AzTrials
AzTrials

Hand OsteoarthritisHANDYNCT06254105

Feasibility of a Cross-sectorial Management Program in Hand Osteoarthritis

A study testing HANDY programme in people with Hand Osteoarthritis, run by Parker Research Institute at 1 site in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To support the referral of people with Hand Osteoarthritis (HOA) to evidence-based occupational therapy addressing decreased ADL ability, a cross-sectorial management program for people with HOA, named HANDY, was developed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 105 years
Conditions the study is for
Hand Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
HANDY programme
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
5 Jan 2024to 28 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 105 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • People diagnosed with hand OA, > 18 years and motivated to participate in a group program focusing on improvement in ADL task performance
  • General practitioners (GPs) working in a clinic with agreement with the Danish health insurance receiving patients with all kinds of everyday symptoms and illnesses, who express interest in contributing to development and evaluation of a program for people with hand OA.
  • Occupational therapists (OTs) working with community-based rehabilitation and with six months of community-based working experience

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ulla Andersen, MScOT contact

+4520286578

ulla.andersen.03@regionh.dk

Eva Elisabet Ejlersen Wæhrens, PhD contact

+4538164166 ext. +4526140702

eva.elisabet.waehrens@regionh.dk

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Parker Institute

    Frederiksberg, Capital Region, 2000

    Ulla Andersen, MScOT, 20286578, ulla.andersen.03@regionh.dk

    Eva Elisbet Wæhrens, PhD, 38164166, eva.elisabet.waehrens@regionh.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

To support the referral of people with Hand Osteoarthritis (HOA) to evidence-based occupational therapy addressing decreased ADL ability, a cross-sectorial management program for people with HOA, named HANDY, was developed. The HANDY program includes procedures for needs evaluation and referral, and a group-based occupational therapy program. The development was based on the United Kingdom's Medical Research Councils recommendations. A core element is involvement of stakeholders. Therefore, the research group has worked closely with GPs, OTs, people with HOA and specialist within rheumatology. Through a co-productional process the HANDY program was developed based on theories, research evidence, current best practice and the preferences of people with HOA. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the HANDY

Read the detailed description

Background Osteoarthritis (OA) occurs after the age of 40 and increases with age causing pain and stiffness mostly in knees, hands, and hips. Globally nearly 600 million people are affected and it is estimated to increase to 642 million in 2050 due to growth and ageing populations. Hand OA is the second most common OA subtype, and clinically hand OA can be seen with three clinically patterns, First were the distal and proximal interphalangeal joints are affected, secondly including the thumb base, or thirdly in a combination of the two before mentioned.

People with hand OA reports difficulties in relation to performance of Activities of Daily Living (ADL). More specifically, they report using extra time and/or effort and occasionally also need of help to manage daily life. ADL task performance problems may be in relation to personal ADL (PADL) tasks carried out every day such as bathing, dressing, and eating or instrumental ADL (IADL) tasks carried out on a weekly basis such as cleaning, cooking, and shopping. When people with hand OA are observed using standardized ADL assessment tool, the overall ADL motor ability also indicates clumsiness and use of extra effort for the population. When comparing the mean of ADL motor ability with other age-related healthy adults, people with hand OA have a lower ADL motor ability.

In 2020 OA was the top-ten leading cause of disability for older adults (>70 years). The increasing OA population presenting with decreased ADL ability will lead to a greater burden on the health care system. According to the 2018 EULAR recommendations, people with hand OA should be offered multidisciplinary and multimodal treatment approaches. In relation to non-pharmacological treatment education, training, home modifications, assistive devices, and splints to reduce symptoms and improve overall functioning and quality of life are recommended. Several of these treatment modalities may be employed by occupational therapists to improve ADL ability including education, home modifications, assistive devices, and splinting. Still, when exploring current practice of referring people with disabilities due to hand OA for occupational therapy among Danish general practitioners, only one were referred. Moreover, a literature review indicated a lack of an evidence-based occupational therapy program addressing decreased ADL ability among people with hand OA. Previous interventions studies involving people with hand OA have often focused on improving body functions (e.g. muscle strength) through exercises. This approach is based on the assumption that improved body function will lead to increased ability to perform ADL. Research, however, indicates that improved body function not necessarily translate into improved ADL ability. Rather, existing research support, that interventions focusing on ADL also has an effect on improvement of ADL ability for people with chronic condition.

