AzTrials
AzTrials

Dry Eye SyndromesNCT06220474

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive RF Treatment in Refractory MGD

A study testing The Thermage FLX System in people with Dry Eye Syndromes and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, run by The University of Hong Kong at 2 sites in Hong Kong.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this prospective, 24-week, double-masked, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trials to compare clinical efficacy and safety of RF and MGX with MGX alone in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction-related dry eye disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
The Thermage FLX System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
112 participants
Where
2 sitesHong Kong
Study dates
22 Oct 2024to 31 Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 or more
  • Bilateral dry eye disease as confirmed by presence of both symptoms and signs 2.1 Symptoms: Abnormal result on the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness Questionnaire (SPEED) dry eye symptom questionnaire (≥5) 2.2 Signs: Abnormal result in at least one of the following three clinical tests - tear osmolarity, NIKBUT and corneal staining for punctate epithelial erosions and,
  • Bilateral moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction - at least Grade 1 meibum quality (cloudy appearance) and Grade 2 meibum expressibility (moderate pressure required). And,
  • Refractory MGD - The failure to respond to at least three types of conventional therapy, including artificial tears, topical or systemic antibiotics and anti-inflammatory treatments and the aforementioned heat-based therapies, over a period of at least 2 years
  • Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV - Type V and VI skinned subjects are excluded from the study due to the high risk of pain and focal hypopigmentation
  • Mentally fit to give informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Fitzpatrick skin type V-VI
  • History of eyelid scarring
  • Infrared meibography evidence of significant acinar gland atrophy (dropout of >30%) - these patients have been shown not to benefit from heat-based therapies due to end-stage disease
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Active corneal disease such as infectious keratitis, allergic keratoconjunctivitis, pterygium, exposure keratopathy, lagophthalmos, trichiasis or dellen
  • Current systemic intake of photosensitive medications, including tetracycline group of drugs.
  • History of corneal abnormality or surgery within 3 months

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Kendrick Co SHIH contact

94326271

kcshih@hku.hk

Hong Kong2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Grantham Hospital

    Hong Kong

    Kendrick Co Shih

    Recruiting
  • HKU Eye Centre

    Hong Kong

    Kendrick Co SHIH, 94326271, kcshih@hku.hk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive Radiofrequency Treatment in Patients With Refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this prospective, 24-week, double-masked, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trials to compare clinical efficacy and safety of RF and MGX with MGX alone in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction-related dry eye disease. The main question it aims to answer is whether radiofrequency treatment and meibomian gland expression is more effective in improving tear breakup time, as measured using non-invasive video keratography, compared with meibomian gland expression alone, in patients with refractory meibomian gland dysfunction-related dry eye disease.

Participants will be divided into two groups, one group will receive RF treatment followed with MGX and another will receive sham treatment with MGX.

Read the detailed description

Dry eye disease(DED) is a prevalent age-related ophthalmic condition. Depending on the population studied and the diagnostic criteria used, dry eye disease is estimated to have a high prevalence in most populations , with a female preponderance. In the latest 2017 Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II (TFOS DEWS II) Epidemiology Report, which compiled dry eye prevalence data from studies worldwide, the reported the prevalence of DED ranged from 5 to 50%. The risk of dry eye disease increases with age, where with every increase in 10 years of age, the self-reported symptoms of DED increased by 2%. In one study in Asia, up to 70% of elderly patients greater than 60 years of age suffering from symptomatic dry eye disease. Dry eye disease causes gritty and painful eyes, with associated blurred vision. For sufferers, it poses a significant burden on quality of life and limitations activities on activities of daily living, resulting in considerable economic costs to society. A 2006 health-economics study in the United Kingdom estimated that the annual healthcare costs to the public sector for every 1000 dry eye patients was USD 1.1 million.

The causes of dry eye can be broadly classified into those with aqueous tear deficiency, excessive tear evaporation or a combination of both. The most common cause of excessive tear evaporation is meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). This is a common condition of the eyelids where there is a significant change in both the consistency and quantity of meibum, resulting in chronic inflammation of the eyelids and subsequent ocular surface dysfunction. MGD has a prevalence from 46.2% to 69.3% in several studies targeting Asian populations, with a trend of higher prevalence in the elderly. Insufficient lipid secretion from meibomian gland undermines tear film stability, producing dry eye symptoms despite normal tear secretion. In a recent study, up to 70.3% of dry eye patients were found to have concurrent MGD. Refractory MGD is defined by the failure to respond to more than at least three types of conventional therapy, including lubricating eyedrops, gels and ointments and topical or systemic anti-inflammatory treatment, in the past two years.

