AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic CancerPhase 2LIQUIPANCNCT06391892

Liquid Biopsy (ctDNA) Guided Treatment in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Neoadjuvant CTX vs. Upfront Surgery

A Phase 2 study testing Neoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgery and Upfront surgery in people with Pancreatic Cancer and Circulating Tumor Cell, run by Elisabethinen Hospital at 1 site in Austria.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the clinical prognostic impact (on DFS and OS) of liquid biopsy guided treatment vs. standard of care (physicians choice) in localized pancreatic cancer (CA 19-9 levels <500, no vessel contact and recommended by multidisciplinary tumor board). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
What is being tested?
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgery and Upfront surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
11 Jan 2024to 1 Jun 2027
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Informed consent
  • >18 years old
  • localized pancreatic cancer to go for upfront surgery

Who cannot join

  • synchronous secondary malignancy
  • pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern

    Linz, Upper Austria, 4010

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: Liquid Biopsy Guided Treatment in Localized Pancreatic Cancer (LIQUIPANC): Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) as Precision Medicine Tool for Stratification of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy vs. Upfront Surgery

This study evaluates the clinical prognostic impact (on DFS and OS) of liquid biopsy guided treatment vs. standard of care (physicians choice) in localized pancreatic cancer (CA 19-9 levels <500, no vessel contact and recommended by multidisciplinary tumor board). ctDNA positive patients are randomized to either receive neoadjvuant chemotherapy at current gold standard physicians choice vs. upfront surgery because of assumed high biological risk for early recurrence of ctDNA+. ctDNA- will receive upfront surgery in adherence to local guidelines.

Read the detailed description

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by high recurrence rates and poor long-term survival, even following potentially curative surgical resection and modern multimodal treatment. Despite improvements in surgical techniques, perioperative management, and systemic chemotherapy, a substantial proportion of patients with anatomically resectable PDAC experience early disease recurrence, suggesting the presence of occult systemic disease that cannot be adequately identified by conventional staging methods.

Current treatment decisions are primarily based on radiological resectability, clinical performance status, and established biomarkers such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). However, these parameters provide limited information about individual tumor biology and the risk of early recurrence. Consequently, patients with apparently favorable anatomical characteristics may still harbor biologically aggressive disease.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive biomarker for assessing tumor biology, monitoring treatment response, and predicting oncological outcomes. In previous studies, the investigators demonstrated that an early decrease in ctDNA levels of at least 42% after two weeks of systemic chemotherapy could predict subsequent radiological treatment response with high sensitivity and specificity, substantially earlier than conventional imaging (Kirchweger et al., Frontiers in Oncology, 2022). Furthermore, pretherapeutic ctDNA positivity in patients with localized PDAC was associated with significantly shorter disease-free survival (3.3 vs. 18.1 months), despite the absence of radiological evidence of advanced or metastatic disease (Kirchweger et al., European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2021).

These findings suggest that pretherapeutic ctDNA detection may identify patients at increased risk of early recurrence who could potentially benefit from neoadjuvant systemic treatment, even when conventional clinical and radiological criteria favor upfront surgery.

However, a universal neoadjuvant treatment approach for all patients with anatomically resectable PDAC remains controversial. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy may provide early systemic disease control and reveal aggressive tumor biology, it also exposes patients to treatment-related toxicity, potential deterioration in quality of life, and the risk of losing the opportunity for surgical resection due to disease progression or treatment intolerance. Therefore, a more individualized treatment strategy incorporating biological risk assessment may help optimize treatment sequencing.

The LIQUIPANC study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial investigating the prognostic and potential clinical utility of ctDNA-guided treatment strategies in patients with anatomically resectable PDAC.

Eligible patients have localized PDAC without radiological vessel involvement, CA19-9 levels below 500 U/mL, and a multidisciplinary tumor board recommendation for upfront surgical resection based on conventional staging.

Following informed consent, approximately 30 mL of peripheral blood is collected before the initiation of oncological treatment. Plasma-derived ctDNA is analyzed using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), primarily targeting KRAS G12/G13 mutations, with additional KRAS Q61 testing if the initial analysis is negative.

