Oral HygieneNCT06453122
Effect of Toothbrushing Without Chlorhexidine on Oral Hygiene Indices in Patients With Orotracheal Intubation
A study testing Oral care in people with Oral Hygiene and Intensive Care, run by Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The oral hygiene method commonly used in intubated patients orotracheal is tooth brushing (mechanical removal) and washing the oral cavity and the orotracheal tube (TOT) with digluconate solution chlorhexidine (CLX). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Oral Hygiene, Intensive Care, Chlorhexidine
- What is being tested?
- Oral care
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 15 Mar 2024to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients admitted to the adult ICU;
- age over 18;
- both sexes;
- orotracheal intubation monitored from the first day;
- absence of foci of infection in the oral cavity (periapical lesions,
- periodontal abscesses, extensive cavities, opportunistic infections);
- presence of at least five teeth per dental arch
Who cannot join
- patients in whom oral hygiene is not possible;
- patients extubated before 24 hours from baseline;
- patients with foci of infection in the oral cavity present in the baseline moment;
- patients who died before 24 hours from baseline;
- patients whose guardians do not authorize the research to be carried out;
- patients whose information about oral and general health and other study variables are not available in the medical record, are doubtful or not capable of collection.
- patients after heart surgery
- patients with reintubation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Hospital israelita Albert Einstein
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05652-900
About this study
Official title: Effect of Toothbrushing Without Chlorhexidine on Oral Hygiene Indices and Risks of Systemic Complications in Patients With Orotracheal Intubation: Randomized Pilot Clinical Study and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
The oral hygiene method commonly used in intubated patients orotracheal is tooth brushing (mechanical removal) and washing the oral cavity and the orotracheal tube (TOT) with digluconate solution chlorhexidine (CLX). However, recent studies have demonstrated that the use of CLX in these conditions may expose the patient to a potential increased risk of mortality. Recent recommendations made by international bodies related to hospital biosafety no longer include the use of CLX in ICU oral hygiene routine. A question not yet answered in the literature is whether the absence of CLX in the critical patient's oral hygiene routine predisposes increased accumulation of dental plaque or microbial colonization related to the risk of systemic complications, such as pneumonia and sepsis. The cost-effectiveness of this protocol change also needs to be evaluated, as the withdrawal of CLX may result in changes in the risk profile morbidity and mortality during hospitalization. The present study aims to investigate whether brushing the oral cavity with mineral water changes the pattern of biofilm accumulation and clinical appearance of the oral mucosa in relation to brushing done with CLX. Microbiological analysis of the oropharyngeal biofilm and cost-effectiveness impact assessment will also be carried out.
Read the detailed description
- Chlorhexidine group: Oral hygiene will be carried out in accordance with the standard operating procedures already carried out for all patients admitted to the ICU. First, the secretion contained in the oral cavity will be aspirated with a suction probe or a dental sucker or the suction brush itself before starting the oral hygiene procedure. The hygiene process will begin by moistening the oral cavity, using non-sterile gauze soaked in filtered mineral water and applying it to the entire oral mucosa. Subsequently, the sucking toothbrush or oral swab should be moistened frequently with 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solution and proceed with cleaning the dental surfaces on their buccal, palatal and occlusal surfaces, moving towards the oral cavity and tongue, using the bristle part of the toothbrush; With the region opposite the dental bristles or oral swab, the 0.12% chlorhexidine solution will be applied to the oral mucosa, palate, tongue dorsum and orotracheal tube, always performing a postero-anterior movement and removing any dirt with the aid of moistened gauze . The oral cavity will be constantly vacuumed throughout the oral hygiene procedure. Finally, the lips will be lubricated with a standardized lip moisturizer. The procedure will be carried out every 8 hours, that is, three times a day.
- Water group: The intervention group procedure will be carried out in the same way and frequency as the control group, however, replacing the 0.12% chlorhexidine solution with mineral water. Oral hygiene will be carried out by the nursing team, who will be blind to the indices to be evaluated. The team will be previously trained to carry out hygiene procedures by the ICU team of dental surgeons.
