AzTrials
AzTrials

Sickle-Cell Disease with CrisisPhase 3PASCNCT06315920

Analgesic Effect of Parecoxib Versus Morphine in SCD Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

A Phase 3 study testing Parecoxib and Morphine in people with Sickle-Cell Disease with Crisis, run by Oman Medical Speciality Board.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Introduction: This study focuses on the treatment of painful crises in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) patients using Paracoxib, a non-opioid, compared to Morphine. It addresses the need for alternative medications that reduce opioid dependency while providing effective analgesia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Sickle-Cell Disease with Crisis
What is being tested?
Parecoxib and Morphine
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
226 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 May 2026to 1 Jul 2028
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • An adult (>18 years) sickle cell disease patient presents with moderate-severe vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) to the ED.

Who cannot join

  • Non-VOC Pain (e.g. Acute chest syndrome, sequestration, septic arthritis, Etc.)
  • Weight less than 50 KG
  • Recurrent visits > one visit/ week
  • Opioids within 24hrs
  • NSAIDs within 24hrs
  • Contraindications to NSAIDs (e.g. allergy, Asthma, CKD, pregnancy, Etc.)
  • Lactating mothers
  • Visited another health institution within 24hrs

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

USAMA ALKHALASI, MD contact

+96894094001

u.alkhalasi@gmail.com

About this study

Official title: Parecoxib Versus Morphine in Acute Pain Management for Sickle Cell Disease Patients in Emergency Department: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: This study focuses on the treatment of painful crises in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) patients using Paracoxib, a non-opioid, compared to Morphine. It addresses the need for alternative medications that reduce opioid dependency while providing effective analgesia.

Objectives:

Read more

Primary: Evaluate the analgesic effect of Paracoxib versus Morphine in SCD vaso-occlusive crises.

Secondary: Reduce opioid use/dependence, decrease the length of hospital stays, and monitor side effects related to Paracoxib.

Methodology: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial, conducted in a tertiary care emergency department. The study includes adult SCD patients with moderate to severe crises, excluding non-VOC pain, certain medications, and specific medical conditions. The sample size is 226 patients, split equally into two groups.

Intervention: Patients receive either Morphine or Paracoxib, with periodic assessment of vital signs and pain. Additional Morphine is administered if required. Data collection and analysis are meticulously planned.

Expected Outcomes: Improvement in SCD pain management, reduction in opioid usage, and potential benefits in terms of hospital stays and patient satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is a prevalent hematological disorder in Oman. Patients frequently present to Emergency Departments (ED) with painful crises, often requiring high doses of opioids like Morphine. However, the complications associated with opioid use, including dependency, necessitate exploring alternative analgesic options. This research proposes a comparative study of Parecoxib, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and Morphine in managing pain for SCD patients in the ED.

Background: Recent studies have highlighted Parecoxib's potential in various clinical settings. In trauma patients, Parecoxib demonstrated comparable analgesic efficacy to Morphine, suggesting its broader applicability in the ED. Parecoxib has shown benefits in post-operative pain management, reducing opioid requirements and associated adverse events. Notably, in post knee replacement surgeries, Parecoxib effectively managed pain and facilitated functional recovery. It also contributed to decreased postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery without increasing adverse events.

Research Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of Parecoxib versus Morphine in SCD patients experiencing vaso-occlusive crises. Secondary objectives include assessing the potential reduction in opioid dependence, length of hospital stay, recurrence of ED visits, and monitoring any Parecoxib-related side effects in SCD patients.

Methodology:

  • Study Design: A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
  • Study Setting: AFH Emergency Department, a tertiary care institution.
  • Target Population: Adult SCD patients (>18 years) presenting with moderate to severe vaso-occlusive crises.
  • Exclusion Criteria: Include non-VOC pain, weight < 50 kg, frequent ED visits, recent opioid/NSAID use, contraindications to NSAIDs, lactating mothers, and recent visits to other health institutions.
  • Sample Size: The sample size of 226 patients, split into two groups of 113 each, was determined for a two-sided hypothesis test with a 5% significance level and 90% power. This design ensures a high probability of detecting a significant difference in the analgesic efficacy between Parecoxib and Morphine for SCD patients. The calculated size is based on expected effect sizes from previous research, with additional allowance for potential dropouts, ensuring the study's statistical validity and comprehensiveness.
  • Intervention: Computer-randomized administration of Morphine or Parecoxib. Continuous monitoring of vital signs and pain assessment at set intervals post-medication administration. Senior emergency physicians and residents will conduct assessments.
  • Data Collection and Analysis: The study will be double-blinded, with only the preparing nurse aware of the medication used. Data will be recorded using Epi-Data and analyzed using SPSS version 25.

