Narrow MaxillaNCT06230484
IFPE (Invisalign First Palatal Expander)
A study testing Invisalign first palatal expander and Conventional rapid maxillary expansion in people with Narrow Maxilla, run by University of British Columbia.
Trial summary
Malocclusions with narrow upper arches are usually treated in the mixed dentition with a traditional bonded maxillary expander. Most recently, a new design of a removable expander by Align was brought to our attention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Narrow Maxilla
- What is being tested?
- Invisalign first palatal expander and Conventional rapid maxillary expansion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Feb 2024to Apr 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patients in mixed dentition with 6 present on both Right and Left in the upper arch
- Patients with transverse maxillary deficiency (presence of unilateral or bilateral crossbite, or intermolar width (as measured where the palatal groove meets the gingival margin of the first molar) of 33 mm or less)
Who cannot join
- multiple and/or advanced caries,
- missing teeth due to aplasia, trauma, or deep caries,
- supernumerary teeth,
- congenital craniofacial malformations or congenital or acquired systematic disease,
- previous orthodontic treatment
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Bingshuang Zou, DDS contact
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Clinical Trial on the Outcomes of Invisalign First Palatal Expander
Malocclusions with narrow upper arches are usually treated in the mixed dentition with a traditional bonded maxillary expander. Most recently, a new design of a removable expander by Align was brought to our attention. In this prospective clinical study, the investigators will compare the patient-reported treatment outcomes and the dental-skeletal treatment effects on palatal dimensions. With this study, the investigators will have a better understanding of this newly developed appliance and its application in early orthodontic treatment.
Read the detailed description
Purpose:
This prospective study is aimed to investigate the patient-reported treatment outcomes and the dental-skeletal treatment effects on palatal dimensions and to compare them with those of traditional maxillary expansion.
Hypothesis:
The null hypothesis will be:
- 1: There are no differences in the inter-canine, inter-molar width, and molar inclination between IFPE and RME groups.
- 2: There are no differences in the arch width, length, size and shape, palatal surface area and volume, plaque index, and white spot lesion formation between IFPE and RME groups.
- 3: There are no differences in patients' experience of perceived pain intensity and discomfort during the first two weeks of treatment between IFPE and RME groups.
Justification:
The Invisalign First System (IFS) has been used in transverse arch development but with less skeletal effects in growing subjects. A new appliance, Invisalign First palatal expander (IFPE), designed to rapidly expand the maxillary arch with a daily change protocol has been introduced. This prospective clinical trial will compare the efficacy and efficiency between IFPE and conventional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) for maxillary arch expansion in mixed dentition. Patient-reported treatment outcomes in terms of quality of life during the treatment will also be investigated.
Objectives:
The broad, long-term objective of the project is to evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of IFPE and compare the treatment outcomes with those of subjects treated with conventional RME.
The specific aim of this research project is to compare the primary (the inter-molar width, molar inclination, the arch width, length, size and shape, palatal surface area and volume) and secondary (plaque index, and white spot lesion formation, difficulties with speech and eating) outcomes between IFPE and conventional RME for maxillary arch expansion in mixed dentition. With the results of this prospective clinical trial, orthodontists will gain knowledge of the efficacy and efficiency of IFEP compared with traditional RME and make their own decisions with the evidence to be provided by this study.
Research Protocol:
Research Design:
A power calculation based on the previous study by Lione et al.12 indicated a sample of 50 patients in each group to estimate inter-first molar width with a minimum difference of 1mm and a standard deviation (SD) of 3mm, with a power of 80%.
This project will be a multi-centre, prospective clinical trial with two parallel arms. The study protocol will be registered on CliniclTrials.gov. Ethical approval will be obtained from the Institute Research Board of the University of British Columbia before trial commencement and informed consent will be required from each subject before entering the study.
The recruitment will occur at two private orthodontic offices: one is an Invisalign diamond provider's office, and the other is a pediatric dentist and orthodontist group office. All the patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be treated with IFPE in the first office. While patients recruited from the second office under the same inclusion criteria will be treated with conventional Hyrax-type RME. The eligibility criteria will include patients of both sexes from 6 - 12 years of age, in mixed dentition with maxillary first molars completely erupted, and transverse maxillary deficiency. In particular, the presence of unilateral or bilateral crossbite, or intermolar width (as measured where the palatal groove meets the gingival margin of the first molar) of 33 mm or less). Exclusion criteria will include the following: multiple and/or advanced caries, missing teeth due to aplasia, trauma, or deep caries, supernumerary teeth, congenital craniofacial malformations or congenital or acquired systematic disease, and previous orthodontic treatment.