- Conditions
- Oral Hygiene, Intensive Care, Chlorhexidine
- Being tested
- Oral care
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Oral careOther
The intervention group procedure will be carried out in the same way and frequency of the control group, however, replacing the chlorhexidine solution 0.12% for mineral water. Oral hygiene will be carried out by the nursing team, which will be blind to the indices to be evaluated. The team will be previously trained to carry out hygiene procedures by the team of ICU dental surgeons.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorhexidine | Active comparator | patients with oral hygiene performed with tooth brushing and washing with 0.12% chlorhexidine Receives: Other: Oral care |
| Water | Sham comparator | patients with oral hygiene performed with tooth brushing and washing with filtered water. Receives: Other: Oral care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Analyze oral cavity brushing
Analyze oral cavity brushing done with mineral water in the ICU in regarding the accumulation of biofilm and the appearance of the oral mucosa and compare these variables with brushing done with CLX.
Measured: T0 (baseline) - first day of intubation; • T1 - after 3 days of intubation or immediately after extubation (with a minimum of 1 day of intubation); • T2 - after 7 days of intubation (if you still remain intubated).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2024
- Study start15 Mar 2024
- Primary completion31 Oct 2024
- Study completion31 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Oral HygieneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Sao Paulo
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fernanda de P Eduardo, Principal investigator, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06453122
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5736-23
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Klompas M, Branson R, Cawcutt K, Crist M, Eichenwald EC, Greene LR, Lee G, Maragakis LL, Powell K, Priebe GP, Speck K, Yokoe DS, Berenholtz SM. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-associated events, and nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;43(6):687-713. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.88. Epub 2022 May 20.
PubMed 35589091Klompas M, Branson R, Eichenwald EC, Greene LR, Howell MD, Lee G, Magill SS, Maragakis LL, Priebe GP, Speck K, Yokoe DS, Berenholtz SM. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;35 Suppl 2:S133-54. doi: 10.1017/s0899823x00193894. No abstract available.
PubMed 25376073Prendergast V, Kleiman C, King M. The Bedside Oral Exam and the Barrow Oral Care Protocol: translating evidence-based oral care into practice. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013 Oct;29(5):282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 20.
PubMed 23702324Bellissimo-Rodrigues WT, Menegueti MG, de Macedo LD, Basile-Filho A, Martinez R, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F. Oral mucositis as a pathway for fatal outcome among critically ill patients exposed to chlorhexidine: post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2664-6. No abstract available.
PubMed 31775844Zhao T, Wu X, Zhang Q, Li C, Worthington HV, Hua F. Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 24;12(12):CD008367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008367.pub4.
PubMed 33368159
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Toothbrushing Without Chlorhexidine on Oral Hygiene Indices and Risks of Systemic Complications in Patients With Orotracheal Intubation: Randomized Pilot Clinical Study and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06453122
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5736-23
- Conditions
- Oral Hygiene, Intensive Care, Chlorhexidine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Sao Paulo
- Study start
- 15 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The oral hygiene method commonly used in intubated patients orotracheal is tooth brushing (mechanical removal) and washing the oral cavity and the orotracheal tube (TOT) with digluconate solution chlorhexidine (CLX). However, recent studies have demonstrated that the use of CLX in these conditions may expose the patient to a potential increased risk of mortality. Recent recommendations made by international bodies related to hospital biosafety no longer include the use of CLX in ICU oral hygiene routine. A question not yet answered in the literature is whether the absence of CLX in the critical patient's oral hygiene routine predisposes increased accumulation of dental plaque or microbial colonization related to the risk of systemic complications, such as pneumonia and sepsis. The cost-effectiveness of this protocol change also needs to be evaluated, as the withdrawal of CLX may result in changes in the risk profile morbidity and mortality during hospitalization. The present study aims to investigate whether brushing the oral cavity with mineral water changes the pattern of biofilm accumulation and clinical appearance of the oral mucosa in relation to brushing done with CLX. Microbiological analysis of the oropharyngeal biofilm and cost-effectiveness impact assessment will also be carried out.
Detailed description
- Chlorhexidine group: Oral hygiene will be carried out in accordance with the standard operating procedures already carried out for all patients admitted to the ICU. First, the secretion contained in the oral cavity will be aspirated with a suction probe or a dental sucker or the suction brush itself before starting the oral hygiene procedure. The hygiene process will begin by moistening the oral cavity, using non-sterile gauze soaked in filtered mineral water and applying it to the entire oral mucosa. Subsequently, the sucking toothbrush or oral swab should be moistened frequently with 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solution and proceed with cleaning the dental surfaces on their buccal, palatal and occlusal surfaces, moving towards the oral cavity and tongue, using the bristle part of the toothbrush; With the region opposite the dental bristles or oral swab, the 0.12% chlorhexidine solution will be applied to the oral mucosa, palate, tongue dorsum and orotracheal tube, always performing a postero-anterior movement and removing any dirt with the aid of moistened gauze . The oral cavity will be constantly vacuumed throughout the oral hygiene procedure. Finally, the lips will be lubricated with a standardized lip moisturizer. The procedure will be carried out every 8 hours, that is, three times a day.
