AzTrials
AzTrials

Time Restricted EatingHLNCT06188754

Healthy Lifestyles for Bipolar Disorder

A study testing Time restricted eating and Mediterranean diet in people with Time Restricted Eating and Diet, Mediterranean, run by University of California, Berkeley at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of two different healthy lifestyles on outcomes for those with bipolar disorder. The goals are to understand the acceptability of time-restricted eating and the mediterranean diet for those who are already receiving medication treatment for bipolar disorder… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Time Restricted Eating, Diet, Mediterranean
What is being tested?
Time restricted eating and Mediterranean diet
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Jun 2024to 28 Feb 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • meets diagnostic criteria for bipolar I disorder or bipolar II disorder (but not cyclothymia, BD Not otherwise specified or BD due to another medical condition)
  • current sleep (insomnia, hypersomnolence) or circadian sleep-wake (delayed phase, advanced phase, irregular sleep-wake, non-24-hour sleep-wake-type) concerns indicated by endorsement of at least some sleep or circadian-related impairment across the screening self-reports or interview
  • Living in an English-speaking country (and one that we have expertise in research procedures and diet)
  • Has been speaking English for at least 10 years, speaks English in the home, or certifies that they are able to understand English well for the study and demonstrates this during the screening interview.
  • Receiving medical care for BD (referrals will be provided for those who would like to begin care)
  • Mood-stabilizing medication regimens stable for at least one month
Show all 12Show fewer
  • < 5 kg weight change in the past 3 months
  • Currently eating ≥ 12 hours per day at least twice per week
  • Able to operate the camera function and respond to web-based surveys by phone (loaner phones will be provided as needed)
  • Not engaged in current shift work or have other responsibilities such as providing care that would chronically disrupt their sleep (i.e., > 3 h between 22:00 and 05:00 h for at least 1 day/week)
  • Able to complete 7 days of dietary logs adequately (e.g., at least 2 entries per day, covering at least a 5-hour eating window) during the baseline period
  • Able to complete screening and baseline questionnaires adequately (e.g., not failing more than 1 attention check item with instructed responding; responding to standard multiple-choice items in a mean of < 2 seconds per item). Where individuals respond to more than 14 items in a row with the same response, we will manually review for possible invalidity.

Who cannot join

  • Current episode of depression, hypomania or mania, or psychosis (assessed by the aDiagnostic Interview for Anxiety, Mood, and Obsessive-compulsive and Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders; DIAMOND), Participants with acute mood disorder episodes will be encouraged to seek treatment and to consider the study when symptoms have remitted.
  • Eating disorder diagnosis (by self-report of treatment or diagnosis at any point during their life, Short Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-QS) scores above clinical concern thresholds for eating disorders, or DIAMOND interview of symptoms during adulthood)
  • Past 3-month alcohol use disorder or substance use disorder (assessed by DIAMOND)
  • Active suicidal ideation coupled with plan, intent or attempt history as assessed by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale
  • Conditions that would interfere with ability to take part in the intervention , including pregnancy, breastfeeding, uncorrected hypo or hyperthyroidism, gastrointestinal conditions impairing nutrient absorption,
  • Medical conditions such as HIV, AIDS, lupus, or multiple sclerosis that could confound the assessment of mania or other measures
  • Medications contraindicated for fasting: clozapine, glucose-lowering medications, diabetes-related injections, medications requiring food early morning or late evening, corticosteroids; medications such as semaglutide will not be an exclusion criteria
  • Cognitive deficits as noted during the initial interview or as indicated by low performance on the Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (< 20 on the weighted score).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Sheri L Johnson, PhD contact

(510) 519-4305

calmprogram@berkeley.edu

Nandini Rajgopal, BS contact

(510) 519-4305

calmprogram@berkeley.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of California

    Berkeley, California, 94720

    Sheri L Johnson, 4153476755, sljohnson@berkeley.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Time-restricted Eating vs. Mediterranean Diet as Adjunctive Interventions for Bipolar Disorder

