Cardiac ArrestNCT06226246
Evaluation of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-based Dispatcher Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training
A study testing HEROS VR CPR training program and Conventional HEROS CPR training program in people with Cardiac Arrest, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
This study aims to compare the effect of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and CPR training with added virtual reality (VR) on trainee self-efficacy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Arrest
- What is being tested?
- HEROS VR CPR training program and Conventional HEROS CPR training program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2024to 30 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-medical personnel aged 18~65
Who cannot join
- Who have received CPR training within the past 1 year.
- For whom it is difficult to wear the VR equipment due to a history of side effects or problems such as head trauma.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study aims to compare the effect of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and CPR training with added virtual reality (VR) on trainee self-efficacy.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to compare the conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training program (HEROS CPR training program) with the HEROS VR (virtual reality) CPR training program to which the newly developed VR curriculum was added. The experimental group is the HEROS VR training group, and CPR training is conducted for approximately 60 minutes for 6 to 8 trainees per training. At the start and the end of the training, students are taught about cardiac arrest, recognition of emergency situations, and reporting to 119 by watching VR, and in the middle part, they practice chest compressions by watching conventional HEROS video. The control group is the existing HEROS training group. To control variables, the number of trainees per training was limited to 6 to 8, and the existing video-based CPR training was implemented. The investigators will conduct a Modified Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy scale survey before and after training to compare the difference in the improvement of trainees' self-efficacy evaluation of CPR after CPR training in the HEROS VR curriculum and the existing HEROS curriculum.
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest
- Being tested
- HEROS VR CPR training program, Conventional HEROS CPR training program
- Keywords
- CPR education, Virtual reality
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HEROS VR CPR training programBehavioural
HEROS VR training program which combined video training and VR session
Conventional HEROS CPR training programBehavioural
Conventional HEROS training program using video learning
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HEROS VR | Experimental | Trainee trained by HEROS VR CPR training program Receives: Behavioral: HEROS VR CPR training program |
| Conventional HEROS | Active comparator | Trainee trained by conventional HEROS CPR training program Receives: Behavioral: Conventional HEROS CPR training program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Modified Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy scale
Modified Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy scale (Modified BRS-SES):
The scale consists of 8 questionnaires with a 5-point Likert scale. After aggregating the scores, the score is converted to a scale of 100 points, with a minimum score of 20 and a maximum of 100. A higher score indicates a higher level of self-efficacy.
Measured: Immediately before training and immediately after the training program
Secondary outcomes (1)
System Usability Scale
System Usability Scale for VR device:
The scale consists of 10 item questionnaire with five response options from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The results of the 10 questions are aggregated and converted to a score out of 100. The higher the score the higher the usability.
Measured: Immediately after the VR training program
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2024
- Study start1 Apr 2024
- Primary completion23 Sep 2024
- Study completion30 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiac ArrestStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- STEPHEN LEE, MD, MA, Principal investigator, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06226246
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0420232290
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 3 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 13 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Park GJ, Kong SYJ, Song KJ, Shin SD, Kim TH, Ro YS, Myklebust H, Birkenes TS. The Effectiveness of a New Dispatcher-Assisted Basic Life Support Training Program on Quality in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance During Training and Willingness to Perform Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Study. Simul Healthc. 2020 Oct;15(5):318-325. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000435.
PubMed 32604135Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD006575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006575.pub2.
PubMed 19160288Aim F, Lonjon G, Hannouche D, Nizard R. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Training in Orthopaedic Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
PubMed 26412672Nas J, Thannhauser J, Vart P, van Geuns RJ, Muijsers HEC, Mol JQ, Aarts GWA, Konijnenberg LSF, Gommans DHF, Ahoud-Schoenmakers SGAM, Vos JL, van Royen N, Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA. Effect of Face-to-Face vs Virtual Reality Training on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;5(3):328-335. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4992.
PubMed 31734702Zheng J, Du L, Deng X, Zhang L, Wang J, Chen G. Efficacy of virtual reality techniques in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and trial sequential analysis. BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):e058827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058827.
