Spinal Cord InjuriesNCT06364813
Co-developing a Novel Intervention to Promote Wellbeing of Family Caregivers of Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing COMPANION eHealth Program in people with Spinal Cord Injuries and Caregiver Burden, run by University of British Columbia.
Trial summary
Family caregivers of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) provide the majority of care and are at high risk of experiencing caregiver burden, which not only impacts caregivers' own wellbeing, but also their ability to respond to patients' needs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Caregiver Burden
- What is being tested?
- COMPANION eHealth Program
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2024to Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Family caregiver of an adult individual with SCI
- Must be older than 18 years old
- Must live in Canada
- Must live with the individual with SCI in the community
- The spinal cord injury of the individual with SCI must have happened no earlier than 6 months prior to participation
Who cannot join
- Family caregiver with major medical and physical conditions that needs routine visits to medical doctors (e.g., cancer)
- Family caregivers of individuals with SCI who are still in a rehabilitation facility
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Family caregivers of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) provide the majority of care and are at high risk of experiencing caregiver burden, which not only impacts caregivers' own wellbeing, but also their ability to respond to patients' needs. Health education using online approaches (eHealth) has the potential to improve quality of care, enhance communication between health care users and providers, reduce costs and increase access to existing knowledge and education for family caregivers. Here, the investigators propose a research study to assess the quality of the eHealth program. The findings of this study will lead to the refinement of the eHealth program.
Read the detailed description
People with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience an irreversible neurological impairment. Each year there are more than 17,000 and 3,500 new cases of SCI in the United States and Canada, respectively. The estimated lifetime health care and direct economic cost that SCI imposes is between $1.6m and $3m (CAD) per person. However, this number is substantially higher when unpaid care provided by family caregivers is considered. Family caregivers of individuals with SCI provide the majority of care, from assistance with activities of daily living to managing finances. Family caregivers report negative social and health-related consequences such as difficulties in maintaining a social life or full-time employment. Family caregivers also tend to ignore their own mental and physical health needs. The burden and distress caused by caregiving responsibilities not only impacts caregivers, but also caregivers' ability to respond to the patients' needs. Therefore, it is essential to better understand and address the needs and challenges faced by family caregivers. In preliminary work conducted to explore these issues, the investigators examined the needs and challenges of family caregivers of individuals with SCI through conducting a systematic review, an online survey and semi-structured interviews. Working with end-users partners and building on this line of research, the investigators aim to provide the information and resources required and requested by family caregivers to address their needs via an eHealth tool. Through this needs-based technology intervention, the investigators' goal is to improve the physical and psychological wellbeing of family caregivers of individuals with SCI and, ultimately, to improve the well-being of the individuals with SCI. In addition, the investigators will investigate patterns of health care use among family caregivers and individuals with SCI as a means to evaluate the impact of the intervention.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Caregiver Burden
- Being tested
- COMPANION eHealth Program
- Keywords
- Caregiving, eHealth, online education, family caregivers
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Caregiver Burden
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
COMPANION eHealth ProgramOther
COMPANION consists of online, self-paced educational modules with information on a range of topics such as providing medical care, applying for financial aid and home aid, working on the relationship with the care recipient, dealing with mental health issues, and learning life skills.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| COMPANION Group | Experimental | eHealth education: participants receive family caregiving education through the COMPANION eHealth program. Receives: Other: COMPANION eHealth Program |
| No Intervention | No intervention | Control group participants will receive the usual care available at their local rehabilitation clinic. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Family caregivers' subjective burden as assessed by the Zarit Burden Interview
The 12-item Zarit Burden Interview uses a 5-point scale to measure family caregivers' subjective burden by asking participants how often they experience certain feelings. Individual responses range from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always) and are added to generate a total score. Total scores can range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 48. A total score ranging between 0-10 indicates no to mild burden, 10-20 indicates mild to moderate burden, and >20 indicates high burden. The Zarit Burden Interview will be administered via survey at 3 timepoints.
Measured: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Participants' objective burden as assessed by the Dutch Objective Burden Inventory
The 38-item Dutch Objective Burden Inventory will be used to measure family caregivers' objective burden by assessing participants' perceived burden relating to care activities over the past three months. Individual responses are scored (1 = Not at all burdensome, 2 = somewhat burdensome, 3 = very burdensome) and the average calculated to produce a total score (ranging from 1 to 3). Higher averages indicate higher objective burden. The Dutch Objective Burden Inventory will be administered via survey at 3 timepoints.
Measured: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Participants' distress as assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale
The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) contains 21 items assessing distress over the past week using a 4-point Likert scale (0=never, 3=always). Responses for each item will be scored and averaged into a single distress indicator with higher scores indicating more distress. The DASS will be administered via survey at 3 timepoints.
