SedationPhase 4NCT06212401
Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketofol for Moderate Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
A Phase 4 study testing Dexmedetomidine and Ketofole in people with Sedation, run by Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Patients were randomly divided into Dexmedetomidine or Ketofol for sedation. In patients who received Dexmedetomidine, a 2ml ampule of 100 ug/ml was diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sedation
- What is being tested?
- Dexmedetomidine and Ketofole
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 20-60 years
- Any gender
- Scheduled for elective ERCP
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II
Who cannot join
- Allergic to dexmedetomidine, Ketofol, or related medications
- BMI over 36 kg/m2 (morbidly obese)
- History of stroke, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, chronic liver disease, hypothyroidism, and congestive cardiac failure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
Karachi, Sindh, 74200
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketofol For Moderate Sedation In Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Randomized Controlled Trial
Patients were randomly divided into Dexmedetomidine or Ketofol for sedation. In patients who received Dexmedetomidine, a 2ml ampule of 100 ug/ml was diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml. Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr and it was labeled as "infusion 1". In the Ketofol group, 2 ml ketamine (50mg/ml) and 10 ml of propofol 1% (10mg/ml) were diluted in 8ml of normal saline. This mixture was 20 ml each, making 5mg/ml of ketamine and propofol. Patients received 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion, labeled as "infusion 2".
Read the detailed description
Patients aged 20-60 years of any gender scheduled for elective ERCP were included. All these patients had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II. While those who were allergic to dexmedetomidine, Ketofol, or related medications, BMI over 36 kg/m2 (morbidly obese), had a history of stroke, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, chronic liver disease, hypothyroidism, and congestive cardiac failure were excluded. Furthermore, pregnant, or breastfeeding women or patients who reported chronic use of sedative medications or substance abuse, known contraindications to ERCP, and already enrolled in another clinical trial study were excluded.
Patients were randomly divided into two groups using computer randomization. All patients were taken to the procedure room and venous access was secured on a non-dominant hand by 20G IV cannula, intravenous (I/V) fluid (ringer lactate or normal saline) was started by 8 ml/kg/h, and oxygen support was provided by nasal cannula at 4 liters per minute. Standard monitors were attached for heart rate (HR), noninvasive blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and peripheral oxygen saturation SpO2. Injection midazolam 0.05 mg/kg was also given I/V to every patient in both groups to decrease the anxiety of patients.
Patients received either Dexmedetomidine or Ketofol for sedation. All syringes and infusion sets were covered by silver paper and these infusions were labeled as infusion 1 or 2. In patients who received Dexmedetomidine, a 2ml ampule of 100 ug/ml was diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml. Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr and it was labeled as "infusion 1". In the Ketofol group, 2 ml ketamine (50mg/ml) and 10 ml of propofol 1% (10mg/ml) were diluted in 8ml of normal saline. This mixture was 20 ml each, making 5mg/ml of ketamine and propofol. Patients received 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion, labeled as "infusion 2".
During infusion, vitals were recorded at 0,1,3,5, and 10-minute intervals from the start, and the Ramsay Sedation scale score (RSS) was recorded every 1 minute. Both infusions were started as per the randomization of groups. The mean difference in time to achieve adequate sedation and time to good recovery were noted as outcomes in each group. In addition, complications during the procedure and recovery were also noted. Adequate sedation was defined as the time from initiation of infusion to achieve an RSS score of 4. While Modified Aldrete's score (MAS) was used to assess the recovery. Time from discontinuation of the infusion to achieve an MAS score of 9 was labeled as a good recovery.
- Conditions
- Sedation
- Being tested
- Dexmedetomidine, Ketofole
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DexmedetomidineDrug
Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr
KetofoleDrug
Patients received ketofol 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dexmedetomidine | Experimental | Dexmedetomidine in a 2 ml ampule of 100 ug/ml diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml. Receives: Drug: Dexmedetomidine |
| Ketofol | Active comparator | 2 ml ketamine (50mg/ml) and 10 ml of propofol 1% (10mg/ml) diluted in 8 ml of normal saline. This mixture was 20 ml each, making 5mg/ml of ketamine and propofol. Receives: Drug: Ketofole |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ramsay sedation score
Clinical Score Patient's Characteristics
- Awake; agitated or restless or both
- Awake; cooperative, oriented, and tranquil
- Awake but responds to commands only
- Asleep; brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
- Asleep; sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
- Asleep; no response to glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
Measured: 0-2 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Modified Aldrete's score
Modified Aldrete's Score, also known as the Aldrete Score, consists of five criteria, each scored from 0 to 2, with a maximum total score of 10. The criteria are:
- Activity
- Respiration
- Circulation
- Consciousness
- Oxygen Saturation
- A score of 9-10 indicates the patient is ready for discharge from the recovery area.
- A score of 8 may be acceptable for discharge based on the surgeon's and anesthetist's discretion.
