AzTrials
AzTrials

Surgical TrainingNCT06301230

Home- vs. Hospital-based Surgical Training

A study testing Portable Laparoscopic Trainer (PLET) in people with Surgical Training, run by Clarunis - Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of training with a personal, portable laparoscopic endo-trainer (PLET) on residents' laparoscopic skills. All participants were randomised to either a home- or hospital-based PLET training group and surgical skill performance was assessed using five laparoscopic… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Surgical Training
What is being tested?
Portable Laparoscopic Trainer (PLET)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
1 Sep 2020to 31 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years
  • surgical resident

Who cannot join

  • none

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Clarunis Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel

    Basel, 4002

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: The PLET Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home- Versus Hospital-based Surgical Training

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of training with a personal, portable laparoscopic endo-trainer (PLET) on residents' laparoscopic skills. All participants were randomised to either a home- or hospital-based PLET training group and surgical skill performance was assessed using five laparoscopic exercises. Endpoints consisted ofsubjective and objective assessment ratings as well as exercise time and qualitative data up to 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference in exercise time and secondary outcomes included performance scores as well as qualitative data.

Being tested
Portable Laparoscopic Trainer (PLET)
Keywords
Surgical training, Surgical skill performance, PLET, Portable Laparoscopic Trainer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Portable Laparoscopic Trainer (PLET)Device

    The PLET trainer is light and easy to transport packed in a bag and consists of a foldable plastic box, which can be assembled in less than 30 seconds by means of simple handles. There are three accesses for the surgical instruments (ports) as well as a central recess over which a tablet with an integrated camera can be placed.

    Each participant received a previously prepared opaque envelope containing a black or white USB stick from the Principal Investigator with the assignments on it as part of the randomization process. The outcome assessors were blinded to the allocation.

Study groups in NCT06301230
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hospital-based surgical training groupActive comparatorThis group represents the surgical residents who trained with PLET at the hospital.
Receives: Device: Portable Laparoscopic Trainer (PLET)
Home-based surgical training groupExperimentalThis group represents the surgical residents who trained with PLET at home.
Receives: Device: Portable Laparoscopic Trainer (PLET)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Exercise time

    Amount of time surgical residents need for laparoscopic exercises

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  2. Assessment rating

    Subjective and objective assessment ratings of surgical skills during exercise

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Qualitative feedback

    Open questions about motivation of participating in the study and improving surgical skills

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2024
  2. Study start1 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06301230
Sponsor's protocol ID
PLET-2022
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
22 Feb 2024
Last updated
8 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Kuemmerli C, Linke K, Daume D, Germann N, Peterli R, Muller-Stich B, Klasen JM. The PLET (Portable Laparoscopic Endo-Trainer) study: a randomized controlled trial of home- versus hospital-based surgical training. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 13;409(1):186. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03375-z.

    PubMed 38869683

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Portable Laparoscopic Trainer (PLET) in people with Surgical Training, run by Clarunis - Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Exercise time (time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06301230, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in