Acute on Chronic Liver FailureNCT06276907
An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Role of Therapeutic Plasma-exchange in Ameliorating Secondary Organ Dysfunctions in Patients With ACLF and Develop Biomarkers of Treatment Response
A study testing Plasma Exchange and Standard Medical Treatment in people with Acute on Chronic Liver Failure, run by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
Rationale: Current understanding of the pathophysiology of ACLF suggests that unresolved injury, poor infection control, and liver regeneration result in persistent systemic inflammation and cytokine storm, which subsequently lead to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) resulting in multiple organ failures… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute on Chronic Liver Failure
- What is being tested?
- Plasma Exchange and Standard Medical Treatment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 190 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2024to 31 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with ACLF with AARC grade 2 or more with or without single secondary organ failure.
Who cannot join
- 1. Patients with age less than 18 years or more than 65 years
- Patients with HVOTO or EHPVO
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (beyond Milan) or any extrahepatic malignancy
- Active bleed (mucosal or variceal) or severe coagulopathy (platelets <20,000 or INR>4)
- Patients with refractory shock requiring norepinephrine >0.5ug/kg/min
- Patients with retroviral infections
Show all 9Show fewer
- Pregnancy or active breastfeeding
- Known severe cardiopulmonary diseases (structural or valvular heart disease, coronary artery disease, coronary pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease)
- Lack of informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
India1 site
Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110070
Dr Rakhi Maiwall, DM, 01146300000, rakhi_2011@yahoo.co.in
About this study
Rationale: Current understanding of the pathophysiology of ACLF suggests that unresolved injury, poor infection control, and liver regeneration result in persistent systemic inflammation and cytokine storm, which subsequently lead to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) resulting in multiple organ failures, septic shock and deaths in ACLF. Nearly 74% of ACLF patients initially diagnosed without SIRS, sepsis, or organ failure developed SIRS by day 7 which increases the onset of secondary organ failure and sepsis with high short-term mortality. The emerging use of plasma exchange has shown some potential benefits in terms of dampening systemic inflammation and improvement of outcomes in some ACLF patients. However, there is currently no randomized controlled trial exploring the potential role in ameliorating secondary organ dysfunctions in patients with ACLF is not known. Hence in the current objective, we want to study the role of plasma exchange in the management of sec. organ failure in ACLF patients in a randomized controlled trial and identify the biomarker to access the treatment response to therapy.
Read the detailed description
Hypothesis: We hypothesize that detrimental complications which include secondary organ dysfunction (circulation, brain, respiration, and kidneys) in patients with acute on chronic liver failure may be related to defects in the host response, which may be responsible for the progression of the disease. Thus, understanding the pathophysiology of secondary organ dysfunction particularly the role of gut dysbiosis and metabolic adaptation of the host in patients with ACLF is essential for preventing and ameliorating the function of these organs which in turn would improve overall survival. Considering systemic inflammation induces metabolic adaptation, the role of TPE in preventing the development of secondary organ failures and biomarkers of response to therapy would be evaluated in patients with ACLF.
Key Objectives: Can we develop specific biomarkers of response to therapy to identify the right patient selection that could benefit from spontaneous survival and avoid a liver transplant? Primary Objective To study the role of therapeutic plasma exchange versus standard medical treatment in patients with ACLF on improving AARC grade by 1 at day 14.
Secondary Objectives
- To study the role of TPE versus standard medical treatment in patients with ACLF on transplant-free survival at 28-days
- To study the impact on progression or resolution of secondary organ failures at day 7 and 14
- Impact on systemic inflammation, renal functions, and ammonia at day 3 7, and day 14
- Impact on systemic hemodynamics- decrease in the dose of vasopressors, lactate clearance, and improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio and urine output after therapy
- Impact on bilirubin and bile acid reduction at day 3 7 and 14
- Impact on the development of infections, new organ failures at day 7 and day 14
- To study the levels of CRP, IL-6, IL-10 pre and post-therapy at day 3, 7 and 14
- To evaluate the improvement in AARC, SOFA and MELD at day 3 7, 14 and develop a model based on AARC score for identifying responders.
- Adverse effects of therapy
- Additional experiments of plasma proteomics and metabolomics will be performed. (as mentioned above)
- To study the impact on systemic inflammation, endothelial function (von-willebrand factor and ADAMTS), inflammatory cytokines damage-associated molecular patterns (HMGB1) at day 3 and 7 and day 14
- Impact on monocyte function (phagocytosis and mitochondrial respiration) In this open-label, randomized controlled trial patients will be randomized 1:1 to two groups. Patients would be randomized using block randomization with 19 blocks and block-size of 10 and SNOSE technique (sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes). Patients fulfilling the selection criteria of ACLF AARC consensus will be recruited in the study and will be randomized into two groups patients in each group) to receive either standard medical therapy alone or standard therapy with plasma-exchange (details mentioned below).
