Chronic Subdural HematomaCHESSNCT06347796
Chronic Subdural Hematoma Treatment With Embolization Versus Surgery Study
A study testing Conventional Surgery and Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) in people with Chronic Subdural Hematoma, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 31 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test in moderately symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) patients if middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) can be used as an alternative to conventional open surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Subdural Hematoma
- What is being tested?
- Conventional Surgery and Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 520 participants
- Where
- 31 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2024to Feb 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 40-90 years inclusively.
- Per CT of the head, (one of the following): Unilateral convexity CSDH measuring at least 10 mm in thickness OR Bilateral CSDH if only one side is considered for treatment (at least 10 mm in thickness) and the contralateral side is asymptomatic and < 10 mm in thickness.
- CSDH at least 2/3 isodense or hypodense, verified on axial CT slice used to measure the thickness of the qualifying CSDH.
- Qualifying baseline head CT performed within the 7 days prior to randomization.
- Able to undergo assigned treatment within 72 hours after randomization.
- Patient or legally authorized representative agrees to be randomized, and provides written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization.
Who cannot join
- Secondary cause apart from trauma for the qualifying SDH, such as an underlying vascular abnormality or tumor.
- Tentorial or interhemispheric SDH.
- Secondary to CSDH, MRC of 0, 1, 2, or 3 in any muscle group contralateral to the side of the CSDH 4.
- Pre CSDH mRS of 5 or higher.
- Secondary to CSDH, patient is unable to complete TUG (i.e.,TUG > 120 seconds, unable to walk, or tries TUG but quits in ≤ 120 seconds). Note: This criterion does not apply if the patient does not complete TUG for reason other than CSDH.
- Secondary to CSDH, ASR of 0, 1, or 2.
Show all 25Show fewer
- Emergent surgical evacuation such as open craniotomy, burr hole drainage, or Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS) is required for the patient.
- Unable to withhold all antiplatelet agents or OACs for the first 7 days after randomization.
- Indication that withdrawal of care will be implemented for the qualifying SDH.
- Prior surgical treatment for CSDH if the surgery is less than 30 days prior to randomization.
- On tranexamic acid.
- Platelet count of <100,000 per microliter refractory to transfusion.
- Coagulopathy that cannot be corrected to an INR of ≤1.5.
- Known contraindications to angiography.
- Known intolerance to occlusion procedures.
- Known vascular anatomy (small artery size) or blood flow (high vascular resistance peripheral to the feeding arteries) that precludes catheter placement or embolic agent (Embosphere Microspheres or CONTOUR particles) injection.
- Known presence of collateral vessel pathways potentially endangering normal territories or cranial nerves during embolization.
- Known large diameter arteriovenous shunt, i.e., where the blood does not pass through an arterial/capillary/venous transition but directly from an artery to a vein or presence of patent extra-to-intracranial anastomoses (where study embolization devices could pass directly into the internal carotid artery, vertebral artery, or intracranial vasculature) that cannot be addressed with coil embolization.
- Patient has a known active systemic infection or sepsis.
- Patient is pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating.
- Life expectancy of less than 6 months due to comorbid terminal conditions.
- Concurrent participation in another research protocol for investigation of an experimental therapy.
- Known or suspected to not be able to comply with the study protocol.
- For unilateral CSDH, no measurable deficit secondary to the CSDH on the Timed Up and Go [TUG], Aphasia Severity Rating [ASR], or MRC. At baseline, a measurable deficit on the TUG is defined as: time ≥10 seconds. At baseline, a measurable deficit on the ASR is defined as: a score ≤4. At baseline, a measurable deficit on the MRC is defined as: a score < 5 in any muscle group contralateral to the site of the CSDH.
- For bilateral CSDH, no measurable deficit secondary to the treatment-eligible CSDH on the ASR or MRC. At baseline, a measurable deficit on the ASR is defined as: a score ≤4. At baseline, a measurable deficit on the MRC is defined as: a score < 5 in any muscle group contralateral to the treatment-eligibile CSDH side.
Trial locations and contacts
31 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
31 sites in 1 country
United States31 sites, 29 recruiting
- Recruiting
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Jonathan Grossberg
- Recruiting
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Christopher Stapleton, MD
- Recruiting
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Nirav Patel, MD
- Recruiting
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Philip Taussky, MD
- Recruiting
Cooper University Hospital
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Sean Behnke
Daniel Tonetti, MD
- Recruiting
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Andrew Carlson, MD
- Recruiting
Good Samaritan Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220
Andrew Ringer, MD
- Recruiting
University of Missouri Healthcare
Columbia, Missouri, 65212
Brooke Hoffman
Steven Carr
- Recruiting
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Babu Welch, MD
- Recruiting
JFK Neuroscience Institute, JFK University Medical Center
Edison, New Jersey, 08820
Brian Jankowitz, MD
- Recruiting
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555
Jessica L Spahn, 409-266-8859, jlspahn@utmb.edu
Lauren Dawson, 409-354-9792, lndawson@utmb.edu
- Recruiting
University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030
Sunil Sheth, MD
- Recruiting
Baptist Medical Center Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Ricardo Hanel, MD
- Recruiting
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 61660
Koji Ebersole, MD
- Recruiting
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 33136
Robert Starke, MD
- Withdrawn
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
- Recruiting
Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
Christopher Kellner, MD
- Recruiting
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Newark, New Jersey, 07101
Amit Singla, MD
- Recruiting
University of Pennyslvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Jan Burkhardt, MD
- Recruiting
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Bernard Bendok, MD
- Recruiting
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Ramesh Grandhi, MD
- Recruiting
University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Justin Mascitelli, MD
- Recruiting
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Michael Levitt, MD
- Recruiting
Washington University, St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Joshua Osbun, MD
- Active, not recruiting
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
- Recruiting
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33617
Maxim Mokin, MD
- Recruiting
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
David Altschul, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center
Toledo, Ohio, 43608
Osama Zaidat, MD
- Recruiting
Philadelphia Neurological Institute
Upland, Pennsylvania, 19013
Mandy Binning, MD
- Recruiting
Westchester Medical Center
Valhalla, New York, 10595
Chirag Gandhi, MD
- Recruiting
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Stacey Wolfe, MD
About this study
The goal of this clinical trial is to test in moderately symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) patients if middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) can be used as an alternative to conventional open surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Compared to open conventional surgery, does MMAE reduce the need for rescue surgery or deaths?
