Migraine DisordersPhase 4FreMRINCT06244823
The FreMRI Study: Advanced MRI on Migraine Patients Treated With Fremanezumab
A Phase 4 study testing Fremanezumab Prefilled Syringe in people with Migraine Disorders and Migraine With Aura, run by Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The goal of this open-label, single-blind, controlled-trial is to evaluate brain changes evaluated with diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and functional MRI in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine that will be treated with Fremanezumab, 12 weeks after the treatment onset… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Migraine Disorders, Migraine With Aura, Migraine Without Aura
- What is being tested?
- Fremanezumab Prefilled Syringe
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 87 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2023to 1 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Definite diagnosis of Migraine With Aura or Migraine Without Aura according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd version (IHCD-3) (1).
- Age between 18 and 65 years old.
- Providing signed informed consent form.
- Diagnosis of migraine before 50 years old.
- History of migraine during at least 12 months prior to the study.
- With eight or more migraine days per month within the last three months
Who cannot join
- 1.Presence of other primary headache disorders other than infrequent tension-type headache or medication overuse headache (MOH).
- Participation of MOH patients will be restricted to a maximum of 50% of the total sample.
- Prior use of Fremanezumab or another monoclonal antibody targeting CGRP or CGRP receptor.
- Prior use of less than two or more than four preventive drugs according to the local national guidelines (34), with inadequate response after sufficient doses and enough time or lack of tolerability.
- Any medical condition that might prevent study completion or interfere with interpretation of results.
- History of any neurological or neurosurgical condition affecting the brain.
Show all 16Show fewer
- History of moderate-severe head trauma.
- History of other chronic pain syndrome with a frequency of five or more days of pain per month.
- Presence of daily headache
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Current or recent use of any other prophylactic treatment in the preceding five half-lives prior to the start.
- Exposure to onabotulinumtoxinA in the preceding four months.
- Any expected surgery during the study.
- Use of opioids or barbiturates.
- Any condition contraindicating an MRI acquisition.
- Completing headache diary at least 80% of the time during the screening period
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
Valladolid, 47010
David Garcia Azorin, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Structural, Diffusion and Connectomics MRI Study on Migraine Patients Treated With Fremanezumab: The FreMRI Study
The goal of this open-label, single-blind, controlled-trial is to evaluate brain changes evaluated with diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and functional MRI in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine that will be treated with Fremanezumab, 12 weeks after the treatment onset, compared with the baseline.
Type of study: Phase IV clinical trial Participant population: high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Participants will be treated with Fremanezumab.
Read the detailed description
Fremanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting calcitonin C-reactive peptide (CGRP) that has proven to be effective in the treatment of episodic and chronic migraine. Due to the molecular weight of the drug, it is not supposed to cross the blood-brain barrier, acting peripherally.
Patients with migraine have shown gray and white matter changes that can be evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
In the present study, we aim to evaluate the presence of MRI changes in patients treated with Fremanezumab, 12 weeks after the treatment onset, compared with the baseline.
Number of Subjects: 87 patients. Study Duration per Subject Study duration per patient will be 8 months.
Study procedures:
In the first visit, the screening visit, patients will receive a detailed explanation of the study and will sign informed consent form. Inclusion-exclusion criteria will be reviewed and evaluation of vital signs, general and neurological examination will be done. Patients will receive a headache diary and will be trained in its use.
First MRI scan will be acquired within 0-14 days, prior to Fremanezumab injection.
Patients will do four monthly additional hospital visits. During each visit, occurrence of any adverse event will be interrogated; clinical situation will be analyzed and Fremanezumab will be administered. Visits will be performed at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Last visit will be performed after 12 weeks, without Fremanezumab injection.
The second MRI will be acquired at 12 ± 1 weeks after the first Fremanezumab injection.
Intervention:
MRI acquisition Images will be acquired during interictal periods, defined as at least 24 hours from last migraine attack. High-resolution 3D T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted and resting-state functional MRI data will be acquired using a Philips Achieva 3T MRI unit (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) with a 32-channel head coil in the MRI facility at the Universidad de Valladolid (Valladolid, Spain).
For the anatomical T1-weighted images, the following acquisition parameters will be used: Turbo Field Echo (TFE) sequence, repetition time (TR) = 8.1 ms, echo time (TE) = 3.7 ms, flip angle = 8º, 256 x 256 matrix size, 1 x 1 x 1 mm3 of spatial resolution and 170 sagittal slices covering the whole brain.
Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) will be obtained using the next parameters: TR = 9000 ms, TE = 86 ms, flip angle = 90º, 61 gradient directions, two baseline volumes with opposite phase encoding direction, b-value = 1000 s/mm2, 128 x 128 matrix size, 2 x 2 x 2 mm3 of spatial resolution and 66 axial slices covering the whole brain.
Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) will be acquired with the following parameters: TR = 3000 ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle = 80º, 80 x 80 matrix size, 3 x 3 x 4 mm3 of spatial resolution, 35 axial slices covering the whole brain and 197 volumes. During this acquisition, the patient will close the eyes but remain awake.
All the scans will be acquired during the same session, starting with the T1-weighted scan, followed by the diffusion-weighted scan and ending with the rs-fMRI scan. Total acquisition time for a single subject is approximately 28 minutes, divided in the following periods of time: six minutes for the T1-weighted scan, 12 minutes for the diffusion-weighted scan and 10 minutes for the rs-fMRI scan. If we consider patient preparation, obtainment of documents and informed consent form, the whole process will take about 50-70 minutes.
Image processing T1-weighted morphometric parameters MRI images will be processed in order to obtain cortical curvature, cortical thickness, gray matter volume and surface area of the different gray matter regions.
Grey matter volume will be obtained for all the 84 grey matter regions from the Desikan-Killiany atlas (Reuter et al., 2012). Also, cortical curvature, cortical thickness and area will be calculated for the 68 regions from the atlas that are cortical regions.
DWI processing DWI will be processed to carry out two types of analysis: Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) and structural connectomics.
Prior to the beginning of both processing pipelines, diverse preprocessing procedures will be implemented on the DWI data. Diffusion-weighted images will be denoised, using "dwidenoise" tool from MRtrix (www.mrtrix.org), eddy currents, motion and B0 field inhomogeneity corrected, using "dwipreproc" tool from MRtrix, and B1 field inhomogeneity corrected, using "dwibiascorrect" tool with the "-fast" option from MRtrix.
Four diffusion descriptors from Diffusion Tensor Imaging will be obtained: Fractional Anisotropy (FA), Mean Diffusivity (MD), Radial Diffusivity (RD) and Axial Diffusivity (AD). We will also be using measures non based on the diffusion tensor, like the return-to-origin probability (RTOP), which reflects cellularity and restrictions better than MD.
Once the DWI data are preprocessed, a whole brain mask for each image will be generated using "dwi2mask" tool from MRtrix and, next, diffusion tensors at each voxel will be estimated using the "dtifit" tool from FSL, also obtaining FA, MD and AD maps. RD will be manually calculated by obtaining the mean of the second and the third eigenvalues, which will also be previously computed with "dtifit". RTOP will be estimated using the method called "Apparent Measures Using Reduced Acquisitions" (AMURA).
Structural connectomics The analysis of structural connectivity will use the segmentation results from T1-weighted processing pipeline.
Anatomically-Constrained Tractography (ACT) will be implemented. Previously, five-tissue-type (5TT) segmented images for each subject will be obtained from the T1-weighted images using the "5ttgen" tool from MRtrix to have suitable images for ACT. 5TT image and the automated parcellation from FreeSurfer will be inearly registered to the FA image using the FLIRT tool from FSL.
Finally, structural connectivity matrices will be computed from the filtered tractography output and the registered cortical segmentation volumes. 84 × 84 connectivity matrices, corresponding to the 84 cortical and subcortical regions from the Desikan-Killiany atlas, will be obtained using mean FA and the number of streamlines in each connection as connectome metrics. Connectivity matrices constructed in this manner are symmetric, so only a half of each matrix will be employed for further analysis.
Due to the tractography method employed, it is possible that streamlines start and end in different points belonging to the same gray matter region from the Desikan-Killiany atlas. For this reason, these connections ("self-connections") will also be included in the analysis.
fMRI processing The fMRI processing pipeline will be fully implemented in the software CONN. Firstly, some preprocessing steps will be implemented. fMRI volumes will be realigned and unwarpped to estimate and correct subject motion. To identify outliers, ARtifact detection Tools (ART) based outlier detection algorithm will be implemented. Then, fMRI volumes will be directly coregistered to the corresponding structural volumes (T1-weighted images) using a rigid body transformation. T1-weighted images will be segmented to detect different types of tissue, i.e., gray matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
Finally, the functional connectivity matrix for each case will be computed considering whole-brain region-to-region connections, using the 84 cortical and subcortical regions from the Desikan-Killiany atlas in each subject as regions of interest. The matrices will contain the Z-values from the Fisher's r-to-z transformation.
Safety Variables Safety and side effects will be evaluated according to reported adverse events, both spontaneously by patients and systematically analyzed during study visits. Vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, temperature and respiratory rate), physical examination and 12-lead electrocardiography will be done prior to the enrollment. Presence of any adverse event or local injection-site reaction will be systematically addressed. Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale will assess suicidal ideation and behavior at baseline.