Expected Outcomes: The study aims to enhance pain management protocols for SCD patients in the ED. By introducing Parecoxib as an alternative to opioids, we anticipate reduced opioid use, shortened hospital stays, fewer ED visits, and overall cost-effectiveness in managing SCD pain crises. The findings will be disseminated through local and international conferences and journals.

Being tested
Parecoxib, Morphine
Keywords
SCD, Parecoxib , Opioids
Medical subject headings
Vaso-Occlusive Crises

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ParecoxibDrug

    Also called a COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)

    Single dose of 40mg of IV Parecoxib.

  • MorphineDrug

    Also called Morphine Sulfate

    Single dose of 5 mg of IV Morphine.

Study groups in NCT06315920
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ParecoxibExperimental40mg of IV Parecoxib
Receives: Drug: Parecoxib
MorphineActive comparator5 mg of IV Morphine
Receives: Drug: Morphine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain reduction at 60 mins.

    analgesics effect of Parecoxib versus Morphine in sickle cell disease vaso- occlusive crisis.

    Measured: 60 mintues

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Adverse Events/Side Effects

    Any reported adverse events reported by subjects or attending doctor

    Measured: 48 hours

  2. The need of rescue pain medications

    After 60 min , patients can have rescue medications as standard of care.

    Measured: 60 mintues

  3. Recurrent visit

    Any recurrent visit with painful vaso- occlusive crisis

    Measured: 48 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Mar 2024
  2. Study start1 May 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 May 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
226 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06315920
Sponsor's protocol ID
AFMS-MREC 009/2021
Acronym
PASC
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
12 Mar 2024
Last updated
20 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Baharuddin KA, Rahman NH, Wahab SF, Halim NA, Ahmad R. Intravenous parecoxib sodium as an analgesic alternative to morphine in acute trauma pain in the emergency department. Int J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan 3;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-7-2.

    PubMed 24386899
  • Laoruengthana A, Rattanaprichavej P, Reosanguanwong K, Chinwatanawongwan B, Chompoonutprapa P, Pongpirul K. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacies of ketorolac and parecoxib for early pain management after total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2020 Dec;27(6):1708-1714. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Nov 13.

    PubMed 33197808
  • Stoltz RR, Harris SI, Kuss ME, LeComte D, Talwalker S, Dhadda S, Hubbard RC. Upper GI mucosal effects of parecoxib sodium in healthy elderly subjects. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jan;97(1):65-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05265.x.

    PubMed 11808971
  • Rasmussen GL, Steckner K, Hogue C, Torri S, Hubbard RC. Intravenous parecoxib sodium foracute pain after orthopedic knee surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2002 Jun;31(6):336-43.

    PubMed 12083587
  • Zhuang Q, Tao L, Lin J, Jin J, Qian W, Bian Y, Li Y, Dong Y, Peng H, Li Y, Fan Y, Wang W, Feng B, Gao N, Sun T, Lin J, Zhang M, Yan S, Shen B, Pei F, Weng X. Postoperative intravenous parecoxib sodium followed by oral celecoxib post total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients (PIPFORCE): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e030501. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030501.

    PubMed 31924632
  • Mu DL, Zhang DZ, Wang DX, Wang G, Li CJ, Meng ZT, Li YW, Liu C, Li XY. Parecoxib Supplementation to Morphine Analgesia Decreases Incidence of Delirium in Elderly Patients After Hip or Knee Replacement Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):1992-2000. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002095.

    PubMed 28525512
  • Nong L, Sun Y, Tian Y, Li H, Li H. Effects of parecoxib on morphine analgesia after gynecology tumor operation: a randomized trial of parecoxib used in postsurgical pain management. J Surg Res. 2013 Aug;183(2):821-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.059. Epub 2013 Mar 30.

    PubMed 23587455

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Parecoxib and Morphine in people with Sickle-Cell Disease with Crisis, run by Oman Medical Speciality Board.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact USAMA ALKHALASI, MD (+96894094001, u.alkhalasi@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain reduction at 60 mins. (time frame: 60 mintues). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06315920, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in