Ventricular Dysfunction, RightTERRANCT06193655
Test-retest Reproducibility of Right Heart Parameters of Chamber Size and Function
An observational study of Ventricular Dysfunction, Right, run by Istituto Auxologico Italiano.
Trial summary
The reliability of advanced echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters at repeated measurements is not fully clarified. Test-retest reliability of measurements is crucial for follow-up studies and for clinical monitoring of patients to detect a significant change in ventricular performance, as… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
- How many people
- 215 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2024to Sep 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Consecutive patients fulfilling the study enrolment criteria, with clinical indication to perform echocardiography and CMR study, with a relatively fair distribution of RV ejection fraction: normal (25%), mildly reduced (25%), moderately reduced (25%) and severely reduced (25%)
Who may be able to join
- Age over 18 years old
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years old
- Pregnancy/breast feeding
- Tricuspid valve repair/prosthesis
- Pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator
- Complex congenital diseases (exceptions: bicuspid aortic valve, atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, corrected tetralogy of Fallot)
- Poor acoustic window
Show all 12Show fewer
- Inability to acquire 3D datasets with at least 20 volumes/s
- Very irregular R-R interval
- Claustrophobia
- Acute conditions
- Hemodynamically instable patients
- Patients who do not provide consent for the study protocol
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Test Retest Reproducibility of Right heArt Parameters by Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (EACVI TERRA Study)
The reliability of advanced echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters at repeated measurements is not fully clarified. Test-retest reliability of measurements is crucial for follow-up studies and for clinical monitoring of patients to detect a significant change in ventricular performance, as well as to assess the outcome of various therapies on the size and function of cardiac structures. For echocardiography, the variability of the measurement is more complex, as it depends both on acquisition and reading variability, but also closer to the real life setting than observer variability. Much more limited data exist on the test-retest reliability of right heart parameters, i.e. right ventricle (RV), right atrial (RA) and tricuspid annulus (TA) parameters than on their observer variability and than of the equivalent left-sided parameters.
The primary aim of the study is to compare the test-retest reproducibility and agreement of advanced echocardiographic parameters of RV and RA size and function, and of tricuspid annulus (TA) size against the respective parameters obtained by conventional echocardiography and by CMR (where applicable).
Read the detailed description
Right ventricular (RV) size and function play a crucial role in determining patient functional status and prognosis in various conditions. The quantification of RV dimensions and function is part of any routine imaging workup involving echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. Complex clinical decision-making, such as to select candidates for various interventions (repair procedures for treating tricuspid regurgitation, ventricular assist devices, etc) and imaging follow-up to identify the optimal timing for intervention require an accurate and reproducible approach to RV evaluation. However, due to its complex shape, thin and highly trabeculated wall, the RV is more challenging and technically difficult to evaluate in comparison to the left ventricle (LV). In the last years, RV strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and ejection fraction by three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography emerged as superior metrics of RV systolic performance, overcoming some of the limitations of conventional echocardiographic parameters. To date, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been considered the gold standard for the assessment of RV volumes and ejection fraction. More recently, RV strain as a more sensitive and less load-dependent metric of RV performance than ejection fraction can be quantified by CMR feature tracking, yet its clinical value remains to be demonstrated.
The reliability of advanced echocardiographic and CMR parameters at repeated measurements is not fully clarified. For echocardiography, the variability of the measurement is more complex, as it depends both on acquisition and reading variability, but also closer to the real life setting than observer variability. Much more limited data exist on the test-retest reliability of RV, right atrial (RA) and tricuspid annulus (TA) parameters than on their observer variability and than of the equivalent left-sided parameters. Test-retest reliability of measurements is crucial for follow-up studies and for clinical monitoring of patients to detect a significant change in ventricular performance, as well as to assess the outcome of various therapies on tricuspid valve (TV) and RV size and function.
The investigators aim to explore in a multicenter setting the test-retest reproducibility of RV and RA size and function, and of tricuspid annulus (TA) size by echocardiography and CMR.
The primary aim of the study is to compare the test-retest reproducibility and agreement of advanced echocardiographic parameters of RV and RA size and function, and of tricuspid annulus (TA) size against the respective parameters obtained by conventional echocardiography and by CMR (where applicable).