Statistical Analysis Parameter evolution in time and relationship with change in monthly migraine days for each of the parameters, i.e., morphometric (gray matter) parameters, diffusion descriptors (white matter), structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity, longitudinal evolution will be assessed.
n order to analyze the structural connectivity matrices, firstly, the mean number of streamlines in each connection (cell from the connectivity matrix) will be computed for each group. Next, connections with less than 500 streamlines (group mean) will be discarded in order to exclude weak connections, for which results could be unreliable, from further analysis.
In the case of functional resting-state connectivity matrices, a similar rejection of non-important connections will be selected, connections with absolute Z-value lower than 0.1 are excluded, i.e., a Pearson correlation value of r = 0.1 following the Fisher's r-to-z transformation.
In the previous two cases, if the thresholds are too high or too low, i.e., almost all the connections are rejected, or almost no connections are rejected, the thresholds will be changed.
A model will be implemented for each of the four types of analysis described in the document. In each of the models, the significant effect of the covariates and the predictive capability of the model using the lowest number of covariates will be considered. To compare the different models, Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) will be used (67). In the case of very similar AIC values, the model with a lower number of regressors will be chosen.
For each of the four types of analysis, the predictive model will be computed for a single regressor. Regressors with p-value equal or higher than 0.05 in the singular predictive model will not be further considered to be included in the final model; while the remaining regressors will be considered for the final model of the corresponding type of analysis.
Relationship between MRI parameters evolution and clinical response A linear mixed-effect model will be prepared using the same strategy that was employed for the analysis of change in monthly migraine days and MRI parameters. To evaluate the clinical response to treatment, a dichotomic variable showing positive or negative response to treatment will be used, instead of change in monthly migraine days.
Positive response to treatment is considered as 50% reduction in number of monthly migraine days.
Exploratory variables analysis The final model used in the analysis of the relationship between the diverse MRI parameters and change in monthly migraine days will be used. The variable representing the change in monthly migraine days will be replaced by the change in monthly intense headache days, in monthly days of acute treatment medication.
In the case of response to treatment, the same final model from the analysis of clinical response considered as 50% reduction in number of monthly migraine days will be used. Response to treatment, in this case, will be represented by reduction of 75%, 100% and 30% of monthly migraine days.
Analysis of adverse events Categorical adverse events will be compared using Fisher's exact test. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered as statistically significant.
- Being tested
- Fremanezumab Prefilled Syringe
- Keywords
- Treatment outcomes, Preventive treatment, Brain functional changes, Brain structural changes
- Medical subject headings
- Migraine Disorders, Migraine with Aura, Migraine without Aura, Brain Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fremanezumab Prefilled SyringeDrug
MRI will be scanned prior to the first administration of Fremanezumab, within 0-14 days, prior to Fremanezumab injection. The second MRI will be acquired at 12 ± 1 weeks after the first Fremanezumab injection.Images will be acquired during interictal periods, defined as at least 24 hours from last migraine attack. All the scans will be acquired during the same session, starting with the T1-weighted scan, followed by the diffusion-weighted scan and ending with the rs-fMRI scan. Total acquisition time for a single subject is approximately 28 minutes, divided in the following periods of time: six minutes for the T1-weighted scan, 12 minutes for the diffusion-weighted scan and 10 minutes for the rs-fMRI scan. If we consider patient preparation, obtainment of documents and informed consent form, the whole process will take about 50-70 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fremanezumab | Experimental | Patients will be treated with 225 mg of subcutaneous injections of Fremanezumab per month.
Patients will do four monthly additional hospital visits. During each visit, occurrence of any adverse event will be interrogated; clinical situation will be analyzed and Fremanezumab will be administered. Visits will be performed at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Last visit will be performed after 12 weeks, without Fremanezumab injection. Receives: Drug: Fremanezumab Prefilled Syringe |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Morphometric MRI parameters change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 1
Cortical curvature
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Morphometric MRI parameters change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 2.
Cortical thickness
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Morphometric MRI parameters change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 3.
Gray matter volume
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Morphometric MRI parameters change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 4.
Surface area,
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Diffusion MRI descriptors change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 1.
Fractional anisotropy
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Diffusion MRI descriptors change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 2.
Mean diffusivity
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Diffusion MRI descriptors change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 3.
Radial diffusivity
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Diffusion MRI descriptors change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 4.
Axial diffusivity
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Structural connectivity change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 1.
Number of streamlines in the connection between two regions
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Structural connectivity change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 2.
Mean fractional anisotropy in the connection between two regions
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Structural connectivity change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 3.
Mean axial diffusivity in the connection between two regions
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Resting-state functional connectivity change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab.
Z-score
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Secondary outcomes (22)
Relationship between morphometric MRI parameters and the change in monthly migraine days 1.
Cortical curvature
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between morphometric MRI parameters and the change in monthly migraine days 2.