Measured: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Participants' relationship quality satisfaction as assessed by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale
The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS-32) consists of 32 items for measuring the level of relationship quality satisfaction among dyads in general and during the past few weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 151. Higher scores indicate less distress and high adjustment. The DAS-32 will be administered via survey at 3 timepoints.
Measured: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Participants' health-related quality of life as assessed by the Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey
The Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12) is a questionnaire that will be used to measure family caregivers' health-related quality of life during the past four weeks and compared to their health one year ago. Items relate to general health perceptions, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. 2 separate scores are generated from responses, a "Physical Health Summary Measure (PCS-physical component score)" and a "Mental Health Summary Measure (MCS-mental component score)". The VR-12 scoring algorithm is used to score PCS and MCS based on weights derived from 877,775 responses to a Veterans RAND 36-Item Health Survey (VR-36) that was administered federally to American veterans in 1999, resulting in variable minimum and maximum score values. Higher PCS and MCS scores indicate better health. The VR-12 will be administered via survey at 3 timepoints.
Measured: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Caregiver competence as assessed by the Caregiving Competence Scale
Caregiver competence is measured by a 4-item Likert scale asking participants to rate feelings about their competency and performance of their caregiving role. Response options range from 4 = "very much" to1 = "not at all". Total score values range from 0 to 12 with higher scores indicating higher caregiving competence. The Caregiving Competence Scale will be administered via survey at 3 timepoints.
Measured: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Caregiver costs as assessed by the Caregiver Indirect and Informal Care Cost Assessment Questionnaire
The Caregiver Indirect and Informal Care Cost Assessment Questionnaire (CIIQ) consists of 13 items with information including, but not limited to, work status, time missed at work, productivity, and physical and emotional caregiving duties. Responses are open-ended apart from one item using a 10-point scale ranging from 0 ("could work as usual") to 10 ("Could not work at all"). Calculations will be conducted to estimate indirect and informal caregiver costs. Total scores report cost in dollars and can range from as low as zero to any maximum number. Higher scores indicate greater financial impact due to informal care costs. The CIIQ will be coupled with a bespoke item asking about additional money fcSCI spend on themselves. To minimize concerns about recall, a one-week recall period will be used for the CIIQ and a three-month recall period will be used for the bespoke item.
Measured: 0 months, 3 months and 6 months
Participants' opinion regarding the usability of the implementation as assessed by the System Usability Scale
The System Usability Scale (SUS) consists of a 10-item questionnaire with five response options scored on a Likert scale ranging from "Strongly agree" to "Strongly disagree." It is used to measure usability of the eHealth implementation based on participants' experience using COMPANION over the last 3 months. It will be administered only to participants in the intervention group via survey at 2 timepoints. Raw scores range from 0-40 and are algorithmically converted into meaningful SUS scores ranging from 0-100. Higher scores indicate higher perceived usability.
Measured: 3 months and 6 months
Participants' experience using the implementation as assessed by a qualitative interview
Optional semi-structured interviews (45-60 minutes) will be used to explore fcSCI's experience with the eHealth implementation. Interview guides will be created to ask participants to share their perspective on advantages and disadvantages of the program. Participating in the interview will only be offered to participants in the intervention group.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2024
- Study startMay 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionMay 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Somayyeh Mohammadi, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- William C Miller, PhD, Study chair, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06364813
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H20-01461
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 15 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 16 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mohammadi S, Whitehurst DGT, Robillard JM, Schneeberg A, Erlander B, Pauly E, Cathcart H, Miller WC. Feasibility and exploratory outcomes of the COMPANION eHealth tool for the wellbeing of family caregivers of individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2026 Sep 30. doi: 10.1038/s41393-026-01280-4. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42816541Mohammadi S, Erlander B, Cathcart H, Robillard JM, Sauvageau S, Whitehurst DGT, Pauly E, Page B, Miller WC. Codeveloping a Novel Intervention to Promote the Well-Being of Family Caregivers of Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Control Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 25;14:e67709. doi: 10.2196/67709.
PubMed 40998319
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Co-developing a Novel Intervention to Promote Wellbeing of Family Caregivers of Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06364813
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H20-01461
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Caregiver Burden
- Keywords
- Caregiving, eHealth, online education, family caregivers
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation
- Study start
- May 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- May 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Family caregivers of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) provide the majority of care and are at high risk of experiencing caregiver burden, which not only impacts caregivers' own wellbeing, but also their ability to respond to patients' needs. Health education using online approaches (eHealth) has the potential to improve quality of care, enhance communication between health care users and providers, reduce costs and increase access to existing knowledge and education for family caregivers. Here, the investigators propose a research study to assess the quality of the eHealth program. The findings of this study will lead to the refinement of the eHealth program.