- Water group: The intervention group procedure will be carried out in the same way and frequency as the control group, however, replacing the 0.12% chlorhexidine solution with mineral water. Oral hygiene will be carried out by the nursing team, who will be blind to the indices to be evaluated. The team will be previously trained to carry out hygiene procedures by the ICU team of dental surgeons.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorhexidine | Active comparator | Other: Oral carepatients with oral hygiene performed with tooth brushing and washing with 0.12% chlorhexidine |
| Water | Sham comparator | Other: Oral carepatients with oral hygiene performed with tooth brushing and washing with filtered water. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- patients admitted to the adult ICU;
- age over 18;
- both sexes;
- orotracheal intubation monitored from the first day;
- absence of foci of infection in the oral cavity (periapical lesions,
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- patients in whom oral hygiene is not possible;
- patients extubated before 24 hours from baseline;
- patients with foci of infection in the oral cavity present in the baseline moment;
- patients who died before 24 hours from baseline;
- patients whose guardians do not authorize the research to be carried out;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Oral careThe intervention group procedure will be carried out in the same way and frequency of the control group, however, replacing the chlorhexidine solution 0.12% for mineral water. Oral hygiene will be carried out by the nursing team, which will be blind to the indices to be evaluated. The team will be previously trained to carry out hygiene procedures by the team of ICU dental surgeons. | Other | Chlorhexidine, Water |
Primary outcome
Analyze oral cavity brushing
Time frame: T0 (baseline) - first day of intubation; • T1 - after 3 days of intubation or immediately after extubation (with a minimum of 1 day of intubation); • T2 - after 7 days of intubation (if you still remain intubated).
Analyze oral cavity brushing done with mineral water in the ICU in regarding the accumulation of biofilm and the appearance of the oral mucosa and compare these variables with brushing done with CLX.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 35589091Klompas M, Branson R, Cawcutt K, Crist M, Eichenwald EC, Greene LR, Lee G, Maragakis LL, Powell K, Priebe GP, Speck K, Yokoe DS, Berenholtz SM. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-associated events, and nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;43(6):687-713. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.88. Epub 2022 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 25376073Klompas M, Branson R, Eichenwald EC, Greene LR, Howell MD, Lee G, Magill SS, Maragakis LL, Priebe GP, Speck K, Yokoe DS, Berenholtz SM. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;35 Suppl 2:S133-54. doi: 10.1017/s0899823x00193894. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23702324Prendergast V, Kleiman C, King M. The Bedside Oral Exam and the Barrow Oral Care Protocol: translating evidence-based oral care into practice. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013 Oct;29(5):282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 20.
- Background: PubMed 31775844Bellissimo-Rodrigues WT, Menegueti MG, de Macedo LD, Basile-Filho A, Martinez R, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F. Oral mucositis as a pathway for fatal outcome among critically ill patients exposed to chlorhexidine: post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2664-6. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33368159Zhao T, Wu X, Zhang Q, Li C, Worthington HV, Hua F. Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 24;12(12):CD008367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008367.pub4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Oral Hygiene
Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of the Effects of Oral Hygiene Regimens on Clinical, Immunomodulatory, and Microbial Outcomes and Oral Tolerance in People With Gingivitis
Microbiome, Cytokines
Not yet recruiting
Game-based Oral Health Promotion
Oral Hygiene
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Personalized Digital Oral Health Intervention in Patients With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.
Oral Hygiene in Patients With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances, Dental Plaque
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Periodontal Disease and Small Vulnerable Newborns in Rural Nepal: A Community-based Trial
Preterm Birth, Low Birth Weight
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Oil Pulling Using Oils in Comparison With Mouthwash for Gingivitis
Gingivitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fernanda de P Eduardo principal investigator
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Oral care in people with Oral Hygiene and Intensive Care, run by Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Analyze oral cavity brushing (time frame: T0 (baseline) - first day of intubation; • T1 - after 3 days of intubation or immediately after extubation (with a minimum of 1 day of intubation); • T2 - after 7 days of intubation (if you still remain intubated).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06453122, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2026.