AzTrials
AzTrials

Ischemic Heart DiseaseMICRO2NCT06212466

MCG as a Noninvasive Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected INOCA (MICRO2)

An observational study of Ischemic Heart Disease and Coronary Microvascular Disease, run by Genetesis Inc. at 8 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective, multicenter, observational, single-arm trial to validate CardioFlux MCG's ability to diagnose myocardial ischemia caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with suspected ischemia and confirmed no obstructive coronary artery disease (suspected INOCA) by using diagnostic measures of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
CardioFlux
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
136 participants
Where
8 sitesUnited States
Study dates
3 Jun 2024to 15 Apr 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Men and women aged 18 years and older with chronic/stable angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (suspected INOCA) with completed invasive CFR measurement within 180 days or are scheduled to undergo invasive angiography with CFR assessment by bolus thermodilution within 30 days of informed consent at an enrolling clinical trial center.

Who may be able to join

  • In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all the following criteria:
  • ≥ 18 years of age at the time of enrollment.
  • Willing to provide written informed consent.
  • Signs and symptoms of chest pain prompted further evaluation by a coronary angiogram within the previous 5 years.
  • Invasive CFR (via bolus thermodilution) completed within 180 days, or scheduled within 30 days, of informed consent.
  • 4.1. CFR must be performed in the mid Left Anterior Descending (LAD) vessel.
  • Successfully passing CardioFlux MCG Quality Preview prior to MCG study scan. 5.1. Patients must be able to fit into the device. 5.2. Patients must be able to lie supine for 5 minutes. 5.3. Patients must not have any of the following: 5.3.1. Presence of ferromagnetic metal between the sternal notch and costal margin of the rib cage.
  • 5.3.2. Implanted pacemakers or cardioverter/defibrillators. 5.3.3. Implanted infusion pumps and/or neuro stimulators. 5.3.4. Note: sternotomy wires and stents are acceptable. 5.3.5. Note: Failure to meet inclusion criteria 5.3 will render the MCG scan uninterpretable. However, any patient who may be scanned with the presence of any of the above objects is not at any risk of harm by the device. Prosthetic joints are allowed if the MCG Quality Preview is acceptable.

Who cannot join

  • An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
  • Obstructive CAD (either anatomical or physiological) defined as:
  • 1.1. ≥ 70% lesion in any major epicardial or branch vessel by CT or invasive Angiography; 1.2. ≥ 50% lesion in the Left Main (LM) vessel by CT or invasive Angiography; 1.3. or either an FFR<0.80 or iFR or RFR <0.89 in the obstructed vessel,
  • Any of the following cardiac pathologies:
  • 2.1. Epicardial spasm. 2.2. History of non-ischemic dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. 2.3. Suspected myocarditis. 2.4. Documented acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within previous 30 days. 2.5. Known left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <45% on most recent assessment (can be via ECHO), or hospitalization for Reduced ejection fraction within 180 days. (HFpEF is allowed).
  • 2.6. Currently in atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter at the time of enrollment.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • 2.7. Complete Bundle Branch Block. 2.8. Known moderate or severe valvular disease (anything besides mild). 2.9. Known severe Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) as determined by Echocardiography.
  • 2.10. Dextrocardia.
  • Known estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min.
  • Life expectancy <3-yrs. due to non-cardiovascular comorbidity.
  • Concurrent enrollment in a clinical trial in which therapeutic intervention is administered within 30 days of enrollment.
  • Prior enrollment in MICRO 1.0 and/or MICRO(T) data development study.
  • Pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

United States8 sites
  • The Christ Hospital

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Cleveland Clinic, Cardiovascular Medicine Research

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Ascension St. John Hospital

    Detroit, Michigan, 48236

  • Saint Elizabeth Medical Center

    Edgewood, Kentucky, 41017

  • University of Florida, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610

  • St. Luke's Health System, Cardiovascular Research

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64111

  • Hackensack Meridian Mountainside Medical Center

    Montclair, New Jersey, 07042

  • Mayo Clinic, Cardiovascular Research

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Magnetocardiography as a Noninvasive Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected Myocardial Ischemia With No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

A prospective, multicenter, observational, single-arm trial to validate CardioFlux MCG's ability to diagnose myocardial ischemia caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with suspected ischemia and confirmed no obstructive coronary artery disease (suspected INOCA) by using diagnostic measures of coronary flow reserve (CFR) via invasive angiography as a reference standard for diagnosis.

Read the detailed description

Magnetocardiography (MCG) is a noninvasive imaging modality that has been extensively studied over the past several decades as a diagnostic imaging solution for various forms of cardiovascular disease. MCG measures the magnetic field that arises from the electrical activity of the heart's pacemaker activity, the very same activity which yields surface electric field potentials as measured by the electrocardiogram. Unlike electrocardiographic signals, however, MCG signals are undistorted by conductive tissue noise, and are highly sensitive to ischemic injury and vortex currents missed by the same electrocardiographic measurements. Accordingly, numerous clinical trials suggest the usefulness of MCG for the evaluation of ischemia in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating the usefulness of MCG in the detection of myocardial ischemia, both in patients with symptoms of ACS, and in patients with stable angina. Since MCG is a functional assessor of depolarization and repolarization heterogeneity, it is hypothesized that MCG may be a useful frontline diagnostic modality to identify CMD in patients who would otherwise have normal coronary CT angiograms and/or stress tests. The proposed study intends to study the diagnostic accuracy of MCG in patients with suspected INOCA.