Cortical thickness
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between morphometric MRI parameters and the change in monthly migraine days 3.
Gray matter volume
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between morphometric MRI parameters and the change in monthly migraine days 4.
Surface area.
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between diffusion descriptors and the change in monthly migraine days 1.
Fractional anisotropy
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between diffusion descriptors and the change in monthly migraine days 2.
Mean diffusivity
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between diffusion descriptors and the change in monthly migraine days 3.
Radial diffusivity
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between diffusion descriptors and the change in monthly migraine days 4.
Axial diffusivity.
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between structural connectivity and the change in monthly migraine days 1. [Time Frame: baseline, week 12]
Number of streamlines in the connection between two regions.
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between structural connectivity and the change in monthly migraine days 2. [Time Frame: baseline, week 12]
Mean fractional anisotropy in the connection between two regions.
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between structural connectivity and the change in monthly migraine days 3. [Time Frame: baseline, week 12]
Mean axial diffusivity in the connection between two regions.
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between resting-state functional connectivity and the change in monthly migraine days. [Time Frame: baseline, week 12]
Z-score
Measured: Baseline, week 12-15
Baseline morphometric MRI parameters will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days 1.
Cortical curvature
Measured: Baseline
Baseline morphometric MRI parameters will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days 2.
Cortical thickness
Measured: Baseline
Baseline morphometric MRI parameters will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days 3.
Gray matter volume
Measured: Baseline
Baseline morphometric MRI parameters will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days 4.
Surface area.
Measured: Baseline
Baseline diffusion MRI descriptors will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine headache days 1.
Fractional anisotropy
Measured: Baseline
Baseline diffusion MRI descriptors will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine headache days 2.
Mean diffusivity
Measured: Baseline
Baseline diffusion MRI descriptors will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine headache days 3.
Radial diffusivity
Measured: Baseline
Baseline diffusion MRI descriptors will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine headache days 4.
Axial diffusivity.
Measured: Baseline
Baseline structural connectivity will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days.
Number of streamlines in the connection between two regions.
Measured: Baseline
Baseline resting-state functional connectivity will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days
Z-score
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2024
- Study start1 Mar 2023
- Primary completion1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (67)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Migraine DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The present study is an open-label, controlled-trial, single-blind trial analyzing brain changes measured by dMRI and fMRI in patients with high frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine will be treated with Fremanezumab, 12 weeks after treatment.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Valladolid, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia, Complejo Público Asistencial de Zamora
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, David García Azorín, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
- Investigators
- Angel L Guerrero Peral, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Sanidad de Castilla y León
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06244823
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CASVE 20-469
- Other IDs
- 2020-004509-30
- Acronym
- FreMRI
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 24 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymized data may be shared upon reasonable request to the principal investigator.
Publications
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202. No abstract available.
PubMed 29368949Karsan N, Bose P, Goadsby PJ. The Migraine Premonitory Phase. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018 Aug;24(4, Headache):996-1008. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000624.
PubMed 30074545Quintela E, Castillo J, Munoz P, Pascual J. Premonitory and resolution symptoms in migraine: a prospective study in 100 unselected patients. Cephalalgia. 2006 Sep;26(9):1051-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01157.x.
PubMed 16919055Giffin NJ, Ruggiero L, Lipton RB, Silberstein SD, Tvedskov JF, Olesen J, Altman J, Goadsby PJ, Macrae A. Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology. 2003 Mar 25;60(6):935-40. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000052998.58526.a9.
PubMed 12654956Afridi KS, Kaube H, Goadsby JP. Glyceryl trinitrate triggers premonitory symptoms in migraineurs. Pain. 2004 Aug;110(3):675-680. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.007.
PubMed 15288408Guo S, Vollesen ALH, Olesen J, Ashina M. Premonitory and nonheadache symptoms induced by CGRP and PACAP38 in patients with migraine. Pain. 2016 Dec;157(12):2773-2781. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000702.
PubMed 27842045Burstein R, Jakubowski M. Unitary hypothesis for multiple triggers of the pain and strain of migraine. J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):9-14. doi: 10.1002/cne.20688.
PubMed 16258903Noseda R, Kainz V, Borsook D, Burstein R. Neurochemical pathways that converge on thalamic trigeminovascular neurons: potential substrate for modulation of migraine by sleep, food intake, stress and anxiety. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 4;9(8):e103929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103929. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25090640Denuelle M, Fabre N, Payoux P, Chollet F, Geraud G. Hypothalamic activation in spontaneous migraine attacks. Headache. 2007 Nov-Dec;47(10):1418-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00776.x.
