Pain, ChronicNCT06336447
VR and Cooled Genicular Nerve Radio Frequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Pain
A study testing Experimental: Group #1: Virtual Reality Headset and Group 2 No Virtual Reality Headset in people with Pain, Chronic, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will examine the impact of virtual reality used in conjunction with sedation compared to sedation alone in patients undergoing watervcooled genicular nerve ablations for chronic knee pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- Experimental: Group #1: Virtual Reality Headset and Group 2 No Virtual Reality Headset
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Jan 2024to 28 Feb 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing genicular RFA will be eligible for inclusion in the study
- Patients with knee pain, baseline average of > 4/10
- X-ray evidence of osteoarthritis of the knee
- Pain duration of >6 weeks and no previous knee surgeries
- Patients will also only be included who have never undergone a RFA on the affected knee
Who cannot join
- Individuals who do not have evidence of osteoarthritis on X-ray,
- Secondary gain expected to influence treatment outcomes
- Poorly controlled psychiatric condition that could affect outcome (e.g. active substance abuse) or impose a barrier to participation
- Chronic opioid use and anticoagulation therapy that cannot be stopped and could warrant a different treatment approach (e.g. phenol ablation)
- Severe motion sickness
- Seizure disorder
Show all 9Show fewer
- Vision loss
- Pregnant
- Nursing
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Northwestern Medicine Pain Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Paul Fitzgerald, 312-695-1064, p-fitzgerald2@northwestern.edu
Jason Ross, MD
About this study
Official title: Can Virtual Reality Improve Patient Tolerance in Patients Undergoing Water Cooled Genicular Nerve Radio Frequency Ablation in Patients With Chronic Knee Pain? A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study will examine the impact of virtual reality used in conjunction with sedation compared to sedation alone in patients undergoing watervcooled genicular nerve ablations for chronic knee pain.
The goals of the study is to determine the relative efficacy of virtual reality as a distraction modality when used as an adjuvant to procedural sedation compared to sedation alone for procedure related pain. To assess procedural satisfaction, and 1-month pain and functional outcomes.To explore whether virtual reality and lower procedure-related pain scores affect 1-month outcomes. And finally to determine whether demographic and clinical characteristics are associated with outcome measures.
- Conditions
- Pain, Chronic
- Being tested
- Experimental: Group #1: Virtual Reality Headset, Group 2 No Virtual Reality Headset
- Keywords
- Pain, Knee Pain, Virtual Reality, Radio Frequency Ablation, Genicular Nerve Block
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental: Group #1: Virtual Reality HeadsetOther
Group 1 will be assigned to the Virtual Realtity Headset. Participants will wear the device for at least 10 minutes prior to the planned procedure. Subjects will receive standard procedure. The VR Headset will be removed 10 minutes after the planned procedure.
Group 2 No Virtual Reality HeadsetOther
Group 2 will receive standard care without the use of the Virtuality Reality Heaset.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group #1: Virtual Reality Headset | Experimental | Group 1 will be assigned to the Virtual Realtity Headset. Participants will wear the headset for at least 10 minutes prior to the planned procedure. Subjects will receive standard procedure. The VR Headset will be removed 10 minutes after the planned procedure. Receives: Other: Experimental: Group #1: Virtual Reality Headset |
| Group 2 No Virtual Reality Headset | Active comparator | Group 2 will receive standard care without the use of the Virtuality Reality Headset. Receives: Other: Group 2 No Virtual Reality Headset |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Procedural related pain
Reported procedural related pain on a 0-10 verbal rating scale (VRS)
Measured: 10 minutes after procedure
Secondary outcomes (5)
Procedure related satisfaction
Procedure related satisfaction on a 1-5 Likert scale (5=most satisfied, 1=least satisfied)
Measured: 10 minutes after prodedure
Post procedure anxiety
Post-procedural numerical rating scale (NRS) for anxiety on an 11-point scale (0=no anxiety 10=worst possible level of anxiety)
Measured: 10 minutes after procedure
Mean reduction in pain 1 month after procedure
Mean reduction on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores for average and worst knee pain at 1 month
Measured: 30 days after procedure
Midazolam administered
Milligrams of midazolam administered during procedure for sedation
Measured: 10 minutes before procedure to end of prodedure
Fentanyl administered
Micrograms of fentanyl administered during procedure
Measured: 10 minutes before procedure to end of prodedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2024
- Study start12 Jan 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion28 Feb 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Northwestern UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trail.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jason Ross, Northwestern University
- Investigators
- Jason Ross, MD, Principal investigator, Northwestern Univesity
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06336447
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STU00220295
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, Bridgett L, Williams S, Guillemin F, Hill CL, Laslett LL, Jones G, Cicuttini F, Osborne R, Vos T, Buchbinder R, Woolf A, March L. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1323-30. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
PubMed 24553908Hsu H, Siwiec RM. Knee Osteoarthritis. 2023 Jun 26. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507884/
PubMed 29939661Conger A, Gililland J, Anderson L, Pelt CE, Peters C, McCormick ZL. Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: Current Evidence and Future Directions. Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(Suppl 1):S20-S23. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab129.
PubMed 34308957Iannaccone F, Dixon S, Kaufman A. A Review of Long-Term Pain Relief after Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis. Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):E437-E444.
PubMed 28339444Hoffman HG, Richards TL, Van Oostrom T, Coda BA, Jensen MP, Blough DK, Sharar SR. The analgesic effects of opioids and immersive virtual reality distraction: evidence from subjective and functional brain imaging assessments. Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6):1776-83, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000270205.45146.db.