Secondary aims:
- Compare the test-retest reproducibility and agreement of echocardiographic measurements with corresponding CMR measurements: 3D right ventricular ejection fraction vs CMR right ventricular ejection fraction, 2D TA diameter vs CMR TA diameter etc, in individual centers and in core lab
- Compare the test-retest reproducibility of RV measurements with corresponding LV measurements (i.e. right vs left ventricular ejection fraction, right vs left ventricular global longitudinal strain etc) using echocardiography and CMR in individual centers and in core lab
- Compare reproducibility of measurements between 2 different analysis software applied on the same images (at core lab)
- Assess the impact of observer experience and center volume (n° studies /year) on the measurement reproducibility on semi-automated vs fully-automated analyses; to evaluate the potential role of training on improving reproducibility, the inter-observer reproducibility of tested parameters will be compared between 10 expert readers (averaged measurements) and 10 new users (trainees).
Methodology:
Multicenter cross-sectional prospective study of consecutive patients fulfilling the study enrolment criteria, with clinical indication to perform echocardiography and CMR study, with a relatively fair distribution of right ventricular ejection fraction: normal (25%), mildly reduced (25%), moderately reduced (25%) and severely reduced (25%), will be enrolled in each center.
The time interval between echo and CMR studies should be < 48 h, in the absence of any significant change in clinical status or therapy between the 2 studies.
For echocardiography, 2 sets of acquisitions by 2 different operators will be performed at the beginning and at the end of a routine study (at least 20 min apart). This set will include:
- RV focused 4-chamber view (FR 50-80 fps)
- M-mode tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)
- Tissue Doppler S-wave
- LV 4-, 2-chamber and apical long-axis (FR 50-80 fps)
- Conventional 4-chamber dedicated for left and right atrium
- 3D dataset of RV (including TA and right atrium)
- 3D dataset of LV (including left atrium)
- RV systolic pressure by continuous wave Doppler
Test-retest measurements will be done independently by the same two operators that acquired the echo images.
For CMR, 2 sets of acquisitions by 2 different technicians including 4-chamber view cine and two sets of short-axis stacks for RV will be acquired at the beginning and at the end of a routine study (at least 20 min apart) after having removed the patient from the scan and his/her repositioning on the table for the second set of acquisitions.
Test-retest measurements will be done independently by two operators analyzing blindly the two acquisitions.
Measurements obtained in each center will be compared with core lab measurements.
Blood pressure and heart rate will be recorded before and at the end of the study.
Demographic, anthropometric and clinical data will be collected.
Based on non-inferiority of 3D right ventricular ejection fraction reproducibility as compared to CMR right ventricular ejection fraction reproducibility (ICC=0.82), the calculated minimal sample size with 5% margin is 183 patients. Taking into account 15% risk of poor quality images or missing value, the sample size was set to at least 215 patients to be enrolled in 6 months.
A minimum of 20 European centers will be invited to collect echocardiography and CMR data from at least 12 subjects/center with a relatively fair distribution of RV ejection fraction by CMR: normal (25%), mildly reduced (25%), moderately reduced (25%) and severely reduced (25%) to be enrolled in 6 months.
- Conditions
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
- Keywords
- right ventricle, right atrium, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, reproducibility
- Medical subject headings
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Right ventricular ejection fraction test-retest reproducibility
Agreement and intraclass correlation of 2 sets of repeated measurements 20 minutes apart by echocardiography and CMR
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Right ventricular longitudinal strain test-retest reproducibility
Agreement and intraclass correlation of 2 sets of repeated measurements 20 minutes by echocardiography and CMR
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Right atrial volume test-retest reproducibility
Agreement and intraclass correlation of 2 sets of repeated measurements 20 minutes by echocardiography and CMR
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Tricuspid annulus size test-retest reproducibility
Agreement and intraclass correlation of 2 sets of repeated measurements 20 minutes by echocardiography and CMR
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jan 2024
- Study startJan 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionApr 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ventricular Dysfunction, RightStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istituto Auxologico ItalianoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 215 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istituto Auxologico Italiano
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centro Cardiologico Monzino
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gianluca Pontone, Study director, Centro Cardiologico Monzino
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06193655
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 09C219
- Acronym
- TERRA
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Test Retest Reproducibility of Right heArt Parameters by Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (EACVI TERRA Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06193655
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TERRA / 09C219
- Conditions
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
- Keywords
- right ventricle, right atrium, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, reproducibility
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 215 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Istituto Auxologico ItalianoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centro Cardiologico Monzino
- Study start
- Jan 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The reliability of advanced echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters at repeated measurements is not fully clarified. Test-retest reliability of measurements is crucial for follow-up studies and for clinical monitoring of patients to detect a significant change in ventricular performance, as well as to assess the outcome of various therapies on the size and function of cardiac structures. For echocardiography, the variability of the measurement is more complex, as it depends both on acquisition and reading variability, but also closer to the real life setting than observer variability. Much more limited data exist on the test-retest reliability of right heart parameters, i.e. right ventricle (RV), right atrial (RA) and tricuspid annulus (TA) parameters than on their observer variability and than of the equivalent left-sided parameters.