PubMed 18052951Maniyar FH, Sprenger T, Monteith T, Schankin C, Goadsby PJ. Brain activations in the premonitory phase of nitroglycerin-triggered migraine attacks. Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):232-41. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt320. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
PubMed 24277718Stankewitz A, Aderjan D, Eippert F, May A. Trigeminal nociceptive transmission in migraineurs predicts migraine attacks. J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 9;31(6):1937-43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4496-10.2011.
PubMed 21307231Schulte LH, May A. The migraine generator revisited: continuous scanning of the migraine cycle over 30 days and three spontaneous attacks. Brain. 2016 Jul;139(Pt 7):1987-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww097. Epub 2016 May 5.
PubMed 27190019Beissner F, Meissner K, Bar KJ, Napadow V. The autonomic brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis for central processing of autonomic function. J Neurosci. 2013 Jun 19;33(25):10503-11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1103-13.2013.
PubMed 23785162Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
PubMed 21979382Jensen K, Tuxen C, Olesen J. Pericranial muscle tenderness and pressure-pain threshold in the temporal region during common migraine. Pain. 1988 Oct;35(1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90277-1.
PubMed 3200599
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Structural, Diffusion and Connectomics MRI Study on Migraine Patients Treated With Fremanezumab: The FreMRI Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06244823
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FreMRI / CASVE 20-469
- Keywords
- Treatment outcomes, Preventive treatment, Brain functional changes, Brain structural changes
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de ValladolidUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Valladolid, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia, Complejo Público Asistencial de Zamora
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this open-label, single-blind, controlled-trial is to evaluate brain changes evaluated with diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and functional MRI in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine that will be treated with Fremanezumab, 12 weeks after the treatment onset, compared with the baseline.
Type of study: Phase IV clinical trial Participant population: high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Participants will be treated with Fremanezumab.
Detailed description
Fremanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting calcitonin C-reactive peptide (CGRP) that has proven to be effective in the treatment of episodic and chronic migraine. Due to the molecular weight of the drug, it is not supposed to cross the blood-brain barrier, acting peripherally.
Patients with migraine have shown gray and white matter changes that can be evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
In the present study, we aim to evaluate the presence of MRI changes in patients treated with Fremanezumab, 12 weeks after the treatment onset, compared with the baseline.
Number of Subjects: 87 patients. Study Duration per Subject Study duration per patient will be 8 months.
Study procedures:
In the first visit, the screening visit, patients will receive a detailed explanation of the study and will sign informed consent form. Inclusion-exclusion criteria will be reviewed and evaluation of vital signs, general and neurological examination will be done. Patients will receive a headache diary and will be trained in its use.
First MRI scan will be acquired within 0-14 days, prior to Fremanezumab injection.
Patients will do four monthly additional hospital visits. During each visit, occurrence of any adverse event will be interrogated; clinical situation will be analyzed and Fremanezumab will be administered. Visits will be performed at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Last visit will be performed after 12 weeks, without Fremanezumab injection.
The second MRI will be acquired at 12 ± 1 weeks after the first Fremanezumab injection.
Intervention:
MRI acquisition Images will be acquired during interictal periods, defined as at least 24 hours from last migraine attack. High-resolution 3D T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted and resting-state functional MRI data will be acquired using a Philips Achieva 3T MRI unit (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) with a 32-channel head coil in the MRI facility at the Universidad de Valladolid (Valladolid, Spain).
For the anatomical T1-weighted images, the following acquisition parameters will be used: Turbo Field Echo (TFE) sequence, repetition time (TR) = 8.1 ms, echo time (TE) = 3.7 ms, flip angle = 8º, 256 x 256 matrix size, 1 x 1 x 1 mm3 of spatial resolution and 170 sagittal slices covering the whole brain.
Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) will be obtained using the next parameters: TR = 9000 ms, TE = 86 ms, flip angle = 90º, 61 gradient directions, two baseline volumes with opposite phase encoding direction, b-value = 1000 s/mm2, 128 x 128 matrix size, 2 x 2 x 2 mm3 of spatial resolution and 66 axial slices covering the whole brain.
Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) will be acquired with the following parameters: TR = 3000 ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle = 80º, 80 x 80 matrix size, 3 x 3 x 4 mm3 of spatial resolution, 35 axial slices covering the whole brain and 197 volumes. During this acquisition, the patient will close the eyes but remain awake.
All the scans will be acquired during the same session, starting with the T1-weighted scan, followed by the diffusion-weighted scan and ending with the rs-fMRI scan. Total acquisition time for a single subject is approximately 28 minutes, divided in the following periods of time: six minutes for the T1-weighted scan, 12 minutes for the diffusion-weighted scan and 10 minutes for the rs-fMRI scan. If we consider patient preparation, obtainment of documents and informed consent form, the whole process will take about 50-70 minutes.
Image processing T1-weighted morphometric parameters MRI images will be processed in order to obtain cortical curvature, cortical thickness, gray matter volume and surface area of the different gray matter regions.