To support the referral of people with hand OA to evidence-based occupational therapy addressing decreased ADL ability, a cross-sectorial management program for people with hand OA, named HANDY, was developed. The HANDY program includes procedures for needs evaluation and referral, and a group-based occupational therapy program. The development was based on the United Kingdom's Medical Research Councils recommendations. A core element is involvement of stakeholders. Therefore, the research group has worked closely with GPs, OTs, people with hand OA and specialist within rheumatology. Through a co-productional process the HANDY program was developed based on theories, research evidence, current best practice and the preferences of people with hand OA. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the HANDY program.

Methods Aims The overall aim is to investigate the feasibility of the cross-sectorial management program, HANDY, for people with hand OA (v. 1.0) in terms of content and delivery of needs evaluation, referral procedures, the occupational therapy intervention, and the cross-sectorial collaboration.

More specifically, based on the guidance developed by O'Cathain:

  1. Determine to what extent the HANDY program needs to be refined or adapted to make it more acceptable to users or more relevant or useful to the specific context in which it is delivered (Intervention development)?
  2. Identify adjustments needed to improve relevance of the HANDY program for people with hand OA, general practitioners and occupational therapist, and determine which aspects are fixed and flexible (Intervention components)?
  3. Determine which components that are meaningful and beneficial, and identify unintended positive/negative side effects (Perceived value, benefits, harms or unintended consequences).
  4. Explore the overall perception of the content and delivery described in the HANDY program and if it is relevant to implement in practice (Acceptability in principle).
  5. Explore to what extent people with hand OA, general practitioners and occupational therapist do think that the HANDY program can be implemented and if it varies across municipalities (Feasibility and acceptability in practice).
  6. Determine the number of referrals in the HANDY program, as well as the number of sessions delivered for people with hand OA. Furthermore, the adherence to procedures described for the program, the duration of components in each session and if the dose was sufficient (Fidelity, reach and dose).

Aspects related to trial design and to development and refinement of program theory including mechanisms of actions will be explored in a future pilot-RCT study.

Design, settings This is a feasibility study using a cohort design involving people with hand OA, general practitioners and occupational therapist employing a mixed-method approach.

The feasibility of the HANDY program will be evaluated in two municipalities in the Capital Region of Denmark. The municipalities have approximately 48.000 and 56.000 inhabitants, respectively, and are both located near Copenhagen. In each municipality three general practitioners and one community-based rehabilitation centre will be involved. In one municipality the three general practitioners work in the same clinic, whereas in the other municipality they work in two different clinics. The rehabilitation centres are organised under the municipal health administration.

The occupational therapy part of the HANDY program will be delivered in the homes and in the rehabilitation centre. In the rehabilitation centre, sessions will be held in contextualized situations, where people with hand OA may be engaged in educational programs and practice strategies to improve ADL tasks performance. To ensure a representative sample and enough information about feasibility of the program, each municipality must complete two HANDY occupational therapy interventions.

Participants People diagnosed with hand OA (n=30), > 18 years and motivated to participate in a group program focusing on improvement in ADL task performance. General practitioners (GPs) (n=6) working in a clinic with agreement with the Danish health insurance receiving patients with all kinds of everyday symptoms and illnesses, who express interest in contributing to development and evaluation of a program for people with hand OA. Occupational therapists (OTs) (n=4) working with community-based rehabilitation and with six months of community-based working experience.

Recruitment

People with hand OA will be recruited by six GPs from January 5, 2024. When a person with hand OA consults the GP, the GP briefly informs about the research project (e.g., by saying: "this is a project offering a cross-sectorial management program, including a needs evaluation, and if relevant, referral for a group-based occupational therapy intervention addressing problems related to performance of daily activities related to hand OA"), and then asks if he/she is interested in learning more about the project. If the person confirms to be interested, the GP provides additional oral and written information on the project. If the person then confirms that he/she will participate, the GP obtains written consent as a prerequisite to initiate the HANDY program.

Cross-sectorial management program The first version of the HANDY program was developed based on the United Kingdom's Medical Research Councils recommendations. The manualised HANDY program includes descriptions of procedures related to the GP's evaluation of the client's need for referral to occupational therapy, procedures for referral from the GP to community-based occupational therapy, the group-based occupational therapy programme, and recommendations related to collaboration and communication between GP and occupational therapist.