PubMed 35149577Hernandez-Padilla J, Suthers F, Fernandez-Sola C, Granero-Molina J. Development and psychometric assessment of the Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy Scale. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Apr;15(3):e10-8. doi: 10.1177/1474515114562130. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
PubMed 25422522
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-based Dispatcher Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06226246
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0420232290
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest
- Keywords
- CPR education, Virtual reality
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to compare the effect of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and CPR training with added virtual reality (VR) on trainee self-efficacy.
Detailed description
This study aims to compare the conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training program (HEROS CPR training program) with the HEROS VR (virtual reality) CPR training program to which the newly developed VR curriculum was added. The experimental group is the HEROS VR training group, and CPR training is conducted for approximately 60 minutes for 6 to 8 trainees per training. At the start and the end of the training, students are taught about cardiac arrest, recognition of emergency situations, and reporting to 119 by watching VR, and in the middle part, they practice chest compressions by watching conventional HEROS video. The control group is the existing HEROS training group. To control variables, the number of trainees per training was limited to 6 to 8, and the existing video-based CPR training was implemented. The investigators will conduct a Modified Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy scale survey before and after training to compare the difference in the improvement of trainees' self-efficacy evaluation of CPR after CPR training in the HEROS VR curriculum and the existing HEROS curriculum.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HEROS VR | Experimental | Behavioral: HEROS VR CPR training programTrainee trained by HEROS VR CPR training program |
| Conventional HEROS | Active comparator | Behavioral: Conventional HEROS CPR training programTrainee trained by conventional HEROS CPR training program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Non-medical personnel aged 18~65
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Who have received CPR training within the past 1 year.
- For whom it is difficult to wear the VR equipment due to a history of side effects or problems such as head trauma.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HEROS VR CPR training programHEROS VR training program which combined video training and VR session | Behavioural | HEROS VR |
| Conventional HEROS CPR training programConventional HEROS training program using video learning | Behavioural | Conventional HEROS |
Primary outcome
Modified Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy scale
Time frame: Immediately before training and immediately after the training program
Modified Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy scale (Modified BRS-SES): The scale consists of 8 questionnaires with a 5-point Likert scale. After aggregating the scores, the score is converted to a scale of 100 points, with a minimum score of 20 and a maximum of 100. A higher score indicates a higher level of self-efficacy.
1 secondary outcome
System Usability Scale
Time frame: Immediately after the VR training program
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32604135Park GJ, Kong SYJ, Song KJ, Shin SD, Kim TH, Ro YS, Myklebust H, Birkenes TS. The Effectiveness of a New Dispatcher-Assisted Basic Life Support Training Program on Quality in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance During Training and Willingness to Perform Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Study. Simul Healthc. 2020 Oct;15(5):318-325. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000435.
- Background: PubMed 19160288Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD006575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006575.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 26412672Aim F, Lonjon G, Hannouche D, Nizard R. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Training in Orthopaedic Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
- Background: PubMed 31734702Nas J, Thannhauser J, Vart P, van Geuns RJ, Muijsers HEC, Mol JQ, Aarts GWA, Konijnenberg LSF, Gommans DHF, Ahoud-Schoenmakers SGAM, Vos JL, van Royen N, Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA. Effect of Face-to-Face vs Virtual Reality Training on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;5(3):328-335. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4992.
- Background: PubMed 35149577Zheng J, Du L, Deng X, Zhang L, Wang J, Chen G. Efficacy of virtual reality techniques in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and trial sequential analysis. BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):e058827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058827.
- Background: PubMed 25422522Hernandez-Padilla J, Suthers F, Fernandez-Sola C, Granero-Molina J. Development and psychometric assessment of the Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy Scale. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Apr;15(3):e10-8. doi: 10.1177/1474515114562130. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
CAROTID DOPPLER AND CEREBRAL OXIMERY IN POST CARDIAC ARREST ICU PATIENTS
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Carotid Doppler
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Acid-base Disorders and Ventilation Settings in Cardiogenic Shock and Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: Comparison With VentilO Algorithm
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiogenic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
STEPHEN LEE, MD, MA principal investigator
SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HEROS VR CPR training program and Conventional HEROS CPR training program in people with Cardiac Arrest, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Modified Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy scale (time frame: Immediately before training and immediately after the training program). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06226246, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2024.