PubMed 18042882Ding J, He Y, Chen L, Zhu B, Cai Q, Chen K, Liu G. Virtual reality distraction decreases pain during daily dressing changes following haemorrhoid surgery. J Int Med Res. 2019 Sep;47(9):4380-4388. doi: 10.1177/0300060519857862. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
PubMed 31342823Bair MJ, Wu J, Damush TM, Sutherland JM, Kroenke K. Association of depression and anxiety alone and in combination with chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care patients. Psychosom Med. 2008 Oct;70(8):890-7. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318185c510. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
PubMed 18799425
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Can Virtual Reality Improve Patient Tolerance in Patients Undergoing Water Cooled Genicular Nerve Radio Frequency Ablation in Patients With Chronic Knee Pain? A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06336447
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STU00220295
- Conditions
- Pain, Chronic
- Keywords
- Pain, Knee Pain, Virtual Reality, Radio Frequency Ablation, Genicular Nerve Block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will examine the impact of virtual reality used in conjunction with sedation compared to sedation alone in patients undergoing watervcooled genicular nerve ablations for chronic knee pain.
The goals of the study is to determine the relative efficacy of virtual reality as a distraction modality when used as an adjuvant to procedural sedation compared to sedation alone for procedure related pain. To assess procedural satisfaction, and 1-month pain and functional outcomes.To explore whether virtual reality and lower procedure-related pain scores affect 1-month outcomes. And finally to determine whether demographic and clinical characteristics are associated with outcome measures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trail.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group #1: Virtual Reality Headset | Experimental | Other: Experimental: Group #1: Virtual Reality HeadsetGroup 1 will be assigned to the Virtual Realtity Headset. Participants will wear the headset for at least 10 minutes prior to the planned procedure. Subjects will receive standard procedure. The VR Headset will be removed 10 minutes after the planned procedure. |
| Group 2 No Virtual Reality Headset | Active comparator | Other: Group 2 No Virtual Reality HeadsetGroup 2 will receive standard care without the use of the Virtuality Reality Headset. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients undergoing genicular RFA will be eligible for inclusion in the study
- Patients with knee pain, baseline average of > 4/10
- X-ray evidence of osteoarthritis of the knee
- Pain duration of >6 weeks and no previous knee surgeries
- Patients will also only be included who have never undergone a RFA on the affected knee
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Individuals who do not have evidence of osteoarthritis on X-ray,
- Secondary gain expected to influence treatment outcomes
- Poorly controlled psychiatric condition that could affect outcome (e.g. active substance abuse) or impose a barrier to participation
- Chronic opioid use and anticoagulation therapy that cannot be stopped and could warrant a different treatment approach (e.g. phenol ablation)
- Severe motion sickness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Group #1: Virtual Reality HeadsetGroup 1 will be assigned to the Virtual Realtity Headset. Participants will wear the device for at least 10 minutes prior to the planned procedure. Subjects will receive standard procedure. The VR Headset will be removed 10 minutes after the planned procedure. | Other | Group #1: Virtual Reality Headset |
| Group 2 No Virtual Reality HeadsetGroup 2 will receive standard care without the use of the Virtuality Reality Heaset. | Other | Group 2 No Virtual Reality Headset |
Primary outcome
Procedural related pain
Time frame: 10 minutes after procedure
Reported procedural related pain on a 0-10 verbal rating scale (VRS)
5 secondary outcomes
Procedure related satisfaction
Time frame: 10 minutes after prodedure
Post procedure anxiety
Time frame: 10 minutes after procedure
Mean reduction in pain 1 month after procedure
Time frame: 30 days after procedure
Midazolam administered
Time frame: 10 minutes before procedure to end of prodedure
Fentanyl administered
Time frame: 10 minutes before procedure to end of prodedure
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 24553908Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, Bridgett L, Williams S, Guillemin F, Hill CL, Laslett LL, Jones G, Cicuttini F, Osborne R, Vos T, Buchbinder R, Woolf A, March L. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1323-30. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
- Background: PubMed 29939661Hsu H, Siwiec RM. Knee Osteoarthritis. 2023 Jun 26. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507884/
- Background: PubMed 34308957Conger A, Gililland J, Anderson L, Pelt CE, Peters C, McCormick ZL. Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: Current Evidence and Future Directions. Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(Suppl 1):S20-S23. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab129.
- Background: PubMed 28339444Iannaccone F, Dixon S, Kaufman A. A Review of Long-Term Pain Relief after Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis. Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):E437-E444.
- Background: PubMed 18042882Hoffman HG, Richards TL, Van Oostrom T, Coda BA, Jensen MP, Blough DK, Sharar SR. The analgesic effects of opioids and immersive virtual reality distraction: evidence from subjective and functional brain imaging assessments. Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6):1776-83, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000270205.45146.db.
- Background: PubMed 31342823Ding J, He Y, Chen L, Zhu B, Cai Q, Chen K, Liu G. Virtual reality distraction decreases pain during daily dressing changes following haemorrhoid surgery. J Int Med Res. 2019 Sep;47(9):4380-4388. doi: 10.1177/0300060519857862. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
- Background: PubMed 18799425Bair MJ, Wu J, Damush TM, Sutherland JM, Kroenke K. Association of depression and anxiety alone and in combination with chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care patients. Psychosom Med. 2008 Oct;70(8):890-7. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318185c510. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
Related trials for Pain, Chronic
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jason Ross, MD principal investigator
Northwestern Univesity
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental: Group #1: Virtual Reality Headset and Group 2 No Virtual Reality Headset in people with Pain, Chronic, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Paul Fitzgerald, RN,BSN,MS (312-695-1064, p-fitzgerald2@northwestern.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Procedural related pain (time frame: 10 minutes after procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06336447, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2026.