AzTrials
AzTrials

Peri-implant MucositisNCT06305000

Impact of Keratinized Mucosa Augmentation on Treatment Outcomes of Peri-implant Mucositis

A study testing Non-surgical treatment and Free gingival graft in people with Peri-implant Mucositis, run by Biruni University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to observe the effects of keratinized mucosa width on peri-implant tissues by evaluating clinical and biochemical parameters. The main question it aims to answer is: Would increasing the width of the keratinized mucosa with free gingival graft (FGG) in peri-implant mucositis be beneficial in terms of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Peri-implant Mucositis
What is being tested?
Non-surgical treatment and Free gingival graft
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
27 Mar 2024to 10 Sep 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Individual dental implants with a fixed prosthetic restoration that has been functional for at least 1 year
  • No systemic disease and medication use that may affect periodontal or peri-implanter tissues
  • Not receiving periodontal treatment in the last 6 months
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • Prosthetic restorations with an excessive contour which do not allow peri-implant pocket measurement
  • Being pregnant or breastfeeding,
  • Autoimmune and/or inflammatory diseases of the oral cavity,
  • Active periodontal disease
  • Smokers (≥ 10 cigarettes per day)
  • Improperly positioned implants

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Biruni University

    Istanbul

    Ayse E Selman, +905366393184, aselman@biruni.edu.tr

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Impact of Keratinized Mucosa Augmentation Following Non-surgical Therapy on Treatment Outcomes of Peri-implant Mucositis.

This study aims to observe the effects of keratinized mucosa width on peri-implant tissues by evaluating clinical and biochemical parameters. The main question it aims to answer is:

Would increasing the width of the keratinized mucosa with free gingival graft (FGG) in peri-implant mucositis be beneficial in terms of clinical periodontal parameters and peri-implant crevicular fluid levels of inflammatory cytokines compared to non-surgical therapy alone?

Read more

Our study consists of 4 groups:

Peri-implant healthy group with sufficient keratinized mucosa (≥ 2mm) (n=16), peri-implant mucositis group with sufficient keratinized mucosa (n=16), peri-implant mucositis group with insufficient keratinized mucosa (< 2mm) receiving only non-surgical treatment (n=16), peri-implant mucositis group with insufficient keratinized mucosa receiving FGG in addition to non-surgical treatment (n=16). Clinical and biochemical measurements will be recorded at the baseline, 1st month, 4th month and 7th month of the study. Peri-implant crevicular fluid samples will be collected at baseline, 1st month, 4th month and 7th month. IL-1β, RANKL, OPG levels, and RANKL/OPG ratio will be analyzed from collected samples.

Researchers will evaluate the possible benefits of FGG application in addition to non-surgical therapy by comparing the biochemical and clinical changes in areas with and without FGG application in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis.

Being tested
Non-surgical treatment, Free gingival graft

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Non-surgical treatmentProcedure or surgery

    Non-surgical treatment consists of oral hygiene instructions, full mouth supragingival scaling using titanium hand instruments, ultrasonic devices, and subgingival debridement under local anesthesia with titanium curettes and ultrasonic instruments in a single appointment.

  • Free gingival graftProcedure or surgery

    After adequate local anesthesia is achieved. A horizontal incision is placed mucogingival junction level to prepare the recipient bed. A split-thickness flap is raised without disturbing the periosteum. FGG is obtained from the palate, extending from the mesial surface of the second premolar to the middle of the first molar. The graft is shaped and stitched on the recipient surface.

Study groups in NCT06305000
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Peri-implant healthy group with sufficient keratinized mucosa (≥ 2mm)No interventionNot described
Peri-implant mucositis group with sufficient keratinized mucosa (≥ 2mm)ExperimentalOnly non-surgical therapy will apply
Receives: Procedure: Non-surgical treatment
Peri-implant mucositis group with insufficient keratinized mucosa (< 2mm) receiving FGGExperimentalFree gingival graft will apply following non-surgical therapy
Receives: Procedure: Non-surgical treatment; Procedure: Free gingival graft

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Inflammatory parameter levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid

    Peri-implant crevicular fluid samples will be collected from 3 sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal) of the implants using methylcellulose strips PerioPaper® (Oralflow Inc., Smithtown, NY, USA) gently placed into the cleansed and dried pocket for 30 sec. Interleukin-1beta, RANKL and OPG levels and RANKL/ OPG ratio will be evaluated.

    Measured: Baseline (prior to therapy)

  2. Inflammatory parameter levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid

    Peri-implant crevicular fluid samples will be collected from 3 sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal) of the implants using methylcellulose strips PerioPaper® (Oralflow Inc., Smithtown, NY, USA) gently placed into the cleansed and dried pocket for 30 sec. Interleukin-1beta, RANKL and OPG levels and RANKL/ OPG ratio will be evaluated.

    Measured: 1st month

  3. Inflammatory parameter levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid

    Peri-implant crevicular fluid samples will be collected from 3 sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal) of the implants using methylcellulose strips PerioPaper® (Oralflow Inc., Smithtown, NY, USA) gently placed into the cleansed and dried pocket for 30 sec. Interleukin-1beta, RANKL and OPG levels and RANKL/ OPG ratio will be evaluated.

    Measured: 4th month

  4. Inflammatory parameter levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid

    Peri-implant crevicular fluid samples will be collected from 3 sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal) of the implants using methylcellulose strips PerioPaper® (Oralflow Inc., Smithtown, NY, USA) gently placed into the cleansed and dried pocket for 30 sec. Interleukin-1beta, RANKL and OPG levels and RANKL/ OPG ratio will be evaluated.

