Prosthesis DurabilityNCT06228859
Evaluation of Locator Versus TITACH Attachment for Mandibular Overdentures.
A study testing overdentures with different attachments in people with Prosthesis Durability, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical study was to evaluate the locator and TITACH attachments used for retaining mandibular 2-implant overdentures regarding retention , bite force and implant marginal bone loss after overdenture insertion Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Prosthesis Durability
- What is being tested?
- overdentures with different attachments
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 10 Mar 2023to Sep 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1) Complete edentulism with adequate residual alveolar bone quantity (height and width) and quality (density) at the area between the mental foramina (confirmed by cone beam CT, I -CAT, Pennsylvania, USA), 2) All patients had Angle's class I maxilla-mandibular relation with suitable inter-arch space (verified by a tentative jaw relation), and 3) All patients complained of inadequate retention and stability of their conventional mandibular dentures.
Who cannot join
- 1) systemic conditions that impede Osseo-integration, such as uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis, and head and neck radiation, 2) hazardous behaviors such as smoking, bruxism, and drunkenness, 3) individuals with a history of persistent TMJ disorders or reduced neuromuscular control.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Heba Wageh Abozaed
Al Mansurah, Dakahleia, 88001
Heba W Abozaed, heba_zeid@mans.edu.eg
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Locator Versus TITACH Attachment for Mandibular 2-Implant Overdentures. One-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical study was to evaluate the locator and TITACH attachments used for retaining mandibular 2-implant overdentures regarding retention , bite force and implant marginal bone loss after overdenture insertion
Read the detailed description
Locator (resilient stud) attachments have grown in favor in recent decades because they are self-aligned, give dual retention, and need less inter-arch space. The attachment's low profile may be beneficial in individuals with limited restorative space for reducing denture breakage . Furthermore, the interchangeable color-coded nylon inserts come in a variety of retention levels. Furthermore, the attachments allow for limited hinge movement and may adjust implant inclination of up to 40 degrees. However, nylon inserts exhibit significant wear and distortion and need intensive care. Elsyad et al, discovered that Locator attachments had the greatest incidence of prosthetic problems (particularly wear/distortion and replacement of retentive components) in a recent 5-year randomized controlled experiment .
A current study (TITACH) attachment (Implanova Dental Implants, Dental Evolutions Inc., USA) was designed to alleviate the issues associated with Locator attachments. Unlike the Locator system's nylon attachments, this connection enables metal-to-metal contact between the abutment and its cap. TITACH abutment, TITACH metal cap, and a silicone sleeve are the three components. When the metal cap engages the abutment, vertical holes allow it to open. The silicone sleeve functions as a block-out during cap pick-up. This type of connection may accommodate up to 33o divergence for a single implant or 66o divergence for contralateral implants. A vertical clearance of 4.5 mm and a diameter of 6 mm are required to fit the cap. It enables up to 0.2 mm of vertical cushioning, allowing for mucosal compression during function and progressive prosthesis seating. Furthermore, each attachment can withstand 7-10 lbs. of force.
Retention is the power of a dental prosthesis to withstand pressures of dislodgment along the line of installation. Prosthesis retention has been established as one of the most essential aspects in achieving successful implant overdenture therapy and increased patient satisfaction.In a previous in-vitro study, TITACH attachments were related to better retentive force results than Locator attachments, according to the authors. Although in-vitro retention testing provides for the standardization of testing conditions, Oral conditions such as mucosa, saliva, temperature, and masticatory stress may affect retention values24. Because intraoral parameters such as the presence of saliva and the structure of the residual ridge have been taken to be considered, objective assessment of clinical retention forces is preferable to subjective evaluation. Maximum biting force is determined by the activity of the jaw's elevator muscles, which is regulated by Cranio-mandibular biomechanics. In individuals with ridge resorption, dental implants will enhance biting force as part of masticatory efficiency. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures have at least double the masticatory biting force of conventional dentures.
