Thumb OsteoarthritisBASTIONNCT07569549
Surgery for Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: Joint Replacement vs. Trapeziectomy
A study testing Implantation of trapeziometacarpal prosthesis and Trapeziectomy with Capsuloplasty in people with Thumb Osteoarthritis and Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the surgical method with total joint arthroplasty, (TOUCH joint prosthesis), is as good as or better than the traditional surgical method, trapezectomy, to treat thumb base joint osteoarthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Thumb Osteoarthritis, Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis, Carpometacarpal (CMC) Joint Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Implantation of trapeziometacarpal prosthesis and Trapeziectomy with Capsuloplasty
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 4 Sep 2026to Mar 2038
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 40-80 years at inclusion
- CMC-joint osteoarthritis grade 1-3 (Eaton-Littler classification)
- Rest pain or pain reducing hand function with indication for surgery
- Insufficient relief from non-operative treatment for ≥3 months (orthosis, OTC analgesics, cortisone injection)
- Eligible for both prosthesis and trapezectomy per including surgeon
- Non-smoker or complete smoking cessation ≥6 weeks prior to surgery
Who cannot join
- Previous surgery to thumb base or STT-joint
- Ongoing general chronic pain condition or other pain in the same hand predominant over the thumb base pain.
- Dementia or cognitive impairment
- Trapezium height <7 mm on plain radiograph
- Active smoker
- Osteoarthritis grade 4 (Eaton-Littler)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Handsurgery, Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala
Elias Gardell, MD, attending hand surgeon, +46(0) 186171544, elias.gardell@uu.se
Sara Edsfeldt, MD, PhD, senior attending, +46 (0) 186119031, sara.edsfeldt@uu.se
About this study
Official title: BASTION - BASe of Thumb Osteoarthritis Management Non-inferiority Trial: Surgical Treatment of First Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Comparison Between Joint Replacement and Trapeziectomy
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the surgical method with total joint arthroplasty, (TOUCH joint prosthesis), is as good as or better than the traditional surgical method, trapezectomy, to treat thumb base joint osteoarthritis.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
Does surgery with total joint arthroplasty provide better power grip and pinch grip strength compared to traditional surgery?
What is the long-term risk of complications for both methods?
Which method is more cost-effective for the healthcare system?
Researchers will compare total joint arthroplasty (TOUCH) to trapezectomy (a procedure where a bone in the thumb base is removed) to see which method provides the best results for the patient.
Participants will:
Be randomized to undergo either an operation with total joint arthroplasty or a trapezectomy.
Undergo an initial evaluation and a health economic cost analysis after one year.
Attend follow-up checkups at 2, 5, and 10 years post-surgery to evaluate long-term function and the durability of the prosthesis.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale:
Basal joint arthritis of the thumb (trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis) is a common condition causing pain and reduced hand function. While trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction/capsuloplasty has long been a gold standard, total joint arthroplasty, such as the TOUCH prosthesis, has gained popularity. However, there is a lack of high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these methods regarding long-term functional outcomes, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to compare the clinical and health-economic outcomes of total joint arthroplasty with TOUCH prosthesis versus trapeziectomy with capsuloplasty.
Study Design and Randomization:
This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Following informed consent obtained by the attending surgeon, participants are randomized to either:
- Total joint arthroplasty using the TOUCH prosthesis.
- Trapeziectomy with capsuloplasty. Randomization is performed in close proximity to the day of surgery. Due to the nature of the interventions, participants are informed of the surgical method postoperatively.
Procedures and Follow-up
- Surgical Intervention: Both procedures are performed according to standardized institutional protocols.
- Postoperative Care (Trapeziectomy): The thumb is immobilized in a cast for 3 weeks, followed by a standardized rehabilitation program led by occupational and physical therapists.
- Postoperative Care (total joint arthroplasty): A stable soft dressing is applied for 3 weeks, followed by the same rehabilitation protocol.