The primary aim of the study is to compare the test-retest reproducibility and agreement of advanced echocardiographic parameters of RV and RA size and function, and of tricuspid annulus (TA) size against the respective parameters obtained by conventional echocardiography and by CMR (where applicable).
Detailed description
Right ventricular (RV) size and function play a crucial role in determining patient functional status and prognosis in various conditions. The quantification of RV dimensions and function is part of any routine imaging workup involving echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. Complex clinical decision-making, such as to select candidates for various interventions (repair procedures for treating tricuspid regurgitation, ventricular assist devices, etc) and imaging follow-up to identify the optimal timing for intervention require an accurate and reproducible approach to RV evaluation. However, due to its complex shape, thin and highly trabeculated wall, the RV is more challenging and technically difficult to evaluate in comparison to the left ventricle (LV). In the last years, RV strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and ejection fraction by three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography emerged as superior metrics of RV systolic performance, overcoming some of the limitations of conventional echocardiographic parameters. To date, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been considered the gold standard for the assessment of RV volumes and ejection fraction. More recently, RV strain as a more sensitive and less load-dependent metric of RV performance than ejection fraction can be quantified by CMR feature tracking, yet its clinical value remains to be demonstrated.
The reliability of advanced echocardiographic and CMR parameters at repeated measurements is not fully clarified. For echocardiography, the variability of the measurement is more complex, as it depends both on acquisition and reading variability, but also closer to the real life setting than observer variability. Much more limited data exist on the test-retest reliability of RV, right atrial (RA) and tricuspid annulus (TA) parameters than on their observer variability and than of the equivalent left-sided parameters. Test-retest reliability of measurements is crucial for follow-up studies and for clinical monitoring of patients to detect a significant change in ventricular performance, as well as to assess the outcome of various therapies on tricuspid valve (TV) and RV size and function.
The investigators aim to explore in a multicenter setting the test-retest reproducibility of RV and RA size and function, and of tricuspid annulus (TA) size by echocardiography and CMR.
The primary aim of the study is to compare the test-retest reproducibility and agreement of advanced echocardiographic parameters of RV and RA size and function, and of tricuspid annulus (TA) size against the respective parameters obtained by conventional echocardiography and by CMR (where applicable).
Secondary aims:
- Compare the test-retest reproducibility and agreement of echocardiographic measurements with corresponding CMR measurements: 3D right ventricular ejection fraction vs CMR right ventricular ejection fraction, 2D TA diameter vs CMR TA diameter etc, in individual centers and in core lab
- Compare the test-retest reproducibility of RV measurements with corresponding LV measurements (i.e. right vs left ventricular ejection fraction, right vs left ventricular global longitudinal strain etc) using echocardiography and CMR in individual centers and in core lab
- Compare reproducibility of measurements between 2 different analysis software applied on the same images (at core lab)
- Assess the impact of observer experience and center volume (n° studies /year) on the measurement reproducibility on semi-automated vs fully-automated analyses; to evaluate the potential role of training on improving reproducibility, the inter-observer reproducibility of tested parameters will be compared between 10 expert readers (averaged measurements) and 10 new users (trainees).