Interventions SMT Group: Patients randomized to SMT Group will be given standard medical therapy (SMT) only included as per requirement. Nutritional therapy 25-30 kcal/kg/day, to reach at least 80% of this target, lactulose, bowel wash, albumin, terlipressin or norepinephrine, and antibiotics will be provided according to the local institutional guidelines. Anti-virals in hepatitis B reactivation and details of the type of antiviral will be included..
Patients with organ failures requiring organ support would be managed in the intensive care unit. Patients would be managed with the standard of care which will include the use of vasopressors (norepinephrine or terlipressin for maintaining mean arterial pressure >65 mm of Hg, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy ( intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy) for standard renal indications. Patients would be fed enterally with the use of parenteral nutrition in patients wherein enteral nutrition is not tolerated. Intravenous low-dose hydrocortisone would be administered to patients with norepinephrine >0.25 ug/kg/min, according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021. The use of antioxidants (N-acetylcysteine) would be recorded.
Plasma exchange: Patients randomized to this group will receive plasma exchange on day 1 Response assessment will be done to assess the need for a second session from day 3-7 and subsequently every week till day 28. A minimum of 3 sessions would be considered in the first seven days. The duration of each session would be 3-4 hours. Patients with partial response (not meeting criteria for a complete response after 3 sessions) would be considered for additional sessions as decided by the treating physician until desired complete response, adverse effects, liver transplant, death, or clinical futility. The complete response will be defined as a sustained reduction in bilirubin and international normalized ratio without any clinical worsening requiring discontinuation of therapy. Failure of therapy would be defined as the development of adverse eff ects, new onset sepsis, or organ failure. In such patients, further sessions would be deferred. Blood access was established with a double-lumen catheter inserted into the patient's femoral or jugular vein.
- Conditions
- Acute on Chronic Liver Failure
- Being tested
- Plasma Exchange, Standard Medical Treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Plasma ExchangeBiological
On day 1 Response assessment will be done to assess the need for a second session from day 3-7 and subsequently every week till day 28. A minimum of 3 sessions would be considered in the first seven days. The duration of each session would be 3-4 hours. Patients with partial response (not meeting criteria for a complete response after 3 sessions) would be considered for additional sessions as decided by the treating physician until desired complete response, adverse effects, liver transplant, death, or clinical futility. The complete response will be defined as a sustained reduction in bilirubin and international normalized ratio without any clinical worsening requiring discontinuation of therapy. Failure of therapy would be defined as the development of adverse effects, new onset sepsis, or organ failure. In such patients, further sessions would be deferred. Blood access was established with a double-lumen catheter inserted into the patient's femoral or jugular vein.
Standard Medical TreatmentOther
Patients randomized to SMT Group will be given standard medical therapy (SMT) only included as per requirement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma Exchange | Experimental | On day 1 Response assessment will be done to assess the need for a second session from day 3-7 and subsequently every week till day 28. A minimum of 3 sessions would be considered in the first seven days. The duration of each session would be 3-4 hours. Patients with partial response (not meeting criteria for a complete response after 3 sessions) would be considered for additional sessions as decided by the treating physician until desired complete response, adverse effects, liver transplant, death, or clinical futility. The complete response will be defined as a sustained reduction in bilirubin and international normalized ratio without any clinical worsening requiring discontinuation of therapy. Failure of therapy would be defined as the development of adverse effects, new onset sepsis, or organ failure. In such patients, further sessions would be deferred. Blood access was established with a double-lumen catheter inserted into the patient's femoral or jugular vein. Receives: Biological: Plasma Exchange |
| Standard Medical Treatment | Active comparator | Patients randomized to SMT Group will be given standard medical therapy (SMT) only included as per requirement. Receives: Other: Standard Medical Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The AARC grading is done by AARC score the values of which vary from 5-15 , pts are divided into 3 grades i.e AARC score 5-7- grade 1, 8-10- grade 2, and AARC 11-15 as grade 3. Improvement in 1 grade is associated with 40% improvement in 28-day survival
the measure is an ordinal variable with 3 categories as above (grade 1, 2 and 3) derived from AARC score from 5-15
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Transplant-free survival at 28-days
Measured: 28 days
The impact of TPE on the progression or resolution of secondary organ failures at day 7, 14 and 28
Each organ failure will be defined based on the definition as yes or no. Depending on if the patient improves or progresses the information will be collected and analyzed.