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of two different healthy lifestyles on outcomes for those with bipolar disorder. The goals are to understand the acceptability of time-restricted eating and the mediterranean diet for those who are already receiving medication treatment for bipolar disorder, and to consider how these two food plans predict changes in manic symptoms, depressive symptoms, and Quality of Life. Participants will complete daily measures of eating, sleep and mood for two weeks, and then will be assigned to follow one of the two food plans for eight weeks. The investigators will measure symptoms and Quality of Life at baseline and during and after the food plan.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine the effects of time-restricted eating as compared to the mediterranean diet. In time-restricted eating (TRE), participants will be asked to limit their food intake to a period of 10 hours per day. In the mediterranean diet, participants will be asked to follow a food plan that emphasizes vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and olive oil as central dietary components. The investigators aim to test both food plans as additions to standard medication approaches in bipolar disorder. Participants who are receiving medical treatment for bipolar disorder and who report at least some sleep or circadian problems will complete baseline measures and then will be randomly assigned to TRE or the mediterranean diet for 8 weeks, and then will complete measures of symptoms, Quality of Life, and possible treatment mechanisms at the end of treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention. If successful, this work will provide a novel, easily implemented and highly acceptable intervention for BD.

Being tested
Time restricted eating, Mediterranean diet
Keywords
bipolar disorder, sleep, circadian rhythm
Medical subject headings
Intermittent Fasting, Bipolar Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Time restricted eatingBehavioural

    Also called intermittent fasting

    Limiting food intake to 10 hours per day

  • Mediterranean dietBehavioural

    Dietary advice designed to improve consumption of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and the use of olive oil.

Study groups in NCT06188754
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Time Restricted Eating (TRE) for 8 weeksExperimentalParticipants will receive an intro to TRE and then throughout 8 weeks they will receive brief online psychoeducation several times per week with optional weekly coaching sessions. TRE involves restricting the window of eating to 10 hours/ day, most typically by avoiding eating in the first 1-2 hours after awakening and in the 2-4 before sleep. Those with an eating window > 14 hours will be asked to restrict their eating to 12 hours in the first week, then 10 hours in week 2. To select the period, investigators will ask Ss to review baseline logs to consider sleep, eating, family meals and social commitment schedules, and any special energy demands, such as exercise. During the eating window, no restrictions are placed on the type or quantity of food consumed. The investigators will instruct participants to follow their habitual diet within their 10-hour eating window and to aim to consume the same number of calories per day as they did at baseline.
Receives: Behavioral: Time restricted eating
Mediterranean diet for 8 weeksActive comparatorParticipants will receive a several page introduction to the mediterranean diet, and then will receive support throughout the 8 week intervention to follow this food plan, including brief online psychoeducation that will be sent several times per week, and optional weekly coaching sessions. The mediterranean diet is a plan for healthy eating based on how people eat in the mediterranean region. Individuals will be encouraged to consume vegetables (6 servings/day), fruits (2-4 servings/day), whole grains (daily), legumes (3-4 times per week), nuts (.5 oz per day), and oily fish (2 servings/week). Participants will be encouraged to choose lean meats and other sources of protein over red meat and processed meats. Sweets, refined cereals, alcohol, and wine or alcohol will be labelled as extras, and participants will be encouraged to limit consumption of extras.
Receives: Behavioral: Mediterranean diet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Acceptability

    Participant self-ratings of the acceptability of the intervention: The primary index of acceptability will be the percentage of individuals who endorse that they agree or strongly agree that they would recommend the food plan to a friend. This single item has been used in previous trials of bipolar disorder. Higher agreement will be considered a positive outcome.

    Measured: immediately post-treatment (10 weeks after enrollment)

  2. Adherence to time-restricted eating

    Adherence will be scored based on the time of their first and final calorie consumption each day during the 8 week intervention. The investigators will select entries from the time interval that contains 95% of intake events. Following standards in other US and European studies of TRE, the investigators will focus on days in which participants adequately logged (e.g., entered at least two intake events, covering at least a 5 hour window), and will calculate the percentage of days in which individuals met the eating window goal. High adherence will be defined as meeting this standard on at least 78% of days logged. As supplemental data, the investigators will report the percentage of days logged, and the percentage of days in which individuals logged adequately and followed the planned window.

    Measured: Average number of daily food logs showing adherence across the 8-week intervention

  3. Adherence to Mediterranean Diet

    Adherence will be scored based on a Food Frequency Questionnaire that we developed for this study. We will score this using the Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet scoring system (AMed), which provides up to 9 points based on above-median consumption of beneficial foods (e.g., fruits and vegetables) and below median consumption of "extras" such as alcohol. Higher scores reflect better adherence to the mediterranean diet.