Grey matter volume will be obtained for all the 84 grey matter regions from the Desikan-Killiany atlas (Reuter et al., 2012). Also, cortical curvature, cortical thickness and area will be calculated for the 68 regions from the atlas that are cortical regions.
DWI processing DWI will be processed to carry out two types of analysis: Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) and structural connectomics.
Prior to the beginning of both processing pipelines, diverse preprocessing procedures will be implemented on the DWI data. Diffusion-weighted images will be denoised, using "dwidenoise" tool from MRtrix (www.mrtrix.org), eddy currents, motion and B0 field inhomogeneity corrected, using "dwipreproc" tool from MRtrix, and B1 field inhomogeneity corrected, using "dwibiascorrect" tool with the "-fast" option from MRtrix.
Four diffusion descriptors from Diffusion Tensor Imaging will be obtained: Fractional Anisotropy (FA), Mean Diffusivity (MD), Radial Diffusivity (RD) and Axial Diffusivity (AD). We will also be using measures non based on the diffusion tensor, like the return-to-origin probability (RTOP), which reflects cellularity and restrictions better than MD.
Once the DWI data are preprocessed, a whole brain mask for each image will be generated using "dwi2mask" tool from MRtrix and, next, diffusion tensors at each voxel will be estimated using the "dtifit" tool from FSL, also obtaining FA, MD and AD maps. RD will be manually calculated by obtaining the mean of the second and the third eigenvalues, which will also be previously computed with "dtifit". RTOP will be estimated using the method called "Apparent Measures Using Reduced Acquisitions" (AMURA).
Structural connectomics The analysis of structural connectivity will use the segmentation results from T1-weighted processing pipeline.
Anatomically-Constrained Tractography (ACT) will be implemented. Previously, five-tissue-type (5TT) segmented images for each subject will be obtained from the T1-weighted images using the "5ttgen" tool from MRtrix to have suitable images for ACT. 5TT image and the automated parcellation from FreeSurfer will be inearly registered to the FA image using the FLIRT tool from FSL.
Finally, structural connectivity matrices will be computed from the filtered tractography output and the registered cortical segmentation volumes. 84 × 84 connectivity matrices, corresponding to the 84 cortical and subcortical regions from the Desikan-Killiany atlas, will be obtained using mean FA and the number of streamlines in each connection as connectome metrics. Connectivity matrices constructed in this manner are symmetric, so only a half of each matrix will be employed for further analysis.
Due to the tractography method employed, it is possible that streamlines start and end in different points belonging to the same gray matter region from the Desikan-Killiany atlas. For this reason, these connections ("self-connections") will also be included in the analysis.
fMRI processing The fMRI processing pipeline will be fully implemented in the software CONN. Firstly, some preprocessing steps will be implemented. fMRI volumes will be realigned and unwarpped to estimate and correct subject motion. To identify outliers, ARtifact detection Tools (ART) based outlier detection algorithm will be implemented. Then, fMRI volumes will be directly coregistered to the corresponding structural volumes (T1-weighted images) using a rigid body transformation. T1-weighted images will be segmented to detect different types of tissue, i.e., gray matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
Finally, the functional connectivity matrix for each case will be computed considering whole-brain region-to-region connections, using the 84 cortical and subcortical regions from the Desikan-Killiany atlas in each subject as regions of interest. The matrices will contain the Z-values from the Fisher's r-to-z transformation.
Safety Variables Safety and side effects will be evaluated according to reported adverse events, both spontaneously by patients and systematically analyzed during study visits. Vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, temperature and respiratory rate), physical examination and 12-lead electrocardiography will be done prior to the enrollment. Presence of any adverse event or local injection-site reaction will be systematically addressed. Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale will assess suicidal ideation and behavior at baseline.
Statistical Analysis Parameter evolution in time and relationship with change in monthly migraine days for each of the parameters, i.e., morphometric (gray matter) parameters, diffusion descriptors (white matter), structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity, longitudinal evolution will be assessed.
n order to analyze the structural connectivity matrices, firstly, the mean number of streamlines in each connection (cell from the connectivity matrix) will be computed for each group. Next, connections with less than 500 streamlines (group mean) will be discarded in order to exclude weak connections, for which results could be unreliable, from further analysis.
In the case of functional resting-state connectivity matrices, a similar rejection of non-important connections will be selected, connections with absolute Z-value lower than 0.1 are excluded, i.e., a Pearson correlation value of r = 0.1 following the Fisher's r-to-z transformation.
In the previous two cases, if the thresholds are too high or too low, i.e., almost all the connections are rejected, or almost no connections are rejected, the thresholds will be changed.
