AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainNCT06207097

Compare the Effect of Exercise Program Plus Dry Needling Versus Elastic Taping

A study testing physiotherapy techniques in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Americas - Chili at 1 site in Chile.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal health condition in society. It is a leading cause of disability globally and has created a significant burden in terms of work disability and high healthcare costs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
physiotherapy techniques
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
22 participants
Where
1 siteChile
Study dates
1 Aug 2023to 18 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Workers of the University of the Americas, Santiago Centro Campus, Echaurren and República Headquarters

Who cannot join

  • Not having a diagnosis of cancer,
  • Hernia of the nucleus pulposus with neural symptoms,
  • Pregnant
  • History of recent surgery (<6 months)
  • History of tumor
  • History of spinal fracture
  • People with belonephobia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Chile1 site
  • Universidad de las Americas

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7750495

Other trials in Chile

About this study

Official title: Effect of Dry Needling Plus Exercise Compared to Elastic Taping Plus Exercise on the Reduction of Nonspecific Low Back Pain and Functionality

Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal health condition in society. It is a leading cause of disability globally and has created a significant burden in terms of work disability and high healthcare costs.

Studies on the treatment of combined therapies for non-specific low back pain are scarce, so it is not known in depth which intervention is the best for reducing pain. For this reason, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of physical exercise plus dry needling versus physical exercise plus elastic bandage. For this, a randomized clinical trial was carried out with a total of 22 people, where pain was evaluated using the ENA scale and functionality using the Oswestry test. Participants received CORE stabilization exercises. CORE stability training has become a popular training trend and has begun to be applied in rehabilitation programs and sports medicine (1).

The expected results of the study are that the group that receives the physical exercise intervention plus dry needling will have better results in reducing the pain and functionality variable, evaluated with ENA and Oswestry in 4 sessions.

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Being tested
physiotherapy techniques
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • physiotherapy techniquesOther

    Dry neeling: invasive physiotherapy technique where an acupuncture needle is used on painful points Elastic taping: physiotherapy technique where elastic bandage is used on the skin Exercise program: physical exercise prescription

Study groups in NCT06207097
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dry needling plus exercise program.ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: physiotherapy techniques
Elastic taping plus exercise program.ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: physiotherapy techniques

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain (pain scale (VAS) 1 to 109

    visual analog pain scale

    Measured: 1 week

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. dysfunction (percentage of disability due to low back pain (from 0 to 10%))

    Evaluation of dysfunction due to low back pain with the Oswestry Dysfunction Scale

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2024
  2. Study start1 Aug 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion18 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06207097
Sponsor's protocol ID
CEC_FP_2023022
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
5 Jan 2024
Last updated
16 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing physiotherapy techniques in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Americas - Chili at 1 site in Chile.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Chile. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain (pain scale (VAS) 1 to 109 (time frame: 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in