Tibia FractureNCT06436365
Is the Expert Nail With Poller Screws Superior to the Distal Tibial Locked Plate in the Management of Short Oblique Distal Tibial Fractures?
A study testing Locking expert intramedullary nail fixation and Distal locked plate in people with Tibia Fracture, run by Kasr El Aini Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Distal tibial fracture management is difficult because of poor blood supply resulted from subcutaneous location. Therefore, the study aims to compare expert intramedullary nail (IMN) with poller screws to the distal tibial locked plate regarding operative and complications outcomes Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tibia Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Locking expert intramedullary nail fixation and Distal locked plate
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2023to 1 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Skeletally mature (18-60 years) male and female patients presented with short oblique fractures which were defined by a fracture with an oblique fracture line its an inclination equal to or greater than 30° with respect to the perpendicular to the axis of the tibia .
Who cannot join
- We excluded patients presented with other fracture patterns
- intraarticular distal tibial fractures, old fractures, infected fractures, open fractures, and pathological fractures.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Kasr Alainy Hospital - Faculty of Medicine - Cairo University
Cairo, 11765
About this study
Distal tibial fracture management is difficult because of poor blood supply resulted from subcutaneous location. Therefore, the study aims to compare expert intramedullary nail (IMN) with poller screws to the distal tibial locked plate regarding operative and complications outcomes
Read the detailed description
Stabilization of the fractured segments is the main goal in fracture fixation which will help to achieve proper healing, fasten early mobility, and get the full function of the injured limb. The fractures may be managed conservatively or by fixation whether internal or external .
Tibial fractures are the most common long bone fractures because of their subcutaneous location which makes them more liable to trauma. They are more common in young males as they are related to sports and traffic accidents. Elderly people come in second place of tibial fractures because they are more likely to occur from simple falls. Proper surgical management of displaced tibial fracture will help in increasing bone stability with the surrounding tissue and improving the bone alignment which in turn fastens the early movement, increases overall function, and prevents prolonged bedridden.
Distal tibia fractures represent from 7% to 10% of all lower limb fractures. Basically, there is controversy over the use of the term "distal tibial fractures" Some authors use the term to describe the distal metaphyseal fractures as defined by one Muller square as Giannoudis 2015 et al. Others use distal tibial fractures to refer to distal shaft fractures (meta-diaphyseal region) from 4 to 11 centimeters starting from the plafond as Polat 2015 et al . Others use the term for both regions, describing them as " two muller squares" as Mauffrey 2012 et al.
Management of distal tibial fracture management is difficult especially in old patients with mature skeletons and without involvement of knee joint because of a fracture near the position to the ankle joint with decreased blood flow resulting from the subcutaneous anatomical location [8]. There are common fixation techniques performed in distal tibial fracture management like open reduction with internal fixation, intramedullary nail insertion (IMN), minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis, and external fixation with limited open reduction and internal fixation.
Despite these different management methods achieving success in proper reduction and enhancing the stability and union, they were associated with disadvantages that need to be considered during the management plan which makes no single method ideally preferred for all combined bone and soft tissue distal tibial traumas. Therefore, studies should address all advantages, disadvantages, and the proper application of each method.
We aim in our study to compare expert IMN with poller screws to the distal tibial locked plates in the management of the short oblique distal tibial fractures regarding clinical outcomes, radiological findings, complications, and the need for a secondary operation.
- Conditions
- Tibia Fracture
- Being tested
- Locking expert intramedullary nail fixation, Distal locked plate
- Medical subject headings
- Tibial Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Locking expert intramedullary nail fixationProcedure or surgery
the fracture was reduced to enable the insertion of the guide wire to restore the rotation, length, and angulation. Poller screws were used as control deformity by narrowing the medullary canal and were inserted on the deformity concave side between the nail and bone cortex. A ball-ended guidewire was placed through the entry point to the tibial canal and then to the tibial fracture site under the guidance of fluoroscopy. The guide wire should be inserted centrally within the distal segment on both lateral and anteroposterior views and be far about 1 to 0.5 centimeters from the ankle joint. Reamers with deep fluted and small diameters were used slowly to increase the diameter to reach 0.5 mm till the cortical chatter.
The nail was inserted by attachment of insertion device and locking of the proximal screw to the nail by directing its apex posteriorly. The nail insertion was done by flexing the knee to prevent any patellar impingement.