    Measured: 7th month

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Plaque index (Silness & Löe, 1964)

    0: Absence of microbial plaque

    1. Thin plaque layer at the mucosal margin, only detectable by scraping with a probe
    2. Moderate layer of plaque in the along the mucosal margin; interdental spaces free, but plaque is visible to naked eye
    3. Abundant plaque along with the mucosal margin; interdental places filled with plaque

    Measured: Baseline (prior to therapy)

  2. Plaque index (Silness & Löe, 1964)

    Plaque index (Silness \& Löe, 1964):

    0: Absence of microbial plaque

    1. Thin plaque layer at the mucosal margin, only detectable by scraping with a probe
    2. Moderate layer of plaque in the along the mucosal margin; interdental spaces free, but plaque is visible to naked eye
    3. Abundant plaque along with the mucosal margin; interdental places filled with plaque

    Measured: 1st month

  3. Plaque index (Silness & Löe, 1964)

    0: Absence of microbial plaque

    1. Thin plaque layer at the mucosal margin, only detectable by scraping with a probe
    2. Moderate layer of plaque in the along the mucosal margin; interdental spaces free, but plaque is visible to naked eye
    3. Abundant plaque along with the mucosal margin; interdental places filled with plaque

    Measured: 4th month

  4. Plaque index (Silness & Löe, 1964)

    0: Absence of microbial plaque

    1. Thin plaque layer at the mucosal margin, only detectable by scraping with a probe
    2. Moderate layer of plaque in the along the mucosal margin; interdental spaces free, but plaque is visible to naked eye
    3. Abundant plaque along with the mucosal margin; interdental places filled with plaque

    Measured: 7th month

  5. Gingival Index ( Löe & Silness,1963)

    0: normal gingiva

    1. mild inflammation - slight change in color and slight edema but no bleeding on probing
    2. moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing, bleeding on probing
    3. severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration with tendency to spontaneous bleeding

    Measured: Baseline (prior to therapy)

  6. Gingival Index ( Löe & Silness,1963)

    0: normal gingiva

    1. mild inflammation - slight change in color and slight edema but no bleeding on probing
    2. moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing, bleeding on probing
    3. severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration with tendency to spontaneous bleeding

    Measured: 1st month

  7. Gingival Index ( Löe & Silness,1963)

    0: normal gingiva

    1. mild inflammation - slight change in color and slight edema but no bleeding on probing
    2. moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing, bleeding on probing
    3. severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration with tendency to spontaneous bleeding

    Measured: 4th month

  8. Gingival Index ( Löe & Silness,1963)

    0: normal gingiva

    1. mild inflammation - slight change in color and slight edema but no bleeding on probing
    2. moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing, bleeding on probing
    3. severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration with tendency to spontaneous bleeding

    Measured: 7th month

  9. Bleeding on probing (Ainamo & Bay 1975)

    Bleeding on probing A bleeding-on-probing percentage score assessed as the proportion of bleeding sites (dichotomous yes/no evaluation) when stimulated by a standardized manual probe with a controlled (~25 g) force to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) on all present teeth/ implants.

    Measured: Baseline (prior to therapy)

  10. Bleeding on probing (Ainamo & Bay 1975)

    Bleeding on probing A bleeding-on-probing percentage score assessed as the proportion of bleeding sites (dichotomous yes/no evaluation) when stimulated by a standardized manual probe with a controlled (~25 g) force to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) on all present teeth/ implants.

    Measured: 1st month

  11. Bleeding on probing (Ainamo & Bay 1975)

    Bleeding on probing A bleeding-on-probing percentage score assessed as the proportion of bleeding sites (dichotomous yes/no evaluation) when stimulated by a standardized manual probe with a controlled (~25 g) force to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) on all present teeth/ implants.

    Measured: 4th month

  12. Bleeding on probing (Ainamo & Bay 1975)

    Bleeding on probing A bleeding-on-probing percentage score assessed as the proportion of bleeding sites (dichotomous yes/no evaluation) when stimulated by a standardized manual probe with a controlled (~25 g) force to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) on all present teeth/ implants.

    Measured: 7th month

  13. Keratinized mucosa width

    The apical-coronal distance from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ) Measurements will be made at three points on implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal) using a periodontal probe.

    Measured: Baseline (prior to therapy)

  14. Keratinized mucosa width

    The apical-coronal distance from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ). Measurements will be made at three points on implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal) using a periodontal probe.

    Measured: 1st month

  15. Keratinized mucosa width

    The apical-coronal distance from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ). Measurements will be made at three points on implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal) using a periodontal probe.

    Measured: 4th month

  16. Keratinized mucosa width

    The apical-coronal distance from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ). Measurements will be made at three points on implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal) using a periodontal probe.

    Measured: 7th month

  17. Probing depth

    Probing pocket depth: The distance from the base of the pocket to the mucosal margin. Measurements will be made at six points on all teeth/ implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, midlingual, and distolingual) using a periodontal probe.

    Measured: Baseline (prior to therapy)

  18. Probing depth

    Probing pocket depth: The distance from the base of the pocket to the mucosal margin. Measurements will be made at six points on all teeth/ implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, midlingual, and distolingual) using a periodontal probe.

    Measured: 1st month

  19. Probing depth

    The distance from the base of the pocket to the mucosal margin. Measurements will be made at six points on all teeth/ implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, midlingual, and distolingual) using a periodontal probe.

    Measured: 4th month

  20. Probing depth

    The distance from the base of the pocket to the mucosal margin. Measurements will be made at six points on all teeth/ implants (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, midlingual, and distolingual) using a periodontal probe.

    Measured: 7th month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Mar 2024
  2. Study start27 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion10 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 Sep 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
48 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06305000
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-KAEK-80-23-25
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
5 Mar 2024
Last updated
10 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in