Marginal bone loss (MBL) is a multifactorial occurrence that occurs around the cervical region of dental implants. Monitoring MBL surrounding implants is critical for determining dental implant success because it is thought to be a reliable predictor of bone response to surgery and occlusal loading. Whatever causes it, marginal bone loss is a major contributor to the development of peri-implantitis.
- Conditions
- Prosthesis Durability
- Being tested
- overdentures with different attachments
- Medical subject headings
- Prosthesis Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
overdentures with different attachmentsProcedure or surgery
Also called prosthodontics
different types of overdenture attachments in relation to retention, bite force, and periimplant tissue health.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group I (LOA): Patients were given overdentures with locator attachments. | Experimental | locater groups or overdenture attachment Receives: Procedure: overdentures with different attachments |
| Group II (TIA): Patients were given overdentures with TITACH attachment. | Experimental | TITACH groups for overdenture attachment Receives: Procedure: overdentures with different attachments |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Retention forces were measured using a digital force-meter.
Wearing mandibular dentures and resting his chin on the apparatus chin rest, each patient was instructed to move his head until the L-shaped hooks touched the U-shaped fork at the same time. The force-meter was then moved vertically until the overdenture was removed from its position , at which point the force-meter reading in (N) was recorded. The measurements were completed three times, and the mean was calculated
Measured: Baseline (at time of insertion), six months, one year after insertion
Secondary outcomes (1)
Maximum bite forces were measured bilaterally using a bite force transducer.
The device consists of a bite fork equipped with strain gauges, which were placed between the occlusal surfaces of the denture teeth in the first molar region. Patients were instructed to bite as hard as possible on the apparatus fork for a few seconds, and measurements were taken three times for each side. Left and right force measurements were added, and the mean was statistically analyzed.
Measured: Baseline (at time of insertion), six months, one year after insertion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jan 2024
- Study start10 Mar 2023
- Primary completionDec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prosthesis DurabilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mansoura UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Heba Wageh Abozaed Elsaed Mansour, Mansoura University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06228859
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M10071020
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Locator Versus TITACH Attachment for Mandibular 2-Implant Overdentures. One-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06228859
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M10071020
- Conditions
- Prosthesis Durability
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical study was to evaluate the locator and TITACH attachments used for retaining mandibular 2-implant overdentures regarding retention , bite force and implant marginal bone loss after overdenture insertion
Detailed description
Locator (resilient stud) attachments have grown in favor in recent decades because they are self-aligned, give dual retention, and need less inter-arch space. The attachment's low profile may be beneficial in individuals with limited restorative space for reducing denture breakage . Furthermore, the interchangeable color-coded nylon inserts come in a variety of retention levels. Furthermore, the attachments allow for limited hinge movement and may adjust implant inclination of up to 40 degrees. However, nylon inserts exhibit significant wear and distortion and need intensive care. Elsyad et al, discovered that Locator attachments had the greatest incidence of prosthetic problems (particularly wear/distortion and replacement of retentive components) in a recent 5-year randomized controlled experiment .
A current study (TITACH) attachment (Implanova Dental Implants, Dental Evolutions Inc., USA) was designed to alleviate the issues associated with Locator attachments. Unlike the Locator system's nylon attachments, this connection enables metal-to-metal contact between the abutment and its cap. TITACH abutment, TITACH metal cap, and a silicone sleeve are the three components. When the metal cap engages the abutment, vertical holes allow it to open. The silicone sleeve functions as a block-out during cap pick-up. This type of connection may accommodate up to 33o divergence for a single implant or 66o divergence for contralateral implants. A vertical clearance of 4.5 mm and a diameter of 6 mm are required to fit the cap. It enables up to 0.2 mm of vertical cushioning, allowing for mucosal compression during function and progressive prosthesis seating. Furthermore, each attachment can withstand 7-10 lbs. of force.