For each group, 50 consecutively recruited patients will be treated with IFPE and RME, respectively. For the IFPE group, patients will be treated with IFPE with no other auxiliaries and no enamel interproximal reduction (IPR) will be planned during treatment. Patients will be instructed to wear the expander 20-22 hours/day with a daily change protocol until the maxillary lingual cusps are in contact with the mandibular buccal cusps, followed by passive retention for 6 months. In the RME group, a two-banded Hyrax-type expander with one-quarter turn (0.25mm) every day will be performed until the maxillary lingual cusps are in contact with the mandibular buccal cusps, followed by a passive retention of 6 months. Orthodontic appointments will be scheduled weekly at first, then moved to monthly.
Digital casts before (T1) and after expansion (T2) will be collected and inter-canine width, inter-molar width, molar inclination, palatal width, surface area, and volume will be measured by using Rhino3D v5.0 software (Robert McNeel and Associates, Seattle, Wash). The buccal surfaces of the maxillary molars will be assessed for non-cavitated carious lesions (white spot lesions) using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) index. The plaque index was assessed using color-based plaque staining. Questionnaires will be given to the patients to fill out on days 1, 7 and 14 regarding level of pain and discomfort, difficulty with speech and eating, interference with daily activities and functional jaw impairment.
Statistical analysis:
SPSS software (version 27.0, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY) will be used for the statistical analyses. Measurements for 10 randomly selected models will be repeated 1 week apart to assess intra-examiner agreement. Intra-class correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots will be used to test the intra-examiner agreement. All measurements will be assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilks test. Descriptive statistics in the form of median and interquartile ranges (IQR, Q3-Q1) will be reported when the parameters did not show a normal distribution. Changes between T1 and T2 in each group will be analyzed with paired t-test for normal data and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-normal data. Intergroup comparison will be evaluated with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests with Bonferroni correction. The significant level was set as P < 0.05.
- Conditions
- Narrow Maxilla
- Being tested
- Invisalign first palatal expander, Conventional rapid maxillary expansion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Invisalign first palatal expanderDevice
Most recently, a new design of a removable expander by Align was brought to our attention. In this prospective clinical study, the investigators will compare the patient-reported treatment outcomes and the dental-skeletal treatment effects on palatal dimensions. With this study, the investigators will have a better understanding of this newly developed appliance and its application in early orthodontic treatment.
Conventional rapid maxillary expansionDevice
Malocclusions with narrow upper arches are usually treated in the mixed dentition with a traditional bonded maxillary expander.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IFPE patients | Active comparator | patients receiving IFPE treatment Receives: Device: Invisalign first palatal expander |
| (control group): RME patients | Active comparator | patients receiving conventional rapid maxillary expansion treatment Receives: Device: Conventional rapid maxillary expansion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
inter-canine, inter-molar, and palatal width
measured by using Rhino3D v5.0 software in millimeters
Measured: one year
Qualitative measurements from questionnaire- level of pain and discomfort
VAS = visual analogue scale, ranges from minimum score 0% (extremely uncomfortable) to 100% (very comfortable). Higher score is good (comfortable).
Measured: one year
molar inclination
measured by using Rhino3D v5.0 software in degrees
Measured: one year
surface area
measured by using Rhino3D v5.0 software in millimeters squared
Measured: one year
volume
measured by using Rhino3D v5.0 software in millimeters cubed
Measured: one year
noncavitated carious lesions
The buccal surfaces of the maxillary molars will be assessed for noncavitated carious lesions (white spot lesions) using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) index. The higher the score the worse condition:
0 Sound
- First visual change in enamel (seen only after prolonged air drying or restricted to the confines of a pit or fissure)
- Distinct visual change in enamel
- Localized enamel breakdown (without clinical visual signs of dentinal involvement)
- Underlying dark shadow from dentin
- Distinct cavity with visible dentin
- Extensive distinct cavity with visible dentin
Measured: one year
Plaque
Plaque index was assessed using color-based plaque staining. 0 - no visible plaque, 1-plaque visible only by scraping on the denture base with a blunt instrument, 2-moderate accumulation of visible plaque, and 3-abundance of plaque. By summing up the scores from the five areas, the plaque was recorded on a scale from 0 to 15 points.
