AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary EmbolismPhase 3STRATIFY-IINCT06453876

Percutaneous Embolectomy, Low Dose Thrombolysis or Heparin for Intermediate High Risk Pulmonary Embolism (STRATIFY II)

A Phase 3 study testing Ultrasound assisted Thrombolysis, Percutaneous Embolectomy and Heparin in people with Pulmonary Embolism, run by Jesper Kjaergaard at 2 sites in Denmark.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The STRATIFY II trial investigates the efficacy of three different approaches to reducing thrombus burdon in patients with acute intermediate high-risk pulmonary embolism: percutaneous embolectomy (the AlphaVAC(R), AngioDynamics or the Flow Triever® system, INARI medical), Low intravenous thrombolysis (Alteplase 10… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Embolism
What is being tested?
Ultrasound assisted Thrombolysis, Percutaneous Embolectomy and Heparin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
210 participants
Where
2 sitesDenmark
Study dates
17 Jun 2026to 31 Oct 2029
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Intermediate high-risk PE according to ESC criteria
  • Class II risk assessed by the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (1).
  • Thrombus visible in main, lobar or segmental pulmonary arteries on CT angiography
  • 14 days of symptoms or less, with significant worsening of symptoms within 7 days

Who cannot join

  • Altered mental state (GCS < 14)
  • No qualifying CT angiography performed (> 24 hour since CT angiography)
  • Women of childbearing potential, unless negative HCG test is present.
  • Thrombolysis for PE within 14 days of randomization
  • Thrombus passing through patent Foramen Ovale (risk of paradoxical embolism)
  • Ongoing oral anticoagulation therapy (heparins, aspirin, antiplatelet therapy and NOAC allowed)
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Comorbidity making 6 months survival unlikely.
  • Absolute contraindications for thrombolysis:
  • History of haemorrhagic stroke or stroke of unknown origin
  • Ischaemic stroke in previous 6 months
  • Central nervous system neoplasm
  • Major trauma, surgery, or head injury in previous 3 weeks
  • Bleeding diathesis - Active bleeding

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Jesper Kjaergaard, MD PhD DMSc contact

+4535450969

jesper.kjaergaard.05@regionh.dk

Lia Bang, MD PhD contact

+4535450988

lia.evi.bang@regionh.dk

Denmark2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen, DK2100

    Lia E Bang, MD PhD, +45 3545 3545, lia.evi.bang@regionh.dk

    Recruiting
  • Odense University Hospital

    Odense, 5000

    Gro Engholm, MD PHD, +45 66 11 33 33, gro.egholm@rsyd.dk

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

The STRATIFY II trial investigates the efficacy of three different approaches to reducing thrombus burdon in patients with acute intermediate high-risk pulmonary embolism: percutaneous embolectomy (the AlphaVAC(R), AngioDynamics or the Flow Triever® system, INARI medical), Low intravenous thrombolysis (Alteplase 10 mg) and heparin with the option to perform full-dose thrombolysis. As a co-primary secondary end point the trial assess the incremental efficacy of the embolectomy vs the catheter based low dose thrombolysis approach.

Thus the two main hypothesis being tested are:

  1. Thrombus burden reduction after 48-96 h is increased with a catheter based (embolectomy or low-dose alteplase) compared to the a heparin with optional high dose thrombolysis approach (1st co-primary outcome)
  2. Thrombus burden reduction after 48-96 h is increased with percutaneous embolectomy compared to low-dose alteplase (2nd co-primary outcome)
Read the detailed description

Background: Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with a significant risk of death or hemodynamic deterioration. The optimal treatment strategy should balance efficacy in reducing thrombus burden and hemodynamic compromise with risk of complications, in particular bleeding. Previous studies have investigated conventional high-dose, short term thrombolysis by recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator (rtPA), finding a reduction in risk hemodynamic deterioration, but not in mortality, and a substantial increase in significant bleeding complications.

Percutaneous catheter-based techniques of embolectomy or low dose thrombolysis may offer lower risk of complication while still being efficacious. A clinical equipoise remains as data from RCTs of reasonable size remain to be published.

The current trial addresses this paucity of data by randomizing patients to one of three treatment modalities:

Design: Regional collaborative, randomized trial with 1:1:1 allocation of 210 patients with acute intermediate-high risk PE and no absolute contraindications to thrombolysis Intervention: 1:1:1 randomization (stratified for index hospital) to