This demonstrates a significant unmet clinical need in the assessment of patients, and especially women, with INOCA. The current standard of care for these patients is resource/time intensive and associated with a significant rate of non-diagnostic clinical data requiring expensive and invasive evaluation for safe patient management. Magnetocardiography offers the potential for rapid, safe, noninvasive, non-radiologic assessment of the INOCA population, and may lead to earlier treatment strategies for CMD patients.

From the participating clinical sites, patients age ≥18 years who presented with chest pain or exertional dyspnea concerning for myocardial ischemia with no obstructive epicardial CAD on invasive or computed tomographic coronary angiography will be screened and subsequently enrolled when meeting criteria. This is a prospective observational study used for clinical data collection for the clinical validation testing of the CardioFlux MCG system. There will be no intervention introduced by the study device. The interpretation of the CardioFlux MCG data made by the study reader(s) will not be known to the patient's treating physician. Similarly, the patient's coronary physiology data, diagnosis, or interventions made by the patient's treating physician in following the standard of care will not be known to any of the scan readers. Except for the introduction of the MCG scan, there will be no other alteration to the patient standard of care.

Being tested
CardioFlux
Keywords
Magnetocardiography, CardioFlux, Coronary Flow Reserve
Medical subject headings
Myocardial Ischemia, Microvascular Angina, Angina Pectoris

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CardioFluxDevice

    The device is a magnetocardiography (MCG) scanner named CardioFlux, which is paired with a cloud processing software for the acquisition, display, and analysis of magnetic fields generated by cardiac electrical activity.

Study groups in NCT06212466
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CMD PositivePatients who have confirmed presence of CMD via invasive angiography/CFR
Receives: Device: CardioFlux
CMD NegativePatients who have confirmed absence of CMD via invasive angiography/CFR
Receives: Device: CardioFlux

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of CardioFlux MCG in determining the presence of CMD

    Diagnostic accuracy of CardioFlux MCG in determining the presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction, as measured by AUC with ground truth defined as an invasive CFR <2.5 for bolus thermodilution method.

    H0: AUC<0.55 Ha: AUC≥0.55

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Sensitivity and specificity in determining presence of CMD (Rule In)

    Patients who have confirmed presence of CMD via invasive CFR: Sensitivity and specificity of CardioFlux MCG in determining the presence of CMD with the gold standard defined as an invasive CFR <2.5 for thermodilution method as determined by a positive MCG scan output as defined by a Magnetic Dispersion Dynamics (MDD) score less than 41 fT/ms.

    Sensitivity

    • H0<0.30
    • Ha≥0.30

    Specificity

    • H0<0.70
    • Ha ≥0.70

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Sensitivity and specificity in determining presence of CMD (Rule Out)

    Patients who have confirmed absence of CMD via invasive CFR:

    Sensitivity

    • H0<0.70
    • Ha≥0.70

    Specificity

    • H0<0.30
    • Ha ≥0.30

    Measured: 6 months

  3. ROC/AUC, sensitivity and specificity at CFR cut-offs of <2.0 and 3.0.

    ROC/AUC, sensitivity and specificity for invasive CFR by thermodilution methods at CFR cut-offs of <2.0 and 3.0.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Patient-Reported Experiences with CardioFlux

    Self-reported questionnaire (5 questions scored 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) with a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 25.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Participant Age

    Age (years)

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Participant Height

    in meters; if known

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Participant Weight

    in kilograms; if known

    Measured: 6 months

  8. Participant Gender at Birth

    Male/Female

    Measured: 6 months

  9. Index of Microvascular Resistance (IMR)

    Sensitivity, Specificity, and ROC/AUC for CardioFlux will also be calculated against Index of Microvascular Resistance (IMR), defined as >25.

    Measured: 6 months

  10. Comparison of bolus vs. continuous thermodilution

    Comparison of bolus thermodilution (CFR-bolus) and continuous thermodilution (CFR-cont) against MCG when CFR-cont is available.

    Measured: 6 months

  11. Number of Adverse Events

    Safety will be monitored by the reporting of adverse events (related and non-related to the device) throughout the trial.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2024
  2. Study start3 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion15 Apr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06212466
Sponsor's protocol ID
MICRO 2.0
Acronym
MICRO2
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
29 Nov 2023
Last updated
10 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ischemic Heart Disease and Coronary Microvascular Disease, run by Genetesis Inc. at 8 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic accuracy of CardioFlux MCG in determining the presence of CMD (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in