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2024
- Study startFeb 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionFeb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Narrow MaxillaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bingshuang Zou, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06230484
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H23-00231
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 22 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Clinical Trial on the Outcomes of Invisalign First Palatal Expander
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06230484
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H23-00231
- Conditions
- Narrow Maxilla
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Malocclusions with narrow upper arches are usually treated in the mixed dentition with a traditional bonded maxillary expander. Most recently, a new design of a removable expander by Align was brought to our attention. In this prospective clinical study, the investigators will compare the patient-reported treatment outcomes and the dental-skeletal treatment effects on palatal dimensions. With this study, the investigators will have a better understanding of this newly developed appliance and its application in early orthodontic treatment.
Detailed description
Purpose:
This prospective study is aimed to investigate the patient-reported treatment outcomes and the dental-skeletal treatment effects on palatal dimensions and to compare them with those of traditional maxillary expansion.
Hypothesis:
The null hypothesis will be:
- 1: There are no differences in the inter-canine, inter-molar width, and molar inclination between IFPE and RME groups.
- 2: There are no differences in the arch width, length, size and shape, palatal surface area and volume, plaque index, and white spot lesion formation between IFPE and RME groups.
- 3: There are no differences in patients' experience of perceived pain intensity and discomfort during the first two weeks of treatment between IFPE and RME groups.
Justification:
The Invisalign First System (IFS) has been used in transverse arch development but with less skeletal effects in growing subjects. A new appliance, Invisalign First palatal expander (IFPE), designed to rapidly expand the maxillary arch with a daily change protocol has been introduced. This prospective clinical trial will compare the efficacy and efficiency between IFPE and conventional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) for maxillary arch expansion in mixed dentition. Patient-reported treatment outcomes in terms of quality of life during the treatment will also be investigated.
Objectives:
The broad, long-term objective of the project is to evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of IFPE and compare the treatment outcomes with those of subjects treated with conventional RME.
The specific aim of this research project is to compare the primary (the inter-molar width, molar inclination, the arch width, length, size and shape, palatal surface area and volume) and secondary (plaque index, and white spot lesion formation, difficulties with speech and eating) outcomes between IFPE and conventional RME for maxillary arch expansion in mixed dentition. With the results of this prospective clinical trial, orthodontists will gain knowledge of the efficacy and efficiency of IFEP compared with traditional RME and make their own decisions with the evidence to be provided by this study.
Research Protocol:
Research Design:
A power calculation based on the previous study by Lione et al.12 indicated a sample of 50 patients in each group to estimate inter-first molar width with a minimum difference of 1mm and a standard deviation (SD) of 3mm, with a power of 80%.
This project will be a multi-centre, prospective clinical trial with two parallel arms. The study protocol will be registered on CliniclTrials.gov. Ethical approval will be obtained from the Institute Research Board of the University of British Columbia before trial commencement and informed consent will be required from each subject before entering the study.
The recruitment will occur at two private orthodontic offices: one is an Invisalign diamond provider's office, and the other is a pediatric dentist and orthodontist group office. All the patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be treated with IFPE in the first office. While patients recruited from the second office under the same inclusion criteria will be treated with conventional Hyrax-type RME. The eligibility criteria will include patients of both sexes from 6 - 12 years of age, in mixed dentition with maxillary first molars completely erupted, and transverse maxillary deficiency. In particular, the presence of unilateral or bilateral crossbite, or intermolar width (as measured where the palatal groove meets the gingival margin of the first molar) of 33 mm or less). Exclusion criteria will include the following: multiple and/or advanced caries, missing teeth due to aplasia, trauma, or deep caries, supernumerary teeth, congenital craniofacial malformations or congenital or acquired systematic disease, and previous orthodontic treatment.
For each group, 50 consecutively recruited patients will be treated with IFPE and RME, respectively. For the IFPE group, patients will be treated with IFPE with no other auxiliaries and no enamel interproximal reduction (IPR) will be planned during treatment. Patients will be instructed to wear the expander 20-22 hours/day with a daily change protocol until the maxillary lingual cusps are in contact with the mandibular buccal cusps, followed by passive retention for 6 months. In the RME group, a two-banded Hyrax-type expander with one-quarter turn (0.25mm) every day will be performed until the maxillary lingual cusps are in contact with the mandibular buccal cusps, followed by a passive retention of 6 months. Orthodontic appointments will be scheduled weekly at first, then moved to monthly.
Digital casts before (T1) and after expansion (T2) will be collected and inter-canine width, inter-molar width, molar inclination, palatal width, surface area, and volume will be measured by using Rhino3D v5.0 software (Robert McNeel and Associates, Seattle, Wash). The buccal surfaces of the maxillary molars will be assessed for non-cavitated carious lesions (white spot lesions) using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) index. The plaque index was assessed using color-based plaque staining. Questionnaires will be given to the patients to fill out on days 1, 7 and 14 regarding level of pain and discomfort, difficulty with speech and eating, interference with daily activities and functional jaw impairment.