- Follow-up Schedule: Participants are evaluated at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, and 10 years postoperatively.
- Imaging: Radiographic evaluations are performed for the prosthesis group at 6 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, and 10 years to monitor for prosthesis loosening or "z-deformity" (MCP joint hyperextension) compared to the trapeziectomy group.
Data Management and Quality Assurance:
Data is collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) to ensure data integrity and validation. Physical informed consent forms are stored securely at the Department of Hand Surgery. Source data verification is performed by comparing registry data against electronic medical records and paper-based Case Report Forms (CRFs).
Sample Size and Power Calculation:
The primary outcome is Jamar grip strength at 12 months. Based on a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 6.5 kg and a standard deviation (SD) of 8.5 kg (derived from existing literature and pilot data), a power calculation (90% power, alpha 0.05, two-sided t-test) determined a requirement of 37 patients per group. To account for a 10% dropout rate, the total cohort size is set at 84 patients (42 per arm).
Health Economic Analysis:
A comprehensive health economic evaluation will be conducted to compare the total costs of both methods. This analysis includes:
- Direct Costs: Implant costs, anesthesia, surgical time, and healthcare utilization (number of visits).
- Indirect Costs: Duration of sick leave and time to return to work.
- Secondary Metrics: Analgesic consumption (paracetamol and opioids), patient-reported quality of life (EQ-5D), and "pain-free days" based on NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) assessments.
The objective is to determine if the higher initial cost of the TOUCH prosthesis is offset by faster recovery, reduced sick leave, and improved long-term productivity.
- Conditions
- Thumb Osteoarthritis, Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis, Carpometacarpal (CMC) Joint Arthritis, Basal Thumb Osteoartrithis
- Being tested
- Implantation of trapeziometacarpal prosthesis, Trapeziectomy with Capsuloplasty
- Keywords
- Thumb base arthroplasty, CMC joint, prosthesis, hand surgery, First Carpometacarpal Joint, Trapeziometacarpal Joint, Rhizarthrosis, Thumb Osteoarthritis, Dual Mobility Prosthesis, Total Joint Replacement, Total Joint Arthroplasty, Ligament Reconstruction, Surgical Reconstruction, Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), Prospective Studies, Comparative Study, Prospective Study, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Economics
- Medical subject headings
- Capillary Malformations, Congenital, 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implantation of trapeziometacarpal prosthesisDevice
Also called TOUCH Dual-Mobility Prosthesis
Surgical implantation of the TOUCH trapeziometacarpal total joint prosthesis (Kerimedical). The prosthesis consists of an uncemented stainless steel stem inserted into the first metacarpal and a dual cup mobility system with a polyethylene ball articulating against a metal cup fixed in the trapezium. The stem is available in straight or 15-degree angled neck configurations. Postoperative management consists of a stable soft dressing for 3 weeks to allow early controlled mobilization, followed by a standardized hand therapy rehabilitation protocol.
Trapeziectomy with CapsuloplastyProcedure or surgery
Surgical excision of the trapezium bone (trapeziectomy) followed by capsuloplasty using a distally based dorsal capsular flap, without tendon interposition. The capsular flap is sutured to stabilize the base of the first metacarpal. No implant or tendon graft is used. Postoperatively, a cast immobilizing the thumb in functional position is applied for 3 weeks, followed by a standardized hand therapy rehabilitation protocol.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 -Dual Mobility Prosthesis (TOUCH) | Experimental | TOUCH Total Joint Arthroplasty (n=42). Implantation of TOUCH trapeziometacarpal prosthesis (Kerimedical). Soft bandage for 3 weeks postoperatively, followed by rehabilitation per national guidelines. Receives: Device: Implantation of trapeziometacarpal prosthesis |
| Arm 2 - Trapeziectomy and Capsular Reconstruction | Active comparator | Trapezectomy with capsuloplasty (n=42). Excision of trapezium with dorsal capsule flap capsuloplasty. Cast immobilization for 3 weeks postoperatively, followed by rehabilitation per national guidelines. Receives: Procedure: Trapeziectomy with Capsuloplasty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hand grip strength
Hand grip strength (JAMAR dynamometer) at 12 months post operatively
Measured: Measured at 12 months postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (10)
Key-pinch grip strength
Key-pinch strength measured by pinch-gauge in kilograms
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Pinch grip strength
3-finger pinch strength measured by pinch gauge in kilograms
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Intensity on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Pain measured with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and load, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "worst imaginable pain"
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Range of movement
Range of movement of thumb measured by physiotherapist. Extension, flexion, volar abduction, radial abduction. In degrees.
