AzTrials
AzTrials

COPDNCT06395311

Psychological Distress in Patients With COPD

An observational study of COPD and Quality of Life, run by Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infecțioase și Pneumoftiziologie Dr. Victor Babeș Timișoara at 1 site in Romania.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can significantly impact a person's quality of life, not only physically but also mentally. This cross-sectional study aims to assess the psychological well-being of COPD patients by utilising specific questionnaires. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
COPD, Quality of Life, Mental Health
What is being tested?
COPD psychological well-being assessment
How many people
98 participants
Where
1 siteRomania
Study dates
13 May 2024to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Individuals with COPD post-bronchodilator spirometry demonstrating airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC < 0.70) following GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) guidelines.

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of COPD established by a qualified healthcare professional (e.g., pulmonologist, general practitioner) based on:
  • Post-bronchodilator spirometry demonstrating airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC < 0.70) following GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) guidelines.
  • Age: 40 years or older.
  • Adequate visual and/or auditory abilities to read and understand study materials and questionnaires or receive instructions verbally if needed.

Who cannot join

  • Other major respiratory illnesses: diagnosis of severe asthma, cystic fibrosis, lung cancer, or other significant respiratory diseases that could present with distinct psychological profiles.
  • Acute COPD exacerbation: experiencing an acute exacerbation of COPD symptoms within the past four weeks.
  • Unstable comorbid conditions: the presence of severe, uncontrolled medical conditions that could significantly affect cognitive function, well-being, or the ability to participate (e.g., unstable heart failure, end-stage renal disease, rapidly progressing malignancy).
  • Severe mental disorders: current or recent diagnosis of a major psychiatric disorder that could significantly interfere with the interpretation of psychological measures or the ability to provide reliable responses (e.g., active schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, a major depressive episode).
  • Problematic substance abuse: current problematic alcohol or illicit drug use (including opioids).
  • Inability to provide informed consent: individuals lacking the cognitive capacity to understand the study and provide consent.
  • Limited language proficiency: insufficient understanding of the language in which the study materials, including questionnaires, are administered.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Romania1 site
  • Spitalul de Boli Infectioase si Pneumoftiziologie Victor Babes

    Timișoara, Timiș County, 300301

Other trials in Romania

About this study

Official title: The Impact of COPD on Psychological Well-being: A Cross-Sectional Study

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can significantly impact a person's quality of life, not only physically but also mentally. This cross-sectional study aims to assess the psychological well-being of COPD patients by utilising specific questionnaires. These questionnaires will evaluate various aspects of mental health, including anxiety, depression, and potentially other relevant factors like self-compassion or fear of negative evaluation, self-efficacy, shame, and guilt. Additionally, the study will examine how these psychological factors relate to the severity of COPD symptoms, such as dyspnea and functional limitations. By understanding the psychological impact of COPD, this research hopes to emphasize the importance of medical education and mental health support in COPD management strategies.

Read the detailed description

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) profoundly impacts both physical health and quality of life. Beyond the challenges of breathlessness and functional limitations, COPD patients often struggle with anxiety, depression, and other mental health difficulties at a much higher rate than the general population. This cross-sectional study seeks to understand the current state of psychological well-being in patients with COPD and explore how it relates to the severity of their condition. the study aims to assess the psychological well-being of COPD patients by utilizing specific questionnaires. These questionnaires will evaluate various aspects of mental health, including anxiety, depression, and potentially other relevant factors like self-compassion or fear of negative evaluation, self-efficacy, shame, and guilt. Additionally, the study will examine how these psychological factors relate to the severity of COPD symptoms, such as dyspnea and functional limitations. Investigators will use the following tests:

  1. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to identify and measure the severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.
  2. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) to measure the impact of COPD on a person's well-being.
  3. The State Shame and Guilt Scale (SSGS) to measure a person's shame and guilt.
  4. The Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) to measure the patient's self-efficacy in managing their chronic respiratory disease.
  5. The Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE) to assess an individual's anxiety around being judged or criticized by others.
  6. The Self-Compassion Scale Short Form (SCS-SF) to measure key components of self-compassion.
  7. The mMRC scale to evaluate the patient's level of breathlessness (dyspnea) in everyday life.
  8. The six-minute walking test (6MWT) to measure how far a person can walk on a flat, hard surface in six minutes.
Being tested
COPD psychological well-being assessment
Keywords
COPD, Quality of life, Anxiety and depression, Psychological distress
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Psychological Well-Being, Anxiety Disorders, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • COPD psychological well-being assessmentOther

    Patients will complete the following questionnaires: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), State Shame and Guilt Scale (SSGS), Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE), Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE), Self-Compassion Scale Short Form (SCS-SF). Dyspnea will be evaluated with the mMRC scale, and functional capacity will be assessed with the six-minute walking test (6MWT).