Currently heat-based therapies are the mainstay and most effective strategies against MGD. Eyelid warming, thermal pulsation and intense light therapy are three prevailing heat-based treatments for MGD- related dry eye disease. Eyelid warming usually involves the application of warm towels, commercialized eye masks (EyeGiene® or Blephasteam®) or eye bags (MGDRx Eye Bag) at least twice a day. Thermal pulsation (Lipiflow®) refers to the delivery of controlled heat together with gentle massage to the eyelids by the machine for 10-17 minutes. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy, which uses light energy on the skin surface, is widely used in dermatology to treat a variety of conditions including dermal vascular lesions, such as port wine stains and hemangiomas, facial rosacea, and acne. Each treatment strategy however carries significant limitations. Self-applied eyelid warm compress is cheap and easily available, but when used alone has limited efficacy. Furthermore, sustained patient adherence to treatment is difficult long term. A single treatment of thermal pulsation therapy has been shown to have sustained therapeutic effects up to 12 months after treatment. However, thermal pulsation is not effective in moderate to severe cases of MGD. From existing studies, IPL has greater clinical efficacy than thermal pulsation, but its therapeutic effects are maintained for a significantly shorter period. As such, monthly repeated treatments for up to 8 months may be required for sustained effects. It is also important to note that none of the existing treatments allow the eyelids to evacuate inspissated meibum effectively, with meibum expression by an ophthalmologist an important step in the treatment process. Thus, MGD is likely to recur long-term.

The Thermage FLX System (WA, USA) is a non-ablative radiofrequency (RF) energy-based device, which has been widely adopted in the cosmetic industry for radiofrequency tissue tightening. RF transfers high energy fluences through the skin to deep dermal layers uniformly while protecting the epidermis. It is postulated that RF stimulates subdermal collagen production for tissue tightening effect. There are several advantages of using non-invasive RF treatment over other currently available energy-based devices. Firstly, the Thermage FLX has a much more precise applicator directly targeting the meibomian glands. Thermage FLX addresses both the upper and lower eyelids as close as possible to the lid margin, which is directly where the meibomian glands are situated, it also addresses the tragus area as well, hence a more precise and direct treatment area can be achieved. Secondly, compared to other energy-based devices, Thermage FLX provides a higher accumulative heat transfer effect around the periocular region, due to its repeated application of at least 4-5 cycles around the periorbital region. With higher accumulative heat energy, we anticipate a better and more effective melting of the meibum, which aids in more effective meibum expression. Thirdly, as Thermage FLX has been widely adopted for radiofrequency tissue tightening due to its collagen resynthesis effect, there has been proven improvement of the elasticity of orbicularis and periocular skin tissue, this can promote better blinking effort and better apposition of lid margins. This may enhance the pumping effect of the orbicularis oculi in the long-term. RF treatment is potentially a safe and effective multimodal treatment for MGD-related dry eye disease.

Being tested
The Thermage FLX System, Sham treatment
Medical subject headings
Dry Eye Syndromes, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The Thermage FLX SystemDevice

    The Thermage FLX System is tested for its therapeutic efficacy and safety on treating refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

  • Sham treatmentDevice

    Sham treatment acts as a control to test the therapeutic efficacy and safety of The Thermage FLX System

Study groups in NCT06220474
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Radiofrequency treatment (RF), followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX)ExperimentalBefore treatment, a thermage return pad will be applied to subject's skin to help prevent electrical burns. The return pad is a rubber, non-active electrode that creates a return path for radiofrequency energy back to the thermage comfort pulse technology (CPT) system. The upper and lower lid of both eyes are marked with skin marking paper (Thermage ® Skin Marking Paper TK-3.00). Coupling fluid is then applied to the external surface of the upper and lower lids of both eyes. All subjects then receive 225 applications to each eye over the upper and lower eyelids. Immediately after treatment, meibomian gland expression will be performed on both upper and lower eyelids of each eye for both eyes of all subjects using meibum expression forceps. Pain is minimized during this procedure by topical application of 0.4% oxybuprocaine hydrochloride.
Receives: Device: The Thermage FLX System
Sham treatment, followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX)Sham comparatorThe training mode is used in the Thermage FLX, which simulates treatment without dissipation of radiofrequency energy. Immediately after treatment, meibomian gland expression will be performed on both upper and lower eyelids of each eye for both eyes of all subjects using meibum expression forceps. Pain is minimized during this procedure by topical application of 0.4% oxybuprocaine hydrochloride.
Receives: Device: Sham treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in non-invasive keratographic tear breakup time (NIKBUT)

    NIKBUT is measured in seconds and average of 3 consecutive readings is taken. Higher values mean better outcomes.