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Metacarpophalangeal (MCP)-joint hyperextension
Radiographic MCP-joint hyperextension (Z-deformity)
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Complications
Complications, such as trigger thumb, de Quervain's, reoperation, and infection, reported within 12 months of surgery.
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Use of analgesics
Total usage of analgesic during the post operative period.
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Duration of sick leave
Total duration of sick leave.
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Patient-reported outcomes EQ-5D
Patient-reported outcome of the hand surgery using validated questionnaire EQ-5D
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Patient-reported outcomes PRWHE
Patient-reported outcome of the hand surgery using validated questionnaire PRWHE
Measured: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2026
- Study start4 Sep 2026
- Primary completionMay 2030 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2038 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Thumb OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Uppsala County Council, Sweden
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nils Hailer, MD, PhD. Professor, Study director, Department of orthopaedics and hand surgery, Akademiska hospital, Uppsala, SwedenSara Edsfeldt, MD, PhD, senior attending, Principal investigator, Department of orthopaedics and hand surgery, Akademiska hospital, Uppsala, SwedenSara Edsfeldt, MD, PhD, senior attending, Study chair, Department of orthopaedics and hand surgery, Akademiska hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07569549
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Dnr2026-00547-01
- Other IDs
- 2026-00547-01
- Acronym
- BASTION
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 5 years after publication. Requests should be directed to Central contact person. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement and provide proof of approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority.
Publications
Werle S, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Simmen BR, Sprott H, Herren DB. Age- and gender-specific normative data of grip and pinch strength in a healthy adult Swiss population. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009 Feb;34(1):76-84. doi: 10.1177/1753193408096763. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
PubMed 19129352Kim JK, Park MG, Shin SJ. What is the minimum clinically important difference in grip strength? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2536-41. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3666-y. Epub 2014 May 10.
PubMed 24817380Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022.
PubMed 18760153Kierkegaard M, Petitclerc E, Hebert LJ, Mathieu J, Gagnon C. Responsiveness of performance-based outcome measures for mobility, balance, muscle strength and manual dexterity in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1. J Rehabil Med. 2018 Feb 28;50(3):269-277. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2304.
PubMed 29260836Draak TH, Pruppers MH, van Nes SI, Vanhoutte EK, Bakkers M, Gorson KC, Van der Pol WL, Lewis RA, Notermans NC, Nobile-Orazio E, Leger JM, Van den Bergh PY, Lauria G, Bril V, Katzberg H, Lunn MP, Pouget J, van der Kooi AJ, van den Berg LH, van Doorn PA, Cornblath DR, Hahn AF, Faber CG, Merkies IS; PeriNomS study group. Grip strength comparison in immune-mediated neuropathies: Vigorimeter vs. Jamar. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2015 Sep;20(3):269-76. doi: 10.1111/jns.12126.
PubMed 26115516Bohannon RW. Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019 Jan;31(1):75-78. doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.75. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
PubMed 30774209Herren DB, Marks M, Neumeister S, Schindele S. Low complication rate and high implant survival at 2 years after Touch(R) trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Oct;48(9):877-883. doi: 10.1177/17531934231179581. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
PubMed 37310049Kriegs-Au G, Petje G, Fojtl E, Ganger R, Zachs I. Ligament reconstruction with or without tendon interposition to treat primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):209-18. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00001.
