AzTrials
AzTrials

DiaphragmNCT06347549

The Impact of Diaphragmatic Breathing Instructions and Inspiratory Pressures on Diaphragm Contraction in Healthy Adults

An observational study of Diaphragm, run by Hong Kong Metropolitan University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a cross-sectional obsessional study. This study aims (1) to investigate the relationship between sternocleidomastoid muscle recruitment and diaphragm thickness fraction during increasing inspiratory resistance in healthy adults; (2) to compare diaphragmatic and sternocleidomastoid muscle recruitment patterns… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Diaphragm
What is being tested?
Various intensities of inspiratory muscle training
How many people
62 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
8 Apr 2024to 16 Jul 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Healthy adults

Who may be able to join

  • Participants ≥18 years of age with normal health

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy.
  • Participants with known cardiovascular, pulmonary, musculoskeletal or psychiatric disorders.
  • Participants with respiratory symptoms (from flu or other respiratory infection during the 2 weeks prior to measurements.
  • Participants can not cooperate the maximal inspiratory pressure measurement.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Hong Kong Metropolitan University

    Hong Kong, None Selected

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Diaphragmatic and Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Recruitment at Various Inspiratory Loads With and Without Breathing Instruction in Healthy Adults

This is a cross-sectional obsessional study.

This study aims (1) to investigate the relationship between sternocleidomastoid muscle recruitment and diaphragm thickness fraction during increasing inspiratory resistance in healthy adults; (2) to compare diaphragmatic and sternocleidomastoid muscle recruitment patterns with and without a standard diaphragmatic breathing instruction with increasing inspiratory resistance in healthy adults.

Participants will be asked to breathe through a pressure threshold inspiratory loading device under different inspiratory resistances with and without a standard diaphragmatic breathing instruction. sternocleidomastoid muscle activity will be measured with surface electromyography, and diaphragm thickness will be assessed with ultrasonography.

Read the detailed description

Upon arrival at the laboratory, eligible participants will first perform a standard spirometry lung function test. The maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) will be determined with a pressure threshold inspiratory loading device (POWERbreathe, K2). Each participant will then be instructed to use the device to perform, in random order, 10 breaths at an inspiratory intensity of 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80% MIP. A rest period of 15 minutes will be allowed between each inspiratory pressure set of 10 breaths. Simultaneous surface electromyographic (sEMG) recording of the right sternocleidomastoid muscle and ultrasound of right diaphragmatic thickness will be conducted during each breath.

The entire recording procedure will be repeated on a separate day. During the repeat measurements, participants will be provided with specific breathing instruction to focus on the use of the diaphragm and to inhale air to the lower part of the chest. Practice trials will be conducted to ensure participant's understanding of diaphragmatic breathing.

Conditions
Diaphragm
Being tested
Various intensities of inspiratory muscle training
Keywords
Diaphragmatic thickening fraction, Sternocleidomastoid muscles, Inspiratory pressures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Various intensities of inspiratory muscle trainingDiagnostic test

    Each participant will be instructed to use a pressure threshold inspiratory loading device to perform, in random order, 10 breaths at an inspiratory intensity of 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80% of their maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP). A rest period of 15 minutes will be allowed between each inspiratory pressure set of 10 breaths. Simultaneous surface electromyographic (sEMG) recording of the right sternocleidomastoid muscle and ultrasound of right diaphragmatic thickness will be conducted during each breath.

    The entire recording procedure will be repeated on a separate day. During the repeat measurements, participants will be provided with specific breathing instruction to focus on the use of the diaphragm and to inhale air to the lower part of the chest.

Study groups in NCT06347549
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Healthy adultsParticipants ≥18 years of age with normal health will be recruited in this study.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Various intensities of inspiratory muscle training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diaphragmatic thickening fraction

    Diaphragmatic thickening fraction is determined by "(thickness of the diaphragm at end inspiratory - thickness at end expiratory)/thickness at end expiratory". Diaphragmatic thickness will be measured by ultrasonography.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Muscle activation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle

    Surface electromyography will be used to measure accessory inspiratory muscle (sternocleidomastoid muscles) activity during each inspiratory muscle training intensity.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Perceived Exertion Borg scale

    This is a vertical scale quantified from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no symptoms, and 10 represents the maximum symptoms. The Borg score provides an individual measurement of the exercise intensity.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2024
  2. Study start8 Apr 2024
  3. Primary completion16 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion16 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case crossover
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06347549
Sponsor's protocol ID
HE-SF2024/09
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
28 Mar 2024
Last updated
28 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Diaphragm, run by Hong Kong Metropolitan University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diaphragmatic thickening fraction (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in