Distal locked plateProcedure or surgery
Cobb dissector was used in creation extra-periosteal subcutaneous tunnel for gentle introduction of a proper plate which was determined by choosing appropriate size and level guided by imaging which helped in prevention of any periosteal damage. Manual closed reduction was performed using the percutaneous clamps. Distal screws were positioned as the following, one was inserted above the medial malleolus, another one was inserted right and below the fracture, and the other screws were inserted to help in anatomical plate positioning. By reduction preservation, proximal screws were inserted by small incisions which was followed by insertion of the remained distal screws.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| expert IMN with poller screws | Experimental | Twenty-one patients underwent IMN fixation by placing in a supine position with the knee flexed at 90 degrees above the radiolucent table to enable intraoperative imaging and a bolster was put below the thigh to enable knee flexion up to 110 degrees. Multiple interlocking screws were inserted in the expert nail which costed the double compared to the ordinary nail. Receives: Procedure: Locking expert intramedullary nail fixation |
| distal tibial locked plate | Active comparator | patients underwent distal locked plates by placing in a supine position and raising of the contralateral iliac crest which enhanced the rotation and made it easier for medial side access. Thigh was elevated and torniquet was put up to 300 mmHg. By reduction preservation, proximal screws were inserted by small incisions which was followed by insertion of the remained distal screws. Receives: Procedure: Distal locked plate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS)
questionnaire assessing main nine aspects (daily life activity, pain, supports, swelling, jumping, stiffness, squatting, stair climbing, and running) with a maximum score of 100 indicated normal and minimal score of zero indicated totally impaired function. The score was graded by excellent (for scores between 91 to 100), good (scores between 61 to 90), fair (scores between 31 to 60), and poor (scores between 0 to 30)
Measured: 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Complications
Complications were also assessed like malunion, delayed union, deep venous thrombosis, infection, and nonunion.
Measured: 2 weeks and 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 May 2024
- Study start1 Feb 2023
- Primary completion1 Aug 2023
- Study completion1 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Tibia FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The authors performed a prospective randomized controlled trial by including 42 patients to compare expert IMN with poller screws (Group One including 21 patients) versus distal tibial locked plate (Group Two including 21 patients) in fixation of extra-articular distal tibial fractures. The study was conducted after obtaining clearance from the Scientific Board and the Ethical Committee and all patients signed informed consents before starting the study.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kasr El Aini Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmed Omar Sabry, Kasr El Aini Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06436365
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MD-190-2020
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 24 May 2024
- Last updated
- 31 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Is the Expert Nail With Poller Screws Superior to the Distal Tibial Locked Plate in the Management of Short Oblique Distal Tibial Fractures?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06436365
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MD-190-2020
- Conditions
- Tibia Fracture
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kasr El Aini HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 May 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Distal tibial fracture management is difficult because of poor blood supply resulted from subcutaneous location. Therefore, the study aims to compare expert intramedullary nail (IMN) with poller screws to the distal tibial locked plate regarding operative and complications outcomes
Detailed description
Stabilization of the fractured segments is the main goal in fracture fixation which will help to achieve proper healing, fasten early mobility, and get the full function of the injured limb. The fractures may be managed conservatively or by fixation whether internal or external .
Tibial fractures are the most common long bone fractures because of their subcutaneous location which makes them more liable to trauma. They are more common in young males as they are related to sports and traffic accidents. Elderly people come in second place of tibial fractures because they are more likely to occur from simple falls. Proper surgical management of displaced tibial fracture will help in increasing bone stability with the surrounding tissue and improving the bone alignment which in turn fastens the early movement, increases overall function, and prevents prolonged bedridden.
Distal tibia fractures represent from 7% to 10% of all lower limb fractures. Basically, there is controversy over the use of the term "distal tibial fractures" Some authors use the term to describe the distal metaphyseal fractures as defined by one Muller square as Giannoudis 2015 et al. Others use distal tibial fractures to refer to distal shaft fractures (meta-diaphyseal region) from 4 to 11 centimeters starting from the plafond as Polat 2015 et al . Others use the term for both regions, describing them as " two muller squares" as Mauffrey 2012 et al.
Management of distal tibial fracture management is difficult especially in old patients with mature skeletons and without involvement of knee joint because of a fracture near the position to the ankle joint with decreased blood flow resulting from the subcutaneous anatomical location [8]. There are common fixation techniques performed in distal tibial fracture management like open reduction with internal fixation, intramedullary nail insertion (IMN), minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis, and external fixation with limited open reduction and internal fixation.