    Measured: From baseline to 6 months post- treatment between study groups

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) symptom score

    One number was collected per patient, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

    Measured: From baseline to 6 months post-treatment between study groups

  2. Percentage of subjects with normal non-invasive keratographic tear breakup time (NIKBUT)

    > 10 seconds, with lower scores meaning worse

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Percentage of subjects with normal SPEED

    <5, with higher scores meaning worse

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Change in best corrected visual acuity

    from logmar(1.0 to -0.1)

    Measured: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

  5. Incidence of periorbital pain

    at least 3/10 and above, with higher scores meaning worse

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Incidence of ocular adverse events

    evidence of uveitis, conjunctivitis, scleritis/episcleritis, new lens opacities, new cornea opacities

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Incidence of non-ocular adverse events

    eyelid skin burn, eyelid redness, eyelid hyper/hypopigmentation

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jan 2024
  2. Study start22 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
One group of patients receiving radiofrequency treatment (RF) followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX) Another group of patients receiving and MGX
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
112 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06220474
Sponsor's protocol ID
11221686
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
10 Dec 2023
Last updated
27 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Publications

  • McCarty CA, Bansal AK, Livingston PM, Stanislavsky YL, Taylor HR. The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne, Australia. Ophthalmology. 1998 Jun;105(6):1114-9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96016-X.

    PubMed 9627665
  • Lee AJ, Lee J, Saw SM, Gazzard G, Koh D, Widjaja D, Tan DT. Prevalence and risk factors associated with dry eye symptoms: a population based study in Indonesia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Dec;86(12):1347-51. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.12.1347.

    PubMed 12446361
  • Chia EM, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Lee AJ, Maroun R, Wang JJ. Prevalence and associations of dry eye syndrome in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;31(3):229-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00634.x.

    PubMed 12786773
  • Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Chou P, Hsu WM. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jun;110(6):1096-101. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00262-8.

    PubMed 12799232
  • Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

    PubMed 28736335
  • Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;118(9):1264-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.9.1264.

    PubMed 10980773
  • Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, Jalbert I, Lekhanont K, Malet F, Na KS, Schaumberg D, Uchino M, Vehof J, Viso E, Vitale S, Jones L. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):334-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

    PubMed 28736337
  • Mathers WD, Lane JA, Zimmerman MB. Tear film changes associated with normal aging. Cornea. 1996 May;15(3):229-34. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199605000-00001.

    PubMed 8713923
  • Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Incidence of dry eye in an older population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;122(3):369-73. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.3.369.

    PubMed 15006852
  • The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the Epidemiology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007 Apr;5(2):93-107. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70082-4.

    PubMed 17508117
  • Miljanovic B, Dana R, Sullivan DA, Schaumberg DA. Impact of dry eye syndrome on vision-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;143(3):409-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.11.060. Epub 2007 Jan 2.

    PubMed 17317388
  • Clegg JP, Guest JF, Lehman A, Smith AF. The annual cost of dry eye syndrome in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom among patients managed by ophthalmologists. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;13(4):263-74. doi: 10.1080/09286580600801044.

    PubMed 16877285
  • Foulks GN, Bron AJ. Meibomian gland dysfunction: a clinical scheme for description, diagnosis, classification, and grading. Ocul Surf. 2003 Jul;1(3):107-26. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70139-8.

    PubMed 17075643
  • Schaumberg DA, Nichols JJ, Papas EB, Tong L, Uchino M, Nichols KK. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for, MGD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):1994-2005. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997e. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21450917
  • Rabensteiner DF, Aminfar H, Boldin I, Schwantzer G, Horwath-Winter J. The prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction, tear film and ocular surface parameters in an Austrian dry eye clinic population. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;96(6):e707-e711. doi: 10.1111/aos.13732. Epub 2018 Apr 15.

    PubMed 29656524

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in