PubMed 14960663Guzzini M, Arioli L, Annibaldi A, Pecchia S, Latini F, Ferretti A. Interposition Arthroplasty versus Dual Cup Mobility Prosthesis in Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Randomized Study. Hand (N Y). 2024 Nov;19(8):1260-1268. doi: 10.1177/15589447231185584. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
PubMed 37482747Newton A, Talwalkar S. Arthroplasty in thumb trapeziometacarpal (CMC joint) osteoarthritis: An alternative to excision arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2022 Nov 26;35:134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.11.011. eCollection 2023 Jan.
PubMed 36471695
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- BASTION - BASe of Thumb Osteoarthritis Management Non-inferiority Trial: Surgical Treatment of First Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Comparison Between Joint Replacement and Trapeziectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07569549
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BASTION / Dnr2026-00547-01
- Conditions
- Thumb Osteoarthritis, Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis, Carpometacarpal (CMC) Joint Arthritis, Basal Thumb Osteoartrithis
- Keywords
- Thumb base arthroplasty, CMC joint, prosthesis, hand surgery, First Carpometacarpal Joint, Trapeziometacarpal Joint, Rhizarthrosis, Thumb Osteoarthritis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Uppsala County Council, Sweden
- Study start
- 4 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2038 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the surgical method with total joint arthroplasty, (TOUCH joint prosthesis), is as good as or better than the traditional surgical method, trapezectomy, to treat thumb base joint osteoarthritis.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does surgery with total joint arthroplasty provide better power grip and pinch grip strength compared to traditional surgery?
What is the long-term risk of complications for both methods?
Which method is more cost-effective for the healthcare system?
Researchers will compare total joint arthroplasty (TOUCH) to trapezectomy (a procedure where a bone in the thumb base is removed) to see which method provides the best results for the patient.
Participants will:
Be randomized to undergo either an operation with total joint arthroplasty or a trapezectomy.
Undergo an initial evaluation and a health economic cost analysis after one year.
Attend follow-up checkups at 2, 5, and 10 years post-surgery to evaluate long-term function and the durability of the prosthesis.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale:
Basal joint arthritis of the thumb (trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis) is a common condition causing pain and reduced hand function. While trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction/capsuloplasty has long been a gold standard, total joint arthroplasty, such as the TOUCH prosthesis, has gained popularity. However, there is a lack of high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these methods regarding long-term functional outcomes, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to compare the clinical and health-economic outcomes of total joint arthroplasty with TOUCH prosthesis versus trapeziectomy with capsuloplasty.
Study Design and Randomization:
This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Following informed consent obtained by the attending surgeon, participants are randomized to either:
- Total joint arthroplasty using the TOUCH prosthesis.
- Trapeziectomy with capsuloplasty. Randomization is performed in close proximity to the day of surgery. Due to the nature of the interventions, participants are informed of the surgical method postoperatively.
Procedures and Follow-up
- Surgical Intervention: Both procedures are performed according to standardized institutional protocols.
- Postoperative Care (Trapeziectomy): The thumb is immobilized in a cast for 3 weeks, followed by a standardized rehabilitation program led by occupational and physical therapists.
- Postoperative Care (total joint arthroplasty): A stable soft dressing is applied for 3 weeks, followed by the same rehabilitation protocol.
- Follow-up Schedule: Participants are evaluated at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, and 10 years postoperatively.
- Imaging: Radiographic evaluations are performed for the prosthesis group at 6 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, and 10 years to monitor for prosthesis loosening or "z-deformity" (MCP joint hyperextension) compared to the trapeziectomy group.
Data Management and Quality Assurance:
Data is collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) to ensure data integrity and validation. Physical informed consent forms are stored securely at the Department of Hand Surgery. Source data verification is performed by comparing registry data against electronic medical records and paper-based Case Report Forms (CRFs).