  • Needs evaluation The purpose of the needs evaluation is to clarify the relevance of referring the person with hand OA to community-based occupational therapy. The needs evaluation is conducted when a person with hand OA consults the GP with problems related to hand OA, or when problems related to hand OA are addressed during a consultation not related to hand OA in the first place. The needs evaluation is performed to determine if the hand OA affects the persons with hand OA daily life. First the GP asks questions related to how the person with hand OA perceives using the hands in performance of ADL tasks, e.g., zipping zippers when dressing, cutting nails, opening cans when cooking, or wringing a cloth when cleaning. Then a screening covering five aspects is conducted: 1) assessment of grip strength with, 2) assessment of problems turning things with the hands, for example turning a key in a lock, 3) assessment of problems related to turning up taps, 4) assessment of problems related to turning a round doorknob or handle, and 5) assessment of problems related to buttoning buttons. In step 1 hand strength is assessed by using simple handshake, and steps 2-5 are assessed asking the person with hand OA, and hence are based on self-report. All aspects are scored with yes or no. The person with hand OA is referred to community-based occupational therapy based on answering at least one of the questions with "yes".
  • Referral procedures Referral is conducted using existing electronic procedures. As part of the referral the GP takes an anamnesis focusing on the persons with hand OA level of functioning and the identified problems related to daily life, including the specific diagnosis.

In the municipality the referral is received and processed according to standard procedures.

  • Occupational Therapy program

The HANDY occupational therapy intervention follows the Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM), specifying the steps of a problem-solving process focused on enabling participation in needed and important tasks in everyday life. The HANDY occupational therapy intervention consists of six mandatory sessions of 120 minutes. The intervention consists of a combination of individual and group sessions, with a maximum of eight people with hand OA in each group.

Session 1 consists of an individual session in the persons with hand OA home involving evaluations of self-reported and observed ADL task performance. The Activities of Daily Living Interview (ADL-I) is used to measure self-reported ADL ability, and the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) to measure observed ADL ability. Both ADL-I and AMPS are valid and reliable measurements for people with chronic conditions. Following the ADL evaluation, the person with hand OA and OT will together formulate goals for the intervention using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) and begin the speculations about reasons for decreased ADL ability.

Sessions 2 to 5 are group-based, held at the rehabilitations centre and involve peer learning activities. In session 2 the people with hand OA are introduced to how they can identify factors influencing their individual ADL task performances (using the Transactional Model of Occupation (TMO)) in plenum. The results of the individual analyses form the basis for sessions 3 to 5 focusing on improving ADL task performance by addressing these factors. The interventions are mainly based on compensatory strategies to improve ADL task, in relation to energy conservation (session 3), assistive devices and the use of orthoses (session 4). The last group sessions will also address how necessary and meaningful activities (e.g., ADL, leisure, or social activities) may be used to maintain hand function (session 5). The group sessions will be individualised based on the people with hand OA individual evaluation and problems with performing ADL tasks. The occupational therapy intervention is terminated with an individual session (session 6) in the person with hand OA home involving evaluation of goal attainment and changes in self-reported and observed ADL ability using ADL-I, AMPS and GAS.

  • Communication and Collaboration After the final session of the occupational therapy intervention, the OT submits an epicrisis to the GP, including information on how the person with hand OA profited from the programme, any potential outcomes related to ADL ability, whether the person with hand OA was referred to other services in the municipality (e.g., physiotherapy or assistance in the home), and potential future recommendations.

Training of GPs and OTs To support that the HANDY program will be delivered according to the manual (fidelity), the GPs and OTs will be trained in procedures related to content and delivery. GPs will in a one-hour online session be trained in the procedures of needs evaluation, referral, and cross-sectorial collaboration. The OTs will participate in a two-day workshop with half day follow up before the first session of the occupational therapy intervention is delivered. They will be trained in the occupational therapy intervention, including evaluations of self-reported and observed ADL performance and procedures for goal setting, and in the cross-sectorial collaboration procedures.

Procedures for data collection:

A mixed-method approach will be used to gather data to explore aspects of content and delivery.

Registration forms will be collected during each step of the HANDY program in relation to research objectives 1 to 6. The GP fills out a registration form immediately after each consultation including a needs evaluation and when the overall program is finalised, i.e., when the GP receives an epicrisis from the occupational therapist. Moreover, the GP registrates the number of persons with hand OA declining the invitation to participate based on the initial information. OTs and people with hand OA will fill in registration forms after each intervention session.

Focus group interviews with people with hand OA will be carried out after completion of the occupational therapy program. Qualitative individual interviews with the GPs and qualitative focus group interviews with OTs will be conducted after the HANDY program has been completed. All interviews address research questions 1, 3, 4, and 5.

To determine change in ADL ability among people with hand OA, data in terms of ADL-I and AMPS will be collected at session 1 and 6 in the occupational therapy intervention. The ADL-I and the AMPS have demonstrated sensitivity to change among persons living with chronic conditions. (Furthermore, the level of goal attainment, measured with GAS, will also be evaluated at session 6.