Detailed description
People with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience an irreversible neurological impairment. Each year there are more than 17,000 and 3,500 new cases of SCI in the United States and Canada, respectively. The estimated lifetime health care and direct economic cost that SCI imposes is between $1.6m and $3m (CAD) per person. However, this number is substantially higher when unpaid care provided by family caregivers is considered. Family caregivers of individuals with SCI provide the majority of care, from assistance with activities of daily living to managing finances. Family caregivers report negative social and health-related consequences such as difficulties in maintaining a social life or full-time employment. Family caregivers also tend to ignore their own mental and physical health needs. The burden and distress caused by caregiving responsibilities not only impacts caregivers, but also caregivers' ability to respond to the patients' needs. Therefore, it is essential to better understand and address the needs and challenges faced by family caregivers. In preliminary work conducted to explore these issues, the investigators examined the needs and challenges of family caregivers of individuals with SCI through conducting a systematic review, an online survey and semi-structured interviews. Working with end-users partners and building on this line of research, the investigators aim to provide the information and resources required and requested by family caregivers to address their needs via an eHealth tool. Through this needs-based technology intervention, the investigators' goal is to improve the physical and psychological wellbeing of family caregivers of individuals with SCI and, ultimately, to improve the well-being of the individuals with SCI. In addition, the investigators will investigate patterns of health care use among family caregivers and individuals with SCI as a means to evaluate the impact of the intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| COMPANION Group | Experimental | Other: COMPANION eHealth ProgrameHealth education: participants receive family caregiving education through the COMPANION eHealth program. |
| No Intervention | No intervention | –Control group participants will receive the usual care available at their local rehabilitation clinic. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Family caregiver of an adult individual with SCI
- Must be older than 18 years old
- Must live in Canada
- Must live with the individual with SCI in the community
- The spinal cord injury of the individual with SCI must have happened no earlier than 6 months prior to participation
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Family caregiver with major medical and physical conditions that needs routine visits to medical doctors (e.g., cancer)
- Family caregivers of individuals with SCI who are still in a rehabilitation facility
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| COMPANION eHealth ProgramCOMPANION consists of online, self-paced educational modules with information on a range of topics such as providing medical care, applying for financial aid and home aid, working on the relationship with the care recipient, dealing with mental health issues, and learning life skills. | Other | COMPANION Group |
Primary outcome
Family caregivers' subjective burden as assessed by the Zarit Burden Interview
Time frame: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
The 12-item Zarit Burden Interview uses a 5-point scale to measure family caregivers' subjective burden by asking participants how often they experience certain feelings. Individual responses range from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always) and are added to generate a total score. Total scores can range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 48. A total score ranging between 0-10 indicates no to mild burden, 10-20 indicates mild to moderate burden, and >20 indicates high burden. The Zarit Burden Interview will be administered via survey at 3 timepoints.
8 secondary outcomes
Participants' objective burden as assessed by the Dutch Objective Burden Inventory
Time frame: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Participants' distress as assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale
Time frame: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Participants' relationship quality satisfaction as assessed by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale
Time frame: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Participants' health-related quality of life as assessed by the Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey
Time frame: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Caregiver competence as assessed by the Caregiving Competence Scale
Time frame: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months
Caregiver costs as assessed by the Caregiver Indirect and Informal Care Cost Assessment Questionnaire
Time frame: 0 months, 3 months and 6 months
Participants' opinion regarding the usability of the implementation as assessed by the System Usability Scale
Time frame: 3 months and 6 months
Participants' experience using the implementation as assessed by a qualitative interview
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42816541Mohammadi S, Whitehurst DGT, Robillard JM, Schneeberg A, Erlander B, Pauly E, Cathcart H, Miller WC. Feasibility and exploratory outcomes of the COMPANION eHealth tool for the wellbeing of family caregivers of individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2026 Sep 30. doi: 10.1038/s41393-026-01280-4. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40998319Mohammadi S, Erlander B, Cathcart H, Robillard JM, Sauvageau S, Whitehurst DGT, Pauly E, Page B, Miller WC. Codeveloping a Novel Intervention to Promote the Well-Being of Family Caregivers of Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Control Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 25;14:e67709. doi: 10.2196/67709.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
William C Miller, PhD study chair
University of British Columbia
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing COMPANION eHealth Program in people with Spinal Cord Injuries and Caregiver Burden, run by University of British Columbia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Somayyeh Mohammadi, PhD (604 734 1313 ext. 6262, somayyeh.mohammadi@ubc.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Family caregivers' subjective burden as assessed by the Zarit Burden Interview (time frame: 0 months, 3 months, and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06364813, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2024.