Retention is the power of a dental prosthesis to withstand pressures of dislodgment along the line of installation. Prosthesis retention has been established as one of the most essential aspects in achieving successful implant overdenture therapy and increased patient satisfaction.In a previous in-vitro study, TITACH attachments were related to better retentive force results than Locator attachments, according to the authors. Although in-vitro retention testing provides for the standardization of testing conditions, Oral conditions such as mucosa, saliva, temperature, and masticatory stress may affect retention values24. Because intraoral parameters such as the presence of saliva and the structure of the residual ridge have been taken to be considered, objective assessment of clinical retention forces is preferable to subjective evaluation. Maximum biting force is determined by the activity of the jaw's elevator muscles, which is regulated by Cranio-mandibular biomechanics. In individuals with ridge resorption, dental implants will enhance biting force as part of masticatory efficiency. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures have at least double the masticatory biting force of conventional dentures.
Marginal bone loss (MBL) is a multifactorial occurrence that occurs around the cervical region of dental implants. Monitoring MBL surrounding implants is critical for determining dental implant success because it is thought to be a reliable predictor of bone response to surgery and occlusal loading. Whatever causes it, marginal bone loss is a major contributor to the development of peri-implantitis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group I (LOA): Patients were given overdentures with locator attachments. | Experimental | Procedure: overdentures with different attachmentslocater groups or overdenture attachment |
| Group II (TIA): Patients were given overdentures with TITACH attachment. | Experimental | Procedure: overdentures with different attachmentsTITACH groups for overdenture attachment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1) Complete edentulism with adequate residual alveolar bone quantity (height and width) and quality (density) at the area between the mental foramina (confirmed by cone beam CT, I -CAT, Pennsylvania, USA), 2) All patients had Angle's class I maxilla-mandibular relation with suitable inter-arch space (verified by a tentative jaw relation), and 3) All patients complained of inadequate retention and stability of their conventional mandibular dentures.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1) systemic conditions that impede Osseo-integration, such as uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis, and head and neck radiation, 2) hazardous behaviors such as smoking, bruxism, and drunkenness, 3) individuals with a history of persistent TMJ disorders or reduced neuromuscular control.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| overdentures with different attachmentsAlso: prosthodonticsdifferent types of overdenture attachments in relation to retention, bite force, and periimplant tissue health. | Procedure or surgery | Group I (LOA): Patients were given overdentures with locator attachments., Group II (TIA): Patients were given overdentures with TITACH attachment. |
Primary outcome
Retention forces were measured using a digital force-meter.
Time frame: Baseline (at time of insertion), six months, one year after insertion
Wearing mandibular dentures and resting his chin on the apparatus chin rest, each patient was instructed to move his head until the L-shaped hooks touched the U-shaped fork at the same time. The force-meter was then moved vertically until the overdenture was removed from its position , at which point the force-meter reading in (N) was recorded. The measurements were completed three times, and the mean was calculated
1 secondary outcome
Maximum bite forces were measured bilaterally using a bite force transducer.
Time frame: Baseline (at time of insertion), six months, one year after insertion
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2024.
Related trials for Prosthesis Durability
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of the Total Knee ps Prosthesis Implanted With the Use of Inertial Sensors
Prosthesis Durability
Not yet recruiting
Abutment Analysis of Metallic Denture Frameworks in Mandibular Kenedy Class III Cases
Occlusion, Prosthesis Durability
Recruiting
TAVR: The Impact of Prothesis Positioning on Valvular and Coronary Hemodynamics
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
RecruitingObservational study
SEBBIN Silicone Gel-filled Testicular Implants
Complication, Prosthesis Durability
RecruitingObservational study
SEBBIN Round, Anatomical and Biconvex Gluteal Implants
Complication, Prosthesis Durability
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing overdentures with different attachments in people with Prosthesis Durability, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Heba W Abozaed, PhD (01091762662, heba_zeid@mans.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Retention forces were measured using a digital force-meter. (time frame: Baseline (at time of insertion), six months, one year after insertion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.