Measured: day 7, 14 and 28
the development of infection at day 7 and 14 in patients who had no infection
Measured: day 7 and day 14
Duration of ICU and hospital stay
Measured: 28 days
The proportion of patients developing adverse events will be compared between the two groups
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2024
- Study start1 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute on Chronic Liver FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06276907
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ILBS-ACLF-16
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 2 Jan 2024
- Last updated
- 26 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Role of Therapeutic Plasma-exchange in Ameliorating Secondary Organ Dysfunctions in Patients With ACLF and Develop Biomarkers of Treatment Response
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06276907
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ILBS-ACLF-16
- Conditions
- Acute on Chronic Liver Failure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: Current understanding of the pathophysiology of ACLF suggests that unresolved injury, poor infection control, and liver regeneration result in persistent systemic inflammation and cytokine storm, which subsequently lead to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) resulting in multiple organ failures, septic shock and deaths in ACLF. Nearly 74% of ACLF patients initially diagnosed without SIRS, sepsis, or organ failure developed SIRS by day 7 which increases the onset of secondary organ failure and sepsis with high short-term mortality. The emerging use of plasma exchange has shown some potential benefits in terms of dampening systemic inflammation and improvement of outcomes in some ACLF patients. However, there is currently no randomized controlled trial exploring the potential role in ameliorating secondary organ dysfunctions in patients with ACLF is not known. Hence in the current objective, we want to study the role of plasma exchange in the management of sec. organ failure in ACLF patients in a randomized controlled trial and identify the biomarker to access the treatment response to therapy.
Detailed description
Hypothesis: We hypothesize that detrimental complications which include secondary organ dysfunction (circulation, brain, respiration, and kidneys) in patients with acute on chronic liver failure may be related to defects in the host response, which may be responsible for the progression of the disease. Thus, understanding the pathophysiology of secondary organ dysfunction particularly the role of gut dysbiosis and metabolic adaptation of the host in patients with ACLF is essential for preventing and ameliorating the function of these organs which in turn would improve overall survival. Considering systemic inflammation induces metabolic adaptation, the role of TPE in preventing the development of secondary organ failures and biomarkers of response to therapy would be evaluated in patients with ACLF.
Key Objectives: Can we develop specific biomarkers of response to therapy to identify the right patient selection that could benefit from spontaneous survival and avoid a liver transplant? Primary Objective To study the role of therapeutic plasma exchange versus standard medical treatment in patients with ACLF on improving AARC grade by 1 at day 14.
Secondary Objectives
- To study the role of TPE versus standard medical treatment in patients with ACLF on transplant-free survival at 28-days
- To study the impact on progression or resolution of secondary organ failures at day 7 and 14
- Impact on systemic inflammation, renal functions, and ammonia at day 3 7, and day 14
- Impact on systemic hemodynamics- decrease in the dose of vasopressors, lactate clearance, and improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio and urine output after therapy
- Impact on bilirubin and bile acid reduction at day 3 7 and 14
- Impact on the development of infections, new organ failures at day 7 and day 14
- To study the levels of CRP, IL-6, IL-10 pre and post-therapy at day 3, 7 and 14
- To evaluate the improvement in AARC, SOFA and MELD at day 3 7, 14 and develop a model based on AARC score for identifying responders.
- Adverse effects of therapy
- Additional experiments of plasma proteomics and metabolomics will be performed. (as mentioned above)
- To study the impact on systemic inflammation, endothelial function (von-willebrand factor and ADAMTS), inflammatory cytokines damage-associated molecular patterns (HMGB1) at day 3 and 7 and day 14
- Impact on monocyte function (phagocytosis and mitochondrial respiration) In this open-label, randomized controlled trial patients will be randomized 1:1 to two groups. Patients would be randomized using block randomization with 19 blocks and block-size of 10 and SNOSE technique (sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes). Patients fulfilling the selection criteria of ACLF AARC consensus will be recruited in the study and will be randomized into two groups patients in each group) to receive either standard medical therapy alone or standard therapy with plasma-exchange (details mentioned below).
Interventions SMT Group: Patients randomized to SMT Group will be given standard medical therapy (SMT) only included as per requirement. Nutritional therapy 25-30 kcal/kg/day, to reach at least 80% of this target, lactulose, bowel wash, albumin, terlipressin or norepinephrine, and antibiotics will be provided according to the local institutional guidelines. Anti-virals in hepatitis B reactivation and details of the type of antiviral will be included..
Patients with organ failures requiring organ support would be managed in the intensive care unit. Patients would be managed with the standard of care which will include the use of vasopressors (norepinephrine or terlipressin for maintaining mean arterial pressure >65 mm of Hg, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy ( intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy) for standard renal indications. Patients would be fed enterally with the use of parenteral nutrition in patients wherein enteral nutrition is not tolerated. Intravenous low-dose hydrocortisone would be administered to patients with norepinephrine >0.25 ug/kg/min, according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021. The use of antioxidants (N-acetylcysteine) would be recorded.
