AzTrials
AzTrials

Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy of NewbornNCT06447155

Continuous Versus Bolus Feeding in Neonates With Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy

A study testing Bolus feeding and Continuous feeding in people with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy of Newborn and Feeding Patterns, run by Istanbul Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is accepted worldwide as a standard of care for infants born at or beyond 36 weeks gestational age with moderate-to-severe hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 0 days to 1 day
What is being tested?
Bolus feeding and Continuous feeding
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
15 Jun 2024to 15 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 0 days to 1 day
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • The neonates with evidence of encephalopathy de¬fined by seizures or abnormalities on a modified Sarnat exam were enrolled. The hypoxic-ischemic injury was defined by 1. a pH of ≤ 7.0 and/or 2. base deficit \>-16 mmol/L recorded in cord blood or blood gas obtained within the first hour postnatally or a pH of 7.0 - 7.15 and/or base deficit (-10-15.9) mmol/L with the presence of an acute perinatal event (cord prolapse, placental abruption, heart rate decelerations, severe fetal bradycardia). In cases where criteria 1 or 2 are met, with the presence of seizures or a diagnosis of moderate to severe encephalopathy according to the Sarnat \& Sarnat classification based on neurological examination were treated with TH.
  • Exclusion Criteria: Infants with congenital malformation or hereditary metabolic diseases, infants whose enteral feeding was initiated before randomization and infants without lack of parental consent were excluded. The maternal and neonatal demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected from medical records.
  • -

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • IstanbulTRH

    Istanbul

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Continuous Versus Bolus Feeding in Neonates With Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is accepted worldwide as a standard of care for infants born at or beyond 36 weeks gestational age with moderate-to-severe hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE).

While central nervous system is the most affected organ system , multiorgan dysfunction including renal, pulmonary, cardiac, and/or gastrointestinal (GI) compromise is not infrequent. Although the process of 'cooling' itself is well defined, based on high-quality randomized controlled trials, there are few data to inform the provision of nutrition to infants with HIE during and soon after TH.However, breastfeeding plays a beneficial role in maintaining the structural and functional integrity of the gut. It may help to reduce systemic inflammatory response and positively regulates the microbiota. In many studies it is stated that enteral feeding during TH appears to be safe and feasible. There is insufficient evidence to choose the type of enteral feeding either bolus or continuous during TH.

The present study aimed to compare the impact of different types of enteral feeding in infants with HIE receiving TH.

Read the detailed description

Objectives: The investigators aimed to evaluate the clinical consequences of different types of enteral nutrition during TH in babies with HIE.

Methods: This single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted between June 2024 to June 2026 in Istanbul Research and Training Hospital. A cohort of 60 infants with HIE, born at 35 0/7 to 42 6/7 weeks of gestation who received TH were enrolled.

The infants enterally fed with bolus feeding during hypothermia (n =20), those who were fed continuously (n=20) constituted the study groups. The control group (n =20) was composed of neonates who were not fed. Infants were monitored for clinical consequences such as feeding intolerance, time to full enteral feeding, duration of hospitalization, necrotizing enterocolitis and mortality.

Being tested
Bolus feeding, Continuous feeding, Placebo
Keywords
Newborn, Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, Enteral feeding, Bolus, Continuous
Medical subject headings
Feeding Behavior, Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bolus feedingDietary supplement

    The babies fed with bolus feeding during TH composed this group

  • Continuous feedingDietary supplement

    The babies fed with continuous feeding during TH composed this group

  • PlaceboDietary supplement

    The babies who were not fed during TH composed this group

Study groups in NCT06447155
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
The babies fed with bolus feeding during THActive comparatorThe babies were randomized into three groups; Group 1.The neonates who received bolus feeding,Group 2. The neonates who received continuous feeding Group 3. The control group who were not fed during TH. The control group was composed of historical newborns. Three groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Bolus feeding
The babies fed with continuous feeding during THActive comparatorThe babies were randomized into three groups; Group 1.The neonates who received bolus feeding,Group 2. The neonates who received continuous feeding Group 3. The control group who were not fed during TH. The control group was composed of historical newborns.Three groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Continuous feeding
The babies who were not fedPlacebo comparatorThe babies were randomized into three groups; Group 1.The neonates who received bolus feeding,Group 2. The neonates who received continuous feeding Group 3. The control group who were not fed during TH. The control group was composed of historical newborns.Three groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Development of Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)

    The infants will be monitorized for NEC development

    Measured: From admission to NICU till postnatal 15th day or hospital discharge whichever came first

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Feeding intolerance

    The infants will be monitorized for feeding intolerance

    Measured: From admission to NICU till postnatal 15th day or hospital discharge whichever came first

  2. Time to full enteral feeding

    The infants will be monitorized for feeding intolerance

    Measured: From admission to NICU till postnatal 15th day or hospital discharge whichever came first

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jun 2024
  2. Study start15 Jun 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The babies were randomized into three groups; Group 1.The neonates who received bolus feeding,Group 2. The neonates who received continuous feeding Group 3. The control group who were not fed during TH. The control group was composed of historical newborns. Three groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06447155
Sponsor's protocol ID
IstanbulTRH-DArman-003
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
3 Jun 2024
Last updated
6 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during current study may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Publications

  • Azzopardi DV, Strohm B, Edwards AD, Dyet L, Halliday HL, Juszczak E, Kapellou O, Levene M, Marlow N, Porter E, Thoresen M, Whitelaw A, Brocklehurst P; TOBY Study Group. Moderate hypothermia to treat perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1349-58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900854.

    PubMed 19797281
  • Jacobs SE, Berg M, Hunt R, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Inder TE, Davis PG. Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD003311. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003311.pub3.

    PubMed 23440789
  • Martin-Ancel A, Garcia-Alix A, Gaya F, Cabanas F, Burgueros M, Quero J. Multiple organ involvement in perinatal asphyxia. J Pediatr. 1995 Nov;127(5):786-93. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70174-5.

    PubMed 7472837
  • Sharma S, Kallesh A, Aradhya AS, Diggikar S, Veeraiah PS, Subbareddy NN, Walikar S, Reddy IV, Sarji D, Venkatagiri P. Feasibility of Minimal Enteral Nutrition During Therapeutic Hypothermia for Perinatal Asphyxia: A Five-Year Multicenter Experience from South India. Indian J Pediatr. 2023 May;90(5):513-515. doi: 10.1007/s12098-022-04456-x. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

    PubMed 36642779
  • Kumar J, Anne RP, Meena J, Sundaram V, Dutta S, Kumar P. To feed or not to feed during therapeutic hypothermia in asphyxiated neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jun;182(6):2759-2773. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04950-0. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

    PubMed 37014443

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bolus feeding and Continuous feeding in people with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy of Newborn and Feeding Patterns, run by Istanbul Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact DİDEM ARMAN (05056211989, dr_didemcaktir@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Development of Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (time frame: From admission to NICU till postnatal 15th day or hospital discharge whichever came first). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06447155, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in