Study groups in NCT06395311
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
COPD subjectsDiagnosis of COPD established by a qualified healthcare professional (e.g., pulmonologist, general practitioner) based on: Post-bronchodilator spirometry demonstrating airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC < 0.70) following GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) guidelines. Age: 18 years or older. Adequate visual and/or auditory abilities to read and understand study materials/questionnaires or receive instructions verbally
Receives: Other: COPD psychological well-being assessment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Anxiety and depression assessment

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment questionnaire used to identify and measure the severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. It has 14 questions, divided into seven questions assessing anxiety (HADS-A) and seven questions assessing depression (HADS-D). Each question has a 4-point response scale (0-3). Scores of 0-7: normal, scores of 8-10: suggestive of anxiety or depression, and scores of 11+ indicate probable presence of anxiety or depression.

    Measured: At inclusion

  2. Impact of COPD

    The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a questionnaire designed to measure the impact of COPD on a person's well-being. It consists of 8 simple questions. Each question has a 6-point scale (0-5) for the patient to rate their experience. Total scores range from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate a greater negative impact of COPD on a person's life.

    Measured: At inclusion

  3. Shame and guilt assessment

    The State Shame and Guilt Scale (SSGS) is a self-report questionnaire that measures a person's shame and guilt. It has 15 questions in total, divided into three subscales: shame (5 questions), guilt (5 questions), and pride (5 questions), which measures the opposite of shame and guilt. Each item has a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not feeling in this way) to 5 (feeling this way very strongly). Higher scores on each subscale mean individuals experience those feelings more strongly in the moment.

    Measured: At inclusion

  4. Self-efficacy assessment

    The Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) is a questionnaire designed to measure a patient's self-efficacy in managing their chronic respiratory disease, particularly within the context of pulmonary rehabilitation. It has 12 questions focused on managing breathlessness, staying physically active, and coping with emotional challenges due to respiratory disease. Patients rate their confidence on a scale of 1 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

    Measured: At inclusion

  5. Fear of negative evaluation assessment

    The Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE) is a psychological tool used to assess an individual's anxiety around being judged or criticized by others. It consists of 12 items. Statements capture different aspects of fear of negative evaluation. The scale uses a Likert scale response format (e.g., 1 = Not at all characteristic of me, 5 = Extremely characteristic of me). Scores are calculated by summing the responses to each item. Higher scores indicate a greater fear of negative evaluation.

    Measured: At inclusion

  6. Self-compassion assessment

    The Self-Compassion Scale Short Form (SCS-SF) is designed to measure key components of self-compassion. It consists of 12 items. Two items measure each of the six aspects of self-compassion: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. It uses a 5-point Likert scale (1 = almost never to 5 = almost always). A total self-compassion score is calculated. Higher scores indicate greater self-compassion.

    Measured: At inclusion

  7. Dyspnea assessment

    The mMRC scale is a simple questionnaire that grades a patient's level of breathlessness (dyspnea) in everyday life. It has five grades (0-4). The patient selects the statement that best aligns with their experience of breathlessness. Higher scores on the mMRC scale correlate to an increased level of disability for the patient due to breathlessness.

    Measured: At inclusion

  8. Aerobic capacity assessment

    The six-minute walking test (6MWT) measures how far a person can walk on a flat, hard surface in six minutes. It is used to assess aerobic capacity and functional endurance (how well the body can handle activity). The distance walked in 6 minutes is compared with predicted values based on age, gender, and height. A shorter walking distance indicates a lower level of functional exercise capacity.

    Measured: At inclusion

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2024
  2. Study start13 May 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
98 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06395311
Sponsor's protocol ID
2045/11.03.2024
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
24 Apr 2024
Last updated
3 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of COPD and Quality of Life, run by Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infecțioase și Pneumoftiziologie Dr. Victor Babeș Timișoara at 1 site in Romania.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Romania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Anxiety and depression assessment (time frame: At inclusion). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in