthly follow-up call for both participants.
Receives: Behavioral: ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships
Advanced social support + communicationExperimental4 in-person/telephone weekly sessions on providing social support and tips for good communication for caregiver participants and a single monthly follow-up call for caregiver participant
Receives: Behavioral: ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships
Advanced social support + patient psychoeducationExperimental3 in-person/telephone weekly sessions on providing social support for caregiver participants and 2 sessions of social support, decision aids, and tips for good communication for patient participants and a single monthly follow-up call for both participants.
Receives: Behavioral: ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships
Advanced social supportExperimental3 in-person/telephone weekly sessions on providing social support for caregiver participants and a single monthly follow-up call for caregiver participant
Receives: Behavioral: ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Acceptability of Intervention Measure

    four-item measure of implementation outcomes that are often considered "leading indicators" of implementation success; higher score indicate greater acceptability (highest score - 20)

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Intervention Appropriateness Measure

    Four-item measure of implementation outcomes that are often considered "leading indicators" of implementation success; higher score indicate greater appropriateness (highest score - 20)

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Feasibility of Intervention

    Intervention completion rate (# participants completing assigned components) will be tabulated, ≥75% completion rates for assigned components will be considered evidence of feasibility

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline

  4. Feasibility of Data Collection

    Intervention assessment completion rate (# participants completing each study assessment) will be tabulated, ≥75% completion rates for study assessments will be considered evidence of feasibility

    Measured: baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks after baseline

  5. Feasibility of Intervention Process

    Feasibility of Intervention Measure a four-item measure of implementation - higher scores = greater feasibility (highest score - 20)

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. Acceptability of Intervention and Study Procedures

    Determined by thematic analysis, of digitally recorded, semi-structured qualitative interviews adapted from prior study teams' work. Open-ended questions will query participants about their experiences with their assigned intervention components, the navigator, study procedures, how program impacted their engagement in shared decision-making and changes they would like to see made to the intervention and study procedures.

    Measured: 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Health-related decision process for patient as measured by the Decision Conflict Scale

    16-item measure; perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options, factors contributing to uncertainty (e.g., feeling uninformed, unclear values) and feeling that decisions were informed and values-based - Scores range from 0 [no decisional conflict] to 100 [extremely high decisional conflict].

    Measured: baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline

  2. Health-related decision process for patient as measured by the Social Support Effectiveness- Questionnaire

    25 item measure; perceptions of help received in last 3 months with higher scores indicating more effective support - The total possible score is 66 points

    Measured: baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline

  3. Patient and Caregiver well-being/distress as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    14 items total, items measure anxiety and depressive symptoms. Higher scores=worse anxiety/depression - Scoring for each item ranges from zero to three, with three denoting highest anxiety or depression level. A total subscale score of >8 points out of a possible 21 denotes considerable symptoms of anxiety or depression.

    Measured: baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline

  4. Patient wellbeing/quality of life as measured by the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Scale (KDQOL 36)

    36 items measure three components: physical health score, mental health score, and kidney disease health score. Physical health score, mental health score, and kidney disease health score are averaged scores of sub-scales. The range of each score and each sub-scale is 0 - 100, and higher values indicate better QOL status

    Measured: baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline

  5. Patient and caregiver interaction as measured by the Dyadic Coping Inventory

    37-item instrument designed to measure perceived communication and dyadic coping in close relationships when one or both partners are stressed - higher scores = better coping between members of the dyad

    Measured: baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline

  6. Caregiver wellbeing/quality of life as measured by the PROMIS Global Health 10

    10 items, measures global health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in 2 domains: physical and mental health; scoring allows for cost-effectiveness estimates. Higher scores=higher HRQO

    Measured: baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Dec 2023
  2. Study start16 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
128 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06173323
Sponsor's protocol ID
300012221
Other IDs
1K23DK134756
Acronym
ImPart
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
7 Dec 2023
Last updated
26 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gazaway S, Wells R, Gutierrez OM, Azuero A, Cole A, Nix-Parker T, Pitts L, Lyas C, Lang-Lindsey K, Knight R, Pazant P, Gustafuson N, Rayburn A, Umeukeje E, Odom JN. Decision support training for chronic kidney disease dyads: the ImPart Study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Dec 26;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01749-8.

    PubMed 41449447

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships in people with Decision Making, Shared and Family Caregiving, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Shena Gazaway, Phd, RN (205-975-5704, gazaways@uab.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Acceptability of Intervention Measure (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06173323, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in