Enrolment of people with hand OA will be initiated January 2024. When a maximum of eight people with HOA have been referred for occupational therapy, they will form a group receiving the occupational therapy program. Two groups will receive the occupational therapy program in each municipality. People with HOA referred for occupational therapy, but never completing session1 will be considered as drop-outs. Data will be collected according to the project timeline.

Data analysis Descriptive statistics on ordinal data will be presented with median, range and percentages. Number of people with hand OA refereed and included as well as sessions and components delivered will also be presented. The proportions of people with hand OA with relevant improvement of ADL ability will be presented in the relation to ADL-I, AMPS and goals being reach on the GAS. , Clinically relevant difference/change in the ADL-I is >0.64 logits and clinically relevant change on + 0.3 on the AMPS ADL ability logits has been identified as well as + 0.5 as a statistical relevant change. The levels for goal achievement in the GAS are described in levels from -2 to +2. The participant's current level as "-1, less than expected". The expected goal for the participant under "0, expected level". "+1 and +2, is a description of better or much better than expected" and "-2, is the description of worse than the starting level".

Interviews will be transcribed and analysed to find common patterns in relation to a thematic content analysis related to questions 1, 3, 4, 5.

Ethics The study will be conducted in accordance with the Helsinki declaration and Danish law. Informed consent will be obtained from each participant, including people with hand OA, GPs, and OTs, emphasising the right to withdraw from the study at any time. A copy of the consent form will be provided to participants and the first author will be responsible for saving a consent form in the participant's study file. Each participant is given an ID number, with which all data is pseudonymised and only accessed by authorised personnel obliged to secrecy.

To minimise any risk all GPs and OTs will receive training in the procedures of the HANDY program and the delivery will be by educated and experienced personal.

The results of the study will be reported in accessible formats to study participants, decision makers in the participating municipalities, other stakeholders involved in the study, and public in general. Further, results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented on national and international conferences.

Being tested
HANDY programme
Keywords
Feasibility, Occupational therapy, Hand Osteoarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HANDY programmeOther

    The manualised HANDY program includes descriptions of procedures related to the GP's evaluation of the client's need for referral to occupational therapy, procedures for referral from the GP to community-based occupational therapy, the group-based occupational therapy programme, and recommendations related to collaboration and communication between GP and occupational therapist.

Study groups in NCT06254105
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalReceive the HANDY programme
Receives: Other: HANDY programme

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Participant flow

    Counts of participant flow

    Measured: up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Registration forms from GP

    Registration forms designed for the study concern:

    1. Yes/NO questions in relation to whether the instructions for the needs evaluations and referral were followed
    2. Likert scale 1 to 5 (1= very low degree, 5= very high degree). Questions in relation to relevance of content in need evaluation and referal procedures

    Measured: up to 6 months

  2. Registration forms from OT

    Registration forms designed for the study concern:

    1. Yes/NO questions in relation to whether the instructions for occupational intervention session were followed. If No the OT can ad a comment about reason and how deviation was made
    2. Likert scale 1 to 5 (1= very low degree, 5= very high degree). Questions in relation to the relevance of content in the occupational intervention session

    Measured: up to 6 months

  3. Registration forms from people with hand osteoarthritis

    Registration forms from people with hand osteoarthritis concerning perception of content and delivery

    Registration forms designed for the study concern:

    1. Likert scale 1 to 5 (1= very low degree, 5= very high degree). Questions to people with hand osteoarthritis in relation to the perception of content in GP and OT sessions

    Measured: up to 2 months

  4. Observation based ADL motor ability

    Change in observed ADL motor ability, using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Raw ordinal scores are converted into linear, interval scale (i.e. infinite scale) measures of ADL motor ability based on Rasch measurement models and reported in logits.

    Higher measures indicate higher ADL motor ability

    Measured: up to 2 months

  5. Observation based ADL process ability

    Change in observed ADL motor ability, using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Raw ordinal scores are converted into linear, interval scale (i.e. infinite scale) measures of ADL process ability based on Rasch measurement models and reported in logits.

    Higher measures indicate higher ADL process ability

    Measured: up to 2 months

  6. Selfreported ADL ability

    Change in self-reported ADL ability, using the standardised ADL-Interview (ADL-I). Raw ordinal scores are converted into linear, interval scale (i.e. infinite scale) measures of self-reported ADL ability based on Rasch measurement models and reported in logits.