A model will be implemented for each of the four types of analysis described in the document. In each of the models, the significant effect of the covariates and the predictive capability of the model using the lowest number of covariates will be considered. To compare the different models, Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) will be used (67). In the case of very similar AIC values, the model with a lower number of regressors will be chosen.
For each of the four types of analysis, the predictive model will be computed for a single regressor. Regressors with p-value equal or higher than 0.05 in the singular predictive model will not be further considered to be included in the final model; while the remaining regressors will be considered for the final model of the corresponding type of analysis.
Relationship between MRI parameters evolution and clinical response A linear mixed-effect model will be prepared using the same strategy that was employed for the analysis of change in monthly migraine days and MRI parameters. To evaluate the clinical response to treatment, a dichotomic variable showing positive or negative response to treatment will be used, instead of change in monthly migraine days.
Positive response to treatment is considered as 50% reduction in number of monthly migraine days.
Exploratory variables analysis The final model used in the analysis of the relationship between the diverse MRI parameters and change in monthly migraine days will be used. The variable representing the change in monthly migraine days will be replaced by the change in monthly intense headache days, in monthly days of acute treatment medication.
In the case of response to treatment, the same final model from the analysis of clinical response considered as 50% reduction in number of monthly migraine days will be used. Response to treatment, in this case, will be represented by reduction of 75%, 100% and 30% of monthly migraine days.
Analysis of adverse events Categorical adverse events will be compared using Fisher's exact test. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered as statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The present study is an open-label, controlled-trial, single-blind trial analyzing brain changes measured by dMRI and fMRI in patients with high frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine will be treated with Fremanezumab, 12 weeks after treatment.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fremanezumab | Experimental | Drug: Fremanezumab Prefilled SyringePatients will be treated with 225 mg of subcutaneous injections of Fremanezumab per month. Patients will do four monthly additional hospital visits. During each visit, occurrence of any adverse event will be interrogated; clinical situation will be analyzed and Fremanezumab will be administered. Visits will be performed at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Last visit will be performed after 12 weeks, without Fremanezumab injection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Definite diagnosis of Migraine With Aura or Migraine Without Aura according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd version (IHCD-3) (1).
- Age between 18 and 65 years old.
- Providing signed informed consent form.
- Diagnosis of migraine before 50 years old.
- History of migraine during at least 12 months prior to the study.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- 1.Presence of other primary headache disorders other than infrequent tension-type headache or medication overuse headache (MOH).
- Participation of MOH patients will be restricted to a maximum of 50% of the total sample.
- Prior use of Fremanezumab or another monoclonal antibody targeting CGRP or CGRP receptor.
- Prior use of less than two or more than four preventive drugs according to the local national guidelines (34), with inadequate response after sufficient doses and enough time or lack of tolerability.
- Any medical condition that might prevent study completion or interfere with interpretation of results.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fremanezumab Prefilled SyringeMRI will be scanned prior to the first administration of Fremanezumab, within 0-14 days, prior to Fremanezumab injection. The second MRI will be acquired at 12 ± 1 weeks after the first Fremanezumab injection.Images will be acquired during interictal periods, defined as at least 24 hours from last migraine attack. All the scans will be acquired during the same session, starting with the T1-weighted scan, followed by the diffusion-weighted scan and ending with the rs-fMRI scan. Total acquisition time for a single subject is approximately 28 minutes, divided in the following periods of time: six minutes for the T1-weighted scan, 12 minutes for the diffusion-weighted scan and 10 minutes for the rs-fMRI scan. If we consider patient preparation, obtainment of documents and informed consent form, the whole process will take about 50-70 minutes. | Drug | Fremanezumab |
Primary outcome
Morphometric MRI parameters change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 1
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Cortical curvature
Morphometric MRI parameters change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 2.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Cortical thickness
Morphometric MRI parameters change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 3.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Gray matter volume
Morphometric MRI parameters change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 4.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Surface area,
Diffusion MRI descriptors change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 1.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Fractional anisotropy
Diffusion MRI descriptors change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 2.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Mean diffusivity
Diffusion MRI descriptors change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 3.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Radial diffusivity
Diffusion MRI descriptors change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 4.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Axial diffusivity
Structural connectivity change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 1.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Number of streamlines in the connection between two regions
Structural connectivity change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 2.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Mean fractional anisotropy in the connection between two regions
Structural connectivity change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 3.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Mean axial diffusivity in the connection between two regions
Resting-state functional connectivity change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Z-score
22 secondary outcomes
Relationship between morphometric MRI parameters and the change in monthly migraine days 1.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between morphometric MRI parameters and the change in monthly migraine days 2.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between morphometric MRI parameters and the change in monthly migraine days 3.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between morphometric MRI parameters and the change in monthly migraine days 4.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between diffusion descriptors and the change in monthly migraine days 1.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between diffusion descriptors and the change in monthly migraine days 2.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between diffusion descriptors and the change in monthly migraine days 3.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between diffusion descriptors and the change in monthly migraine days 4.