- What is the safety of MMAE and conventional open surgery in these patients?
Read more
Participants will be asked to:
- Share their medical history and undergo physical examinations
- Have blood drawn
- Have CT scans of the head
- Answer questionnaires
- Undergo MMAE or conventional open surgery
- Provide information about possible adverse events Researchers will compare participants in the MMAE group with those in the conventional open surgery group to see if there is a reduced need for rescue surgery or deaths and evaluate safety.
- Conditions
- Chronic Subdural Hematoma
- Being tested
- Conventional Surgery, Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE)
- Keywords
- chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE)
- Medical subject headings
- Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Conventional surgery is surgical drainage through burr holes or craniotomy.
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE)Device
Particle embolization of the middle meningeal artery with micron variants of the Embosphere Microspheres or CONTOUR Embolization Particles device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Middle Menningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) |
| Conventional Surgery (Craniotomy or Burr Holes) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Conventional Surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Need for Rescue Surgery or Death
Participants who need rescue surgery or die.
Measured: Within 180-210 days of randomization
Secondary outcomes (1)
Safety of MMAE and Conventional Open Surgery
The proportion of subjects with symptomatic ischemic stroke, serious/life threatening adverse events, worsening of neurological status (a decline of 1 point on the Markwalder scale) or development of new disabling neurological symptoms, seizures, and/or cranial neuropathy.
Measured: Within 180 days of randomization.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2024
- Study start1 Nov 2024
- Primary completionFeb 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Subdural HematomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 520 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06347796
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23-0160
- Other IDs
- UG3NS128397, UH3NS128397
- Acronym
- CHESS
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 22 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Chronic Subdural Hematoma Treatment With Embolization Versus Surgery Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06347796
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHESS / 23-0160
- Conditions
- Chronic Subdural Hematoma
- Keywords
- chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 520 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test in moderately symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) patients if middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) can be used as an alternative to conventional open surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Compared to open conventional surgery, does MMAE reduce the need for rescue surgery or deaths?
- What is the safety of MMAE and conventional open surgery in these patients?
Participants will be asked to:
- Share their medical history and undergo physical examinations
- Have blood drawn
- Have CT scans of the head
- Answer questionnaires
- Undergo MMAE or conventional open surgery
- Provide information about possible adverse events Researchers will compare participants in the MMAE group with those in the conventional open surgery group to see if there is a reduced need for rescue surgery or deaths and evaluate safety.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Middle Menningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) | Experimental | Device: Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) |
| Conventional Surgery (Craniotomy or Burr Holes) | Active comparator | Procedure: Conventional Surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 40-90 years inclusively.
- Per CT of the head, (one of the following): Unilateral convexity CSDH measuring at least 10 mm in thickness OR Bilateral CSDH if only one side is considered for treatment (at least 10 mm in thickness) and the contralateral side is asymptomatic and < 10 mm in thickness.
- CSDH at least 2/3 isodense or hypodense, verified on axial CT slice used to measure the thickness of the qualifying CSDH.
- Qualifying baseline head CT performed within the 7 days prior to randomization.
- Able to undergo assigned treatment within 72 hours after randomization.
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Secondary cause apart from trauma for the qualifying SDH, such as an underlying vascular abnormality or tumor.
- Tentorial or interhemispheric SDH.
- Secondary to CSDH, MRC of 0, 1, 2, or 3 in any muscle group contralateral to the side of the CSDH 4.
- Pre CSDH mRS of 5 or higher.
- Secondary to CSDH, patient is unable to complete TUG (i.e.,TUG > 120 seconds, unable to walk, or tries TUG but quits in ≤ 120 seconds). Note: This criterion does not apply if the patient does not complete TUG for reason other than CSDH.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional SurgeryConventional surgery is surgical drainage through burr holes or craniotomy. | Procedure or surgery | Conventional Surgery (Craniotomy or Burr Holes) |
| Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE)Particle embolization of the middle meningeal artery with micron variants of the Embosphere Microspheres or CONTOUR Embolization Particles device. | Device | Middle Menningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) |
Primary outcome
Need for Rescue Surgery or Death
Time frame: Within 180-210 days of randomization
Participants who need rescue surgery or die.
1 secondary outcome
Safety of MMAE and Conventional Open Surgery
Time frame: Within 180 days of randomization.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Subdural Hematoma
RecruitingObservational study
Study On Histoacryl Used For Embolization Of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) In Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH)
Subdural Hematoma, Subdural Hematoma, Chronic
Active, not recruiting
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolisation in Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Recruiting
MMA Embolization With NeoCast for Subacute and Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Subdural Hematoma
RecruitingObservational study
Chronic Subdural Hematoma Embolization With Detachable Coils
Chronic Subdural Hemorrhage (cSDH)
RecruitingObservational study
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) Outcomes for Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH)
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
31 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional Surgery and Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) in people with Chronic Subdural Hematoma, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 31 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 31 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jessica Spahn (409-266-8859, jlspahn@utmb.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Need for Rescue Surgery or Death (time frame: Within 180-210 days of randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2026.