    Higher measures indicate higher self-reported ADL ability

    Measured: up to 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Feb 2024
  2. Study start5 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion3 May 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Jun 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Cohort design involving people with hand OA, general practitioners and occupational therapist employing a mixed-method approach
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
44 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06254105
Sponsor's protocol ID
Parker Instituttet
Acronym
HANDY
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
22 Jan 2024
Last updated
28 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • GBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990-2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 May 22;5(6):e316-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00098-X. eCollection 2023 Jun.

    PubMed 37273833
  • Haugen IK, Englund M, Aliabadi P, Niu J, Clancy M, Kvien TK, Felson DT. Prevalence, incidence and progression of hand osteoarthritis in the general population: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Sep;70(9):1581-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.150078. Epub 2011 May 27.

    PubMed 21622766
  • Andersen U; Doessing, A; Gudbergsen, H; Hagelskjaer, V ; Bliddal, H; Waehrens, EE. Indicators of need for Occupational Therapy. Pending publication.

  • Bukhave EB, Huniche L. Activity problems in everyday life--patients' perspectives of hand osteoarthritis: "try imagining what it would be like having no hands". Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(19):1636-43. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.863390. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

    PubMed 24308906
  • Kloppenburg M, Kroon FP, Blanco FJ, Doherty M, Dziedzic KS, Greibrokk E, Haugen IK, Herrero-Beaumont G, Jonsson H, Kjeken I, Maheu E, Ramonda R, Ritt MJ, Smeets W, Smolen JS, Stamm TA, Szekanecz Z, Wittoek R, Carmona L. 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jan;78(1):16-24. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213826. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

    PubMed 30154087
  • Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, Oatis C, Guyatt G, Block J, Callahan L, Copenhaver C, Dodge C, Felson D, Gellar K, Harvey WF, Hawker G, Herzig E, Kwoh CK, Nelson AE, Samuels J, Scanzello C, White D, Wise B, Altman RD, DiRenzo D, Fontanarosa J, Giradi G, Ishimori M, Misra D, Shah AA, Shmagel AK, Thoma LM, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Feb;72(2):149-162. doi: 10.1002/acr.24131. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

    PubMed 31908149
  • Lykkegaard J, Møller A and GH. Håndartrose blandt +70 årige i Almen Praksis, Denmark. [Hand Osteoarthritis among +70 year olds in General Practice, Denmark] Copenhagen; 2021.

  • Bobos P, Nazari G, Szekeres M, Lalone EA, Ferreira L, MacDermid JC. The effectiveness of joint-protection programs on pain, hand function, and grip strength levels in patients with hand arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Ther. 2019 Apr-Jun;32(2):194-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Dec 23.

    PubMed 30587434
  • Takata SC, Wade ET, Roll SC. Hand therapy interventions, outcomes, and diagnoses evaluated over the last 10 years: A mapping review linking research to practice. J Hand Ther. 2019 Jan-Mar;32(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

    PubMed 28647322
  • Kjeken I, Smedslund G, Moe RH, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Uhlig T, Hagen KB. Systematic review of design and effects of splints and exercise programs in hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Jun;63(6):834-48. doi: 10.1002/acr.20427.

    PubMed 21630479
  • Osteras N, Kjeken I, Smedslund G, Moe RH, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Uhlig T, Hagen KB. Exercise for hand osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 31;1(1):CD010388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010388.pub2.

    PubMed 28141914
  • Hand C, Law M, McColl MA. Occupational therapy interventions for chronic diseases: a scoping review. Am J Occup Ther. 2011 Jul-Aug;65(4):428-36. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.002071.

    PubMed 21834458
  • Steultjens EM, Dekker J, Bouter LM, Leemrijse CJ, van den Ende CH. Evidence of the efficacy of occupational therapy in different conditions: an overview of systematic reviews. Clin Rehabil. 2005 May;19(3):247-54. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr870oa.

    PubMed 15859525
  • Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, Boyd KA, Craig N, French DP, McIntosh E, Petticrew M, Rycroft-Malone J, White M, Moore L. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.

    PubMed 34593508
  • O'Cathain A, Hoddinott P, Lewin S, Thomas KJ, Young B, Adamson J, Jansen YJ, Mills N, Moore G, Donovan JL. Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Sep 7;1:32. doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0026-y. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 27965810

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing HANDY programme in people with Hand Osteoarthritis, run by Parker Research Institute at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ulla Andersen, MScOT (+4520286578, ulla.andersen.03@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Participant flow (time frame: up to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06254105, which also lists 23 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in