    Measured: Average number of food logs showing adherence at or above the median for 2 days at the mid-point of treatment (week 6) and at the end of treatment (week 10)

  4. Mania

    Decline in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total scores, completed by a blind rater

    Measured: Lower YMRS at the end of intervention (10 weeks) as compared to baseline

  5. Depression

    Decline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) total scores, completed by a blind rater

    Measured: Lower MADRS at the end of intervention (10 weeks) as compared to baseline

  6. Self-rated Quality of Life (QOL)

    Higher scores on the self-rated Brief Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD) at 1.5-months post intervention as compared to baseline

    Measured: Scores at 1.5-months post-intervention (16 weeks after study entry) as compared to baseline

  7. Mania at follow-up

    Sustained lower YMRS scores across follow-up

    Measured: YMRS scores will be lower at 3, 6, 12 month post-intervention follow-ups as compared to baseline

  8. Depression at follow-up

    Sustained lower MADRS scores across follow-up

    Measured: MADRS scores will be lower at 3, 6, 12 month post-intervention follow-ups as compared to baseline

  9. QOL at follow-up

    Sustained higher Brief QOL.BD scores

    Measured: Brief QOL.BD scores will be higher at 6- and 12-month post-intervention follow-ups as compared to baseline

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Self-rated mania

    Lower Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) Mania scores at post-intervention (10 weeks) and at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 month follow-ups post-intervention

    Measured: at post-intervention (10 weeks) and at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 month follow-ups post-intervention, as compared to baseline

  2. Self-rated depression

    Lower Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) Depression scores at post-intervention (10 weeks) and at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 month follow-ups post-intervention

    Measured: at post-intervention (10 weeks) and at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 month follow-ups post-intervention, as compared to baseline

  3. Sleep hygiene behaviors

    Lower scores on the Sleep Household Environment and In-Bed Behaviors at end-of-treatment (10 weeks) as compared to baseline

    Measured: post-intervention (10 weeks) as compared to baseline

  4. Weekly change in mania severity

    Lower Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) weekly Mania scores post-treatment as compared to those at baseline. The investigators will administer the LIFE interview at 3, 6, and 12-months after the intervention, and interviewers will record a mania severity rating for each week, to cover the time from the end of intervention until one year after the intervention ends.

    Measured: Weekly scores from the end of the intervention through one-year post-intervention follow-up

  5. Sleep disturbance and sleep impairment

    Lower scores on the Patient Outcomes Reporting Information System (PROMIS) sleep disturbance and sleep impairment scores at post-treatment (10 weeks) as compared to baseline

    Measured: post-treatment (10 weeks) as compared to baseline

  6. Sleep mid-point variability (Munich Chronotype Questionnaire; MCTQ)

    MCTQ scores will show a smaller proportion of individuals with either early or delayed chronotype (as reflected in standard scoring for the MCTQ) at post-treatment as compared to baseline

    Measured: post-treatment (10 weeks) as compared to baseline

  7. Regularity of daily routines (Brief Social Rhythm Questionnaire)

    Lower Brief Social Rhythm Questionnaire scores (less irregularity) at post-treatment as compared to baseline

    Measured: post-treatment (10 weeks) as compared to baseline

  8. Daily emotional lability as assessed using ecological momentary assessment

    Lower mean square of successive difference of negative affect scores within derived from the ecological momentary assessments at the mid-point of treatment (6 weeks) as compared to baseline. Participants will be asked to complete negative affect ratings several times per day for 8 days, at the baseline and mid-point of treatment. The investigators will calculate scores to examine the degree of negative affect variability for each day, and then take the average across 8 days at baseline and at treatment mid-point.

    Measured: mid-point of treatment (6 weeks post study entry) as compared to baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jan 2024
  2. Study start5 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion28 Dec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomly assigned to take part in either time-restricted eating or the Mediterranean diet.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06188754
Sponsor's protocol ID
Healthy Lifestyles 01
Acronym
HL
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
18 Dec 2023
Last updated
4 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Measures, data, and analysis scripts will be shared through Open Science Foundation.

Publications

  • Johnson SL, Murray G, Kriegsfeld LJ, Manoogian ENC, Mason L, Allen JD, Berk M, Panda S, Rajgopal NA, Gibson JC, Joyner KJ, Villanueva R, Michalak EE. A randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of time-restricted eating versus Mediterranean diet on symptoms and quality of life in bipolar disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 18;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05790-4.

    PubMed 38762486

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Time restricted eating and Mediterranean diet in people with Time Restricted Eating and Diet, Mediterranean, run by University of California, Berkeley at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sheri L Johnson, PhD ((510) 519-4305, calmprogram@berkeley.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Acceptability (time frame: immediately post-treatment (10 weeks after enrollment)). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06188754, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in