  • Percutaneous Embolectomy plus unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 12 hours of randomization.
  • Low dose thrombolysis (10mg of rtPA, Alteplase) over 6 hours plus UFH or lLMWH within 12 hours of randomization.
  • UFH or LMWH only (with option for conventional thrombolysis according to local protocols for hemodynamic deterioration) Inclusion criteria: 1) Age ≥ 18 years, 2) Intermediate high-risk PE according to ESC criteria AND 3) Class II risk assessed by the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (1). 4) Thrombus visible in main, lobar or segmental pulmonary arteries on CT angiography 5) 14 days of symptoms or less, with significant worsening of symptoms within 7 days Exclusion criteria: 1) Glasgow Coma Scale Score < 14, 2) qualifying CT angiography> 24 hours prior to screening, 3) pregnancy, 4) Thrombolysis for PE within 14 days of randomization 5) Thrombus passing through patent Foramen Ovale, 6) Ongoing oral anticoagulation therapy (heparins, aspirin, antiplatelet therapy and NOAC allowed), 7) Comorbidity making 6 months survival unlikely. 8) Absolute contraindications for thrombolysis(2) Primary outcome: 2 Co-primary outcomes: Reduction in refined modified Miller Score (rmMS) on follow-up (48-96 h) CT pulmonary Angiography comparing catheter-based interventions to UFH/LMWH group (p<0.01, N=210) and reduction in refined Miller Score on follow-up (48-96 h) CT pulmonary Angiography comparing percutaneous embolectomy to low-dose rtPA, p<0.04, N=140). Secondary outcomes: 1) Bleeding complications (major and minor bleeding complication according the FRISC classification) 2) Duration of index admission, including hospital based rehabilitation. 3) Dyspnoea index (Visual analogue scale) after 48-96 h and after 3 months, 4) FiO2, Blood pressure, and respiratory rate, heart rate at time of follow-up CT angiography, 5) Mortality in the three groups (log-rank), and hazard ratios in multivariable analysis using the UFH/LMWH group as reference. 6) Incidence of TR gradient > 40 mmHg at 3 months follow-up echocardiography. 10) 6MWD at 3 months comparing the three groups. 11) Quality of life at 3 months follow-up comparing the three groups (EQ-5Q-5L) Predefined design variables are sex, age above median, known renal failure GFR (<30 ml/min or current renal replacement therapy), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 'saddle' embolus, syncope or CPR performed.
Being tested
Ultrasound assisted Thrombolysis, Percutaneous Embolectomy, Heparin
Keywords
Randomized Clinical Trial, Pulmonary embolism, embolectomy, thrombolysis
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Embolism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound assisted ThrombolysisDevice

    Also called EKOS system

    Please see Arms

  • Percutaneous EmbolectomyDevice

    Also called Inari FlowTriever

    Please see arms

  • HeparinDrug

    Also called Unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin

    Active comparator

Study groups in NCT06453876
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Unfractionated Heparin / Low molecular heparin and thrombolysis if neededActive comparatorStandard medical Therapy for intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism
Receives: Drug: Heparin
Low dose thrombolysisActive comparator10 mg af alteplase intravenously over 6 hours total and heparin
Receives: Device: Ultrasound assisted Thrombolysis
Percutaneous ThrombectomyActive comparatorPercutaneous Embolectomy using the AlphaVac, Angiodynamics or the Inari (R) Flowtriever thrombectomy system (R) and heparin
Receives: Device: Percutaneous Embolectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Thrombus burdon reduction (intervention vs. heparin)

    Reduction in modified Miller score (score of thrombus involvement and segmental flow) comparing percutaneous treated groups (embolectomy and low dose thrombolysis) to heparin/LMWH alone group, p<0.01 (n=140 vs. n=70)

    Measured: To end of inclusion + 96 hours

  2. Thrombus burdon reduction (USAT vs. embolektomy)

    Reduction in modified Miller score (score of thrombus involvement and segmental flow) comparing percutaneous embolectomy and low dose thrombolysis, p<0.04 (n=70 vs n=70)

    Measured: To end of inclusion + 96 hours

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Bleeding complications (major and minor bleeding complication according the TIMI classification)

    TIMI classification

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Duration of index admission, including hospital based rehabilitation

    Duration of index admission

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Dyspnea index (Visual analog scale) after 48-96 hours and after 3 months

    Duration of index admission

    Measured: 96 hours and 3 months

  4. Rate of further interventions for pulmonary embolism during index admission

    (embolectomy, full dose thrombolysis, mechanical ventilation, need for vasopressors, cardio pulmonary resusuctation, VA-ECMO etc)

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Mortality in the three groups (log-rank), and hazard ratio in multivariable analysis using the UFH/LMWH as reference. Inclusion date of last patient's 3 month follow-up defines last day of follow-up

    Clinical outcome

    Measured: 1 year on avarage, at least 3 months

  6. Incidence of TR gradient > 40 mmHg at 3 months follow-up echocardiography

    Incidence of TR suggestive of pulmonary hypertension

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  7. 6MWD at 3 months comparing the three groups

    Functional test

    Measured: 3 months

  8. Quality of life at 3 months follow-up comparing the three groups (PEmbQoL)

    QoL

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2024
  2. Study start17 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completion5 Jun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
1:1:1 randomized allocation
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
210 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06453876
Sponsor's protocol ID
STRATIFY-II 4.1 (10MAR2026)
Acronym
STRATIFY-II
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
4 Dec 2023
Last updated
2 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ultrasound assisted Thrombolysis, Percutaneous Embolectomy and Heparin in people with Pulmonary Embolism, run by Jesper Kjaergaard at 2 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jesper Kjaergaard, MD PhD DMSc (+4535450969, jesper.kjaergaard.05@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Thrombus burdon reduction (intervention vs. heparin) (time frame: To end of inclusion + 96 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in