Sample Size and Power Calculation:
The primary outcome is Jamar grip strength at 12 months. Based on a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 6.5 kg and a standard deviation (SD) of 8.5 kg (derived from existing literature and pilot data), a power calculation (90% power, alpha 0.05, two-sided t-test) determined a requirement of 37 patients per group. To account for a 10% dropout rate, the total cohort size is set at 84 patients (42 per arm).
Health Economic Analysis:
A comprehensive health economic evaluation will be conducted to compare the total costs of both methods. This analysis includes:
- Direct Costs: Implant costs, anesthesia, surgical time, and healthcare utilization (number of visits).
- Indirect Costs: Duration of sick leave and time to return to work.
- Secondary Metrics: Analgesic consumption (paracetamol and opioids), patient-reported quality of life (EQ-5D), and "pain-free days" based on NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) assessments.
The objective is to determine if the higher initial cost of the TOUCH prosthesis is offset by faster recovery, reduced sick leave, and improved long-term productivity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 -Dual Mobility Prosthesis (TOUCH) | Experimental | Device: Implantation of trapeziometacarpal prosthesisTOUCH Total Joint Arthroplasty (n=42). Implantation of TOUCH trapeziometacarpal prosthesis (Kerimedical). Soft bandage for 3 weeks postoperatively, followed by rehabilitation per national guidelines. |
| Arm 2 - Trapeziectomy and Capsular Reconstruction | Active comparator | Procedure: Trapeziectomy with CapsuloplastyTrapezectomy with capsuloplasty (n=42). Excision of trapezium with dorsal capsule flap capsuloplasty. Cast immobilization for 3 weeks postoperatively, followed by rehabilitation per national guidelines. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 40-80 years at inclusion
- CMC-joint osteoarthritis grade 1-3 (Eaton-Littler classification)
- Rest pain or pain reducing hand function with indication for surgery
- Insufficient relief from non-operative treatment for ≥3 months (orthosis, OTC analgesics, cortisone injection)
- Eligible for both prosthesis and trapezectomy per including surgeon
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Previous surgery to thumb base or STT-joint
- Ongoing general chronic pain condition or other pain in the same hand predominant over the thumb base pain.
- Dementia or cognitive impairment
- Trapezium height <7 mm on plain radiograph
- Active smoker
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implantation of trapeziometacarpal prosthesisAlso: TOUCH Dual-Mobility ProsthesisSurgical implantation of the TOUCH trapeziometacarpal total joint prosthesis (Kerimedical). The prosthesis consists of an uncemented stainless steel stem inserted into the first metacarpal and a dual cup mobility system with a polyethylene ball articulating against a metal cup fixed in the trapezium. The stem is available in straight or 15-degree angled neck configurations. Postoperative management consists of a stable soft dressing for 3 weeks to allow early controlled mobilization, followed by a standardized hand therapy rehabilitation protocol. | Device | Arm 1 -Dual Mobility Prosthesis (TOUCH) |
| Trapeziectomy with CapsuloplastySurgical excision of the trapezium bone (trapeziectomy) followed by capsuloplasty using a distally based dorsal capsular flap, without tendon interposition. The capsular flap is sutured to stabilize the base of the first metacarpal. No implant or tendon graft is used. Postoperatively, a cast immobilizing the thumb in functional position is applied for 3 weeks, followed by a standardized hand therapy rehabilitation protocol. | Procedure or surgery | Arm 2 - Trapeziectomy and Capsular Reconstruction |
Primary outcome
Hand grip strength
Time frame: Measured at 12 months postoperatively
Hand grip strength (JAMAR dynamometer) at 12 months post operatively
10 secondary outcomes
Key-pinch grip strength
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Pinch grip strength
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Intensity on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Range of movement
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Metacarpophalangeal (MCP)-joint hyperextension
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Complications
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Use of analgesics
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Duration of sick leave
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Patient-reported outcomes EQ-5D
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Patient-reported outcomes PRWHE
Time frame: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years postoperatively
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 19129352Werle S, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Simmen BR, Sprott H, Herren DB. Age- and gender-specific normative data of grip and pinch strength in a healthy adult Swiss population. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009 Feb;34(1):76-84. doi: 10.1177/1753193408096763. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
- Background: PubMed 24817380Kim JK, Park MG, Shin SJ. What is the minimum clinically important difference in grip strength? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2536-41. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3666-y. Epub 2014 May 10.