Statistical analysis:
SPSS software (version 27.0, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY) will be used for the statistical analyses. Measurements for 10 randomly selected models will be repeated 1 week apart to assess intra-examiner agreement. Intra-class correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots will be used to test the intra-examiner agreement. All measurements will be assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilks test. Descriptive statistics in the form of median and interquartile ranges (IQR, Q3-Q1) will be reported when the parameters did not show a normal distribution. Changes between T1 and T2 in each group will be analyzed with paired t-test for normal data and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-normal data. Intergroup comparison will be evaluated with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests with Bonferroni correction. The significant level was set as P < 0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IFPE patients | Active comparator | Device: Invisalign first palatal expanderpatients receiving IFPE treatment |
| (control group): RME patients | Active comparator | Device: Conventional rapid maxillary expansionpatients receiving conventional rapid maxillary expansion treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients in mixed dentition with 6 present on both Right and Left in the upper arch
- Patients with transverse maxillary deficiency (presence of unilateral or bilateral crossbite, or intermolar width (as measured where the palatal groove meets the gingival margin of the first molar) of 33 mm or less)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- multiple and/or advanced caries,
- missing teeth due to aplasia, trauma, or deep caries,
- supernumerary teeth,
- congenital craniofacial malformations or congenital or acquired systematic disease,
- previous orthodontic treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Invisalign first palatal expanderMost recently, a new design of a removable expander by Align was brought to our attention. In this prospective clinical study, the investigators will compare the patient-reported treatment outcomes and the dental-skeletal treatment effects on palatal dimensions. With this study, the investigators will have a better understanding of this newly developed appliance and its application in early orthodontic treatment. | Device | IFPE patients |
| Conventional rapid maxillary expansionMalocclusions with narrow upper arches are usually treated in the mixed dentition with a traditional bonded maxillary expander. | Device | (control group): RME patients |
Primary outcome
inter-canine, inter-molar, and palatal width
Time frame: one year
measured by using Rhino3D v5.0 software in millimeters
Qualitative measurements from questionnaire- level of pain and discomfort
Time frame: one year
VAS = visual analogue scale, ranges from minimum score 0% (extremely uncomfortable) to 100% (very comfortable). Higher score is good (comfortable).
molar inclination
Time frame: one year
measured by using Rhino3D v5.0 software in degrees
surface area
Time frame: one year
measured by using Rhino3D v5.0 software in millimeters squared
volume
Time frame: one year
measured by using Rhino3D v5.0 software in millimeters cubed
noncavitated carious lesions
Time frame: one year
The buccal surfaces of the maxillary molars will be assessed for noncavitated carious lesions (white spot lesions) using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) index. The higher the score the worse condition: 0 Sound 1. First visual change in enamel (seen only after prolonged air drying or restricted to the confines of a pit or fissure) 2. Distinct visual change in enamel 3. Localized enamel breakdown (without clinical visual signs of dentinal involvement) 4. Underlying dark shadow from dentin 5. Distinct cavity with visible dentin 6. Extensive distinct cavity with visible dentin
Plaque
Time frame: one year
Plaque index was assessed using color-based plaque staining. 0 - no visible plaque, 1-plaque visible only by scraping on the denture base with a blunt instrument, 2-moderate accumulation of visible plaque, and 3-abundance of plaque. By summing up the scores from the five areas, the plaque was recorded on a scale from 0 to 15 points.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Narrow Maxilla
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Laboratory-Fabricated and 3D-Printed Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances
Maxillary Constriction
Recruiting
Clear Orthodontic Expander Versus Hyrax
Malocclusion, Narrow Maxilla
Recruiting
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome (OSAHS) and Transverse Orthodontic Deficiency in Children
Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Transverse Maxillary Deficiency
Not yet recruiting
Quad Helix vs RME for Posterior Cross-bite in Egyptian Children
Posterior Crossbite, Maxillary Expansion
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Invisalign Palatal Expander vs Rapid Palatal Expander With Facemask in Growing Class III Patients
Skeletal Class III Malocclusion, Transverse Maxillary Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bingshuang Zou, DDS contact
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Invisalign first palatal expander and Conventional rapid maxillary expansion in people with Narrow Maxilla, run by University of British Columbia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mirian Dang, DDS (6048222112, drzou@dentistry.ubc.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
inter-canine, inter-molar, and palatal width (time frame: one year). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2024.