AzTrials
AzTrials

Critically IllNCT06244381

Indirect Calorimetry Versus Urea-creatinine Ratio to Evaluate Catabolism in Critically Ill Patients

An observational study of Critically Ill, run by Hospital Sao Domingos at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of the urea/creatinine ratio as a catabolism marker compared to indirect calorimetry to optimize nutritional support in critically ill patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Critically Ill
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 Mar 2024to 1 Oct 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Twenty critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to a 35-bed ICU intended for patients with COVID-19 from April to August 2021 and who underwent determination of energy expenditure with indirect calorimetry on days 1, 4, 7, 9, 14, 17, and 20 days after admission, and who did not have serum creatinine > 4.0 mg/dL upon admission, were not chronic dialysis patients and did not undergo dialysis treatment during the study period. The urea, creatinine, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, and albumin results will be obtained from the hospital's electronic medical record during the study period.

Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients with severe COVID-19 submitted to determination of energetic expenditure between the first and twentieth day of ICU stay -

Exclusion Criteria: patients who, upon arrival at the hospital, had a serum creatinine level above 4.0 mg°/dL, chronic kidney disease patients undergoing dialysis, and patients undergoing dialysis treatment during their stay in the ICU.

-

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Hospital Sao Domingos

    São Luiz, Maranhão, 65075775

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: NUTRITIONAL OPTIMIZATION IN THE DIFFERENT PHASES OF CRITICAL ILLNESS. Comparison of the Urea/Creatinine Ratio With Indirect Calorimetry.

This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of the urea/creatinine ratio as a catabolism marker compared to indirect calorimetry to optimize nutritional support in critically ill patients.

Read the detailed description

The most recent ESPEN guideline on nutritional support in critically ill patients identifies 3 phases in the evolution of critically ill patients: the early acute phase (formerly EBB Phase), characterized by endogenous energy production and activation of autophagy that limits full caloric-protein intake; the late period of the acute phase, when endogenous energy production has reduced to a basal level and autophagy is no longer manifested, and the late or rehabilitation phase. The identification of each of these moments is not based on precise elements. Despite this division into phases, there is no clear evidence of metabolic behavior, especially in the second and third phases, when the catabolic state gives way to anabolism.

Currently, monitoring catabolism is complicated since there is no available biomarker with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. 3-methyl histidine and nitrogen balance are not available in everyday life. As catabolism is not measured, its presence and severity only become apparent when muscle loss and weakness set in.

Recently, Haines et al., analyzing a population of patients with persistent severe disease, who are patients with prolonged hospitalization and with no resolution in the ICU, showed that continued catabolism is their metabolic hallmark and was measured by the urea/creatinine ratio persistently high.

The phases of severe illness could then be defined based on the UCR relationship. The ratio must be high in the early acute and late acute phases and may be a marker of the beginning of the late phase of recovery and anabolism.

Indirect calorimetry, the gold standard for determining energy expenditure energy, has revealed in studies that it can be the marker of the beginning of the anabolic when energy expenditure increases rapidly. This behavior of indirect calorimetry was observed in COVID-19 but has also been demonstrated in other patient populations.

Although indirect calorimetry can represent a reliable measure for determining the beginning of the anabolic phase, it is not a widely available measurement in ICUs, unlike urea and creatinine measurements that are part of routine daily exams in ICUs.

The urea/creatinine ratio may be an efficient catabolism marker to guide nutritional therapy in critically ill patients. Evidence to confirm this hypothesis can be obtained by comparing the urea/creatinine ratio with indirect calorimetry, which is the gold standard for evaluating energy expenditure and catabolism in these patients.

The primary objective will be to correlate the behavior of the urea/creatinine ratio with the energetic expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry in patients with severe forms of COVID-19 to identify the beginning of the anabolic phase that would be translated by a reduction in UCR and an increase in energy expenditure in IC. Secondarily, correlate other catabolism markers with calorimetry results. They are serum albumin, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein.

Conditions
Critically Ill
Keywords
Catabolism, Indirect calorimetry, Urea/creatinine ratio, Critically ill, COVID-19
Medical subject headings
Critical Illness, COVID-19

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Urea/creatinine ratio

    Compare urea/creatinine ratio with indirect calorimetry to determine catabolism and optimize nutritional support in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Serum albumin

    Compare albumin with indirect calorimetry to determine catabolism and optimize nutritional support in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Hemoglobin concentration

    Compare hemoglobin concentration with indirect calorimetry to determine catabolism and optimize nutritional support in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

    Measured: 30 days

  3. C-reactive protein

    Compare C-reactive protein with indirect calorimetry to determine catabolism and optimize nutritional support in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2024
  2. Study start1 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06244381
Sponsor's protocol ID
hsd0124
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
29 Jan 2024
Last updated
19 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Calder PC, Casaer M, Hiesmayr M, Mayer K, Montejo-Gonzalez JC, Pichard C, Preiser JC, Szczeklik W, van Zanten ARH, Bischoff SC. ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2023 Sep;42(9):1671-1689. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Jul 15.

    PubMed 37517372
  • Long CL, Dillard DR, Bodzin JH, Geiger JW, Blakemore WS. Validity of 3-methylhistidine excretion as an indicator of skeletal muscle protein breakdown in humans. Metabolism. 1988 Sep;37(9):844-9. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(88)90118-7.

    PubMed 3138511
  • Haines RW, Zolfaghari P, Wan Y, Pearse RM, Puthucheary Z, Prowle JR. Elevated urea-to-creatinine ratio provides a biochemical signature of muscle catabolism and persistent critical illness after major trauma. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1718-1731. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05760-5. Epub 2019 Sep 17.

    PubMed 31531715
  • Niederer LE, Miller H, Haines KL, Molinger J, Whittle J, MacLeod DB, McClave SA, Wischmeyer PE. Prolonged progressive hypermetabolism during COVID-19 hospitalization undetected by common predictive energy equations. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Oct;45:341-350. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

    PubMed 34620338
  • Long CL, Schaffel N, Geiger JW, Schiller WR, Blakemore WS. Metabolic response to injury and illness: estimation of energy and protein needs from indirect calorimetry and nitrogen balance. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1979 Nov-Dec;3(6):452-6. doi: 10.1177/014860717900300609.

    PubMed 575168
  • Monk DN, Plank LD, Franch-Arcas G, Finn PJ, Streat SJ, Hill GL. Sequential changes in the metabolic response in critically injured patients during the first 25 days after blunt trauma. Ann Surg. 1996 Apr;223(4):395-405. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199604000-00008.

    PubMed 8633918

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Critically Ill, run by Hospital Sao Domingos at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Urea/creatinine ratio (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06244381, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in