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between structural connectivity and the change in monthly migraine days 1. [Time Frame: baseline, week 12]
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between structural connectivity and the change in monthly migraine days 2. [Time Frame: baseline, week 12]
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between structural connectivity and the change in monthly migraine days 3. [Time Frame: baseline, week 12]
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Relationship between resting-state functional connectivity and the change in monthly migraine days. [Time Frame: baseline, week 12]
Time frame: Baseline, week 12-15
Baseline morphometric MRI parameters will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days 1.
Time frame: Baseline
Baseline morphometric MRI parameters will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days 2.
Time frame: Baseline
Baseline morphometric MRI parameters will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days 3.
Time frame: Baseline
Baseline morphometric MRI parameters will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days 4.
Time frame: Baseline
Baseline diffusion MRI descriptors will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine headache days 1.
Time frame: Baseline
Baseline diffusion MRI descriptors will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine headache days 2.
Time frame: Baseline
Baseline diffusion MRI descriptors will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine headache days 3.
Time frame: Baseline
Baseline diffusion MRI descriptors will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine headache days 4.
Time frame: Baseline
Baseline structural connectivity will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days.
Time frame: Baseline
Baseline resting-state functional connectivity will be assessed as potential predictors of change in monthly migraine days
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 29368949Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30074545Karsan N, Bose P, Goadsby PJ. The Migraine Premonitory Phase. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018 Aug;24(4, Headache):996-1008. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000624.
- Background: PubMed 16919055Quintela E, Castillo J, Munoz P, Pascual J. Premonitory and resolution symptoms in migraine: a prospective study in 100 unselected patients. Cephalalgia. 2006 Sep;26(9):1051-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01157.x.
- Background: PubMed 12654956Giffin NJ, Ruggiero L, Lipton RB, Silberstein SD, Tvedskov JF, Olesen J, Altman J, Goadsby PJ, Macrae A. Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology. 2003 Mar 25;60(6):935-40. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000052998.58526.a9.
- Background: PubMed 15288408Afridi KS, Kaube H, Goadsby JP. Glyceryl trinitrate triggers premonitory symptoms in migraineurs. Pain. 2004 Aug;110(3):675-680. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.007.
- Background: PubMed 27842045Guo S, Vollesen ALH, Olesen J, Ashina M. Premonitory and nonheadache symptoms induced by CGRP and PACAP38 in patients with migraine. Pain. 2016 Dec;157(12):2773-2781. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000702.
- Background: PubMed 16258903Burstein R, Jakubowski M. Unitary hypothesis for multiple triggers of the pain and strain of migraine. J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):9-14. doi: 10.1002/cne.20688.
- Background: PubMed 25090640Noseda R, Kainz V, Borsook D, Burstein R. Neurochemical pathways that converge on thalamic trigeminovascular neurons: potential substrate for modulation of migraine by sleep, food intake, stress and anxiety. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 4;9(8):e103929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103929. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 18052951Denuelle M, Fabre N, Payoux P, Chollet F, Geraud G. Hypothalamic activation in spontaneous migraine attacks. Headache. 2007 Nov-Dec;47(10):1418-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00776.x.
- Background: PubMed 24277718Maniyar FH, Sprenger T, Monteith T, Schankin C, Goadsby PJ. Brain activations in the premonitory phase of nitroglycerin-triggered migraine attacks. Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):232-41. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt320. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
- Background: PubMed 21307231Stankewitz A, Aderjan D, Eippert F, May A. Trigeminal nociceptive transmission in migraineurs predicts migraine attacks. J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 9;31(6):1937-43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4496-10.2011.
- Background: PubMed 27190019Schulte LH, May A. The migraine generator revisited: continuous scanning of the migraine cycle over 30 days and three spontaneous attacks. Brain. 2016 Jul;139(Pt 7):1987-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww097. Epub 2016 May 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymized data may be shared upon reasonable request to the principal investigator.
Related trials for Migraine Disorders
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Glymphatic System in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Migraine Treatment: The Health enSuite Study
Migraine, Migraine With Aura
Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study of Rimegepant for Short-term Preventive Treatment of Night-shift-related Migraine in Healthcare Professionals
Migraine Disorders
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Angel L Guerrero Peral, MD, PhD principal investigator
Sanidad de Castilla y León
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Fremanezumab Prefilled Syringe in people with Migraine Disorders and Migraine With Aura, run by Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact David Garcia Azorin, MD, PhD (+34 665872228, davilink@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Morphometric MRI parameters change from baseline during the 12-week period after the administration of Fremanezumab 1 (time frame: Baseline, week 12-15). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06244823, which also lists 67 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2024.