Treatment allocation is determined as follows:

ctDNA-positive patients: Patients with detectable ctDNA are randomized to one of two treatment strategies:

Neoadjuvant treatment arm: Patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to current standards of care and the treating physician's choice, followed by surgical resection when clinically feasible and subsequent treatment according to local guidelines.

Standard-of-care arm: Patients undergo upfront surgical resection, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and further treatment according to current local guidelines and the treating physician's choice.

ctDNA-negative patients: Patients without detectable ctDNA are not randomized and undergo upfront surgical resection in accordance with the multidisciplinary tumor board recommendation and current local standards of care, followed by adjuvant treatment as indicated.

The randomized comparison among ctDNA-positive patients aims to investigate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared with upfront surgery, improves oncological outcomes in patients with potentially unfavorable tumor biology.

The overall study population will additionally be evaluated to investigate the prognostic significance of baseline ctDNA status and its association with disease recurrence and survival.

The primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS) and the prognostic value of ctDNA detection are evaluated as additional outcomes.

LIQUIPANC aims to provide prospective clinical evidence regarding the feasibility and potential value of incorporating liquid biopsy into treatment decision-making for anatomically resectable PDAC. Ultimately, the study seeks to support a more personalized approach to treatment sequencing by identifying patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant systemic therapy while avoiding potentially unnecessary treatment delays and toxicity in others.

Being tested
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgery, Upfront surgery
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Also called Experimental

    All patients included into the study are recommended to go for upfront surgery (CT and CA19-9) by tumor board.

    If preoperative ctDNA is positive, the investigators assume high risk for early recurrence (because of systemic tumor burden) and apply neoadjuvant chemotherapy at physicians choice instead.

    • Apart from blood collection (within the scope of clinical routine), there is no additional diagnostic intervention performed on the patient.
    • The respective neoadjuvant chemotherapeutical drug will be selected and applied by the treating medical oncologist at physicians choice (unaffected by study participation), usually mFOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/nabPaclitaxel at standardized dosage recommended by NCCN and local guidelines.

    FOLFIRONOX: Folinic acid (also known as leucovorin), F - Fluorouracil (5-FU), IRIN - Irinotecan, OX - Oxaliplatin.

  • Upfront surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Also called Standard of care

    Standard of care as recommended by tumor board (not affected by study conditions).

Study groups in NCT06391892
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ctDNA+ _ctDNA guidedExperimentalAll patients enrolled in the study have anatomically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), without radiological vessel involvement and with CA19-9 levels below 500 U/mL, and have been recommended for upfront surgical resection by a multidisciplinary tumor board. Patients with detectable pretherapeutic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are considered at increased biological risk for early disease recurrence and are randomized 1:1 to either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or upfront surgery. Patients allocated to this experimental arm receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to current standards of care and the treating physician's choice, followed by surgical resection when clinically feasible and subsequent treatment according to local guidelines.
Receives: Procedure: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgery
Standard of careOtherPatients assigned to this arm undergo upfront surgical resection as recommended by the multidisciplinary tumor board, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent treatment according to current standards of care and the treating physician's choice. This arm includes two prespecified patient subgroups: ctDNA-positive patients randomized to upfront surgery as part of the randomized comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ctDNA-negative patients assigned to upfront surgery without randomization, in accordance with standard treatment recommendations. The primary randomized treatment comparison is restricted to ctDNA-positive patients. The ctDNA-negative subgroup is evaluated separately for exploratory analyses of the prognostic significance of baseline ctDNA status and oncological outcomes.
Receives: Procedure: Upfront surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. DFS

    Disease free survival

    Measured: After 12 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. OS

    Overall survival

    Measured: After 12 months

  2. ctDNA detection rate

    Detection rate of ctDNA in peripheral blood using a cost-effective and clinical applicable small spectrum ddPCR analysis in order to enable immediate clinical implementation

    Measured: Preoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2024
  2. Study start11 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (physicians choice) vs. upfront surgery
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06391892
Sponsor's protocol ID
1199/2023
Acronym
LIQUIPANC
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
20 Apr 2024
Last updated
3 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Neoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgery and Upfront surgery in people with Pancreatic Cancer and Circulating Tumor Cell, run by Elisabethinen Hospital at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

DFS (time frame: After 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in