Despite these different management methods achieving success in proper reduction and enhancing the stability and union, they were associated with disadvantages that need to be considered during the management plan which makes no single method ideally preferred for all combined bone and soft tissue distal tibial traumas. Therefore, studies should address all advantages, disadvantages, and the proper application of each method.
We aim in our study to compare expert IMN with poller screws to the distal tibial locked plates in the management of the short oblique distal tibial fractures regarding clinical outcomes, radiological findings, complications, and the need for a secondary operation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The authors performed a prospective randomized controlled trial by including 42 patients to compare expert IMN with poller screws (Group One including 21 patients) versus distal tibial locked plate (Group Two including 21 patients) in fixation of extra-articular distal tibial fractures. The study was conducted after obtaining clearance from the Scientific Board and the Ethical Committee and all patients signed informed consents before starting the study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| expert IMN with poller screws | Experimental | Procedure: Locking expert intramedullary nail fixationTwenty-one patients underwent IMN fixation by placing in a supine position with the knee flexed at 90 degrees above the radiolucent table to enable intraoperative imaging and a bolster was put below the thigh to enable knee flexion up to 110 degrees. Multiple interlocking screws were inserted in the expert nail which costed the double compared to the ordinary nail. |
| distal tibial locked plate | Active comparator | Procedure: Distal locked platepatients underwent distal locked plates by placing in a supine position and raising of the contralateral iliac crest which enhanced the rotation and made it easier for medial side access. Thigh was elevated and torniquet was put up to 300 mmHg. By reduction preservation, proximal screws were inserted by small incisions which was followed by insertion of the remained distal screws. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Skeletally mature (18-60 years) male and female patients presented with short oblique fractures which were defined by a fracture with an oblique fracture line its an inclination equal to or greater than 30° with respect to the perpendicular to the axis of the tibia .
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- We excluded patients presented with other fracture patterns
- intraarticular distal tibial fractures, old fractures, infected fractures, open fractures, and pathological fractures.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Locking expert intramedullary nail fixationthe fracture was reduced to enable the insertion of the guide wire to restore the rotation, length, and angulation. Poller screws were used as control deformity by narrowing the medullary canal and were inserted on the deformity concave side between the nail and bone cortex. A ball-ended guidewire was placed through the entry point to the tibial canal and then to the tibial fracture site under the guidance of fluoroscopy. The guide wire should be inserted centrally within the distal segment on both lateral and anteroposterior views and be far about 1 to 0.5 centimeters from the ankle joint. Reamers with deep fluted and small diameters were used slowly to increase the diameter to reach 0.5 mm till the cortical chatter. The nail was inserted by attachment of insertion device and locking of the proximal screw to the nail by directing its apex posteriorly. The nail insertion was done by flexing the knee to prevent any patellar impingement. | Procedure or surgery | expert IMN with poller screws |
| Distal locked plateCobb dissector was used in creation extra-periosteal subcutaneous tunnel for gentle introduction of a proper plate which was determined by choosing appropriate size and level guided by imaging which helped in prevention of any periosteal damage. Manual closed reduction was performed using the percutaneous clamps. Distal screws were positioned as the following, one was inserted above the medial malleolus, another one was inserted right and below the fracture, and the other screws were inserted to help in anatomical plate positioning. By reduction preservation, proximal screws were inserted by small incisions which was followed by insertion of the remained distal screws. | Procedure or surgery | distal tibial locked plate |
Primary outcome
Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS)
Time frame: 2 weeks
questionnaire assessing main nine aspects (daily life activity, pain, supports, swelling, jumping, stiffness, squatting, stair climbing, and running) with a maximum score of 100 indicated normal and minimal score of zero indicated totally impaired function. The score was graded by excellent (for scores between 91 to 100), good (scores between 61 to 90), fair (scores between 31 to 60), and poor (scores between 0 to 30)
1 secondary outcome
Complications
Time frame: 2 weeks and 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tibia Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium-Titanium Hybrid Intramedullary Nail System For Long Bone Fractures
Tibial Fracture, Femoral Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Alloy Scaffold With Controlled Degradation for Periarticular Bone Defects
Periarticular Bone Defect, Proximal Humerus Fracture
RecruitingPhase 3
Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch Versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Open tíbia Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Personalized Weight-Bearing With Smart Crutch Tips After Surgery for Tibial Plateau Fractures
Tibial Plateau Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Outpatient Floor Pedal Bike Utilization
Femur Fracture, Tibia Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Locking expert intramedullary nail fixation and Distal locked plate in people with Tibia Fracture, run by Kasr El Aini Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2024.