- Scores below 8 may necessitate further observation and interventions.
Measured: 10-15 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2024
- Study start1 Dec 2021
- Primary completion30 Jun 2022
- Study completion30 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SedationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Syed Muhammad Abbas, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
- Investigators
- Syed M Abbas, FCPS, Principal investigator, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06212401
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 234
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 18 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketofol For Moderate Sedation In Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06212401
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 234
- Conditions
- Sedation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sindh Institute of Urology and TransplantationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients were randomly divided into Dexmedetomidine or Ketofol for sedation. In patients who received Dexmedetomidine, a 2ml ampule of 100 ug/ml was diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml. Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr and it was labeled as "infusion 1". In the Ketofol group, 2 ml ketamine (50mg/ml) and 10 ml of propofol 1% (10mg/ml) were diluted in 8ml of normal saline. This mixture was 20 ml each, making 5mg/ml of ketamine and propofol. Patients received 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion, labeled as "infusion 2".
Detailed description
Patients aged 20-60 years of any gender scheduled for elective ERCP were included. All these patients had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II. While those who were allergic to dexmedetomidine, Ketofol, or related medications, BMI over 36 kg/m2 (morbidly obese), had a history of stroke, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, chronic liver disease, hypothyroidism, and congestive cardiac failure were excluded. Furthermore, pregnant, or breastfeeding women or patients who reported chronic use of sedative medications or substance abuse, known contraindications to ERCP, and already enrolled in another clinical trial study were excluded.
Patients were randomly divided into two groups using computer randomization. All patients were taken to the procedure room and venous access was secured on a non-dominant hand by 20G IV cannula, intravenous (I/V) fluid (ringer lactate or normal saline) was started by 8 ml/kg/h, and oxygen support was provided by nasal cannula at 4 liters per minute. Standard monitors were attached for heart rate (HR), noninvasive blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and peripheral oxygen saturation SpO2. Injection midazolam 0.05 mg/kg was also given I/V to every patient in both groups to decrease the anxiety of patients.
Patients received either Dexmedetomidine or Ketofol for sedation. All syringes and infusion sets were covered by silver paper and these infusions were labeled as infusion 1 or 2. In patients who received Dexmedetomidine, a 2ml ampule of 100 ug/ml was diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml. Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr and it was labeled as "infusion 1". In the Ketofol group, 2 ml ketamine (50mg/ml) and 10 ml of propofol 1% (10mg/ml) were diluted in 8ml of normal saline. This mixture was 20 ml each, making 5mg/ml of ketamine and propofol. Patients received 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion, labeled as "infusion 2".
During infusion, vitals were recorded at 0,1,3,5, and 10-minute intervals from the start, and the Ramsay Sedation scale score (RSS) was recorded every 1 minute. Both infusions were started as per the randomization of groups. The mean difference in time to achieve adequate sedation and time to good recovery were noted as outcomes in each group. In addition, complications during the procedure and recovery were also noted. Adequate sedation was defined as the time from initiation of infusion to achieve an RSS score of 4. While Modified Aldrete's score (MAS) was used to assess the recovery. Time from discontinuation of the infusion to achieve an MAS score of 9 was labeled as a good recovery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dexmedetomidine | Experimental | Drug: DexmedetomidineDexmedetomidine in a 2 ml ampule of 100 ug/ml diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml. |
| Ketofol | Active comparator | Drug: Ketofole2 ml ketamine (50mg/ml) and 10 ml of propofol 1% (10mg/ml) diluted in 8 ml of normal saline. This mixture was 20 ml each, making 5mg/ml of ketamine and propofol. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged 20-60 years
- Any gender
- Scheduled for elective ERCP
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Allergic to dexmedetomidine, Ketofol, or related medications
- BMI over 36 kg/m2 (morbidly obese)
- History of stroke, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, chronic liver disease, hypothyroidism, and congestive cardiac failure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DexmedetomidinePatients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr | Drug | Dexmedetomidine |
| KetofolePatients received ketofol 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion | Drug | Ketofol |
Primary outcome
Ramsay sedation score
Time frame: 0-2 hours
Clinical Score Patient's Characteristics 1. Awake; agitated or restless or both 2. Awake; cooperative, oriented, and tranquil 3. Awake but responds to commands only 4. Asleep; brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus 5. Asleep; sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus 6. Asleep; no response to glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
1 secondary outcome
Modified Aldrete's score
Time frame: 10-15 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jan 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sedation
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Changes to Prostate Procedures
Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Adults in the Intensive Care Unit
Psychomotor Agitation, Critical Illness
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Media Use, Anxiety, Sedation, and Recovery in Children Having Upper GI Endoscopy
Anesthesia, Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Syed M Abbas, FCPS principal investigator
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Dexmedetomidine and Ketofole in people with Sedation, run by Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ramsay sedation score (time frame: 0-2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2024.