Plasma exchange: Patients randomized to this group will receive plasma exchange on day 1 Response assessment will be done to assess the need for a second session from day 3-7 and subsequently every week till day 28. A minimum of 3 sessions would be considered in the first seven days. The duration of each session would be 3-4 hours. Patients with partial response (not meeting criteria for a complete response after 3 sessions) would be considered for additional sessions as decided by the treating physician until desired complete response, adverse effects, liver transplant, death, or clinical futility. The complete response will be defined as a sustained reduction in bilirubin and international normalized ratio without any clinical worsening requiring discontinuation of therapy. Failure of therapy would be defined as the development of adverse eff ects, new onset sepsis, or organ failure. In such patients, further sessions would be deferred. Blood access was established with a double-lumen catheter inserted into the patient's femoral or jugular vein.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma Exchange | Experimental | Biological: Plasma ExchangeOn day 1 Response assessment will be done to assess the need for a second session from day 3-7 and subsequently every week till day 28. A minimum of 3 sessions would be considered in the first seven days. The duration of each session would be 3-4 hours. Patients with partial response (not meeting criteria for a complete response after 3 sessions) would be considered for additional sessions as decided by the treating physician until desired complete response, adverse effects, liver transplant, death, or clinical futility. The complete response will be defined as a sustained reduction in bilirubin and international normalized ratio without any clinical worsening requiring discontinuation of therapy. Failure of therapy would be defined as the development of adverse effects, new onset sepsis, or organ failure. In such patients, further sessions would be deferred. Blood access was established with a double-lumen catheter inserted into the patient's femoral or jugular vein. |
| Standard Medical Treatment | Active comparator | Other: Standard Medical TreatmentPatients randomized to SMT Group will be given standard medical therapy (SMT) only included as per requirement. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with ACLF with AARC grade 2 or more with or without single secondary organ failure.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- 1. Patients with age less than 18 years or more than 65 years
- Patients with HVOTO or EHPVO
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (beyond Milan) or any extrahepatic malignancy
- Active bleed (mucosal or variceal) or severe coagulopathy (platelets <20,000 or INR>4)
- Patients with refractory shock requiring norepinephrine >0.5ug/kg/min
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma ExchangeOn day 1 Response assessment will be done to assess the need for a second session from day 3-7 and subsequently every week till day 28. A minimum of 3 sessions would be considered in the first seven days. The duration of each session would be 3-4 hours. Patients with partial response (not meeting criteria for a complete response after 3 sessions) would be considered for additional sessions as decided by the treating physician until desired complete response, adverse effects, liver transplant, death, or clinical futility. The complete response will be defined as a sustained reduction in bilirubin and international normalized ratio without any clinical worsening requiring discontinuation of therapy. Failure of therapy would be defined as the development of adverse effects, new onset sepsis, or organ failure. In such patients, further sessions would be deferred. Blood access was established with a double-lumen catheter inserted into the patient's femoral or jugular vein. | Biological | Plasma Exchange |
| Standard Medical TreatmentPatients randomized to SMT Group will be given standard medical therapy (SMT) only included as per requirement. | Other | Standard Medical Treatment |
Primary outcome
The AARC grading is done by AARC score the values of which vary from 5-15 , pts are divided into 3 grades i.e AARC score 5-7- grade 1, 8-10- grade 2, and AARC 11-15 as grade 3. Improvement in 1 grade is associated with 40% improvement in 28-day survival
Time frame: 28 days
the measure is an ordinal variable with 3 categories as above (grade 1, 2 and 3) derived from AARC score from 5-15
5 secondary outcomes
Transplant-free survival at 28-days
Time frame: 28 days
The impact of TPE on the progression or resolution of secondary organ failures at day 7, 14 and 28
Time frame: day 7, 14 and 28
the development of infection at day 7 and 14 in patients who had no infection
Time frame: day 7 and day 14
Duration of ICU and hospital stay
Time frame: 28 days
The proportion of patients developing adverse events will be compared between the two groups
Time frame: 7 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute on Chronic Liver Failure
RecruitingObservational study
CytOSorb TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS Registry
Septic Shock, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Very Low-volume Plasma Exchange in ACLF
Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Recruiting
A Novel Extracorporeal Liver Support Therapy In ALCF and to Evaluate the Efficacy of DIALIVE 2.0, a Liver Dialysis Device.
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF), Liver Cirrhosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
RENEW: Study of Porcine Liver Support in Participants With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure
Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF), Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE)
RecruitingPhase 2
A-TANGO Phase 2 Study
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, Alcoholic Hepatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Plasma Exchange and Standard Medical Treatment in people with Acute on Chronic Liver Failure, run by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dr Rakhi Maiwall, DM (01146300000, rakhi_2011@yahoo.co.in), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The AARC grading is done by AARC score the values of which vary from 5-15 , pts are divided into 3 grades i.e AARC score 5-7- grade 1, 8-10- grade 2, and AARC 11-15 as grade 3. Improvement in 1 grade is associated with 40% improvement in 28-day survival (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2024.