Methodology:
Multicenter cross-sectional prospective study of consecutive patients fulfilling the study enrolment criteria, with clinical indication to perform echocardiography and CMR study, with a relatively fair distribution of right ventricular ejection fraction: normal (25%), mildly reduced (25%), moderately reduced (25%) and severely reduced (25%), will be enrolled in each center.
The time interval between echo and CMR studies should be < 48 h, in the absence of any significant change in clinical status or therapy between the 2 studies.
For echocardiography, 2 sets of acquisitions by 2 different operators will be performed at the beginning and at the end of a routine study (at least 20 min apart). This set will include:
- RV focused 4-chamber view (FR 50-80 fps)
- M-mode tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)
- Tissue Doppler S-wave
- LV 4-, 2-chamber and apical long-axis (FR 50-80 fps)
- Conventional 4-chamber dedicated for left and right atrium
- 3D dataset of RV (including TA and right atrium)
- 3D dataset of LV (including left atrium)
- RV systolic pressure by continuous wave Doppler
Test-retest measurements will be done independently by the same two operators that acquired the echo images.
For CMR, 2 sets of acquisitions by 2 different technicians including 4-chamber view cine and two sets of short-axis stacks for RV will be acquired at the beginning and at the end of a routine study (at least 20 min apart) after having removed the patient from the scan and his/her repositioning on the table for the second set of acquisitions.
Test-retest measurements will be done independently by two operators analyzing blindly the two acquisitions.
Measurements obtained in each center will be compared with core lab measurements.
Blood pressure and heart rate will be recorded before and at the end of the study.
Demographic, anthropometric and clinical data will be collected.
Based on non-inferiority of 3D right ventricular ejection fraction reproducibility as compared to CMR right ventricular ejection fraction reproducibility (ICC=0.82), the calculated minimal sample size with 5% margin is 183 patients. Taking into account 15% risk of poor quality images or missing value, the sample size was set to at least 215 patients to be enrolled in 6 months.
A minimum of 20 European centers will be invited to collect echocardiography and CMR data from at least 12 subjects/center with a relatively fair distribution of RV ejection fraction by CMR: normal (25%), mildly reduced (25%), moderately reduced (25%) and severely reduced (25%) to be enrolled in 6 months.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Consecutive patients fulfilling the study enrolment criteria, with clinical indication to perform echocardiography and CMR study, with a relatively fair distribution of RV ejection fraction: normal (25%), mildly reduced (25%), moderately reduced (25%) and severely reduced (25%)
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age over 18 years old
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Age <18 years old
- Pregnancy/breast feeding
- Tricuspid valve repair/prosthesis
- Pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator
- Complex congenital diseases (exceptions: bicuspid aortic valve, atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, corrected tetralogy of Fallot)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Right ventricular ejection fraction test-retest reproducibility
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Agreement and intraclass correlation of 2 sets of repeated measurements 20 minutes apart by echocardiography and CMR
Right ventricular longitudinal strain test-retest reproducibility
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Agreement and intraclass correlation of 2 sets of repeated measurements 20 minutes by echocardiography and CMR
Right atrial volume test-retest reproducibility
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Agreement and intraclass correlation of 2 sets of repeated measurements 20 minutes by echocardiography and CMR
Tricuspid annulus size test-retest reproducibility
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Agreement and intraclass correlation of 2 sets of repeated measurements 20 minutes by echocardiography and CMR
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2024.
Related trials for Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study of Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Pulmonary Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension
RecruitingObservational study
dPmax for Predicting Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
RecruitingObservational study
Right Ventricular Function and Respiratory Acidosis After Cardiac Surgery
Respiratory Acidosis in ICU Patients, Right Ventricular (RV) Dysfunction
RecruitingPhase 2
Feasibility Trial for a Right Ventricular Failure Platform Trial
Pulmonary Hypertension, Right Ventricular Dysfunction
RecruitingObservational study
Pulmonary Embolism Registry From Short-Term Emergency to Long-Term Follow-Up and Surveillance
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE), Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gianluca Pontone study director
Centro Cardiologico Monzino
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Ventricular Dysfunction, Right, run by Istituto Auxologico Italiano.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Denisa Muraru, Md, PhD (390261911 ext. 2881, denisa.muraru@unimib.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Right ventricular ejection fraction test-retest reproducibility (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2024.