- Background: PubMed 18760153Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022.
- Background: PubMed 29260836Kierkegaard M, Petitclerc E, Hebert LJ, Mathieu J, Gagnon C. Responsiveness of performance-based outcome measures for mobility, balance, muscle strength and manual dexterity in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1. J Rehabil Med. 2018 Feb 28;50(3):269-277. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2304.
- Background: PubMed 26115516Draak TH, Pruppers MH, van Nes SI, Vanhoutte EK, Bakkers M, Gorson KC, Van der Pol WL, Lewis RA, Notermans NC, Nobile-Orazio E, Leger JM, Van den Bergh PY, Lauria G, Bril V, Katzberg H, Lunn MP, Pouget J, van der Kooi AJ, van den Berg LH, van Doorn PA, Cornblath DR, Hahn AF, Faber CG, Merkies IS; PeriNomS study group. Grip strength comparison in immune-mediated neuropathies: Vigorimeter vs. Jamar. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2015 Sep;20(3):269-76. doi: 10.1111/jns.12126.
- Background: PubMed 30774209Bohannon RW. Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019 Jan;31(1):75-78. doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.75. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
- Background: PubMed 37310049Herren DB, Marks M, Neumeister S, Schindele S. Low complication rate and high implant survival at 2 years after Touch(R) trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Oct;48(9):877-883. doi: 10.1177/17531934231179581. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
- Background: PubMed 14960663Kriegs-Au G, Petje G, Fojtl E, Ganger R, Zachs I. Ligament reconstruction with or without tendon interposition to treat primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):209-18. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00001.
- Background: PubMed 37482747Guzzini M, Arioli L, Annibaldi A, Pecchia S, Latini F, Ferretti A. Interposition Arthroplasty versus Dual Cup Mobility Prosthesis in Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Randomized Study. Hand (N Y). 2024 Nov;19(8):1260-1268. doi: 10.1177/15589447231185584. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 36471695Newton A, Talwalkar S. Arthroplasty in thumb trapeziometacarpal (CMC joint) osteoarthritis: An alternative to excision arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2022 Nov 26;35:134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.11.011. eCollection 2023 Jan.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 5 years after publication. Requests should be directed to Central contact person. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement and provide proof of approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority.
Related trials for Thumb Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Thumb Muscle Activation During Different Activities of Daily Living in Thumb Base Osteoarthritis and Healthy Controls
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Placebo Injection
Thumb Osteoarthritis
RecruitingObservational study
ICF-Based Biopsychosocial Assessment With AI-Assisted Profile Prediction: Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis Model
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis, Thumb Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Corticosteroid Against Saline Injections for Thumb Osteoarthritis (CASITOA)
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis
Active, not recruiting
A Study on the Effect of High-concentrated Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) on Osteoarthritis in the Thumb Base.
Osteoarthritis Thumb
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Nils Hailer, MD, PhD. Professor study director
Department of orthopaedics and hand surgery, Akademiska hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Sara Edsfeldt, MD, PhD, senior attending principal investigator
Department of orthopaedics and hand surgery, Akademiska hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Sara Edsfeldt, MD, PhD, senior attending study chair
Department of orthopaedics and hand surgery, Akademiska hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implantation of trapeziometacarpal prosthesis and Trapeziectomy with Capsuloplasty in people with Thumb Osteoarthritis and Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Eva Nordin, Clinical research nurse (+46(0) 186119630, eva.nordin@akademiska.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hand grip strength (time frame: Measured at 12 months postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07569549, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2026.